The Briefing Room
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: 240B on January 19, 2019, 08:47:37 pm
-
I was speaking to her just this morning and she swore an oath to support the wall.
If you don't believe me then just go talk to her yourself. LOL Really go see her. Ask her if she loves Trump and switched to be a Christian Republican. Ask her yourself, Yes or No?
She's dead dammit. It is hard to stop laughing.
-
I was speaking to her just this morning and she swore an oath to support the wall.
If you don't believe me then just go talk to her yourself. LOL Really go see her. Ask her if she loves Trump and switched to be a Christian Republican. Ask her yourself, Yes or No?
She's dead dammit. It is hard to stop laughing.
Well that's what I thought you meant with Ginsburg has just come out as a support of Trump's wall!. I assumed you meant her coffin was being put in a pour for a support column. Wouldn't that be cool, for once Ginsburg would actually be a part of defending America!
-
Ginsburg reminds me of my ol' Lady, she never leaves and any discussion of the subject is null and void.
-
I sure hope when the day comes that Ginsburg retires, that Trump picks Amy Barrett to replace her. He promised she'd be his first pick second time around
-
I sure hope when the day comes that Ginsburg retires, that Trump picks Amy Barrett to replace her. He promised she'd be his first pick second time around
The left is terrified of Amy Barrett. That's why Horizontal Harris and that nut from Hawaii have commenced their intensive Catholic-bashing efforts.
-
The left is terrified of Amy Barrett. That's why Horizontal Harris and that nut from Hawaii have commenced their intensive Catholic-bashing efforts.
I think that probably plays into it, although Christianity of any flavor seems to be Public Enemy #1 these days.
Also .... "Horizontal Harris" .... :rolling:
-
The left is terrified of Amy Barrett. That's why Horizontal Harris and that nut from Hawaii have commenced their intensive Catholic-bashing efforts.
Not to be rude, actually that might run against my nature and be painful, but shouldn't truth in advertising demand that it be 'Whore-izontal Harris? I mean that is more accurate.
-
Not to be rude, actually that might run against my nature and be painful, but shouldn't truth in advertising demand that it be 'Whore-izontal Harris? I mean that is more accurate.
Technically, no. That would indicate that Harris received cash for her services. If receiving 'pay for play' benefits qualified one as being a "whore"... then practically everyone in DC would be deemed "whores".
Oh wait....