Recent Posts
Police say an Ohio man accused of murdering an Uber driver wrongly believed she was involved in an ongoing phone scam. WDTN's Grace Hewitt reports.
An 81-year-old Ohio man has been charged in the fatal shooting of an Uber driver he believed was working with a scammer, according to officials who said the victim was sent to the home by the same scammer.
William Brock told investigators he shot Loletha Hall, 61, outside his home March 25 because he thought she was working with a man who called him pretending to be an officer at the local court, Lt. Kristopher Shultz of the Clark County Sheriff's Office said.
"Mr. Brock received some scam call by a person purporting to be someone from our courts who informed him a family member was incarcerated and that he had a bond of a significant amount of money," Shultz said. "The calls turned from 'I'm an officer in the court' to 'We have this subject hostage, this is a ransom demand.'"
The person who called Brock, or an accomplice, requested an Uber ride to his South Charleston home to pick up the money, Shultz said.
"Ms. Hall did not have any idea," he added.
You're not going to like this post.
My take:
Let's move 15-20 years into the future. From that perspective, an impartial observer is going to look back and reason that the conservative position of "Right to Life" was MORE PROTECTED under Roe, than it is in the Dobbs era ("post-Roe").
How could that be? It wasn't supposed to happen this way, right...?
Wasn't the removal of Roe supposed to "turn back" the abortion issue from an "improperly-decided" Supreme Court decision, and restore it to the states, and thus, "to the people" ???
Wasn't that supposed to be in the best spirit of the [otherwise forgotten] Tenth Amendment ???
Folks, that's EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.
The states -- and "the people -- now HAVE "the power" to decide the abortion debate at the state and at the "ballot box level".
Think about this:
The midwestern/western/southern (and mostly "red") states are the ones with the most (cough) "progressive" laws regarding referendum, initiative, and constitutional "amending".
Conversely, the Atlantic/Northeastern (and more likely "blue") states DO NOT HAVE such voter-progressive options. Certainly not in New England.
So... it's going to be in the mostly red states where we see the popular initiatives to liberalize abortion, and such initiatives are going to mostly succeed in them.
Look at Ohio, where the state constitution was amended through a public vote to include liberalized abortion. And that initiative "won bigly".
It's going to happen in Florida and Arizona this November.
The DCommunists have found their winning strategy for the next several election cycles. Even if they put forth an initiative that loses on the first pass, they'll just repeat it and repeat it and repeat it and repeat it until they DO win (the same way they count ballots, eh...?).
If you are anti-abortion, YOU WERE BETTER OFF UNDER ROE.
It's going to take some time for that to sink in.
But eventually, when all "the Dobbs dust clears", you'll look back...
... and wonder, "what the heck happened...?"
(I told you that you weren't going to like this post).
Page created in 0.029 seconds with 17 queries.