The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: mystery-ak on January 15, 2017, 07:08:54 pm
-
Thousands Of Women Will Wear Pink, Knitted ‘bleep Power Hats’ To Protest Trump
Posted By Eric Owens On 8:34 AM 01/04/2017
Women all across America are planning to festoon themselves with knitted, pink “bleep power hats” during a march on Washington, D.C. — and other cities — scheduled for January 21, the day after Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration.
The organizers of the Pussyhat Project hope to make “a powerful visual statement” at the Women’s March on Washington by having a large number of women show up wearing the hats.
The “bleep power hats,” which feature perky cat-like ears, are a cinch to make, organizers say. “Knitters, crocheters and sewers of all levels” can make the hats at home — preferably with neon pink yarn.
more
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/04/thousands-of-women-will-wear-pink-knitted-bleep-power-hats-to-protest-trump/
-
Prediction.......
Thread gets 1000 posts or is pulled in 3 hrs.
(Thee guesses why) :tongue2:
-
LOL! The forum software broke your link by replacing a key "P" word with "bleep"!
I figured out what it was supposed to be and read the article (no, I can't link it either). There's a snowball's chance in Heck enough of these "ladies" have the knowledge of knitting required to make "thousands" of hats.
-
Thousands Of Women Will Wear Pink, Knitted ‘bleep Power Hats’ To Protest Trump
Women all across America are planning to festoon themselves with knitted, pink “bleep power hats” during a march on Washington, D.C. — and other cities — scheduled for January 21, the day after Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration.
@mystery-ak
We have a liberal female family member who will be at her liberal city's female demonstration against Trump that day.
-
Prediction.......
Thread gets 1000 posts or is pulled in 3 hrs.
(Thee guesses why) :tongue2:
P'y is on the censored list...if I release it I guarantee it will get pulled....btw does anyone know how to knit..lol
-
P'y is on the censored list...if I release it I guarantee it will get pulled....btw does anyone know how to knit..lol
I will grant that Bleeps make powerful visual statements.
-
We have a liberal female family member who will be at her liberal city's female demonstration against Trump that day.
A high school classmate indicates on Facebook that she'll be going, not sure whether in D.C. or in her town of Portland, Ore. **nononono*
-
P'y is on the censored list...if I release it I guarantee it will get pulled....btw does anyone know how to knit..lol
Yes, I do, though I prefer crocheting.
I hasten to add that I won't be making or wearing one of these.
-
These gals should have done their research. Pink has been used in support of Donald Trump for over a year. Khaki may have been the more appropriate color for their protest.
(http://www.covermytimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/trump-women-for-trump-make-america-great-again-facebook-timeline-cover.jpg)
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/10/Women-for-Trump-in-Florida-Joe-RaedleGetty-640x480.jpg)
(http://www.motherjones.com/files/trump-women-cropped_0.jpg)
-
Yes, I do, though I prefer crocheting.
I hasten to add that I won't be making or wearing one of these.
@Sanguine I have a query: If you knitted a blue one, would it be considered transgendered?
-
@Sanguine I have a query: If you knitted a blue one, would it be considered transgendered?
Hmmm. No, that would signal patriarchy. I would think it would have to be green and purple.
-
The counter-protestors will be male and all of them will be carrying this pillow:
(http://qvc.scene7.com/is/image/QVC/v/44/v33044.001?$aemprodgallery$)
(It's from a legit home shopping site, I swear).
-
Is it true that the ones made in China are meant to be worn sideways?
-
Is it true that the ones made in China are meant to be worn sideways?
Okay...now that is just wrong! I can't believe I didn't post that.
-
http://dailycaller.com/search/?q=bleep
Type in the "offending" word and there you have it!
-
@Sanguine I have a query: If you knitted a blue one, would it be considered transgendered?
No, that would mean a cold one
@Cyber Liberty
-
Okay...now that is just wrong! I can't believe I didn't post that.
Me neither. You're a bad influence, Mr. Nut, and need to up your game if you want to stay on the cutting edge. Just try not to hit the Mod3 barrier... 22222frying pan
-
Me neither. You're a bad influence, Mr. Nut, and need to up your game if you want to stay on the cutting edge. Just try not to hit the Mod3 barrier... 22222frying pan
Here is the thing. That @andy58-in-nh, he is like Neidermeyer .... a sneaky little shit just like you. 888high58888
But you are correct I need to pick up my game!
:beer:
-
Here is the thing. That @andy58-in-nh, he is like Neidermeyer .... a sneaky little shit just like you. 888high58888
But you are correct I need to pick up my game!
:beer:
We watched all the same movies in our misspent youths. :beer:
-
These gals should have done their research. Pink has been used in support of Donald Trump for over a year. Khaki may have been the more appropriate color.
Or plaid.
-
(http://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/1009821_10152069132365845_1202075318_n.jpg?oh=e123f0cacd2b7fdc4a065e0548c3bb30&oe=58D74AA2)
Edit: Unbelievably disgusting comment by Wingnut removed.
-
Here is the thing. That @andy58-in-nh, he is like Neidermeyer .... a sneaky little shit just like you. 888high58888
But you are correct I need to pick up my game!
:beer:
@Wingnut
You have much to learn, Grasshopper.
The key to getting away with outrageous blog posts lies in both subtlety and misdirection. As with the miniskirt or bikini, it is better and ultimately more effective to leave just enough to the observer's imagination.
When you can snatch this pebble from my hand, Grasshopper, you will have mastered your craft, the art of which lies not in the pebble, but in the snatch.
-
You can’t march with us: The faux inclusivity of the Women’s March on Washington
By: Carly Hoilman | January 17, 2017
Individuals planning to attend the Women’s March on Washington on Saturday are quickly learning that not all victims are created equal. The New York Times recently ran a piece on the racial tensions among protesters. The article highlights the experience of Jennifer Willis, a 50-year-old mother and wedding minister who was planning on attending the Jan. 21 event with her daughters. She backed out, however, after a post on the event’s Facebook page made her reconsider:
The post, written by a black activist from Brooklyn who is a march volunteer, advised “white allies” to listen more and talk less. It also chided those who, it said, were only now waking up to racism because of the election.
“You don’t just get to join because now you’re scared, too,” read the post. “I was born scared.”
“This is a women’s march,” Willis told the Times. “We’re supposed to be allies in equal pay, marriage, adoption. Why is it now about, ‘White women don’t understand black women’?” ...
Conservative Review (https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/you-cant-march-with-us-the-faux-inclusivity-of-the-womens-march-on-washington)
-
Update: Women’s March Removes Pro-Life Sponsor
by Alexandra DeSanctis January 16, 2017 4:40 PM
UPDATE 4:35 PM: The Women’s March on Washington has removed the pro-life group New Wave Feminists from its list of official event sponsors after backlash from feminists arguing that pro-life women are not welcome in the feminist movement. One of the most prominent of such responses:
Intersectional feminism does not include a pro-life agenda. That’s not how it works! The right to choose is a fundamental part of feminism.
— roxane gay (@rgay) January 16, 2017
Here is the official statement from the women’s march, apologizing for the “error”:
Our statement regarding press today: pic.twitter.com/z1y9cfFFvY
— Women’s March (@womensmarch) January 16, 2017
Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa of New Wave Feminists told LifeSiteNews that the group will still attend the march. “It appears that the [Women's March on Washington] only wants to include a ‘diverse’ array of women who think exactly like them,” she said. “That’s unfortunate, but we will not be deterred.“ ...
Story at National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/443893/womens-march-pro-life-women-arent-feminists?utm_source=nr&utm_campaign=womens-march&utm_medium=facebook&utm_content=desanctis)
Also: Some Women March on Washington (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/443923/women-march-washington), National Review.
-
You can’t march with us: The faux inclusivity of the Women’s March on Washington
By: Carly Hoilman | January 17, 2017
...
Conservative Review (https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/you-cant-march-with-us-the-faux-inclusivity-of-the-womens-march-on-washington)
Update: Women’s March Removes Pro-Life Sponsor
by Alexandra DeSanctis January 16, 2017 4:40 PM
UPDATE 4:35 PM: The Women’s March on Washington has removed the pro-life group New Wave Feminists from its list of official event sponsors after backlash from feminists arguing that pro-life women are not welcome in the feminist movement. ...
Story at National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/443893/womens-march-pro-life-women-arent-feminists?utm_source=nr&utm_campaign=womens-march&utm_medium=facebook&utm_content=desanctis)
Also: Some Women March on Washington (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/443923/women-march-washington), National Review.
Is it wrong for me to wish for a fist fight to break out ? 22222frying pan
-
Update: Women’s March Removes Pro-Life Sponsor
by Alexandra DeSanctis January 16, 2017 4:40 PM
UPDATE 4:35 PM: The Women’s March on Washington has removed the pro-life group New Wave Feminists from its list of official event sponsors after backlash from feminists arguing that pro-life women are not welcome in the feminist movement. One of the most prominent of such responses:
Intersectional feminism does not include a pro-life agenda. That’s not how it works! The right to choose is a fundamental part of feminism.
— roxane gay (@rgay) January 16, 2017
Here is the official statement from the women’s march, apologizing for the “error”:
Our statement regarding press today: pic.twitter.com/z1y9cfFFvY
— Women’s March (@womensmarch) January 16, 2017
Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa of New Wave Feminists told LifeSiteNews that the group will still attend the march. “It appears that the [Women's March on Washington] only wants to include a ‘diverse’ array of women who think exactly like them,” she said. “That’s unfortunate, but we will not be deterred.“ ...
Story at National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/443893/womens-march-pro-life-women-arent-feminists?utm_source=nr&utm_campaign=womens-march&utm_medium=facebook&utm_content=desanctis)
Also: Some Women March on Washington (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/443923/women-march-washington), National Review.
: In a Feminist, what is the difference between PMS and Mad Cow Disease?
One attacks the cow's brain and sends it f'n mental, the other is an agricultural problem.
-
: In a Feminist, what is the difference between PMS and Mad Cow Disease?
One attacks the cow's brain and sends it f'n mental, the other is an agricultural problem.
That's no bull. :whistle:
-
You can’t march with us: The faux inclusivity of the Women’s March on Washington
By: Carly Hoilman | January 17, 2017
Individuals planning to attend the Women’s March on Washington on Saturday are quickly learning that not all victims are created equal. The New York Times recently ran a piece on the racial tensions among protesters. The article highlights the experience of Jennifer Willis, a 50-year-old mother and wedding minister who was planning on attending the Jan. 21 event with her daughters. She backed out, however, after a post on the event’s Facebook page made her reconsider:
The post, written by a black activist from Brooklyn who is a march volunteer, advised “white allies” to listen more and talk less. It also chided those who, it said, were only now waking up to racism because of the election.
“You don’t just get to join because now you’re scared, too,” read the post. “I was born scared.”
“This is a women’s march,” Willis told the Times. “We’re supposed to be allies in equal pay, marriage, adoption. Why is it now about, ‘White women don’t understand black women’?” ...
Conservative Review (https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/you-cant-march-with-us-the-faux-inclusivity-of-the-womens-march-on-washington)
I always get a chuckle out of wacko, leftist femi-nutzys competing with each other to see who is the most oppressed.
-
Is it wrong for me to wish for a fist fight to break out ? 22222frying pan
No. :beer:
-
Massive Women's March crowds swarm DC Metro
By Brooke Seipel - 01/21/17 09:39 AM EST
Social media was flooded with photos of women arriving in D.C. for the Women's March on Washington on Saturday morning, with Metro stations and streets covered in participants.
Tens of thousands are expected for the march. Some are already speculating that the crowds could surpass those of President Trump's inauguration a day earlier, though current estimates predicted otherwise.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2surWFVIAIijpp.jpg)
more
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/315442-massive-womens-march-crowds-swarm-dc-metro
-
I see they are wearing their pink pu$$y hats.
-
Not everyone there will be of their ideology. A friend of mine who heads up a pro-life organization is there right now. Pray for Kristan's safety, because I'm certain she will make her views known to the rabid, loony leftist "ladies." She has guts.
-
Too bad DC is experiencing a January thaw. The little snowflakes would be on the next bus home.
@mountaineer
Kudos to Kristan for wading into the swamp.
-
Thanks. She's an impressive young woman.
-
I hope they clear out before I arrive tomorrow. I don't want to have to say something that will get me tossed off the Metro.
-
Tens of thousands is not massive.
-
Good for these massive women for marching! This could cut down on the taxes I pay for their healthcare!
-
Good for these massive women for marching! This could cut down on the taxes I pay for their healthcare!
:bigsilly:
-
It wouldn't be hard to outnumber the Trump turnout.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tits5XUAEfy0e.jpg)
Bipartisan Report @Bipartisanism 1m1 minute ago
Chicago has officially joined the #WomensMarch in full force!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2titRlVEAA0Qnb.jpg)
-
Tens of thousands is not massive.
Current number count is just over a million. DC Metro sold 500K passes for today alone.
-
Bipartisan Report @Bipartisanism 1m1 minute ago
Chicago has officially joined the #WomensMarch in full force!
On my FB wall, I'm seeing acquantances all over post local marches. Dallas and Austin both have sizable marches. Even all over Europe. There was a lot of social media build up to this and a lot of organizing. The groups behind this found ways to leverage social media globally. I'm seeing local people who aren't even politically active take part in these.
This is in Spain.
(https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/16177615_10158065289970142_738920161594916853_o.jpg?oh=e84d6ebcdb5e75fe2d865013cc36de9e&oe=5910B194)
Sweden
(https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16143136_10158065213795142_5573697743168696976_n.jpg?oh=41a7cd10ff1d72235303195e9c0d08a9&oe=590EA8AA)
Amsterdam
(https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16142890_10158065202410142_5015794346233237182_n.jpg?oh=f2a96f5ff60aae713e3a0a44180fed25&oe=59221A05)
-
For the next four years, the Hippie Radicals have got their 1960's and 70's back!
They are going back to relive the era of constant protests and marches and hating cops and dissing 'The Man'.
Because as Communist agitators, they know nothing else.
-
Not everyone there will be of their ideology. A friend of mine who heads up a pro-life organization is there right now. Pray for Kristan's safety, because I'm certain she will make her views known to the rabid, loony leftist "ladies." She has guts.
The leftists are trying to keep out anyone who is pro-life.
-
Ashley Judd lowers the tone at star-studded DC women's march by reading poem claiming Trump has 'wet dreams' about Ivanka 'his favorite sex symbol' and comparing him to HITLER
More than 200,000 people are participating in the Women's March on Washington in DC on Saturday
The pink hats have become the accessory of the march in reference to Trump's quote 'grab her by the p***y'
Women were spotted wearing the hats on buses, trains and plans as they made their way to the capital
The Women's March on Washington is expected to be largest inauguration-related protest in US history
There are also 600 sister marches planned throughout the country and even across the world
America Ferrera, Ashley Judd, Scarlett Johnasson are expected to speak at the DC event
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4142950/Thousands-women-head-Washington-protest-Trump.html#ixzz4WQ5krZxa
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
-
Yep. If she opens her mouth to voice her pro-life beliefs, she will be tossed.
And yet, the only people who are truly pro-woman are pro-life.
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,244848.0.html (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,244848.0.html)
-
The leftists are trying to keep out anyone who is pro-life.
The pro-lifers are there. Whether they get silenced - or assaulted, even - remains to be seen.
-
42% of women voted for Trump-and that is healthy percentage when running against a woman. (53% of white women, 4% of black women and 26% of Latino women.)
Heard an analysis of the crowd at this march and it seems most are young (malleable and without life experience) and a bunch of tired old feminist left-overs and lesbians who are trying to relive their bra-burning glory days. They surely don't represent me. I wonder how many of them have jobs and pay taxes. They look idiotic in their pink hats and seemingly care for nothing other than birth control and abortion.
-
The pro-lifers are there. Whether they get silenced - or assaulted, even - remains to be seen.
I hope their voices are heard over the shrill leftist idiots, and that they aren't silenced.
The fact that many pro-life women don't appreciate Trump's degradation and predatory nature needs to be heard loud and clear.
-
Madonna Women’s March Video: “I Thought About Blowing Up White House”
By Shari Weiss | 3:17 pm, January 21st, 2017
Madonna was a surprise speaker at the Women’s March on Saturday, where she admitted she’s “thought about blowing up the White House.” Watch below.
Madonna wasn’t previously announced as one of the official participants for the Women’s March On Washington. But nearly five hours into the rally, Amy Schumer came out to announce her. And the singer brought a prepared speech with her, passionately reading off of note cards as she address the large crowd.
Madonna said of Trump’s presidency, “It took this horrific moment of darkness to wake us the f*ck up. It seems we all slipped into a false sense of comfort, that justice would prevail and that good would win in the end. Well, good did not win this election. But good will in the end. So, what today means is that we are far from the end. Today marks the beginning, the beginning of our story. The revolution starts here.”
Continued: http://www.gossipcop.com/madonna-women-march-video-white-house-donald-trump-speech-watch/
-
So, I'm listening to Saturday talk show radio, the host brings this up of which I was unaware.
During the Obama years, Secret Service went to visit those in Alabama and Upstate NY according to the host for saying stuff like this on the net or somewhere. I don't know if they were prosecuted.
So, this seems serious. Does she get a pass?
Pretty unbelievable crap to say.
-
So do they have token blacks this time at their protests? Some of these protests center on "reproductive rights", of course, African Americans get about a 3rd of abortions though they are around 13% of the population.
Check the photos out. It's white women who usually protest for abortion but comparatively have a low rate if I can say that.
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/21/13/3C5AB12B00000578-4142950-image-a-49_1485006826200.jpg)
Etc. Virtually all pictures bear this out.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4142950/Thousands-women-head-Washington-protest-Trump.html
-
You know...it's almost tempting to give them what they want.
They DESERVE a sick, demented, incompetent, contemptuous old hag to be running their world...which used to be the most wealthy society on all earth.
I'm about ready to strike a compromise. Give them the seizured-out old cross-eyed bat. Then let my Western state, and others with Americans in them...let those States secede.
:0001:
-
I see they are wearing their pink pu$$y hats.
@mystery-ak
No offense intended,but there are good and valid reasons to replace the letter "s" with dollar signs.
-
@mystery-ak
No offense intended,but there are good and valid reasons to replace the letter "s" with dollar signs.
Lol. So true
-
Another PMS march? I think I need a Mydol... I feel bloated just watching.
-
(http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/8F69/production/_93731763_mediaitem93730755.jpg)
The London march (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38700123), if anyone cares.
-
(http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/8F69/production/_93731763_mediaitem93730755.jpg)
The London march (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38700123), if anyone cares.
Not really. :shrug:
-
What a bunch of crap. Hey, let's march!! It's not like we're going to accomplish anything but get our ugly mugs on TV, but what the heck! :shrug:
-
I find it frustrating.
Where is that energy, that organisation, that interest - when it comes to something that really makes a difference?
-
Does not Ivanka Trump exemplify everything in a woman that these women aspire to?
But of course to them she's not a woman, because she isn't a liberal.
-
Does not Ivanka Trump exemplify everything in a woman that these women aspire to?
But of course to them she's not a woman, because she isn't a liberal.
Actually, she is a liberal. She and her family spent Hanukkah in Hawaii with my cousin and his family, Hillary bundlers. Kind of appropriate since Ivanka's a bundler for Cory Booker :shrug: Anyway, they hate her because she's gettimg more attention than they are, and she isn't doing anything to get that attention. How sad: They huff and puff and get nothing, yet Ivanka walks down the street and the cameras start snapping!
-
Actually, she is a liberal. She and her family spent Hanukkah in Hawaii with my cousin and his family, Hillary bundlers. Kind of appropriate since Ivanka's a bundler for Cory Booker :shrug: Anyway, they hate her because she's gettimg more attention than they are, and she isn't doing anything to get that attention. How sad: They huff and puff and get nothing, yet Ivanka walks down the street and the cameras start snapping!
Like Rush said, the Feminist Movement is all about giving unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.
-
Daniel Bongino
11 mins ·
What I learned at today's Women's march:
1) women in the womb, and the women who support them, were not allowed
2) Madonna wants to blow up the White House
3) Ashley Judd is a vile creature
4) the organizer of the march has ideological sympathies towards groups that actively suppress women
5) and, many of the marchers had a really
tough time articulating which "rights" they lost after President Trump took office.
-
The organizers of the Pussyhat Project [...] sewers of all levels [...]
Indeed. where then decency in this broad land?
-
(http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/8F69/production/_93731763_mediaitem93730755.jpg)
The London march (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38700123), if anyone cares.
I sure would have loved to have been in a position to sell all those pointy hats.
-
Daniel Bongino
11 mins ·
What I learned at today's Women's march:
2) Madonna wants to blow up the White House
@mountaineer
Don't worry about it. Madonna is always promising to blow something up or down,and she never comes across.
-
I'd love to be the concession holder at Charing Cross.
The station is just out of view to the right and has the only working public toilets within half a mile - and it takes 20p to open the gate.
-
This was major razberries to DT. Heard round the world. Except on FNC, that is.
-
Indeed. where then decency in this broad land?
They were unanimous in their disgust for Donald Trump's comments about grabbing stuff.
So they responded by being equally offensive.
Way to go gals.
-
This protest was about nothing. DT has been prez for fewer than 48 hours. Whose rights has he denied?
-
This protest was about nothing. DT has been prez for fewer than 48 hours. Whose rights has he denied?
Hillary's?
-
This protest was about nothing. DT has been prez for fewer than 48 hours. Whose rights has he denied?
@mountaineer
Well, when you're a leftwinger you can re-define time itself. A friend of mine said her co-worker was complaining that Trump has done nothing for the blacks.
She made this claim last week, before he was inaugurated.
-
Stephanie Jones Key
3 hrs ·
It just occurred to me that Trump has gotten more fat women walking in one day than Michelle Obama did in eight years. - from a comment found on FB... I think it wins the internet for the day.
-
Stephanie Jones Key
3 hrs ·
It just occurred to me that Trump has gotten more fat women walking in one day than Michelle Obama did in eight years. - from a comment found on FB... I think it wins the internet for the day.
I must admit I've had a troublesome mind's image today, every time I saw the headline of this article. "Massive Women's March...". I couldn't shake the image of a hundred massive Rosie Whatzernames marching down the street wearing thong bikinis.
The horror...the horror.....
-
This protest was about nothing. DT has been prez for fewer than 48 hours. Whose rights has he denied?
Or has threatened to deny. Gillibrand yammered about women's rights and civil rights and no one has challenged her to be specific.
-
The news has had a lot of this on...
(http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.423934.1314531044!/img/httpImage/alg-mall-crowd-jpg.jpg)
It was a huge crowd and, oh, never mind, this is a picture of the March for Life a few years ago. The news always covers that NOT.
-
[...] and it takes 20p to open the gate.
Whence comes the quaint notion of 'taking a while for the penny to drop' as often spoken by our friends across the pond... I had a good chuckle finding that one out.
-
I must admit I've had a troublesome mind's image today, every time I saw the headline of this article. "Massive Women's March...". I couldn't shake the image of a hundred massive Rosie Whatzernames marching down the street wearing thong bikinis.
The horror...the horror.....
Think of all the work they could do if they all had a trailer hitch...
-
Prediction.......
Thread gets 1000 posts or is pulled in 3 hrs.
(Thee guesses why) :tongue2:
1. TOS is down
2. Bored Freepers
3. Drunk Freepers
-
The protest in Austin.
(https://scontent-dft4-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/p720x720/16105878_1335627069822704_1515219236410916292_n.jpg?oh=24032d6b8cce68468c30953049cd4655&oe=59031C07)
-
The protest in Austin.
(https://scontent-dft4-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/p720x720/16105878_1335627069822704_1515219236410916292_n.jpg?oh=24032d6b8cce68468c30953049cd4655&oe=59031C07)
The guys working the I-35 exits with the "I am homeless signs" are going to be rich tonight!
-
Now may be a good time to ask them to make me a BLT (Bi-Lesbian-Tran) sandwich
-
The guys working the I-35 exits with the "I am homeless signs" are going to be rich tonight!
:happyhappy:
-
The guys working the I-35 exits with the "I am homeless signs" are going to be rich tonight!
You can't be serious.
Hyper-liberal women, aren't going to give money away. They'll take pictures, do long rambling, boring blog pages, march on some government building or other...but actually give their own money?
Not happening.
-
I got caught up in this crap today trying to get to the Holocaust Museum. Barely made my flight out. I don't know what these women were trying to protest, but they did a magnificent job of trashing the Mall with litter.
I did not encounter any rude protesters. Everyone was polite as I navigated my family perpendicularly across their march path. This happened more than once since their seemed to be no order to what they were doing. As far as I can tell, they didn't want to end, so they just kept marching, picking new paths. Most of the men I saw (and there were a lot of them) were younger, and clearly there to support whatever young women they happened to be having relations with at the time.
I picked up a conversation with a few younger at the airport. Nothing overtly political. They just flew in to be a part of something without being able to articulate what that 'something' was.
Would liked to have had another four hours at the museum, but the crowds at the Metro stops made that impossible.
-
You can't be serious.
Hyper-liberal women, aren't going to give money away. They'll take pictures, do long rambling, boring blog pages, march on some government building or other...but actually give their own money?
Not happening.
There is always Pu$$y
-
There is always Pu$$y
Hey! Easy to find, too - They've got hats!
-
Though the protests might have a different shape, most any Republican that would have gotten in would have had some protests.
8 bloody years of Obama rule was enough; what a nightmare, an assault on American values.
-
There is always Pu$$y
Yup.
Eager, too.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Fp5_e5aPqUY/TMwh6aIsi2I/AAAAAAAAJlA/qH98Lg09_ks/s1600/fat-code-pink1.jpg)
-
I heard there was a major sandwich shortage today.
-
(http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/8F69/production/_93731763_mediaitem93730755.jpg)
The London march (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38700123), if anyone cares.
Looks like thousands of blokes in the London area were able to finish a pint in peace and quiet today.
-
I copy and past this here because I think it FAR more reflective of the opinions of the majority of women in this country than anything we have seen in the streets of Washington lately.
It comes from the post of a much younger than myself woman friend who I met many years ago while she was still in high school! I hope you enjoy reading it as much as I did!
I think we live in one of the greatest places on earth! I feel loved, honored, and respected as a woman here in the United States. The only one who can stop me from being happy and successful in life is ME. The good Lord made MAN and WOMAN. I don't feel a need to compete with men nor do I consider myself better or worse than men. (Or women either.) I know my worth as a child of God, and I don't need to shout it from the roof tops. Personally, I am embarrassed by the marches today and think they were more anti- President Trump rallies than anything else. Talk about shutting down the lines of communication. Do people really believe acting in a contentious manner will get anyone to listen to them? That makes me turn away EVERY TIME.
* My advice to the Marchers (and all the rest of us): 1. If you want to be noticed for more than your looks, get out and make something of yourself. 2. Put energy into helping women in countries where women really ARE undervalued and treated horribly. 3. Draw attention to domestic violence here in America and helping women, men, and children who are being abused. 4. Speak out against violence and abuse of ANY kind. 5. Reach out and help everyone you can, anytime you can with love and a smile. 6. Donate your time and money (if possible) every chance you get to help increase world literacy and education rates and decrease poverty. 7. Be the change you want to see by treating everyone with love and respect.
** These are just a few of many ways we can all make a profound difference in the world.
-
:thumbsup2: @Bigun
-
We mock the millions and millions of men, women, and children around the world whose visceral reaction to DT drove them to make their presence known.
Ridicule, dismissive commentary puts us on the wrong side of yesterday's march.
Just my opinion.
-
We mock the millions and millions of men, women, and children around the world whose visceral reaction to DT drove them to make their presence known.
Ridicule, dismissive commentary puts us on the wrong side of yesterday's march.
Just my opinion.
Mine too.
-
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16265915_10155317393569381_2914626814608434694_n.jpg?oh=866dda218d0e7d361b791f5e559433c1&oe=5902257D)
Fine bunch for sure! **nononono*
-
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16265915_10155317393569381_2914626814608434694_n.jpg?oh=866dda218d0e7d361b791f5e559433c1&oe=5902257D)
Fine bunch for sure! **nononono*
Bet they're still picking up all the trash on the ground these womyn left. Liberals treat the environment like shit, and they claim conservatives are ruining the environment.
-
And the nooze mediuh will never, EVER, remark how the Tea Party No-BammaKair rallies were self-policed and cleaned up.
The frightening, horrific fact is: The mediuh, the political party leaders, BOTH sides...and the government itself, FAVORS these destructive animals over disciplined, responsible citizens. I know why...Cloward-Piven, that is, instigated nihilism and destruction as a means to an end...is now accepted objective.
They hope it's their Big Chance. I posit that it's a recipe for national suicide and enslavement.
-
Women’s March Organizer Recently Met Ex-Hamas Operative, Has Family Ties To Terror Group
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-organizer-recently-met-ex-hamas-operative-has-family-ties-to-terror-group/#ixzz4WR0FDOfR&f
-
We mock the millions and millions of men, women, and children around the world whose visceral reaction to DT drove them to make their presence known.
Ridicule, dismissive commentary puts us on the wrong side of yesterday's march.
Just my opinion.
Did you join the march @Rivergirl ?
-
On the good news side, Trump got more fat women on their feet walking and exercising in one day than Mooch did in 8 years. The down side is, all their periods are going to sync up.
-
Did you join the march @Rivergirl ?
Good morning, @Right_in_Virginia. Still wondering if you could engage on a respectful basis. http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,241991.msg1197995.html#msg1197995
-
I heard there was a major sandwich shortage today.
Are you kidding? These foul mouthed baby killing liberal harridan's would never make anyone a sandwich. I for one are embarrassed they call themselves women. At least they clearly identified themselves so the rest of us can avoid them
-
Next week at the March for Life the country can see what real women look like!
-
Good morning, @Right_in_Virginia. Still wondering if you could engage on a respectful basis. http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,241991.msg1197995.html#msg1197995
@Sanguine
Cows are going to fly before you get an answer to that. Merely marching down the street in a pointless protest is not sufficient.
-
We mock the millions and millions of men, women, and children around the world whose visceral reaction to DT drove them to make their presence known.
Ridicule, dismissive commentary puts us on the wrong side of yesterday's march.
Just my opinion.
If those women wanted to be taken seriously, they should have left out the vulgarly named hats (crawling in the same sewer they are protesting), not made the day about killing babies (rejecting any pro life groups that wanted to march with them) and left old has been skanks like Madonna (blow up the white house) on the sidelines. Then maybe they would get some respect from decent human beings.
-
If those women wanted to be taken seriously, they should have left out the vulgarly named hats (crawling in the same sewer they are protesting), not made the day about killing babies (rejecting any pro life groups that wanted to march with them) and left old has been skanks like Madonna (blow up the white house) on the sidelines. Then maybe they would get some respect from decent human beings.
word
-
Looks like thousands of blokes in the London area were able to finish a pint in peace and quiet today.
(http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xaf1/t51.2885-15/e15/11328276_1634346670144828_1598333475_n.jpg)
-
Good morning, @Right_in_Virginia. Still wondering if you could engage on a respectful basis.
Still wondering why you oppose an honest and respectful question @Sanguine
-
Still wondering why you oppose an honest and respectful question @Sanguine
Now that's just silly.
Let us know when you're ready for a serious discussion.
-
Now that's just silly.
Let us know when you're ready for a serious discussion.
I'll answer you and tell you what I think of your remarks.... but first you must unblock me from sending you a PM.
Have you the courage @Sanguine ?
-
@Sanguine
Cows are going to fly before you get an answer to that. Merely marching down the street in a pointless protest is not sufficient.
I know; I'm the ever-hopeful type.
-
I'll answer you and tell you what I think of your remarks.... but first you must unblock me from sending you a PM.
Have you the courage @Sanguine ?
LOL. If I knew how to block PMs I might have done so at some point, but I don't so I didn't. Is that even possible?
-
This one is pretty funny, threw in the "Palestinians" and "Noble Red Man" on top of womyn's rights and Guy Fawkes.
(http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Masked-protester-on-the-streets-of-Washington-DC.-Daily-Caller-Abbey-Jaroma.jpg)
-
Next week at the March for Life the country can see what real women look like!
Of course the media won't cover it.
-
I'll answer you and tell you what I think of your remarks.... but first you must unblock me from sending you a PM.
Have you the courage @Sanguine ?
Why don't you have that conversation in the open thread? You jab and outright attack just about everybody here, and I think we'd all like to hear more about how and why. No sense in hiding behind PMs.
Enlighten us.
-
This one is pretty funny, threw in the "Palestinians" and "Noble Red Man" on top of womyn's rights and Guy Fawkes.
(http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Masked-protester-on-the-streets-of-Washington-DC.-Daily-Caller-Abbey-Jaroma.jpg)
If the snowflakes knew the first thing about Guy Fawkes they wouldn't be idolizing him, they'd be running like Hell away. They have him confused with a fictional movie character. I suppose that should make it a little easier for us to understand how easily they fall for these celebrity utterances.
-
I'll answer you and tell you what I think of your remarks.... but first you must unblock me from sending you a PM.
Have you the courage @Sanguine ?
(http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/054/349/e5a.png)
-
I will say this much: pretty much all of my city-dwelling female friends, and a good chunk of the male ones too, were either supporting this or actually out in the streets with them—and most of them aren't the activist kind.
I'm not surprised this happened, given Trump's history. However, it was quite tiring seeing the same old clichés.
-
I will say this much: pretty much all of my city-dwelling female friends, and a good chunk of the male ones too, were either supporting this or actually out in the streets with them—and most of them aren't the activist kind.
I'm not surprised this happened, given Trump's history. However, it was quite tiring seeing the same old clichés.
The fact that the loony leftists controlled the media message (a stupid, tired, deceitful one), doesn't mean that many of the marchers or those who supported them, did so without cause.
IMO, it is folly to dismiss every person there (women AND men) as being old feminists hags or bitter leftists.
The old tired clichés are what got broadcast, but the overall message of perhaps the majority there might well be something entirely different than those clichés.....
Trump degrades women. Trump treats women like pieces of meat.
That's not a leftist meme. It's the truth.
-
Why don't you have that conversation in the open thread? You jab and outright attack just about everybody here, and I think we'd all like to hear more about how and why. No sense in hiding behind PMs.
Enlighten us.
Because, my friend.....Nancy requested that we take the bickering to PMs, that's why.
-
The fact that the loony leftists controlled the media message (a stupid, tired, deceitful one), doesn't mean that many of the marchers or those who supported them, did so without cause.
IMO, it is folly to dismiss every person there (women AND men) as being old feminists hags or bitter leftists.
The old tired clichés are what got broadcast, but the overall message of perhaps the majority there might well be something entirely different than those clichés.....
Trump degrades women. Trump treats women like pieces of meat.
That's not a leftist meme. It's the truth.
I always thought you were a radical feminist masquerading as a conservative. The women there were far left, pro choice, anti capitalism types and would have had the march even if Trump was Billy Graham towards women.
No pro life women were allowed to attend.
@musiclady
-
I will say this much: pretty much all of my city-dwelling female friends, and a good chunk of the male ones too, were either supporting this or actually out in the streets with them—and most of them aren't the activist kind.
I'm not surprised this happened, given Trump's history. However, it was quite tiring seeing the same old clichés.
Another anti Trumper liberal.
I know a lot of people and do not know a single man who went to any of the marches and have not heard of any female I know who went and I consider myself middle of the road in terms of politic though lean right and have liberal, middle of the road and conservative friends
You and I must run around in different circles.
@jmyrlefuller
-
Another anti Trumper liberal.
I know a lot of people and do not know a single man who went to any of the marches and have not heard of any female I know who went and I consider myself middle of the road in terms of politic though lean right and have liberal, middle of the road and conservative friends
You and I must run around in different circles.
@jmyrlefuller
Why is it okay for Trump to have liberal friends, invite them to his weddings, and have a daughter that bundles for them, but not okay for @jmyrlefuller to associate with them?
Maybe @jmyrlefuller is keeping his enemies closer or better yet, playing eighth dimensional chess.
-
Why is it okay for Trump to have liberal friends, invite them to his weddings, and have a daughter that bundles for them, but not okay for @jmyrlefuller to associate with them?
Did the bulk of your female friends go to the marches along with most males you know?
@goodwithagun
-
Did the bulk of your female friends go to the marches along with most males you know?
@goodwithagun
Not at all, but Trump's friend Hillary gave the marchers props!
Now that I've answered your question, how about you answer mine?
-
Because, my friend.....Nancy requested that we take the bickering to PMs, that's why.
Ah, but I wasn't talking about bickering. Perhaps @Right_in_Virginia was; I can't read her mind.
I was asking her to participate in an open and honest discussion about ongoing attacks and corresponding lack of substance. Not bickering. I think we really might be able to come to an understanding if she's willing to participate respectfully and honestly.
-
On the good news side, Trump got more fat women on their feet walking and exercising in one day than Mooch did in 8 years. The down side is, all their periods are going to sync up.
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Another anti Trumper liberal.
I know a lot of people and do not know a single man who went to any of the marches and have not heard of any female I know who went and I consider myself middle of the road in terms of politic though lean right and have liberal, middle of the road and conservative friends
You and I must run around in different circles.
@jmyrlefuller
It's just the city-dwelling ones, which thankfully only make up a portion of my social circle. I have quite a few friends on the East Coast; New York, Philadelphia, Maryland, and a few in Florida. The few men who supported these things, I've long known them to be very, very liberal (and either insufferable humblebraggers or obnoxious miserable trolls).
But the women, on the other hand, are different. Most of the rural women (many of them married) just rolled their eyes and basically scoffed. But the city women, and admittedly a lot of them likewise have had a bit of a liberal lean... even the ones that don't make much commentary regarding these types of issues were speaking out in favor of this. One I went to high school with, and a self-described moderate, actually joined the march. The other thing they seemed to have in common was that most were childless: either single, or DINKs.
-
It's just the city-dwelling ones, which thankfully only make up a portion of my social circle. I have quite a few friends on the East Coast; New York, Philadelphia, Maryland, and a few in Florida. The few men who supported these things, I've long known them to be very, very liberal (and either insufferable humblebraggers or obnoxious miserable trolls).
But the women, on the other hand, are different. Most of the rural women (many of them married) just rolled their eyes and basically scoffed. But the city women, and admittedly a lot of them likewise have had a bit of a liberal lean... even the ones that don't make much commentary regarding these types of issues were speaking out in favor of this. One I went to high school with, and a self-described moderate, actually joined the march. The other thing they seemed to have in common was that most were childless: either single, or DINKs.
I think in a year from now, when they realize that they've been duped, they'll be singing a different tune.
-
Ah, but I wasn't talking about bickering. Perhaps @Right_in_Virginia was; I can't read her mind.
I was asking her to participate in an open and honest discussion about ongoing attacks and corresponding lack of substance. Not bickering. I think we really might be able to come to an understanding if she's willing to participate respectfully and honestly.
No...I respect that.
What I meant was that you and I both know where "discussing" it on the open forum would only lead to more hard feelings
....and a locked thread.
-
On the good news side, Trump got more fat women on their feet walking and exercising in one day than Mooch did in 8 years. The down side is, all their periods are going to sync up.
Nuclear holocaust soon to follow.
-
Nuclear holocaust soon to follow.
Or shortages of certain products at Walgreens......
-
It's just the city-dwelling ones, which thankfully only make up a portion of my social circle. I have quite a few friends on the East Coast; New York, Philadelphia, Maryland, and a few in Florida. The few men who supported these things, I've long known them to be very, very liberal (and either insufferable humblebraggers or obnoxious miserable trolls).
But the women, on the other hand, are different. Most of the rural women (many of them married) just rolled their eyes and basically scoffed. But the city women, and admittedly a lot of them likewise have had a bit of a liberal lean... even the ones that don't make much commentary regarding these types of issues were speaking out in favor of this. One I went to high school with, and a self-described moderate, actually joined the march. The other thing they seemed to have in common was that most were childless: either single, or DINKs.
My wife, a strong Trump supporter, got on Facebook yesterday and read numerous comments from her daughters (my stepdaughters) and some female members of my clan who were decidedly anti-Trump. But my wife refuses to comment on politics on FB. I never get on FB. I prefer to harass liberals on news sites.
But many of the females in my close family, like my sisters, are strong liberals. I also find them to be extremely uninformed when talking about national issues. They're liberals because of abortion...that's it.
No other issues are as important.
-
Or shortages of certain products at Walgreens......
MODs jumping on cycles and running people over......
-
Because, my friend.....Nancy requested that we take the bickering to PMs, that's why.
Oh. Sorry, you're right. :shrug:
-
My wife, a strong Trump supporter, got on Facebook yesterday and read numerous comments from her daughters (my stepdaughters) and some female members of my clan who were decidedly anti-Trump. But my wife refuses to comment on politics on FB. I never get on FB. I prefer to harass liberals on news sites.
But many of the females in my close family, like my sisters, are strong liberals. I also find them to be extremely uninformed when talking about national issues. They're liberals because of abortion...that's it.
No other issues are as important.
The "right" to kill babies has always been the sacrament and reason for existence for liberals. It is their guiding principle and their litmus test. They are truly a cult of death, not much different from radical islam. Our nation will be judged for the blood of innocents that we have spilled millions of times over. For this reason alone I do not understand how anyone can be a liberal and a Christian. They are diametrically opposite belief systems.
-
Ah, but I wasn't talking about bickering. Perhaps @Right_in_Virginia was; I can't read her mind.
I was asking her to participate in an open and honest discussion about ongoing attacks and corresponding lack of substance. Not bickering. I think we really might be able to come to an understanding if she's willing to participate respectfully and honestly.
I'm afraid @DCPatriot has a valid point here. What would start out open and honest would descend rapidly, especially with people like me egging it on. I thought better of that earlier after I suggested it. Then we'd end up with a Mod locking the thread....
-
I also find them to be extremely uninformed when talking about national issues.
I call it the Ophra / Ellen Syndrome
Daytime TV has utterly brainwashed the women in this country.
-
aka Massive Woman March
(https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16265803_630497137156831_1766663859028638699_n.jpg?oh=06568956698fa455f7c2c2b308f6fcbf&oe=59124C4F)
-
My wife, a strong Trump supporter, got on Facebook yesterday . . .
What is 'Facebook'?
But many of the females in my close family, like my sisters, are strong liberals. I also find them to be extremely uninformed when talking about national issues. They're liberals because of abortion...that's it.
What exactly is their argument on abortion within the confines of the Constitution of the United States of America? Do they completely disavow Congressional or State legislative rights to legislate this matter? Do they support the use of Federal Executive power (e.g. the point of a gun) to guarantee that abortion is made available everywhere without subject to any check from the Legislative or Judicial branches? Do they disavow the tenets of Roe which uphold the right of any state to regulate abortion after the 24th week?
Because if they do, then they are tyrants. And as tyrants, they are enemies to the very principle of government which our Constitution espouses.
-
Is it a massive march? Or massive women? Enquiring minds wanna know...
-
Thousands Of Women Will Wear Pink, Knitted ‘bleep Power Hats’ To Protest Trump
Posted By Eric Owens On 8:34 AM 01/04/2017
Women all across America are planning to festoon themselves with knitted, pink “bleep power hats” during a march on Washington, D.C. — and other cities — scheduled for January 21, the day after Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration.
The organizers of the Pussyhat Project hope to make “a powerful visual statement” at the Women’s March on Washington by having a large number of women show up wearing the hats.
The “bleep power hats,” which feature perky cat-like ears, are a cinch to make, organizers say. “Knitters, crocheters and sewers of all levels” can make the hats at home — preferably with neon pink yarn.
more
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/04/thousands-of-women-will-wear-pink-knitted-bleep-power-hats-to-protest-trump/
One sign I saw, displayed by a "protestor," read, "Keep Your Hands Off My P**sy."
One "protestor," when interviewed, said the demonstration was about "safety."
Basically, it is all about abortion.
And the person mentioned above evidently thought that the only alternative to legal abortion is what is commonly known as a "back-alley abortion."
These people did not like the idea that their "abortion rights" may be taken away, by a reversal of Roe v. Wade (1973), what with one (or more) appointments to the SCOTUS by President Trump.
-
I call it the Ophra / Ellen Syndrome
Daytime TV has utterly brainwashed the women in this country.
Seriously? Who's got time for that?
-
Seriously? Who's got time for that?
You'd be surprised how many women watch this sh__.
-
Seriously? Who's got time for that?
People on welfare. Kids in basement chowing down on hot pockets. IOW, the usual suspects.
-
I'm not surprised this happened, given Trump's history. However, it was quite tiring seeing the same old clichés.
What history would THAT be. :huh?: His RACIST history, his SEXIST his BIGOTED history, his HOMOPHOBE history? His DIRTY AIR history, his CONSERVATIVE history...what?.
I don't have any great love for Trump. But the Left, in attacking him, are just regurgitating the same pre-printed cards and recitations. They're no different from the last six or so character attacks on non-Democrats; and they bear no corresponding to reality. In the past, or today with Trump.
-
I call it the Ophra / Ellen Syndrome
Daytime TV has utterly brainwashed the women in this country.
@catfish1957 @goatprairie
With females and Metrosexuals,it seems like everything is based on FEELINGS,not reason or facts,and there is no argument you can make that will counter emotions.
In short,the rank and file of the left are incapable of rational thought. Which is why they vote Dim.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tits5XUAEfy0e.jpg)
Bipartisan Report @Bipartisanism 1m1 minute ago
Chicago has officially joined the #WomensMarch in full force!
Wow. Nice weather, so green out, too...looks like summer out.
-
One sign I saw, displayed by a "protestor," read, "Keep Your Hands Off My P**sy."
I saw many many variations of that. But the sign that really got my attention was one that said "My IUD is named 'Mike Pence'". After seeing the sign, I saw the face of the one carrying it and thought, "Why on earth would you ever need an IUD?"
-
aka Massive Woman March
(https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16265803_630497137156831_1766663859028638699_n.jpg?oh=06568956698fa455f7c2c2b308f6fcbf&oe=59124C4F)
@truth_seeker
Besides them being emotional timebombs,it's not hard to see why men want nothing to do with them,and why they hate men.
-
I saw many many variations of that. But the sign that really got my attention was one that said "My IUD is named 'Mike Pence'". After seeing the sign, I saw the face of the one carrying it and thought, "Why on earth would you ever need an IUD?"
Classy things to teach the children at the march The left is vulgar and revels in it
-
Wow. Nice weather, so green out, too...looks like summer out.
Cub's World Series celebration.
-
Classy things to teach the children at the march The left is vulgar and revels in it
@Mom MD
There is a divorced woman in her late 20's that works at the local grocery store. She used to work at the Hardee's across the street from the grocery store,but moved up. For some reason she was friendly while at Hardees,but not so friendly at the grocery store. One day she was in the checkout line as a customer with her little girl who was maybe 7 or 8 at the time,and after asking her about her daughter,I teasingly asked the daughter if she was married. She actually shrieked "NO,I'M NOT MARRIED! I DON'T NEED NO DAMN MAN!"
Her mother's whole face lit up in pride,and she started smiling from ear to ear.
Somehow I think that girl is going to have a number of hostile romances and most a likely a couple of divorces in her future. All thanks to a man-hating mother who raised her little girl to hate and distrust all men.
Of course,me being me,I pointed out to the mother this was no way to raise a child and it was a form of child abuse,so she doesn't even speak to me anymore other than to tell me how much I owe when I buy groceries. Every time I see her I think about the future hell she created for her daughter and the boys and men in her future life,and about how all of them are likely to pass THEIR grief on down the line to others,too.
All of us,including me really need to work on stopping this "group hate" stuff. I have had my own difficulties with women in life (big shock there,huh?),but I just can't imagine a world where I would program a son to grow up hating and distrusting all women because *I* had a few difficulties with a few of them myself. Children should at least be offered the option of screwing up their OWN lives,we don't have to do it for them.
-
Seriously? Who's got time for that?
Most of what is on teevee is available 'on demand', too, or YouTubed. If they want to watch it, chances are they can call it up on their phone..
-
We mock the millions and millions of men, women, and children around the world whose visceral reaction to DT drove them to make their presence known.
Ridicule, dismissive commentary puts us on the wrong side of yesterday's march.
Just my opinion.
To each his own but I personally would not be caught dead among the likes of those marching in the streets of Washington yesterday.
-
To each his own but I personally would not be caught dead among the likes of those marching in the streets of Washington yesterday.
You said it. There may be a few who were genuinely expressing their dislike for Trump's past disrespectful behaviour toward women, but the vast majority in the photos seem to be the usual aggrieved folks, with the usual gripes, and the standard pro-abortion 'Womyn's Rites' song and dance.
I wasn't there, I'm more careful after the race riots there long ago (60s) to not make navigational errors and avoid unwanted conflict zones.
-
To each his own but I personally would not be caught dead among the likes of those marching in the streets of Washington yesterday.
I understand that completely, and I wouldn't be there if my life depended on it.
But there were 500,000 people there yesterday and a lot of them were neither hard core leftists, nor were they fat, ugly women carrying vulgar signs.
I'm going to repeat what was said upthread. I think it's a mistake to assume that the majority of women there (and men) were just crackpot leftist hags, or that they were all ill informed. (Or, actually, that women who supported Trump actually were informed).
Donald Trump is an open misogynist who treats women like pieces of meat.
A lot of respectable, VERY conservative people (both men and women) are very troubled by that.
And I think the numbers in the march yesterday reflect that.
-
You said it. There may be a few who were genuinely expressing their dislike for Trump's past disrespectful behaviour toward women, but the vast majority in the photos seem to be the usual aggrieved folks, with the usual gripes, and the standard pro-abortion 'Womyn's Rites' song and dance.
I wasn't there, I'm more careful after the race riots there long ago (60s) to not make navigational errors and avoid unwanted conflict zones.
I just talked to a family member who lives in DC (a conservative young man who didn't go to the march). There were no incidents yesterday, and there were so many people that they couldn't even march.
I've been repeating the message here often, but most choose to disregard it.
Trump's disrespect for and degradation of women is significant.
Clearly more significant than most here would care to admit.
And the issue isn't going to go away.
-
Most of what is on teevee is available 'on demand', too, or YouTubed. If they want to watch it, chances are they can call it up on their phone..
I know. I was really commenting in kind on the blanket comment.
-
Wow. Nice weather, so green out, too...looks like summer out.
I wonder where that image came from? Tineye couldn't find it anywhere on the web in a reverse search.
-
Trump's disrespect for and degradation of women is significant.
Clearly more significant than most here would care to admit.
And the issue isn't going to go away.
I wonder how that's going to manifest itself as he goes about running his office?
-
I wonder where that image came from? Tineye couldn't find it anywhere on the web in a reverse search.
Let me help you. What big deal just happened in Chicago this past October. It was Huge. 108 years in the making.
-
Let me help you. What big deal just happened in Chicago this past October. It was Huge. 108 years in the making.
Yes, I figured that out from your clue. That's what get me doing a reverse image search on it, and nothing turned up. Haven't seen that before.
-
Yes, I figured that out from your clue. That's what get me doing a reverse image search on it, and nothing turned up. Haven't seen that before.
It was only the largest human gathering in the USA...ever!
****slapping
-
I understand that completely, and I wouldn't be there if my life depended on it.
But there were 500,000 people there yesterday and a lot of them were neither hard core leftists, nor were they fat, ugly women carrying vulgar signs.
I'm going to repeat what was said upthread. I think it's a mistake to assume that the majority of women there (and men) were just crackpot leftist hags, or that they were all ill informed. (Or, actually, that women who supported Trump actually were informed).
Donald Trump is an open misogynist who treats women like pieces of meat.
A lot of respectable, VERY conservative people (both men and women) are very troubled by that.
And I think the numbers in the march yesterday reflect that.
Your constant one hit wonder bashing of Trump over comments he may have made towards women makes you sound like a woman men have never hit on and your jealous leanings come through on all your threads
The fact is àll the women at the marches were leftist, pro choice types and would have be
en there regardless what Trump said about women.
@musiclady
-
Your constant one hit wonder bashing of Trump over comments he may have made towards women makes you sound like a woman men have never hit on and your jealous leanings come through on all your threads
The fact is àll the women at the marches were leftist, pro choice types and would have be
en there regardless what Trump said about women.
@musiclady
So @mirraflake the Bush Hollywood tape is fake?
-
So @mirraflake the Bush Hollywood tape is fake?
@mirraflake doesn't answer questions when the answers prove him/her wrong. I asked a question up thread that has yet to be answered for that very reason.
-
So @mirraflake the Bush Hollywood tape is fake?
What he said on tape trying to be bragdoscious to some young guy and what he does in real life is entirely different. He was in Hollywood mode. Female employees of Trump across the board said he was nothing but respectfull towards them.
@corbe
-
It was only the largest human gathering in the USA...ever!
****slapping
And clearly the most important.......
(unless you happen to be an Indians' fan. ^-^)
-
Let me help you. What big deal just happened in Chicago this past October. It was Huge. 108 years in the making.
More murders in the history of the city? @Wingnut
-
So @mirraflake the Bush Hollywood tape is fake?
No. It just means that the poor fellow believes Trump just said what every male in the world says because every single one of you is perverse (and you're "naïve" if you don't realize that every man degrades women on a regular basis).
That's the "one note" message of the young lad who keeps pinging me as though I care what he says about anything after he smeared every decent man on this forum....... **nononono*
-
What he said on tape trying to be bragdoscious to some young guy and what he does in real life is entirely different. He was in Hollywood mode. Female employees of Trump across the board said he was nothing but respectfull towards them.
@corbe
(http://img.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/sure-fine-whatever.gif)
-
I will say this much: pretty much all of my city-dwelling female friends, and a good chunk of the male ones too, were either supporting this or actually out in the streets with them—and most of them aren't the activist kind.
I'm not surprised this happened, given Trump's history. However, it was quite tiring seeing the same old clichés.
Surprised to speak with my daughter in Denver this morning. Many of her friends, conservative women and men were out in the park yesterday as a measure of their disdain for this president.
-
World Series Cub win? @Wingnut
-
World Series Cub win? @Wingnut
Yes. I believe that is Grant Park and the surrounding area.
@flowers
-
Surprised to speak with my daughter in Denver this morning. Many of her friends, conservative women and men were out in the park yesterday as a measure of their disdain for this president.
That's the point I'm trying to get across.
Even though there were leftist loons and awful, vulgar, fat, angry "feminists" there doesn't mean the entire march can be dismissed out of hand.
MANY conservatives hold Trump in contempt because of his filthy attitude toward women.
To think that the number is insignificant is to deny reality.
-
(http://img.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/sure-fine-whatever.gif)
Yeah............... never mind that Trump was 58 years old when he was just "bragging" about how he degrades and assaults women just because he can......
It's just what "BOYS" do.
Only this BOY is now our President.
And he has far more power over women than he had before.
-
Yeah............... never mind that Trump was 58 years old when he was just "bragging" about how he degrades and assaults women just because he can......
It's just what "BOYS" do.
Only this BOY is now our President.
And he has far more power over women than he had before.
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
-
Yeah............... never mind that Trump was 58 years old when he was just "bragging" about how he degrades and assaults women just because he can......
It's just what "BOYS" do.
Only this BOY is now our President.
And he has far more power over women than he had before.
My husband has several different gym memberships and says that the are a few men who really do talk like this. These men have tumultuous and violent relationships based solely on sexual gratification. The women they date are just like they are. These men run in their own pack because decent men don't want to associate with them. Basically, they are losers.
-
My husband has several different gym memberships and says that the are a few men who really do talk like this. These men have tumultuous and violent relationships based solely on sexual gratification. The women they date are just like they are. These men run in their own pack because decent men don't want to associate with them. Basically, they are losers.
Just from the quotes in the interview, it's clear that both "violent" and "loser" are characteristics of the boy saying it.
Every male in my family is an athlete with multiple experiences in gyms, and they echo your husband's experience.
Decent men don't talk this way.
THAT is why so many women are repulsed by Trump, and this march cannot be summarily dismissed as only a gathering of leftist misfits.
-
Just from the quotes in the interview, it's clear that both "violent" and "loser" are characteristics of the boy saying it.
Every male in my family is an athlete with multiple experiences in gyms, and they echo your husband's experience.
Decent men don't talk this way.
THAT is why so many women are repulsed by Trump, and this march cannot be summarily dismissed as only a gathering of leftist misfits.
And I'm getting really sick of hearing, "Yeah, but Clinton . . . " It's over and nothing will ever be done about Bill's sexual misconduct and alleged sex crimes. As conservatives we cannot justify lowering our standards because the other side did it. That's what liberals do: make excuses.
-
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
88devil Bless you @DCPatriot
-
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
Love free speech as long as you get to do the speaking don't ya!
-
Just from the quotes in the interview, it's clear that both "violent" and "loser" are characteristics of the boy saying it.
Every male in my family is an athlete with multiple experiences in gyms, and they echo your husband's experience.
Decent men don't talk this way.
THAT is why so many women are repulsed by Trump, and this march cannot be summarily dismissed as only a gathering of leftist misfits.
I just cannot take it anymore...gotta......................do...............this......................... :banghead: :laughingdog: :laughingdog: :laughingdog: :laughingdog: :laughingdog:
Oh my musiclady, you are just somethin' else Pfft!
-
And I'm getting really sick of hearing, "Yeah, but Clinton . . . " It's over and nothing will ever be done about Bill's sexual misconduct and alleged sex crimes. As conservatives we cannot justify lowering our standards because the other side did it. That's what liberals do: make excuses.
But it's over now. Trump won. And you don't go into battle with the Army you want, you go into battle with the Army you have, and we are in a life-or-death struggle with The Left in this country. And like it or not, for now, Trump is our "Army".
If you want to have this conversation, let's do it in 2020 when Trump will be challenged for the GOP Nomination. Until then, we need to make sure he does as good of a job as he can.
-
And I'm getting really sick of hearing, "Yeah, but Clinton . . . " It's over and nothing will ever be done about Bill's sexual misconduct and alleged sex crimes. As conservatives we cannot justify lowering our standards because the other side did it. That's what liberals do: make excuses.
And yet, that is exactly what we're doing, isn't it?
We're praising a Bill Clinton, and making excuses for his degradation of women and abuse of power.
-
But it's over now. Trump won. And you don't go into battle with the Army you want, you go into battle with the Army you have, and we are in a life-or-death struggle with The Left in this country. And like it or not, for now, Trump is our "Army".
If you want to have this conversation, let's do it in 2020 when Trump will be challenged for the GOP Nomination. Until then, we need to make sure he does as good of a job as he can.
So you are saying that we no longer should have this "conversation" regardless of how poorly it reflects on the Republican party or the remnants of conservatism?
IOW, we need to shut up and forget who Trump is just because he "won?"
These are serious questions....
-
So you are saying that we no longer should have this "conversation" regardless of how poorly it reflects on the Republican party or the remnants of conservatism?
IOW, we need to shut up and forget who Trump is just because he "won?"
These are serious questions....
Do you want Trump to fail? Even if it means he would have enacted a lot of things that Conservatives are on board with?
-
So you are saying that we no longer should have this "conversation" regardless of how poorly it reflects on the Republican party or the remnants of conservatism?
IOW, we need to shut up and forget who Trump is just because he "won?"
These are serious questions....
No, they are not. **nononono*
-
So you are saying that we no longer should have this "conversation" regardless of how poorly it reflects on the Republican party or the remnants of conservatism?
IOW, we need to shut up and forget who Trump is just because he "won?"
These are serious questions....
I am not a trump fan That said he was a better alternative than Hillary. I sincerely hope trump holds the conservative values he endorsed during the election and I want him to succeed for our countries sake. If he does half of what he said he would I will be pleasantly surprised. Remembering God can use flawed vessels I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Anyone who can't do that should examine their motivations.
-
No, they are not. **nononono*
So you now get to decide what is or is not important?
-
I am not a trump fan That said he was a better alternative than Hillary. I sincerely hope trump holds the conservative values he endorsed during the election and I want him to succeed for our countries sake. If he does half of what he said he would I will be pleasantly surprised. Remembering God can use flawed vessels I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Anyone who can't do that should examine their motivations.
:thumbsup2:
-
Do you want Trump to fail? Even if it means he would have enacted a lot of things that Conservatives are on board with?
That isn't an answer to either of my questions.
Are you saying that Trump's rampant immorality and degradation of women should not be discussed until 2020? That the fact that his lifestyle values do not reflect anything that is remotely conservative needs to be ignored for four years?
IOW, are you saying that we, as conservatives, need to deep six our own values and allow the leftist lies (or at least what used to be lies) about Conservatives be proven right?
What exactly are you saying?
-
I am not a trump fan That said he was a better alternative than Hillary. I sincerely hope trump holds the conservative values he endorsed during the election and I want him to succeed for our countries sake. If he does half of what he said he would I will be pleasantly surprised. Remembering God can use flawed vessels I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Anyone who can't do that should examine their motivations.
:beer:
-
Remember David was an adulterer and a murderer. Character matters but God can and does work through imperfect humans. Thank God for that because I am a very flawed vessel that still hopes to be of service to my King
-
That isn't an answer to either of my questions.
Are you saying that Trump's rampant immorality and degradation of women should not be discussed until 2020? That the fact that his lifestyle values do not reflect anything that is remotely conservative needs to be ignored for four years?
To be honest. Yes. There was plenty of talk about it during the election cycle. At this point it's just beating a dead horse. Now, in 2020 it will be relevant again as he will face opposition to his nomination, based on his performance as POTUS.
-
I am not a trump fan That said he was a better alternative than Hillary. I sincerely hope trump holds the conservative values he endorsed during the election and I want him to succeed for our countries sake. If he does half of what he said he would I will be pleasantly surprised. Remembering God can use flawed vessels I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Anyone who can't do that should examine their motivations.
My own motivation is that I actually believe in the things that conservatives and Republicans used to hold dear.
That IS my motivation.
That Trump is better than Hillary is clear.
But 'giving him a chance' does not even remotely mean overlooking his degradation of women, and the idea that those of us who can't overlook it should be silenced is absurd.
-
To be honest. Yes. There was plenty of talk about it during the election cycle. At this point it's just beating a dead horse. Now, in 2020 it will be relevant again as he will face opposition to his nomination, based on his performance as POTUS.
And "St. Joan of TBR" told us each and every day...ad nausem.
"Dead horse", indeed.
-
Remember David was an adulterer and a murderer. Character matters but God can and does work through imperfect humans. Thank God for that because I am a very flawed vessel that still hopes to be of service to my King
David was repentant and his life harmed by his sin against God.
Trump apologists always overlook that important difference.
-
David was repentant and his life harmed by his sin against God.
Trump apologists always overlook that important difference.
I am not a trump apologist I also do not know his heart Do you? Do you know the harm sin has caused in his life? I merely said I am willing to give him a chance.
-
David was repentant and his life harmed by his sin against God.
Trump apologists always overlook that important difference.
1) Donald Trump gave his stamp of approval on the Inauguration speakers and program.
2) Donald Trump's Inauguration set the record for the number of prayers to God Above.
WhoTF are you to judge him?
-
And "St. Joan of TBR" told us each and every day...ad nausem.
"Dead horse", indeed.
As I understand the rules of this forum members can say whatever they like as long as they are not personally attacking others. I think you should re-read them yet again.
-
To be honest. Yes. There was plenty of talk about it during the election cycle. At this point it's just beating a dead horse. Now, in 2020 it will be relevant again as he will face opposition to his nomination, based on his performance as POTUS.
Sorry. I'll have to respectfully disagree.
Maintaining conservative and moral values is not now, nor will ever be "beating a dead horse."
I'm not going to be silenced no matter how many people screech at me (not you.... others here) to make me stop doing so.
-
Sorry. I'll have to respectfully disagree.
Maintaining conservative and moral values is not now, nor will ever be "beating a dead horse."
I'm not going to be silenced no matter how many people screech at me (not you.... others here) to make me stop doing so.
That's your right.
-
My own motivation is that I actually believe in the things that conservatives and Republicans used to hold dear.
That IS my motivation.
That Trump is better than Hillary is clear.
But 'giving him a chance' does not even remotely mean overlooking his degradation of women, and the idea that those of us who can't overlook it should be silenced is absurd.
Who said you should be silenced? I merely stated that the women marching will get no respect from me until the drop the vulgarity the in your face baby killing and the threats from has been skanks like madonna Until they do they are no better than trump In fact they are a good deal worse He does not base his whole movement on slaughtering babies
-
As I understand the rules of this forum members can say whatever they like as long as they are not personally attacking others. I think you should re-read them yet again.
I'm not personally attacking anyone. I'm attacking her stupid insipid posts on her morality demands.
-
As I understand the rules of this forum members can say whatever they like as long as they are not personally attacking others. I think you should re-read them yet again.
You don't get how it works....... I criticize Trump, they attack me.
I've been talking about the subject of this thread the entire time and regardless of how much others attack me personally, I'm not going to allow them to silence me about what is a very significant subject.
The gathering of women who are repulsed by Trump (which included conservatives, with legitimate motives) cannot be disregarded.
-
Surprised to speak with my daughter in Denver this morning. Many of her friends, conservative women and men were out in the park yesterday as a measure of their disdain for this president.
IF ANY OF YOUR FRIENDS FEMALE OR MALE WENT TO A MARCH THEY ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE OR THEY ARE FOOLS.
It was well known way before the marches who put these on/sponsored them. Communist Party of America, NOW, Socialist of America, ACLU< Planned Parenthood sponsors, Pro Choice groups, LGBT crowd and just about every anti American group out there. Look it up
@Rivergirl
-
I am not a trump fan That said he was a better alternative than Hillary. I sincerely hope trump holds the conservative values he endorsed during the election and I want him to succeed for our countries sake. If he does half of what he said he would I will be pleasantly surprised. Remembering God can use flawed vessels I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Anyone who can't do that should examine their motivations.
Well said @Mom MD :thumbsup2:
-
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
When it requires divine intervention...
-
Who said you should be silenced? I merely stated that the women marching will get no respect from me until the drop the vulgarity the in your face baby killing and the threats from has been skanks like madonna Until they do they are no better than trump In fact they are a good deal worse He does not base his whole movement on slaughtering babies
Read upthread if you want to know who wants me silenced.
No where have I defended anything the leftist creeps in this march have done. In fact, I posted an article about the fact that these leftist creeps tried to keep anyone who is pro-life from marching. (One of the reasons I opposed Trump from the beginning is that he is a liberal and pro-abortion).
I will say it once more....... the fact that many, many women are repulsed by Trump's degradation of women is not something that should be ignored.
That is all.
-
Who is attacking you? Disagreement is not attacking
-
You don't get how it works....... I criticize Trump, they attack me.
I've been talking about the subject of this thread the entire time and regardless of how much others attack me personally, I'm not going to allow them to silence me about what is a very significant subject.
The gathering of women who are repulsed by Trump (which included conservatives, with legitimate motives) cannot be disregarded.
I understand how it works quite well and will not sit idol while ANY poster is being cowed down regardless of wheter or not I agree with them.
-
Unless interns start filing lawsuits, his degradation of women at his age is noted and though I rarely bring it up I will not let Trumpsters paint it away as a nothing burger, either. Unfortunately, all our eggs are in the Trump basket now, we are probably so screwed.
-
When it requires divine intervention...
Again............. I have been discussing the subject of the thread with reason and calmly.
Do you object to that, or do you also want me to shut up because you don't agree with me?
It's curious to find out who believes in freedom here, and who does not.......
-
Could we get back to discussing the recent cardo workout these very large liberal women with mustaches and bad attitudes experienced?
...or not?
-
I understand how it works quite well and will not sit idol while ANY poster is being cowed down regardless of wheter or not I agree with them.
I know you know how it works. I was speaking in jest.
My guess is that PM's were used to bring in reinforcements to silence me.
Won't work. :patriot:
-
So you now get to decide what is or is not important?
It's only my opinion @Bigun The questions asked have already been answered by the poster herself, so they appear to me to be only a way to continue a very tiresome mantra. Again, only my opinion :shrug:
-
Just saw your reply I don't like his behavior either but he is what we have to work with and I think marches like the one yesterday do more harm to our cause than good. The remarks he made were 11 years ago I cannot say I have never said anything I wouldn't want publicized Hopefully he has matured time will tell I will judge him by his actions
-
IF ANY OF YOUR FRIENDS FEMALE OR MALE WENT TO A MARCH THEY ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE OR THEY ARE FOOLS.
It was well known way before the marches who put these on/sponsored them. Communist Party of America, NOW, Socialist of America, ACLU< Planned Parenthood sponsors, Pro Choice groups, LGBT crowd and just about every anti American group out there. Look it up
@Rivergirl
Agreed. I think it would have sent a much stronger message had the more conservative women had a separate march from these Communists. You have to know the company you keep.
-
Could we get back to discussing the recent cardo workout these very large liberal women with mustaches and a bad attitudes experienced?
...or not?
I'm game!
But according to what I heard, there were so many women that they could barely move, thus not getting any cardio, much needed or not.
-
(http://samuel-warde.com/samuel-warde.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Women-March-750x398.jpg)
-
(One of the reasons I opposed Trump from the beginning is that he is a liberal and pro-abortion).
Trump said he is no longer pro abortion, his views have changed after he saw a late term abortion video and the birth of his grandchildren.
@musiclady
-
Just saw your reply I don't like his behavior either but he is what we have to work with and I think marches like the one yesterday do more harm to our cause than good. The remarks he made were 11 years ago I cannot say I have never said anything I wouldn't want publicized Hopefully he has matured time will tell I will judge him by his actions
We didn't mind George W. Bush's past with the drinking, drugs and drunk driving. Because it was in the past.
-
Just saw your reply I don't like his behavior either but he is what we have to work with and I think marches like the one yesterday do more harm to our cause than good. The remarks he made were 11 years ago I cannot say I have never said anything I wouldn't want publicized Hopefully he has matured time will tell I will judge him by his actions
God Bless You, @Mom MD Sounds reasonable and Christian-like to this poor sinner. :patriot:
-
Who said you should be silenced? I merely stated that the women marching will get no respect from me until the drop the vulgarity the in your face baby killing and the threats from has been skanks like madonna Until they do they are no better than trump In fact they are a good deal worse He does not base his whole movement on slaughtering babies
Spot on post! 888high58888 they get no respect and deserve none for those reasons. madonna said she wanted to blow up the WH...then dropped the F bomb. Madona offered to give everyone who voted for hillar a blow job. That deserves not respect.....ever. Many of those women say it is there right to kill babies, walked around in vagina outfits...real classy there.
-
I am not a trump fan That said he was a better alternative than Hillary. I sincerely hope trump holds the conservative values he endorsed during the election and I want him to succeed for our countries sake. If he does half of what he said he would I will be pleasantly surprised. Remembering God can use flawed vessels I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Anyone who can't do that should examine their motivations.
Thank you. Very well stated!
-
It's only my opinion @Bigun The questions asked have already been answered by the poster herself, so they appear to me to be only a way to continue a very tiresome mantra. Again, only my opinion :shrug:
OK! Thanks for clearing that up for me! :beer:
-
Ironically, Donald Trump doesn't touch alcohol of any kind, and has NEVER done drugs.
But that's not enough for our 'Church Lady'.
I totally understand her angst that with all the media tried to do with their October....hell, their weekly 'surprises', that the American voter brushed them aside.
52% of women voters brushed them aside. And she thinks they're all morally deficient too.
Makes me want to puke.
-
Just saw your reply I don't like his behavior either but he is what we have to work with and I think marches like the one yesterday do more harm to our cause than good. The remarks he made were 11 years ago I cannot say I have never said anything I wouldn't want publicized Hopefully he has matured time will tell I will judge him by his actions
I still maintain that supporting Trump's misogyny does serious harm to conservatism, and dismissing his vile speech and abuse of women as nothing is dangerous.
My guess is that it's not even remotely similar to anything you've ever said, @Mom MD .
I'm not 'supporting' the march (I haven't in anything I've said here), but what I am saying is that many, many conservative women are troubled by who Trump is. And based on the nasty things he said about and to women during the campaign, I would venture to say that he hasn't "matured" a bit.
But I guess all of you can "hope" he has "changed."
-
Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/20/billionaire-george-soros-has-ties-to-more-than-50-partners-of-the-womens-march-on-washington/
-
Ironically, Donald Trump doesn't touch alcohol of any kind, and has NEVER done drugs.
But that's not enough for our 'Church Lady'.
I totally understand her angst that with all the media tried to do with their October....hell, their weekly 'surprises', that the American voter brushed them aside.
52% of women voters brushed them aside. And she thinks they're all morally deficient too.
Makes me want to puke.
Well go puke then! She is just as much a member here as you are and just as entitled to say what she wanrs to say.
-
Enough with the *Church Lady* ad hominem
-
We didn't mind George W. Bush's past with the drinking, drugs and drunk driving. Because it was in the past.
If Trump's misogyny were in the past, and had he repented, as Bush did, and his behavior changed, I wouldn't have a problem with it either.
-
Geez, give it a rest. All this constant fighting and name calling, here and on just about every social medium, is tiresome. ****slapping I'm about to shoot my computer, to put it out of its (my) misery.
-
I'm game!
But according to what I heard, there were so many women that they could barely move, thus not getting any cardio, much needed or not.
Friction burns... Road rash....Dry humping..... Oh wait.... wrong movie...
-
Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/20/billionaire-george-soros-has-ties-to-more-than-50-partners-of-the-womens-march-on-washington/
Yep! I posted a link about the organizer FAR upthread now.
-
Well go puke then! She is just as much a member here as you are and just as entitled to say what she wanrs to say.
....over and over and over and over.....on the same freaking page! On this thread since 10AM with the same repetitive BS (in case somebody doesn't understand her) It's insane.
-
I in no way support his past treatment of women I merely hope God can use him in spite of it if conservative women want to protest him without the rest of the zoo I respect that as well Conservatives joining in with the circus of yesterday harms our cause more than it helps it
-
Well go puke then! She is just as much a member here as you are and just as entitled to say what she wanrs to say.
As I said....... I say what I think, completely rationally and relevant to the thread topic, and they attack me personally.
I am criticizing Trump. They are personally smearing me.
Even though I have this sorry band on ignore, they still think they can get to me.
They can't.
But I've had my say here, and will leave with my head held high. :seeya:
-
Nice to see DCP being ever the gentleman
-
Friction burns... Road rash....Dry humping..... Oh wait.... wrong movie...
....cuddling on the sofa watching football. :smokin:
-
(http://www.gotfunnypictures.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/hooters-feminist.jpg)
-
....cuddling on the sofa watching football. :smokin:
The title had "Dallas" in it. Who Knew? :beer:
-
....cuddling on the sofa watching football. :smokin:
:smokin:
-
(http://www.gotfunnypictures.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/hooters-feminist.jpg)
888high58888
-
As I understand the rules of this forum members can say whatever they like as long as they are not personally attacking others. I think you should re-read them yet again.
Exactly....
Except that there are a couple of duped Orange devotees who would like nothing better than turn TBR into an extension of TOS.
-
I still maintain that supporting Trump's misogyny does serious harm to conservatism, and dismissing his vile speech and abuse of women as nothing is dangerous.
My wife thinks Trump is a cad and ahole but still voted for him. She was never bothered by his "talk"
All the conservative women on my FB pages are like "ehh"
-
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
Take your own advice...seriously.
-
Exactly....
Except that there are a couple of duped Orange devotees who would like nothing better than turn TBR into an extension of TOS.
Those would be the same ones whinging about a mythical anti Trump bias at TBR too.
-
....over and over and over and over.....on the same freaking page! On this thread since 10AM with the same repetitive BS (in case somebody doesn't understand her) It's insane.
Why not just ignore the posts you don't like?
-
Why not just ignore the posts you don't like?
LOL because then he couldn't use his gold plated victim card.
-
I have repeatedly asked that people use the ignore feature if they can't get along with another person...this is something I cannot enforce or do for them....but please reconsider and do it.
-
The ONLY thing these stupid marches and rallies are for, is to stand up for Infanticide, and to oppose everything that represents a potential return to the way America was.
Wearing Hijabs in solidarity with a religion that views women as chattel for sexual gratification and celebrating infanticide is all this culture of death that is the left stands for and insists to impose on everyone.
Get used to this kind of crap.
It will be going on as often as Obama/Soros and the Cabal of Leftists can orchestrate it.
And they want the pushback to be the kind that makes their declared worries a reality.
And with Trump - they might get it - which is why they are pushing.
-
Way to go Falcons. Bend...
(http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-atlanta-falcons-cheerleaders-perform-during-a-break-in-the-action-picture-id459740251)
But don't break.
-
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
@DCPatriot
She's not going to do it. It's what she has to do to feel good about herself. She is still pissed that JEB wasn't the Republican nominee,and if she could,she would follow Trump around 24/7,shrieking at him the whole time. She felt like she was a "winner" and "belonged" with the Bush Crime Family and his RINO pals in charge. Now she feels like an outsider,and it's all Trump's fault.
-
Way to go Falcons. Bend...
(http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-atlanta-falcons-cheerleaders-perform-during-a-break-in-the-action-picture-id459740251)
But don't break.
Strange we didn't"t see any ladies that look like this yesterday did we? :silly:
-
I have repeatedly asked that people use the ignore feature if they can't get along with another person...this is something I cannot enforce or do for them....but please reconsider and do it.
I am posting to a member that continues to refer to our President as some sex-freak reprobate....in haughty English.
It's sickening. We know she's of a high moral fiber. And so what? That's gives her special privileges here?
How can she know what's in his heart?
-
Exactly....
Except that there are a couple of duped Orange devotees who would like nothing better than turn TBR into an extension of TOS.
This is a conservative site. Some here constantly bash the President 24/7. Nothing good to say about him. Which side are they really one?
As others have said he is our President, needs our support and when he does something wrong we need to let him know. So far I think he has been doing a great job other than some minor hickups.
@catfish1957
-
Strange we didn't"t see any ladies that look like this yesterday did we? :silly:
Snifff...
Now we are talking. Massive March. And April.. May is there too
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wgn3_1uz_ms/maxresdefault.jpg)
-
Way to go Falcons. Bend...
(http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-atlanta-falcons-cheerleaders-perform-during-a-break-in-the-action-picture-id459740251)
But don't break.
You mysoginistic brute you, treating women as sexual objects!!!!!!!!
@Wingnut
-
I am posting to a member that continues to refer to our President as some sex-freak reprobate....in haughty English.
So what do you call a guy who brags about grabbing women by the the p__y?
-
You mysoginistic brute you, treating women as sexual objects!!!!!!!!
@Wingnut
Time for the man pledge. :silly:
-
So what do you call a guy who brags about grabbing women by the the p__y?
A guy that, at that moment, felt the need to show Mr. Bush how cool and powerful he is.
IOW....typical locker room talk.
And I know a cabal of a dozen beautiful, striking women Realtors, who when they go to a Happy Hour together...can put Trump to shame.
They're all good mothers and girls.
Geez......
-
Sorry. I'll have to respectfully disagree.
Maintaining conservative and moral values is not now, nor will ever be "beating a dead horse."
I'm not going to be silenced no matter how many people screech at me (not you.... others here) to make me stop doing so.
@musiclady
There is nothing even the tiniest bit conservative about you. You are a Totalitarian Church Lady . A Mrs Grundy with a Big Red "R" on your sweater.
-
Strange we didn't"t see any ladies that look like this yesterday did we? :silly:
In the photos there was many hot women at the marches-they were there. These are the same women who will end up marrying a hot, ambitious, confident conservative man with earning power and suddenly turn conservative when she sees what the property taxes on the Mcmansion will be versus the trip she wanted to take to Europe.
Seen this a million times.
Look at the pics of the older women at the marches. No pretty ones.
@catfish1957
-
Friction burns... Road rash....Dry humping..... Oh wait.... wrong movie...
Ewwwww............
I have a very good imagination, and after that, I'm going to have to wash my brain out with soap.
-
If Trump's misogyny were in the past, and had he repented, as Bush did, and his behavior changed, I wouldn't have a problem with it either.
When was his last case of misogyny, I thought all these tapes occurred back around 2011. I haven't heard of anything major since he married Melania, although I'm sure he hasn't necessarily been a saint.
-
OK! Thanks for clearing that up for me! :beer:
:beer:
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s640x640/16196013_637650256437918_4096963549360477423_n.jpg?oh=50ba74cdb40b05085079f42bc232edc7&oe=5912B34D)
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s640x640/16196013_637650256437918_4096963549360477423_n.jpg?oh=50ba74cdb40b05085079f42bc232edc7&oe=5912B34D)
Heh, that would be their ultimate nightmare.
-
Heh, that would be their ultimate nightmare.
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
...as opposed to this???
-
And I know a cabal of a dozen beautiful, striking women Realtors, who when they go to a Happy Hour together...can put Trump to shame.
They're all good mothers and girls.
My wife is in the horse hobby very conservative women as a whole. Gun owning, cowboot wearing, gun owning women, I see how they talk sexually about men when when get together in a group..as bad as any male talk I have heard.
If you go into their tack rooms most will have half naked or calenders of naked cowboys hanging the walls..or the favorite save a horse ride a cowboy
When I mentioned this before I was told they were probably skanks and whores and not conservative Godly women even though they are all conservative married, with kids and I know most of them have never been divorced.
@DCPatriot
-
We mock the millions and millions of men, women, and children around the world whose visceral reaction to DT drove them to make their presence known.
Ridicule, dismissive commentary puts us on the wrong side of yesterday's march.
Just my opinion.
@musiclady
@Rivergirl
Mine, too, considering what Trump really is. His treating women as furniture, is one of them.
-
My wife is in the horse hobby very conservative women as a whole. Gun owning, cowboot wearing, gun owning women, I see how they talk sexually about men when when get together in a group..as bad as any male talk I have heard.
If you go into their tack rooms most will have half naked or calenders of naked cowboys hanging the walls..or the favorite save a horse ride a cowboy
When I mentioned this before I was told they were probably skanks and whores and not conservative women even though they are all conservative married, with kids and I know most of them have never been divorced.
@DCPatriot
It's a sincere pleasure @mirraflake to make your acquaintance. :beer:
-
My wife is in the horse hobby very conservative women as a whole. Gun owning, cowboot wearing, gun owning women, I see how they talk sexually about men when when get together in a group..as bad as any male talk I have heard.
If you go into their tack rooms most will have half naked or calenders of naked cowboys hanging the walls..or the favorite save a horse ride a cowboy
When I mentioned this before I was told they were probably skanks and whores and not conservative Godly women even though they are all conservative married, with kids and I know most of them have never been divorced.
@DCPatriot
Nice try! I remember that thread and don't recall the women being called skanks and whores.
To use your own argument, these women are not conservative regardless of how much they claim to be. That's your mantra biting you on your backside.
-
Ewwwww............
I have a very good imagination, and after that, I'm going to have to wash my brain out with soap.
Hehehehhheee. :smokin:
-
The ONLY thing these stupid marches and rallies are for, is to stand up for Infanticide, and to oppose everything that represents a potential return to the way America was.
Wearing Hijabs in solidarity with a religion that views women as chattel for sexual gratification and celebrating infanticide is all this culture of death that is the left stands for and insists to impose on everyone.
@INVAR
It's shocking that none of the news pundits has pointed out the hypocrisy of the 'murikan left for supporting Muslim immigrants,when the Muslims are a clear danger to both their stated beliefs AND their very lives.
Although,truth to tell,all these anti-Trump females that are foaming at the mouth crazy would look better packed away in a mobile tent and gagged so we didn't have to listen to their constant whining.
I may be wrong,but somehow I just don't see them thriving under Sharia Law.
-
Women's March in DC leaves millions of cats hungry at home
http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/women-s-march-in-dc-leaves-millions-of-needy-cats-unattended-t19221.html (http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/women-s-march-in-dc-leaves-millions-of-needy-cats-unattended-t19221.html)
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
...as opposed to this???
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DWtTydd-cGE/hqdefault.jpg)
"Level Five.......Someday I'm gonna marry that girl."
-
Have you read Ivanka's positions on issues?
She'll make the liberals perfectly happy!
-
You mysoginistic brute you, treating women as sexual objects!!!!!!!!
@Wingnut
@mirraflake
If you think one of them is hard to get along with if you treat her as a sexual object,just wait and see what happens to you when you stop.
-
That's gives her special privileges here?
Every bit, I imagine, the privileges you get from being here from the very beginning, as I've heard a few times.
-
Nice try! I remember that thread and don't recall the women being called skanks and whores.
To use your own argument, these women are not conservative regardless of how much they claim to be. That's your mantra biting you on your backside.
No, it's just normal men and women who talk sexually about the other gender when in groups. Not everyone in life walks around with a prude stick up their up their butt and resting beotch face scowl. It's called having fun, letting your hair down and joking around.
@goodwithagun
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
...as opposed to this???
I'm kinda fond of that red head on the far left....
-
Have you read Ivanka's positions on issues?
She'll make the liberals perfectly happy!
yeah....taking her dad's lead....appealing to the most common denominator.
There's a method to her madness. (I hope) :patriot:
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
...as opposed to this???
@DCPatriot
With the exception of the redhead in the green bra,I suspect the only sexual harassment any of those creatures has had in decades has been imaginary. Most would have to hang around outside state or federal prisons to get a date.
-
I'm kinda fond of that red head on the far left....
DON'T get me started...... :beer:
-
Every bit, I imagine, the privileges you get from being here from the very beginning, as I've heard a few times.
Not just "from here", my friend.
That kinship spans almost 2 decades. Through thick and thin.
This is my home. And I love it and cherish it daily.
-
Not just "from here", my friend.
That kinship spans almost 2 decades. Through thick and thin.
This is my home. And I love it and cherish it daily.
I hear ya.
-
No, it's just normal men and women who talk sexually about the other gender when in groups. Not everyone in life walks around with a prude stick up their up their butt and resting beotch face scowl. It's called having fun, letting your hair down and joking around.
@goodwithagun
Thank God I'm neither your wife nor your daughter. **nononono* If you haven't read my post about my husband's locker room observations then you should. Spoiler alert: Real men think men like you are losers.
-
I may be wrong,but somehow I just don't see them thriving under Sharia Law.
They are either willfully oblivious and wholly ignorant of Islam, or they are perfectly fine with it, because the enemy of their enemy is their friend.
Eventually the crocodile they are feeding will turn, and those imbeciles think they will have it trained and respecting them - because they are…. friends.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
...as opposed to this???
I'm kinda partial to the tattooed crack ho with the sunglasses standing next to the chubby guy.
-
Thank God I'm neither your wife nor your daughter. **nononono* If you haven't read my post about my husband's locker room observations then you should. Spoiler alert: Real men think men like you are losers.
Count me in on that evaluation.
I do not talk about women or have the kind of disgusting sex discussions that he implies are 'normal'. As an ignorant teen - perhaps at one time to appear 'cool' I can perhaps see that kind of talk, but not among the circles I walk.
But then I am the father of three daughters and that kind of demeaning talk about women really pisses me off - because they could be referencing my princesses.
And that is what the guns and swords are there to dissuade.
-
I'm kinda partial to the tattooed crack ho with the sunglasses standing next to the chubby guy.
ROFL! It took me a minute to find her!! :beer:
-
Thank God I'm neither your wife nor your daughter. **nononono* If you haven't read my post about my husband's locker room observations then you should. Spoiler alert: Real men think men like you are losers.
For the last time , I have never sexually assaulted a woman, pushed a woman to have sex nor would I hang around men who did or talk that way. I have talked about women sexually among my male friends numerous times...nearly all men do.(wow she has nice t**'s Been married 20 years, great marriage no divorce. Quit painting me as someone who I am not.
Do I talk this way around my wife? NO
You mentioned your husband was a firefighter on FR. It would curl your hair if you heard FF speak among themselves. Crude Sexual talk and unPC language out the wazoo. And I know plenty of them personally. Conservative FF.
@goodwithagun
-
DON'T get me started...... :beer:
Is that a.... "I wish i could" kinda statement. Cuz that's where I am! 888high58888
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
GUYS! GUYS! Some EYEBLEACH PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
(http://memestorage.com/_nw/23/87899101.jpg)
There are some lines of decorum being crossed over into Vomitville here!
-
Is that a.... "I wish i could" kinda statement. Cuz that's where I am! 888high58888
You are the best! Always bring smiles. :beer:
-
(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/151/914/eye-bleach-motivational-babes-e1284033324953.jpg)
-
I'm kinda partial to the tattooed crack ho with the sunglasses standing next to the chubby guy.
Different strokes for different folks!
-
GUYS! GUYS! Some EYEBLEACH PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
Eye-bleach coming right up. And she's Conservative.
(http://hollywood.greekreporter.com/files/2014/10/Angie-angie-harmon-12616601-640-479.jpg)
-
My wife is in the horse hobby very conservative women as a whole. Gun owning, cowboot wearing, gun owning women, I see how they talk sexually about men when when get together in a group..as bad as any male talk I have heard.
If you go into their tack rooms most will have half naked or calenders of naked cowboys hanging the walls..or the favorite save a horse ride a cowboy
When I mentioned this before I was told they were probably skanks and whores and not conservative Godly women even though they are all conservative married, with kids and I know most of them have never been divorced.
@DCPatriot
News Flash: @mirraflake lies!
Here is a link to the comment you are referencing: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,241808.0.html
Nobody, and I mean nobody, called those women you referenced skanks and whores. In fact, nobody said anything negative about them.
Why did you slander TBR, @mirraflake ? :nono: **nononono*
-
News Flash: @mirraflake lies!
Here is a link to the comment you are referencing: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,241808.0.html
Nobody, and I mean nobody, called those women you referenced skanks and whores. In fact, nobody said anything negative about them.
Why did you slander TBR, @mirraflake ? :nono: **nononono*
LOL you have the wrong thread. i will find it tomorrow
@goodwithagun
-
has anyone figured out yet what the hell they were marching for? :shrug:
-
has anyone figured out yet what the hell they were marching for? :shrug:
The usual stuff, but I saw a pic on Twitchy about tampons. Yep. Now they want you to pay for tampons.
-
has anyone figured out yet what the hell they were marching for? :shrug:
The missionary Position is untenable.
-
PERHAPS?
(http://img.picturequotes.com/2/23/22926/i-need-more-shoes-quote-1.jpg)
-
PERHAPS?
(http://img.picturequotes.com/2/23/22926/i-need-more-shoes-quote-1.jpg)
Go look at that photo at the top of this page and tell me if any of those people seem like women who like shoes.
-
@musiclady
@Rivergirl
Mine, too, considering what Trump really is. His treating women as furniture, is one of them.
Apparently we're supposed to forget all about that since he "won" @Victoria33
Sort of like the leftists did with Bill Clinton......
-
Go look at that photo at the top of this page and tell me if any of those people seem like women who like shoes.
You can tell a lot about a person by the king of shoes they wear.
-
has anyone figured out yet what the hell they were marching for? :shrug:
Because they want to burn it all down and get free shit and punish everyone that they believe is a threat to their deviancy.
Oh, and they want everyone to look at them… look at them.
Debauchery and hubris love a parade.
-
Because they want to burn it all down and get free shit and punish everyone that they believe is a threat to their deviancy.
Oh, and they want everyone to look at them… look at them.
Debauchery and hubris love a parade.
They want looked at, and then they can scream about being objectified. Liberals are so weird.
-
I just talked to a family member who lives in DC (a conservative young man who didn't go to the march). There were no incidents yesterday, and there were so many people that they couldn't even march.
I've been repeating the message here often, but most choose to disregard it.
Trump's disrespect for and degradation of women is significant.
Clearly more significant than most here would care to admit.
And the issue isn't going to go away.
I'm not ignoring, nor am I disagreeing with that issue. It is one I commented on during the primaries, and another of the reasons I don't think much of DT as a human being.
But in the pile of signs, I saw a lot of SJW causes that have very little to do with anything but identity politics of the leftist variety. I remain skeptical that the majority of the turnout was just to protest his misogynistic tendencies, or any of those particular issues, although I cannot divine the motivations of all of the crowd there. After all, the signs I saw had been discarded on the ground, in typical Liberal fashion, and that would bias the sample.
-
has anyone figured out yet what the hell they were marching for? :shrug:
They want free tampons and free abortion, and they wish Mary had aborted Jesus (an actual sign at the protest).
-
I'm not ignoring, nor am I disagreeing with that issue. It is one I commented on during the primaries, and another of the reasons I don't think much of DT as a human being.
But in the pile of signs, I saw a lot of SJW causes that have very little to do with anything but identity politics of the leftist variety. I remain skeptical that the majority of the turnout was just to protest his misogynistic tendencies, or any of those particular issues, although I cannot divine the motivations of all of the crowd there. After all, the signs I saw had been discarded on the ground, in typical Liberal fashion, and that would bias the sample.
I agree with everything you've said. The majority of the turnout was leftist, and they behaved as leftists. The signs shown seem to support that, the speeches were hideous, and the mess left afterwards clearly a sign of irresponsible, filthy leftists. In addition, Soros was most likely financing it, so I in NO way support the majority of what went on.
My only point (the screaming at me and name calling notwithstanding ^-^), is that we ignore at our peril the harm that Trump's very real misogyny does to conservatism. It's not made up, like most criticisms of the left are. It's real.
There are certainly more significant issues in which Trump's liberalism will harm us, but this one should not be ignored.
-
Anyone care to comment on the fact that Saint Jared's brother was at the Women's March in D.C.
-
So you are saying that we no longer should have this "conversation" regardless of how poorly it reflects on the Republican party or the remnants of conservatism?
IOW, we need to shut up and forget who Trump is just because he "won?"
These are serious questions....
Yes, they are serious questions. No, we should not forget. We should demand better behaviour, at least in public, by our leaders, though I doubt that will make any difference what they say, do, or think in private. Still, that does not mean that officially they should not comport themselves as is fitting for the premier representative of the American People.
I haven't forgotten Mr. Trump's numerous flaws, and I have taken plenty of flack for pointing them out. However, I might desire a specific high end tool to work on something and make do with a pawn shop special which never was the quality of what I wanted to work with. That means it is up to me to make sure the tool gets the job done. He is the tool we have, at the insistence of those who made the decision over our objections.
We either sharpen that tool, reshape it, modify it to do the job we want done, or we can complain and watch a mess be made. Our attempts may be met with a lack of success, or they may fail, but at least we will have tried.
We don't get to summarily toss the tool out, or nothing we want, however imperfect, will happen. We play the cards we have been dealt at this point, or we fold.
-
Yes, they are serious questions. No, we should not forget. We should demand better behaviour, at least in public, by our leaders, though I doubt that will make any difference what they say, do, or think in private. Still, that does not mean that officially they should not comport themselves as is fitting for the premier representative of the American People.
I haven't forgotten Mr. Trump's numerous flaws, and I have taken plenty of flack for pointing them out. However, I might desire a specific high end tool to work on something and make do with a pawn shop special which never was the quality of what I wanted to work with. That means it is up to me to make sure the tool gets the job done. He is the tool we have, at the insistence of those who made the decision over our objections.
We either sharpen that tool, reshape it, modify it to do the job we want done, or we can complain and watch a mess be made. Our attempts may be met with a lack of success, or they may fail, but at least we will have tried.
We don't get to summarily toss the tool out, or nothing we want, however imperfect, will happen. We play the cards we have been dealt at this point, or we fold.
@Smokin Joe
Well said!
-
Just saw your reply I don't like his behavior either but he is what we have to work with and I think marches like the one yesterday do more harm to our cause than good. The remarks he made were 11 years ago I cannot say I have never said anything I wouldn't want publicized Hopefully he has matured time will tell I will judge him by his actions
I don't think they harm Conservatives, if the 'credit' is given to SJWs and Pro-abortion types. Those are Liberal causes, and the Liberals will take the credit fro anyone who shows up, regardless of motivation. Because most women I know who espouse conservative values are pro-life, they were supposedly not welcome in those ranks, anyway.
-
My only point (the screaming at me and name calling notwithstanding ^-^), is that we ignore at our peril the harm that Trump's very real misogyny does to conservatism.
True. But we should not stand with the Left on this occasion. They are not marching to protest Trump's misogyny - they are mentioning it only to give themselves a sense of legitimacy. They are ranting mobs of juvenile agitators simply pissed off Hillary did not win and Obama did not decide to declare himself emperor for life.
They believe their religion of sex without consequences and agenda of redistribution is threatened, and this is the reason they decided to "march". They are outraged that an overt Commie Leftist is not still running the government and plundering the culture and society as they demand.
So to them, they were robbed - and they intend to make every justification for tossing this fit.
This is not the time, or the people to stand together with - because their motivations for protest are not OUR motivations.
Ours may be proven out in short order - and then we can say we warned them.
But this spectacle of debauchery and decadence - is not the event, or the occasion.
-
....over and over and over and over.....on the same freaking page! On this thread since 10AM with the same repetitive BS (in case somebody doesn't understand her) It's insane.
Why, it's enough to remind me of certain people during the primaries...and the general.
Handle it.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
...as opposed to this???
That reminds me, I need to get the goldfish a new bicycle...
-
True. But we should not stand with the Left on this occasion. They are not marching to protest Trump's misogyny - they are mentioning it only to give themselves a sense of legitimacy. They are ranting mobs of juvenile agitators simply pissed off Hillary did not win and Obama did not decide to declare himself emperor for life.
They believe their religion of sex without consequences and agenda of redistribution is threatened, and this is the reason they decided to "march". They are outraged that an overt Commie Leftist is not still running the government and plundering the culture and society as they demand.
So to them, they were robbed - and they intend to make every justification for tossing this fit.
This is not the time, or the people to stand together with - because their motivations for protest are not OUR motivations.
Ours may be proven out in short order - and then we can say we warned them.
But this spectacle of debauchery and decadence - is not the event, or the occasion.
I agree.
But if you saw the conversations of women (and men who care about women) on FB or other places, you saw that many of the people interested in this march were not radicals, nor hardcore pro-abortion women. It was moderate and non-political women who didn't go, but were in support of marching against Trump because of his behavior toward women (factual, not political).
I am not saying that it is right to stand together with these women and their evil motives. But I am saying that the average woman out there doesn't know who George Soros is, isn't pro-abortion, isn't hardcore in any sense, doesn't like that Trump doesn't respect women.
Again, we can't ignore the damage is doing to conservatism to the people in the middle.
As I said before, this isn't the most significant damage that he's doing, but it is also not insignificant.
The lies the left told about us in the past are now true with Trump.
-
You know, a few hundred thousand women all dressed as catgirls? I could be persuaded to enjoy that in person.
(http://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/at/2011/7/11/7ff02593b3b455b4a54b3e5405477362_3806.jpg__thumb)
-
Yes, they are serious questions. No, we should not forget. We should demand better behaviour, at least in public, by our leaders, though I doubt that will make any difference what they say, do, or think in private. Still, that does not mean that officially they should not comport themselves as is fitting for the premier representative of the American People.
I haven't forgotten Mr. Trump's numerous flaws, and I have taken plenty of flack for pointing them out. However, I might desire a specific high end tool to work on something and make do with a pawn shop special which never was the quality of what I wanted to work with. That means it is up to me to make sure the tool gets the job done. He is the tool we have, at the insistence of those who made the decision over our objections.
We either sharpen that tool, reshape it, modify it to do the job we want done, or we can complain and watch a mess be made. Our attempts may be met with a lack of success, or they may fail, but at least we will have tried.
We don't get to summarily toss the tool out, or nothing we want, however imperfect, will happen. We play the cards we have been dealt at this point, or we fold.
That all assumes that "we" have the power to have any influence whatsoever on the tool.
That's a pretty big assumption, isn't it, considering that the tool is a narcissist?
-
Oh, Jesus, Lord, God and Savior.....please SHUT UP! 22222frying pan
Why should she?
-
That all assumes that "we" have the power to have any influence whatsoever on the tool.
That's a pretty big assumption, isn't it, considering that the tool is a narcissist?
Not so much. Narcissists are manipulated by manipulating the perception of how people like them. Echo chambers and yes men might hit the mark, the usual leftists will only be ignored. If the MAGA conga line gets out of line a little, though that might have an influence. Without adulation a narcissist starts having problems.
-
Not so much. Narcissists are manipulated by manipulating the perception of how people like them. Echo chambers and yes men might hit the mark, the usual leftists will only be ignored. If the MAGA conga line gets out of line a little, though that might have an influence. Without adulation a narcissist starts having problems.
We've seen that at work over the last eight years, and will likely see it in the next four.
-
We've seen that at work over the last eight years, and will likely see it in the next four.
True that. Although the adulation never really went away for the one who just left. The MSM, afraid of being decried as 'racist', never really let him have it. They won't pull any punches on Trump, but he has the luxury of ignoring them as Liberals. I still think our best bet to influence anything is through Congress, but that hasn't exactly been responsive, either.
However, in Trump's campaign, he did make a series of promises, many of which are do-able, would move in the right direction, and can be accomplished in a Constitutional fashion. If he is reminded of those promises, just maybe he will deliver some good. He seems to be backing water on some of his signature items, though, and I'm not sure if hubris will override his cravings to really be 'yuuge' and 'the best'. People like that can rewrite their belief system in a heartbeat if it gives them the feelgood they crave.
-
We've seen that at work over the last eight years, and will likely see it in the next four.
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/16142990_1026738640790297_4931175412093944922_n.jpg?oh=09ed2f37769264b865d4395c763a385e&oe=591E3F4C)
-
I agree.
But if you saw the conversations of women (and men who care about women) on FB or other places, you saw that many of the people interested in this march were not radicals, nor hardcore pro-abortion women. It was moderate and non-political women who didn't go, but were in support of marching against Trump because of his behavior toward women (factual, not political).
I am not saying that it is right to stand together with these women and their evil motives. But I am saying that the average woman out there doesn't know who George Soros is, isn't pro-abortion, isn't hardcore in any sense, doesn't like that Trump doesn't respect women.
Again, we can't ignore the damage is doing to conservatism to the people in the middle.
As I said before, this isn't the most significant damage that he's doing, but it is also not insignificant.
The lies the left told about us in the past are now true with Trump.
Look, the electorate who put Trump in office didn't give two shakes about Trump's inability to keep his wedding vows or his hands off other mens wives, nor all the crass demonizations he offered throughout the campaign - so what does that tell us about the character of the people in this country?
It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles stands a snow cone's chance in a blast furnace of ever being elected to high office in this country.
This people wanted either a traitor and criminal grifter or a crass and bombastic egomaniac for their ruler. So we got the latter.
The country does not want the kind of principled Christian Conservatism you and I are governed by. They want what we got.
As such, Trump will get to skate on all his foibles as assuredly as Obama did among his acolytes and Conservatism as we once knew it gets relegated to irrelevance and extinction.
-
Look, the electorate who put Trump in office didn't give two shakes about Trump's inability to keep his wedding vows or his hands off other mens wives, nor all the crass demonizations he offered throughout the campaign - so what does that tell us about the character of the people in this country?
It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles stands a snow cone's chance in a blast furnace of ever being elected to high office in this country.
This people wanted either a traitor and criminal grifter or a crass and bombastic egomaniac for their ruler. So we got the latter.
The country does not want the kind of principled Christian Conservatism you and I are governed by. They want what we got.
As such, Trump will get to skate on all his foibles as assuredly as Obama did among his acolytes and Conservatism as we once knew it gets relegated to irrelevance and extinction.
You just don't get it, @INVAR
You imply that Trump won because a decadent electorate chose him as one of them. That's flipping moronic.
If a Ronald Reagan-type had the same exact message as Trump did, he would be POTUS today.
Instead, we got nothing but @txradioguy 's idea of the perfect candidate. The one who says "Barack Obama would make a fine POTUS"....or one that spouts all his failures were due to inexperience, etc.. ....instead of just plain intent to destroy and ruin and divide.
Jesus H. Christ!! You're hopeless.
-
That isn't an answer to either of my questions.
Are you saying that Trump's rampant immorality and degradation of women should not be discussed until 2020? That the fact that his lifestyle values do not reflect anything that is remotely conservative needs to be ignored for four years?
IOW, are you saying that we, as conservatives, need to deep six our own values and allow the leftist lies (or at least what used to be lies) about Conservatives be proven right?
What exactly are you saying?
I can't speak for the other; but what I for one am saying is, the election is OVER.
Given the chance to nominate someone else, the Republican voters passed on it.
Given the choice between Trump and that woman dying of Parkinsons and drowning in embezzlement and graft...there was no choice but to pick Trump.
The election is over. What he did in the past, is not relevant anymore.
If he misbehaves in office, that's a valid discussion. What has he done, in the last 30 hours, that might raise your hackles?
Drudging up old innuendo and dark whisperings, does nothing - except empower the Democrats, and we've seen that conga line of freaks...empower them in continuing their Leftist destruction of what remains of the nation.
DO you want THAT?
-
I can't speak for the other; but what I for one am saying is, the election is OVER.
Given the chance to nominate someone else, the Republican voters passed on it.
Given the choice between Trump and that woman dying of Parkinsons and drowning in embezzlement and graft...there was no choice but to pick Trump.
The election is over. What he did in the past, is not relevant anymore.
If he misbehaves in office, that's a valid discussion. What has he done, in the last 30 hours, that might raise your hackles?
Drudging up old innuendo and dark whisperings, does nothing - except empower the Democrats, and we've seen that conga line of freaks...empower them in continuing their Leftist destruction of what remains of the nation.
DO you want THAT?
Perhaps, coming from you, it'll sink in. But not likely.
She'll take it as giving in. And she's too stubborn.
No....she'd rather keep carrying on around here, praying for the day when she can say, "I told you so!".
-
You just don't get it, @INVAR
You imply that Trump won because a decadent electorate chose him as one of them. That's flipping moronic.
If a Ronald Reagan-type had the same exact message as Trump did, he would be POTUS today.
Instead, we got nothing but @txradioguy 's idea of the perfect candidate. The one who says "Barack Obama would make a fine POTUS"....or one that spouts all his failures were due to inexperience, etc.. ....instead of just plain intent to destroy and ruin and divide.
Jesus H. Christ!! You're hopeless.
@DCPatriot us Conservatives felt we had a Ronald Reagan type person who also had a Ronald Reagan type message and he could have beat hellary, I believe, BUT, alas (clutching my pearls) he was destroyed by an unconventional campaign and a back stabbing party he was obviously unprepared for, but 2020 is only 4 years away, he's a quick learner, better hope your boy doesn't stumble to much..
-
I still maintain that supporting Trump's misogyny does serious harm to conservatism, and dismissing his vile speech and abuse of women as nothing is dangerous.
My guess is that it's not even remotely similar to anything you've ever said, @Mom MD .
I'm not 'supporting' the march (I haven't in anything I've said here), but what I am saying is that many, many conservative women are troubled by who Trump is. And based on the nasty things he said about and to women during the campaign, I would venture to say that he hasn't "matured" a bit.
But I guess all of you can "hope" he has "changed."
Have you done any reading at all on Trump? I have...no, not his ghostwritten autobios. What he's done and who he's hired.
I've made it plain, I'm less-than-impressed. With much of his life and what it is he really did. BUT. One thing that's NOTABLY missing, is racism and misogyny.
He's hired women for important positions. He put his daughter through college and grad school...and DIDN'T hire her.
Because he wanted her to learn, the hard way, in the real world. Not to have the skids greased, and not have her become a socialite like Paris Hilton.
Ivanka went to work for Forest City Enterprises in Cleveland. Which surprised me when I learned of it - I lived in Cleveland for many of those years, and Forest City was a prominent real-estate development firm. The top brass were frequently in society news; and they own the landmark Terminal Tower Building.
But, even with The Apprentice running, not a word about Trump's kid working in Cleveland. She kept a very, very low profile...maybe used an assumed name.
That was all GOOD. She LEARNED, and now she's part of the Trump operation and now, for better or worse, part of the White House team. I have serious differences with her, also - she's very, very liberal - but what was done shows nothing but a father trying to teach his grown child the real-world of business.
Then there are all the spokeswomen and all the advisers and counselors in there who are female. No...I'm sorry, but the Democrats are going to have to spring for new cue cards. Trump is nothing they accuse him of.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16195389_1181498801886206_1374682643848981448_n.jpg?oh=6e4bedb1ef7ca5d034095a7335214710&oe=58FEF65F)
-
You just don't get it
Actually - I DO get it. I'm just looking at all of this through a prism you probably have no use for.
You imply that Trump won because a decadent electorate chose him as one of them. That's flipping moronic.
Is it?
I have had those exact words said to my face, typed in reply to posts made here and elsewhere - that Trump WAS THEM. They were choosing Trump - because he represents THEM in all aspects of his life and aspirations.
People like Cruz and Paul and Carson were said to be a worse evil than Trump.
If a Ronald Reagan-type had the same exact message as Trump did, he would be POTUS today.
WRONG. He would have been destroyed by the Establishment in concert with the media and the Alt Right as assuredly as Cruz was if not moreso.
Hell, your boy Trump would have flung as vitriolic demonizations as could be mustered to do to a Reagan that which was done to his opponents during this past campaign. Not only that, Reagan would NEVER have had the same exact message as Trump - because Reagan was not a lifelong Liberal Democrat espousing Nationalist Populism.
But that is what you folks want now. NOT what Reagan stood for and campaigned upon and governed as. You all wanted what Trump was promising, and threatening, and declaring - and applauded the manner and way in which he achieved it.
Reagan was a gentleman and a statesman.
Trump is neither of those things as evidenced in this past campaign and his tweeting history.
Instead, we got nothing but @txradioguy 's idea of the perfect candidate. The one who says "Barack Obama would make a fine POTUS"….
Excuse you?
It was Trump who said that Obama was going to make a fine president. trump said the same exact thing about Hillary too. It was Trump who VOTED for Obama and congratulated him on winning.
(http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/trumpobama.png)
Reagan would not have VOTED for Obama simply because he only wants to vote for 'winers' when that 'winner' was intent on destroying the principles that governed Reagan's life.
Jesus H. Christ!! You're hopeless.
If your intent is to persuade me to your way of thinking… then yes, such is a hopeless endeavor on your part.
-
@INVAR
The country does not want the kind of principled Christian Conservatism you and I are governed by. They want what we got.
Being a Christian Conservative is NOT the same thing as being a POLITICAL conservative. Your religion does NOT and should NOT run our government.
As such, Trump will get to skate on all his foibles as assuredly as Obama did among his acolytes and Conservatism as we once knew it gets relegated to irrelevance and extinction.
And dealing with the foibles of a religious government would be any better? Do you know ANYTHING about the historic corruption and police states created by organized religion all through history?
-
Can anyone tell me what this topic was all about.
Please recap.
No Power Point.
Slides are okay.
Thank you.
-
Can anyone tell me what this topic was all about.
Please recap.
No Power Point.
Slides are okay.
Thank you.
Hordes of cosplay catgirls?
-
Can anyone tell me what this topic was all about.
Please recap.
No Power Point.
Slides are okay.
Thank you.
@MOD4
Religious loons from the socialist fascist religion protesting against Trumps election. Their team lost,and they just can't stand it.
-
So Naked large women with funny hats have nothing to do with it?
@MOD4
Religious loons from the socialist fascist religion protesting against Trumps election. Their team lost,and they just can't stand it.
-
Can anyone tell me what this topic was all about.
Please recap.
No Power Point.
Slides are okay.
Thank you.
the site is stuck in the same daily "endless do-loop"
over and over
-
the site is stuck in the same daily "endless do-loop"
over and over
And you've done what exactly to help get it out of this mythical rut?
-
the site is stuck in the same daily "endless do-loop"
over and over
Be a de-looper. Refuse to play.
-
So Naked large women with funny hats have nothing to do with it?
@MOD4
Oh,yeah. They are some of the most visible religious loons on the left. Their religion is leftism.
Lots of men also running around wearing those cat hats,too.
Not that it really makes any difference at this point. Everybody has pretty much said everything they wanted to say at least twice,so closing it down would be a mercy killing.
-
Can anyone tell me what this topic was all about.
Please recap.
No Power Point.
Slides are okay.
Thank you.
Something about a March of Massive Women. Things got sort of cloudy after that, ossifer.
-
Something about a March of Massive Women. Things got sort of cloudy after that, ossifer.
Hmmmm..Lends new meaning to .... "get jiggy wit it"?
-
Hmmmm..Lends new meaning to .... "get jiggy wit it"?
It was a march of seismic proportions.
-
Hmmmm..Lends new meaning to .... "get jiggy wit it"?
Fo Shizzle, Mr. Nut. :thumbsup:
-
Being a Christian Conservative is NOT the same thing as being a POLITICAL conservative. Your religion does NOT and should NOT run our government.
First, did I say or suggest that we should be governed as a theocracy???
Being a Reagan Conservative means we are governed by biblical faith and creeds that establish the moral underpinnings of a civil society whereby liberty can exist; governed by the Declaration and the Constitution which keeps strict limits on the federal beast and upholds a distinct American culture and its values; and a defense policy that protects us against those in the world that wants a piece of us.
And dealing with the foibles of a religious government would be any better? Do you know ANYTHING about the historic corruption and police states created by organized religion all through history?
If course I do. Samuel Adams himself said that as the reformation got rid of popery in religion and enabled men to be self-governed and led by God without interference from the institutions of men, so too did he advocate getting rid of the popery in politics - in terms of ridding the notion of monarchy and sole rulers from the minds of men.
As a nation and people, we WERE governed by the moral and religious codes of the faith that established the civil society. You cannot have the kind of liberty intended for us in terms of a limited government with opportunity for all to pursue happiness without it. Because if that were possible, George Bushs' totally misguided idea to bring Constitutional liberty to Iraq would have succeeded. But it didn't and won't. It doesn't work anywhere else but here. And the reason for that is because of the kind of religious heritage and reverence we as a people once had for that which is now seen as an evil and considered totally unnecessary for freedom to exist.
So what we see in terms of our decline and divisions are a direct result of the distance we have put between ourselves and the foundational principles that forged us. INCLUDING the Christian faith that you hold so much disdain for, that is not entirely unwarranted.
-
Hmmmm..Lends new meaning to .... "get jiggy wit it"?
Jiggly, maybe...
-
Can anyone tell me what this topic was all about.
Please recap.
No Power Point.
Slides are okay.
Thank you.
I think it had something to do with hordes of ugly and/or overweight angry female Leftist Lesbians that wanted to warn us to keep our hands off their vaginas because they riot in formation and rule with nasty teeth.
At least that's what I kind of got out of reading about it.
(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2017/01/17/20170122_judd1.jpg)
(https://reujq2sar5z38mfxc343rf51-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Photo-Oct-12-8-08-42-AM-530x350.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2x7b6SWEAAzWe5.jpg)
-
So Naked large women with funny hats have nothing to do with it?
Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
-
And you've done what exactly to help get it out of this mythical rut?
Insinuate that this march was #nevertrump's fault, if history's any guide.
-
Women’s March Organizer Recently Met Ex-Hamas Operative, Has Family Ties To Terror Group
Linda Sarsour, one of the organizers behind Saturday’s Women’s March, being held in Washington, D.C., was recently spotted at a large Muslim convention in Chicago posing for pictures with an accused financier for Hamas, the terrorist group.
Sarsour, the head of the Arab American Association of New York and an Obama White House “Champion of Change,” was speaking at last month’s 15th annual convention of the Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle of North America.
While there, she posed for a picture with Salah Sarsour, a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and former Hamas operative who was jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of his alleged work for the terrorist group.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-organizer-recently-met-ex-hamas-operative-has-family-ties-to-terror-group/#ixzz4WasIlkKx
-
Well that explains the support for Sharia law at the protest.
The Libs take the whole "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" concept to some really ridiculous and dangerous extremes.
-
(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13606956_1012812532134263_3055566656102729113_n.jpg?oh=397abd9a9ee914fb5fd653c4aa9ba176&oe=59013522)
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p480x480/16195944_10154407204478473_6087941776275273692_n.jpg?oh=e138e1dcfb568276358f1f84742cae02&oe=59237BC9)
-
Classy bunch aren't they
-
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265552/anti-semite-who-organized-womens-march-washington-john-perazzo
(http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2017/01/linda.jpg?itok=mRee1HnJ)
It would be interesting to know how many of the useful idiots donning “bleep hats” at Saturday's massive “Women's March on Washington” had any idea—or even cared to know—who the principal organizers of the event were. The answer is undoubtedly close to zero, since the purpose of the entire charade—like all leftist charades—was merely to give the participants an opportunity to publicly signal their own moral superiority while smearing—as racists and fascists—anyone who doesn't accept socialism, identity politics, and perpetual grievance mongering as the ultimate expressions of the American Dream. But for those who actually have an aversion to mindless indoctrination, the facts will be rather disturbing.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p480x480/16195944_10154407204478473_6087941776275273692_n.jpg?oh=e138e1dcfb568276358f1f84742cae02&oe=59237BC9)
Salad hell...more like some Slimfast!
-
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265552/anti-semite-who-organized-womens-march-washington-john-perazzo
(http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2017/01/linda.jpg?itok=mRee1HnJ)
It would be interesting to know how many of the useful idiots donning “bleep hats” at Saturday's massive “Women's March on Washington” had any idea—or even cared to know—who the principal organizers of the event were. The answer is undoubtedly close to zero, since the purpose of the entire charade—like all leftist charades—was merely to give the participants an opportunity to publicly signal their own moral superiority while smearing—as racists and fascists—anyone who doesn't accept socialism, identity politics, and perpetual grievance mongering as the ultimate expressions of the American Dream. But for those who actually have an aversion to mindless indoctrination, the facts will be rather disturbing.
Watch Trump Protesters Try to Explain Specifically What They're Protesting
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/31/hannity-webb-video-trump-protesters-dont-know-why-they-are-protesting
-
Watch Trump Protesters Try to Explain Specifically What They're Protesting
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/31/hannity-webb-video-trump-protesters-dont-know-why-they-are-protesting
ROFLMAO!!! THAT is a riot!
88finger point 88finger point 88finger point
-
Look, the electorate who put Trump in office didn't give two shakes about Trump's inability to keep his wedding vows or his hands off other mens wives, nor all the crass demonizations he offered throughout the campaign - so what does that tell us about the character of the people in this country?
It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles stands a snow cone's chance in a blast furnace of ever being elected to high office in this country.
This people wanted either a traitor and criminal grifter or a crass and bombastic egomaniac for their ruler. So we got the latter.
The country does not want the kind of principled Christian Conservatism you and I are governed by. They want what we got.
As such, Trump will get to skate on all his foibles as assuredly as Obama did among his acolytes and Conservatism as we once knew it gets relegated to irrelevance and extinction.
Well said. I agree with everything you've said here.
The country got what it wanted, after they threw out all the principles that made us truly great.
Ronald Reagan wouldn't have a chance in this environment.
-
Look, the electorate who put Trump in office didn't give two shakes about Trump's inability to keep his wedding vows or his hands off other mens wives, nor all the crass demonizations he offered throughout the campaign - so what does that tell us about the character of the people in this country?
It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles stands a snow cone's chance in a blast furnace of ever being elected to high office in this country.
This people wanted either a traitor and criminal grifter or a crass and bombastic egomaniac for their ruler. So we got the latter.
The country does not want the kind of principled Christian Conservatism you and I are governed by. They want what we got.
As such, Trump will get to skate on all his foibles as assuredly as Obama did among his acolytes and Conservatism as we once knew it gets relegated to irrelevance and extinction.
In that I only disagree that Trump will be allowed to skate. The liberals will fight any and all measures or policies, and failing that, the man himself, in a distraction to ensure as many of their policies remain in place as possible. Even the lie about the MLK Jr. bust being removed was intended to incite the usual suspects, and despite having been exposed as a lie, the mental image so readily accepted has been graven in that Trump is somehow anti-black.
This keeps the usual groups squarely on the Democrat plantation, as does the 'war on women' theme which has been revitalized in all this.
I'm not saying not to see Trump for what he is, but I would not lend one erg of my energy to supporting or appearing to support anything that will so blatantly be used by the Leftists to ensure the status quo under Obama continues.
For Trump to stand in front of the memorial wall in the CIA Atrium and get sidetracked about attendance numbers was just stupid--not to mention disrespectful of the operatives who lost their lives in operations still so secret their names aren't even up there. It doesn't fricking matter if the whole ceremony only played out to security forces and a few hot dog vendors, he is POTUS now, and it's time to act like it.
Conspicuous whiners and protesters will be the order of the day, as they ever have been. You didn't see it with Obama because it was not reported (recall the TEA Party marches over a million strong reported as "thousands" of people..).
-
Jesus H. Christ!! You're hopeless.
For a no-religion forum, you sure spend a lot of time invoking my deity.
Quit that disrespect, if you don't mind.
-
It was a march of seismic proportions.
Actually, I was wondering what that herd would do to a bridge if they marched in step across it....'Galloping Gertie' comes to mind and visions of resonant structural failure could haunt the folks on the lower Potomac for eons...(Whales don't normally beach that far inland).
-
I can't speak for the other; but what I for one am saying is, the election is OVER.
Given the chance to nominate someone else, the Republican voters passed on it.
Given the choice between Trump and that woman dying of Parkinsons and drowning in embezzlement and graft...there was no choice but to pick Trump.
The election is over. What he did in the past, is not relevant anymore.
If he misbehaves in office, that's a valid discussion. What has he done, in the last 30 hours, that might raise your hackles?
Drudging up old innuendo and dark whisperings, does nothing - except empower the Democrats, and we've seen that conga line of freaks...empower them in continuing their Leftist destruction of what remains of the nation.
DO you want THAT?
What a curious question you bring up. Why would you conclude something so absurd from anything I've discussed here?
What is missing from your odd scenario is that I haven't at all been referring to "old innuendo and dark whisperings."
I have been talking about character and integrity.......... qualities that used to be desired in our leaders (at least on the Republican side).
(I actually think it's hilarious that there have been histrionics and nonsense about "religious fascism" and "church lady" smears when what I have been talking about is respect for women, which conservatives used to believe was to be valued).
I DO, however, understand that character is no longer part of the equation in selecting a Presidential nominee in either party. The absence of integrity in his attitude toward women is only a fraction of Trump's problem. His lack of character and truthfulness in other things is more of an issue.
And that is precisely why I no longer am a Republican.
-
Watch Trump Protesters Try to Explain Specifically What They're Protesting
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/31/hannity-webb-video-trump-protesters-dont-know-why-they-are-protesting
Their professors are doing a bang up job teaching them what to think and not how. (http://f1.ifrm.com/13592/198/emo/crazy2.gif)
-
For a no-religion forum, you sure spend a lot of time invoking my deity.
Quit that disrespect, if you don't mind.
I bowed my head when I typed it. :whistle:
-
Oh.............. and two more questions open for anyone, before I leave to get something accomplished today....
1. Since when has treating women with respect become a "Christian only" concept? Are we to assume by some of the comments here that no one who is non-Christian treats women well?
2. When did it become policy to stop criticizing anyone simply because he/she took political office? And how long does this "you can't criticize him because he's better than Hillary and he's President" policy last? A year? Four years?? Forever??
Just curious.
-
What a curious question you bring up. Why would you conclude something so absurd from anything I've discussed here?
What is missing from your odd scenario is that I haven't at all been referring to "old innuendo and dark whisperings."
I have been talking about character and integrity.......... qualities that used to be desired in our leaders (at least on the Republican side).
(I actually think it's hilarious that there have been histrionics and nonsense about "religious fascism" and "church lady" smears when what I have been talking about is respect for women, which conservatives used to believe was to be valued).
I DO, however, understand that character is no longer part of the equation in selecting a Presidential nominee in either party. The absence of integrity in his attitude toward women is only a fraction of Trump's problem. His lack of character and truthfulness in other things is more of an issue.
And that is precisely why I no longer am a Republican.
When the machinations of the GOP ensured we had no voice, no vote in the primaries in this state, I was done. Their mailings are summarily discarded, unopened.
As for the new POTUS, you have not been alone in noting his character and 'alternate facts', and the only hope that exists short of Divine Intervention is that we can hold his feet to the fire and get him to implement or support the policies we approve of, and not follow up on the ones we disapprove of--and that includes his behaviour. However, let's not ignore that two of the seminal themes used by the Left to keep people on their plantation are the alleged "Conservative" (actually, GOP, but "Conservative has been conflated with "Republican") War on Women and the meme of 'keeping blacks down', both such effective emotional tools that they lock in demographics for the very people who engage in both: The Democrat Party.
That leaves real Conservatives between a rock and a hard place. If we protest, we lend support to the very people we disdain and the themes which strengthen our enemies on the left. If we support someone who has a track record which appears to justify the leftists, we strengthen their meme. We aren't even on that segment of the political spectrum, because we are farther to the Right.
We have to go issue by issue and make our specific problems known, not with the support (other than incidentally) of those others, not appearing to side with abortionists, feminazis, and people who would dress as vaginas, but with a clearer and uncompromised message.
That will have to be done at this point on the basis of what he does going forward, not his past. We are free to retain the well-earned distrust for him for his past behaviour, including that during the primaries, and KNOW those tactics are never off the table with him, but I think his narcissism will prove to be more of a problem in the long haul.
-
When the machinations of the GOP ensured we had no voice, no vote in the primaries in this state, I was done. Their mailings are summarily discarded, unopened.
As for the new POTUS, you have not been alone in noting his character and 'alternate facts', and the only hope that exists short of Divine Intervention is that we can hold his feet to the fire and get him to implement or support the policies we approve of, and not follow up on the ones we disapprove of--and that includes his behaviour. However, let's not ignore that two of the seminal themes used by the Left to keep people on their plantation are the alleged "Conservative" (actually, GOP, but "Conservative has been conflated with "Republican") War on Women and the meme of 'keeping blacks down', both such effective emotional tools that they lock in demographics for the very people who engage in both: The Democrat Party.
That leaves real Conservatives between a rock and a hard place. If we protest, we lend support to the very people we disdain and the themes which strengthen our enemies on the left. If we support someone who has a track record which appears to justify the leftists, we strengthen their meme. We aren't even on that segment of the political spectrum, because we are farther to the Right.
We have to go issue by issue and make our specific problems known, not with the support (other than incidentally) of those others, not appearing to side with abortionists, feminazis, and people who would dress as vaginas, but with a clearer and uncompromised message.
That will have to be done at this point on the basis of what he does going forward, not his past. We are free to retain the well-earned distrust for him for his past behaviour, including that during the primaries, and KNOW those tactics are never off the table with him, but I think his narcissism will prove to be more of a problem in the long haul.
The only problem I have with anything you've said is that he's no longer going to be doing interviews with Howard Stern and Billy Bush where he brags about debasing women, so that's not something likely to rear its ugly head "going forward."
However, it does continue to inform us as to who he is as a person (it's not like he was a teenager when he said those things).
I completely agree that we, as conservatives are between a rock and a hard place, and I'm having trouble right now with the fact that this sordid being, who embodies the leftist caricature of conservatives, which has been a lie in the past, is now 'proving' them to be right.
The most important issue to me, among many important issues, is that I am unflinchingly pro-life. The vast majority of marchers yesterday worship abortion. But not all....
There were pro-life women who risked their well-being to march alongside these evil, hateful people.
That has to say something to all of us about the nature of the problem we have here......
-
(https://media.giphy.com/media/XDS6gnQ4ZOqhW/giphy.gif)
-
The only problem I have with anything you've said is that he's no longer going to be doing interviews with Howard Stern and Billy Bush where he brags about debasing women, so that's not something likely to rear its ugly head "going forward."
Oh, the interviews won't, but that meme will persist from the left. Unless he messes up and reinforces that from here, the trap is that to use that part of his past against him reinforces the rabid elements on the Left. I won't do that, either, though I have not forgotten his past behaviour.
However, it does continue to inform us as to who he is as a person (it's not like he was a teenager when he said those things).
Precisely. We know what we know. I completely agree that we, as conservatives are between a rock and a hard place, and I'm having trouble right now with the fact that this sordid being, who embodies the leftist caricature of conservatives, which has been a lie in the past, is now 'proving' them to be right.
We saw this coming. The trick is not to strengthen that which we abhor, on either end of that segment of the political spectrum. The most important issue to me, among many important issues, is that I am unflinchingly pro-life. The vast majority of marchers yesterday worship abortion. But not all....
There were pro-life women who risked their well-being to march alongside these evil, hateful people.
That has to say something to all of us about the nature of the problem we have here......
Yes, it does. Unfortunately, their numbers will be added to the reprehensible majority who were there to promote abortion, push the 'war on women' theme, the Homosexual agenda, and do the SJW thing.
Being counted among those doing wrong does not make a 'right', unfortunately, and it only lends credence to a different (yet much the same) enemy.
What person claiming to support 'women's rights' would advocate an operation in which half or more of those operated on will die (two go in, one comes out), and, statistically speaking, half of whom are female? Twenty Five Million murdered women since Roe isn't a 'war on women'? Not to mention the aftereffects on those who have a "successful procedure".
I would propose that Conservative women who have issues with Trump conduct their own protests, without the leaven of pro-aborts, Homosexualists, and the usual Leftist whackos. Instead of swelling those ranks, stand and be counted as a clear alternative instead of being stirred in with people you'd consider protesting against.
-
It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles stands a snow cone's chance in a blast furnace of ever being elected to high office in this country.
Reagan as well known as a bed jumper back in the day before he married Nancy, bedded numerous actresses-over 50. He admitted he had a very high sex drive when he dated Susan Haywood when she said she had a high sex drive and Reagan said finally he met women whose sex drive matched his. When he broke his thigh he was dating Marilyn Monroe and she would sneak into the hospital and have sex with him.
Actress Piper Laurie said she lost her virginity to Regan when she was 18 and he 39 on the movie she filmed with him.
John Wayne was a serial adulterer. He had sex with hundreds of women while he was married. Most are listed on the public divorce documents from his 3 wives and it was well known he would go to wild sex parties.
Our heroes were not as snow white as they appear. There was no cell phone cameras and no TMZ back then and journalist kept their mouths shut.
This is why I give Trump some benefit of doubt. The only perfect person died 2000 years ago.
@INVAR
@DCPatriot
-
Oh, the interviews won't, but that meme will persist from the left. Unless he messes up and reinforces that from here, the trap is that to use that part of his past against him reinforces the rabid elements on the Left. I won't do that, either, though I have not forgotten his past behaviour.Precisely. We know what we know. We saw this coming. The trick is not to strengthen that which we abhor, on either end of that segment of the political spectrum. Yes, it does. Unfortunately, their numbers will be added to the reprehensible majority who were there to promote abortion, push the 'war on women' theme, the Homosexual agenda, and do the SJW thing.
Being counted among those doing wrong does not make a 'right', unfortunately, and it only lends credence to a different (yet much the same) enemy.
What person claiming to support 'women's rights' would advocate an operation in which half or more of those operated on will die (two go in, one comes out), and, statistically speaking, half of whom are female? Twenty Five Million murdered women since Roe isn't a 'war on women'? Not to mention the aftereffects on those who have a "successful procedure".
I would propose that Conservative women who have issues with Trump conduct their own protests, without the leaven of pro-aborts, Homosexualists, and the usual Leftist whackos. Instead of swelling those ranks, stand and be counted as a clear alternative instead of being stirred in with people you'd consider protesting against.
I'm with you entirely on most of this, as I have been a strong pro-life advocate, speaking out about how abortion itself is the "war on women," including femicide in many countries, the deaths of millions of innocent babies, and the permanent damage done, emotionally and physically from having ANY abortion.
I completely agree that this was not the venue to associate with (again, just stating why some conservative and moderate pro-life women DID choose to march). These people are evil and have perpetrated much evil on this country.
As for Trump...... I suppose that he won't be barging in on naked beauty contestants or bragging about his escapades to lewd talk show hosts in the next four years, but since we have no indication of his repentance for his serial adultery or abuse of women, and since his wife will not be in the WH with him, one can only hope the young female interns keep their doors locked, or at least keep their distance from his grasp.
If they do, we may not hear any future news about this gaping character flaw of his, but that certainly doesn't mean that it no longer exists, and is no longer an issue, nor does it mean, in my opinion, that we, as conservatives, should be silent as though it doesn't matter any more since he "won."
For me, it is hypocritical to have made an issue of Bill Clinton's lack of character, and forget about Trump's just because he falsely put an "R" after his name and was elected President.
-
I guess you'll just have to settle for having a Conservative majority in the SCOTUS for the next 30 years.
-
I guess you'll just have to settle for having a Conservative majority in the SCOTUS for the next 30 years.
We don't even know who Trump's nominee is going to be. He could re-nominate Garland for all we know.
-
We don't even know who Trump's nominee is going to be. He could re-nominate Garland for all we know.
At least so far, looks like Trump is delivering, so I'm cautiously optimistic that he'll nail his SCOTUS picks.
-
We don't even know who Trump's nominee is going to be. He could re-nominate Garland for all we know.
Signing damn good pro conservative legislation today.
@jmyrlefuller
-
As for Trump...... I suppose that he won't be barging in on naked beauty contestants or bragging about his escapades to lewd talk show hosts in the next four years, but since we have no indication of his repentance for his serial adultery or abuse of women, and since his wife will not be in the WH with him, one can only hope the young female interns keep their doors locked, or at least keep their distance from his grasp.
In the event of any improprieties in that regard, we will never be heard over the rancor of the Left. They would use such to destroy him or damage him as much as possible (even though the whole Perjury and Obstruction of Justice thing Bill Clinton did was >wink wink< "just about sex".)
That's how the left rolls, and the already hostile leftist media will be on him like white on rice.
Unfortunately, that won't be attributed to his more liberal past, but will be used to defame Republicans and especially Conservatives, who would be just as quick to attack such behaviour.
At that point much depends on the 'legacy' he wants--whether MAGA trumps 'bringing down the GOPe'. I don't know, but I reckon we're going to find out.
If they do, we may not hear any future news about this gaping character flaw of his, but that certainly doesn't mean that it no longer exists, and is no longer an issue, nor does it mean, in my opinion, that we, as conservatives, should be silent as though it doesn't matter any more since he "won."
Right now, I will not add my voice to the other enemy in the ring--the Liberals. My reasons (as are yours) for opposition to Trump (the person, for his track record) remain, but they are not the reason the Liberals oppose him. I won't add to their protest, I won't validate that which I find objectionable to object to something else, even if that is the same thing. The enemy of my enemy is often just the enemy of my enemy, not my friend.
No, I am willing to look at the situation this way. He is now POTUS. He has a new job. I expect him to conduct himself within that term of employment in such a fashion as to bring honor and respect to the Office of the President of the United States of America. His behaviour in his past employment is irrelevant at this point, though it was relevant during the hiring process and ignored by a sufficient number pf people. Now, we have what we have.
During the hiring process, he made certain promises, set goals, and those are listed (in part) here: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,233460.0.html
(http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,233460.0.html) Within the constraints of conduct befitting his position and reflecting upon this nation, I will measure his success/failure on the basis of how well he performs the very tasks which he said he will do.
That is not a statement of faith in him, nor of abject support, but a metric by which his progress can be measured and one which it cannot be argued is unfair, as he set those goals himself. Within the framework of his employ, let his veracity, his effectiveness, his 'greatness' be measured by those.
In the meantime, we remain vigilant, we pray he is changed by the responsibilities of the office for the better, and we stay true to our own principles. He is already making JV blunders which are innate to his personality.
-
Signing damn good pro conservative legislation today.
@jmyrlefuller
I like the fact that at least so far, Trump is dancing with the ones that brought him, and not trying to reach out to the other side.
-
I like the fact that at least so far, Trump is dancing with the ones that brought him, and not trying to reach out to the other side.
I'll admit that, these few days in... But then, so did Dubya off the get-go.
-
Reagan as well known as a bed jumper back in the day before he married Nancy, bedded numerous actresses-over 50. He admitted he had a very high sex drive when he dated Susan Haywood when she said she had a high sex drive and Reagan said finally he met women whose sex drive matched his. When he broke his thigh he was dating Marilyn Monroe and she would sneak into the hospital and have sex with him.
Actress Piper Laurie said she lost her virginity to Regan when she was 18 and he 39 on the movie she filmed with him.
John Wayne was a serial adulterer. He had sex with hundreds of women while he was married. Most are listed on the public divorce documents from his 3 wives and it was well known he would go to wild sex parties.
Our heroes were not as snow white as they appear. There was no cell phone cameras and no TMZ back then and journalist kept their mouths shut.
This is why I give Trump some benefit of doubt. The only perfect person died 2000 years ago.
You know, it used to be the Left that trotted out the sins and indiscretions of others to insist that Bill Clinton's sexual escapades in the Oval Orifice were immaterial.
Now it's those who self-identify as Conservatives doing the same thing, for Trump.
-
Reagan as well known as a bed jumper back in the day before he married Nancy, bedded numerous actresses-over 50. He admitted he had a very high sex drive when he dated Susan Haywood when she said she had a high sex drive and Reagan said finally he met women whose sex drive matched his. When he broke his thigh he was dating Marilyn Monroe and she would sneak into the hospital and have sex with him.
Actress Piper Laurie said she lost her virginity to Regan when she was 18 and he 39 on the movie she filmed with him.
John Wayne was a serial adulterer. He had sex with hundreds of women while he was married. Most are listed on the public divorce documents from his 3 wives and it was well known he would go to wild sex parties.
Our heroes were not as snow white as they appear. There was no cell phone cameras and no TMZ back then and journalist kept their mouths shut.
This is why I give Trump some benefit of doubt. The only perfect person died 2000 years ago.
@INVAR
@DCPatriot
Good find, @mirraflake !
You'd better edit your post.....somebody is sure to run in to correct you. It was 1986 years ago, this coming April (according to the current calendar) :laugh:
-
The only perfect person died 2000 years ago.
He ain't dead.
-
He ain't dead.
:beer:
-
You know, it used to be the Left that trotted out the sins and indiscretions of others to insist that Bill Clinton's sexual escapades in the Oval Orifice were immaterial.
Now it's those who self-identify as Conservatives doing the same thing, for Trump.
You said this: It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles
I just pointed out Reagan had some wild past and was not the paragon of moral virtue you think he was. I give Trump the same leeway.
If Trump does something in office (adultery etc) I will be the first to skewer him.
@INVAR
@DCPatriot
@sneakypete
-
You said this: It tells me that a person of Reagan's character and principles
I just pointed out Reagan had some wild past and was not the paragon of moral virtue you think he was. I give Trump the same leeway.
Reagan did not brag about his sins, or flaunt them. Reagan never demonized his opponents, made up despicable accusations to get himself ahead in the polls and spent weeks bashing those who dared to dis him.
Trump did. That lack of moral character was on full display during the primaries and the campaign. Giving leeway to a man without demonstrable principles that go beyond self, is not wise. It's as stupid as hiring a convicted sex offender, who bragged about his crimes in prison, to tutor your teenage daughter simply because you think his teaching qualifications are more important than his character.
That said, Trump was selected and sits on the Oval Office, despite my warrantable concerns. I will applaud Trump when he serves the interests of Conservative principles and the Constitution - and I will eviscerate him when he demonstrates harm to the same.
Because I have such negative expectations of his tenure in office - when he does well, I get to enjoy the feeling of pleasant surprise.
Let us hope that becomes the norm over the next 4 years.
-
What a curious question you bring up. Why would you conclude something so absurd from anything I've discussed here?
What is missing from your odd scenario is that I haven't at all been referring to "old innuendo and dark whisperings."
I have been talking about character and integrity.......... qualities that used to be desired in our leaders (at least on the Republican side).
(I actually think it's hilarious that there have been histrionics and nonsense about "religious fascism" and "church lady" smears when what I have been talking about is respect for women, which conservatives used to believe was to be valued).
I DO, however, understand that character is no longer part of the equation in selecting a Presidential nominee in either party. The absence of integrity in his attitude toward women is only a fraction of Trump's problem. His lack of character and truthfulness in other things is more of an issue.
And that is precisely why I no longer am a Republican.
Fine.
Now AFTER the election, you want to join in with the Left in fomenting chaos...which will lead to nothing getting done. Or, more accurately, nothing getting UN-done.
So the economy slides more; the world gets more dangerous with China and Russia and the Islamic crazies all testing, pushing, and conquering and slaughtering.
And then, smirky Chucky Schumer can go on and hammer Trump for being a "Do-Nothing."
And then in 2020, we get Timmy Sandinista Kaine, or Squaw Warren...all ready to drive home the Beauties of Socialism.
DO you want THAT? Whether you like it or not, and I sure don't...the only thing that stands between us and a Venezuelan collapse is the current, non-Marxist President.
And until he starts violating laws or decency in the White House, I'll guardedly support him.
I suggest you do the same, lest you wan to help the Left.
-
Yes, Trump isn't Reagan, we get it!
-
He ain't dead.
Perhaps the most important post on this thread.
Thanks, @roamer_1 !
-
Fine.
Now AFTER the election, you want to join in with the Left in fomenting chaos...which will lead to nothing getting done. Or, more accurately, nothing getting UN-done.
So the economy slides more; the world gets more dangerous with China and Russia and the Islamic crazies all testing, pushing, and conquering and slaughtering.
And then, smirky Chucky Schumer can go on and hammer Trump for being a "Do-Nothing."
And then in 2020, we get Timmy Sandinista Kaine, or Squaw Warren...all ready to drive home the Beauties of Socialism.
DO you want THAT? Whether you like it or not, and I sure don't...the only thing that stands between us and a Venezuelan collapse is the current, non-Marxist President.
And until he starts violating laws or decency in the White House, I'll guardedly support him.
I suggest you do the same, lest you wan to help the Left.
Nothing in your post accurately reflects a single thing I have said on this thread, or elsewhere, nor what I have ever thought.
I suggest you keep your imagination to yourself and not project it on others.
Nothing I say or think helps the left in any way, shape or form, your reckless accusations notwithstanding.
The left was helped when Trump became our nominee. Pretending he isn't what he is, is neither honest, nor conservative.
I'm not doing that, and it most certainly doesn't make me a leftist because I won't.
Again............. your entire post is made up of false assumptions and an erroneous imagination.
-
In the event of any improprieties in that regard, we will never be heard over the rancor of the Left. They would use such to destroy him or damage him as much as possible (even though the whole Perjury and Obstruction of Justice thing Bill Clinton did was >wink wink< "just about sex".)
That's how the left rolls, and the already hostile leftist media will be on him like white on rice.
Unfortunately, that won't be attributed to his more liberal past, but will be used to defame Republicans and especially Conservatives, who would be just as quick to attack such behaviour.
At that point much depends on the 'legacy' he wants--whether MAGA trumps 'bringing down the GOPe'. I don't know, but I reckon we're going to find out. Right now, I will not add my voice to the other enemy in the ring--the Liberals. My reasons (as are yours) for opposition to Trump (the person, for his track record) remain, but they are not the reason the Liberals oppose him. I won't add to their protest, I won't validate that which I find objectionable to object to something else, even if that is the same thing. The enemy of my enemy is often just the enemy of my enemy, not my friend.
No, I am willing to look at the situation this way. He is now POTUS. He has a new job. I expect him to conduct himself within that term of employment in such a fashion as to bring honor and respect to the Office of the President of the United States of America. His behaviour in his past employment is irrelevant at this point, though it was relevant during the hiring process and ignored by a sufficient number pf people. Now, we have what we have.
During the hiring process, he made certain promises, set goals, and those are listed (in part) here: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,233460.0.html
(http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,233460.0.html) Within the constraints of conduct befitting his position and reflecting upon this nation, I will measure his success/failure on the basis of how well he performs the very tasks which he said he will do.
That is not a statement of faith in him, nor of abject support, but a metric by which his progress can be measured and one which it cannot be argued is unfair, as he set those goals himself. Within the framework of his employ, let his veracity, his effectiveness, his 'greatness' be measured by those.
In the meantime, we remain vigilant, we pray he is changed by the responsibilities of the office for the better, and we stay true to our own principles. He is already making JV blunders which are innate to his personality.
I completely concur that the reasons you and I oppose Trump are not even remotely related to the rantings, idiocy, and evil of the left. In fact, what we believe is the polar opposite of what they believe. What we believe in is good and what they stand for is pure evil.
I think we will have to agree to disagree, however, on how silent and patient we should be about Trump's lack of integrity.
I may stand alone on this forum in believing we need to continue to address his liberalism and amorality, but I'm OK with that.
It won't be the first time I stood alone in what I think and believe, and as long as the discussion is reasonable and honest, I enjoy the discourse.
Thanks for a good conversation, @Smokin Joe . I appreciate mature disagreement and adult conversation more than I can express. I've seen enough childish histrionics on this thread to last a lifetime......
-
Nothing in your post accurately reflects a single thing I have said on this thread, or elsewhere, nor what I have ever thought.
I suggest you keep your imagination to yourself and not project it on others.
Nothing I say or think helps the left in any way, shape or form, your reckless accusations notwithstanding.
The left was helped when Trump became our nominee. Pretending he isn't what he is, is neither honest, nor conservative.
I'm not doing that, and it most certainly doesn't make me a leftist because I won't.
Again............. your entire post is made up of false assumptions and an erroneous imagination.
Nope.
The election is over. Trump has been vetted, for better or worse.
Attacking his background NOW...only aids the nihilist Left.
Attack his proposals and present actions. Or else let it go.
You haven't yet told me how it is Trump is misogynist...he who gave big jobs to dozens of women, who helped his own daughter learn the real estate business - the hard way, the real way.
Since you ignore that, and keep on thumping the tub, repeating the rote accusations of the DemocRats...it makes me wonder as to your real motives.
-
Nothing in your post accurately reflects a single thing I have said on this thread, or elsewhere, nor what I have ever thought.
I suggest you keep your imagination to yourself and not project it on others.
Nothing I say or think helps the left in any way, shape or form, your reckless accusations notwithstanding.
The left was helped when Trump became our nominee. Pretending he isn't what he is, is neither honest, nor conservative.
I'm not doing that, and it most certainly doesn't make me a leftist because I won't.
Again............. your entire post is made up of false assumptions and an erroneous imagination.
You admitted this yesterday:
As I said....... I say what I think, completely rationally and relevant to the thread topic, and they attack me personally.
I am criticizing Trump. They are personally smearing me.
You are helping the left when you continually criticize Trump. Trump today signed anti abortion legislation today and crickets from you. So much for him being pro abortion as you said he was yesterday.
@musiclady
@JustPassinThru
-
And I'm getting really sick of hearing, "Yeah, but Clinton . . . " It's over and nothing will ever be done about Bill's sexual misconduct and alleged sex crimes. As conservatives we cannot justify lowering our standards because the other side did it. That's what liberals do: make excuses.
This is true. (To attempt to justify it on these grounds would be a good example of the tu quoque fallacy.)
But I think that some people are noting--reasonably enough, I believe--that there is a double standard at work here.
And that double standard is (both morally and intellectually) indefensible...
-
This is true. (To attempt to justify it on these grounds would be a good example of the tu quoque fallacy.)
But I think that some people are noting--reasonably enough, I believe--that there is a double standard at work here.
And that double standard is (both morally and intellectually) indefensible...
You hit the nail on the head.
-
Even though there were leftist loons and awful, vulgar, fat, angry "feminists" there doesn't mean the entire march can be dismissed out of hand.
Again, very true.
The fallacy here would be known as guilt by association. (The fact that some very undesirable types support X does not automatically guarantee that X is wrong.)
Yet it is interesting to me that only leftist types were there (including the washed-up feminist icon, Gloria Steinem); whereas more conservative types--such as pro-life women--were automatically excluded...
-
Nope.
The election is over. Trump has been vetted, for better or worse.
Attacking his background NOW...only aids the nihilist Left.
Attack his proposals and present actions. Or else let it go.
You haven't yet told me how it is Trump is misogynist...he who gave big jobs to dozens of women, who helped his own daughter learn the real estate business - the hard way, the real way.
Since you ignore that, and keep on thumping the tub, repeating the rote accusations of the DemocRats...it makes me wonder as to your real motives.
Interesting, your giving me advice based on your errant imagination and false assumptions. Unfortunately, I don't take advice from willfully ignorant people.
As for my "motivations".......... I am an across the board conservative (including social and moral conservatism), who despises the left, and an honest person who speaks my mind. I value integrity and point it out when it's not there.
I will continue to do so even if people who choose not to read the actual words call it "thumping the tub" and insinuate that I am somehow a leftist because I don't agree with liberalism.
Enough of this pretzel talk. When you have something legitimate to contribute, give me a buzz.....
:seeya:
-
Again, very true.
The fallacy here would be known as guilt by association. (The fact that some very undesirable types support X does not automatically guarantee that X is wrong.)
Yet it is interesting to me that only leftist types were there (including the washed-up feminist icon, Gloria Steinem); whereas more conservative types--such as pro-life women--were automatically excluded...
They were officially excluded, but they showed up anyway. That's why I have said the entire march should not be dismissed out of hand. It wasn't only leftists who showed up.
I agree with those who have said we shouldn't associate ourselves with the evil, pro-abortion nasty left, but my point all along is that they weren't the only ones represented there, and THAT is what we shouldn't dismiss.
-
You are helping the left when you continually criticize Trump.
I'm calling that suggestion abject Horseshitte and Bovine excrement. Same crap was said when we were bashing Bush for his Mexican immigration positions and his "I've abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system".
We are not stormtroopers for a cult of personality here - criticizing a politician is our duty because liberty warrants that we remain wholly skeptical and circumspect of any and every proposal, act and statement that may impact it.
We can cheer and applaud when our principles are serviced, and attack with vicious abandon when those principles are threatened or acted against.
We don't give a damn if it "helps the left" in your estimation. We don't goosestep to leaders in this country.
At least I don't.
-
They were officially excluded, but they showed up anyway. That's why I have said the entire march should not be dismissed out of hand. It wasn't only leftists who showed up.
I agree with those who have said we shouldn't associate ourselves with the evil, pro-abortion nasty left, but my point all along is that they weren't the only ones represented there, and THAT is what we shouldn't dismiss.
BS If there was conservative women there the liberal media would have gleefully pointed it out and made herculean efforts to do so. I have looked at hundreds of photos of the marches.. nothing but man hating feminist, anti USA bunch and general weirdos and misfits.
I have tons of friends on FB not a single conservative woman I know went but the liberal women I know pointed out they went.
@musiclady
-
News Flash: @mirraflake lies!
Here is a link to the comment you are referencing: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,241808.0.html
Nobody, and I mean nobody, called those women you referenced skanks and whores. In fact, nobody said anything negative about them.
Why did you slander TBR, @mirraflake ? :nono: **nononono*
There really isn't a link to a different thread, is there @mirraflake **nononono*
-
@mirraflake
@INVAR
@DCPatriot
@musiclady
I wish the 4 of you would get a cage match going somewhere. I could make a mint selling tickets.
-
@mirraflake
@INVAR
@DCPatriot
@musiclady
I wish the 4 of you would get a cage match going somewhere. I could make a mint selling tickets.
I have two of the three others on IGNORE, so I haven't got a clue as to what nasty things they're saying to me. The one guy keeps pinging me, but hasn't figured out yet that I have no interest whatsoever in his opinions. even though I never respond to his taunts.
At any rate, no cage match is necessary, although if there were one, I'm pretty sure I would be in the one in the cage and the two of them would be throwing rotten tomatoes in my face. ****slapping
But you could sell tickets to that! You could still make money, I'll bet, though I think only three or four here would buy tickets. I'm pretty sure they'd buy a bunch each though cause I make em real mad, so give it a try!
-
Students for Life were there. Needless to say, their message wasn't welcomed. If you're on Facebook, search for them. They posted photos.
-
Students for Life were there. Needless to say, their message wasn't welcomed. If you're on Facebook, search for them. They posted photos.
Thanks.
-
@mirraflake
@INVAR
@DCPatriot
@musiclady
I wish the 4 of you would get a cage match going somewhere. I could make a mint selling tickets.
If only arguing about liberty, Constitutional principles and limited government was so entertaining to the masses.
The Kardashians are about as deep as most folks are willing to get.
-
I have two of the three others on IGNORE, so I haven't got a clue as to what nasty things they're saying to me. The one guy keeps pinging me, but hasn't figured out yet that I have no interest whatsoever in his opinions. even though I never respond to his taunts.
At any rate, no cage match is necessary, although if there were one, I'm pretty sure I would be in the one in the cage and the two of them would be throwing rotten tomatoes in my face. ****slapping
But you could sell tickets to that! You could still make money, I'll bet, though I think only three or four here would buy tickets. I'm pretty sure they'd buy a bunch each though cause I make em real mad, so give it a try!
They want to take their shirts off but I told them that ship sailed for them years and years ago.
I get 80% of the gate if we move forward!.. Contract are in the mail.
-
If only arguing about liberty, Constitutional principles and limited government was so entertaining to the masses.
The Kardashians are about as deep as most folks are willing to get.
Hey cool. I came here for the Fat Women though.
-
They want to take their shirts off but I told them that ship sailed for them years and years ago.
I get 80% of the gate if we move forward!.. Contract are in the mail.
I want the concessions contract.
-
Students for Life were there. Needless to say, their message wasn't welcomed. If you're on Facebook, search for them. They posted photos.
They were there to protest against abortion, not Donald Trump.
@mountaineer
-
I want the concessions contract.
We might be able to reach an agreement on that. Coke or Pepsi
-
Students for Life were there. Needless to say, their message wasn't welcomed. If you're on Facebook, search for them. They posted photos.
Spit at and signs torn up....... leftists are such nice people, aren't they? They are the epitome of evil, IMO.
Those Students for Life are some brave, brave women!
"Abortion Betrays Women"............... excellent sign!
-
I'm scouring photo's of this Massive march for a possible Under card Match. Can you guys post up some potential candidates.
@Frank Cannon @catfish1957 @mrpotatohead must have a few in mind
-
They want to take their shirts off but I told them that ship sailed for them years and years ago.
I get 80% of the gate if we move forward!.. Contract are in the mail.
Thanks for the "No shirt no service" policy.
Even if I'm being force fed tomatoes, I want to keep my lunch down.....
Ya know what I mean??
-
There really isn't a link to a different thread, is there @mirraflake **nononono*
Here is the the thread. Ok no one came out and called them skanks or whores. I exaggerated. I will admit went overboard in my speech.
YOU however did say they (the women I was referring to) were not conservative when you do not know them. The general thought from other posters(not all) was that people don't act that way when in fact women when they get in groups are just as vile as men in sexual talk about the opposite sex. Yes, even conservative, Republican women.
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,228659.msg1084538.html#msg1084538
@goodwithagun
-
They were there to protest against abortion, not Donald Trump.
@mountaineer
I realize that.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
I'm eyeballing one right now.
-
We might be able to reach an agreement on that. Coke or Pepsi
Well being that I'm from Texas...Coke...means both Coke and Pepsi...and Dr. Pepper...and Sprite so I'll go with all of the above.
-
Well being that I'm from Texas...Coke...means both Coke and Pepsi...and Dr. Pepper...and Sprite so I'll go with all of the above.
Alrighty then. Shiner or Pearl or Lonestar?
-
Hey cool. I came here for the Fat Women though.
Hopefully, you mean the "Fat Women" thread and are not implying anything about your fellow posters?
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
I'm eyeballing one right now.
I just threw up a little in my mouth just now.
How do you get past the gag-reflex?
You must have a cast-iron stomach… or are kinky beyond your years.
-
I can't believe there has been 421 replies to a thread about a bunch of moronic women protesting Trump. I'm so tired of hearing about pu$$ygate that I could scream. No person in her right mind was offended by what he said. He spoke the damned truth. There are women that will sell themselves, throw themselves at men simply because the man has money and power. This speaks more of worthless women to me than men. Until women value themselves, they will always be the butt end of a joke and deservedly so.
Years ago, Eddie Murphy did a routine about how once he became famous, women would throw their P's at him like they were Frisbees.
-
Hopefully, you mean the "Fat Women" thread and are not implying anything about your fellow posters?
oooppps. Sangs Sangs, you give me pangs!
Yeah.. What you said! The marchers
-
I just threw up a little in my mouth just now.
How do you get past the gag-reflex?
You must have a cast-iron stomach… or are kinky beyond your years.
Naw. I just focus on the rose between that black forest of thorns, gelatinous thighs and poison oak.
Did you notice the little redhead... upper left .... in the green top..... Now you know my secret!
-
I'll remind you fellows that I own the exclusive rights to all popcorn sold at TBR matches.
:2popcorn:
-
Hopefully, you mean the "Fat Women" thread and are not implying anything about your fellow posters?
Hey, it's right there in the title: "Massive Women."
-
Naw. I just focus on the rose between that black forest of thorns, gelatinous thighs and poison oak.
Did you notice the little redhead... upper left .... in the green top..... Now you know my secret!
A rubber doll, a red wig and some lube would probably less a threat to your sanity, health and wallet my friend.
We live in an age where if you touch what is depicted in those pics - your member might explode, shrivel up and die. Some of those creatures did have signs to proclaim their privates had teeth.
I'm not willing to risk an STD even looking at that bunch.
But then, I stopped thinking with my lower brain when I hit 30 and realized I had 3 kids a wife and a 30 year mortgage. The lower brain no longer does any thinking in my life.
-
Naw. I just focus on the rose between that black forest of thorns, gelatinous thighs and poison oak.
Did you notice the little redhead... upper left .... in the green top..... Now you know my secret!
She may be cute, but she's had a run-in with a tattoo man.
-
I'm not willing to risk an STD even looking at that bunch.
But then, I stopped thinking with my lower brain when I hit 30 and realized I had 3 kids a wife and a 30 year mortgage. The lower brain no longer does any thinking in my life.
10-4, amigo. I wouldn't touch any of those with your unit....
-
Years ago, Eddie Murphy did a routine about how once he became famous, women would throw their P's at him like they were Frisbees.
I went to a Big 10 Uni, 50k plus students. A fraternity brother of mine I would place in the top 25 of guys on campus in terms of looks
We were leaving a house party one night and 4 girls were walking in and one just started going crazy over Scott saying he was the most attractive man she had ever seen in real life. Her next comment was 'You can bend me over this car and **** ** if you like"
When I realized what looks, status and power mean to women and what these men can get away with versus ordinary mortals
@dfwgator
-
I went to a Big 10 Uni, 50k plus students. A fraternity brother of mine I would place in the top 25 of guys on campus in terms of looks
We were leaving a house party one night and 4 girls were walking in and one just started going crazy over Scott saying he was the most attractive man she had ever seen in real life. Her next comment was 'You can bend me over this car and **** ** if you like"
When I realized what looks, status and power mean to women and what these men can get away with.
@dfwgator
I am sure alcohol had nothing to do with it. You stud muffin you! :smokin:
-
I am sure alcohol had nothing to do with it. You stud muffin you! :smokin:
LOl she wasn't talkin to me..
@Wingnut
-
LOl she wasn't talkin to me..
@Wingnut
My bad! It was still funny though! :silly:
-
Alrighty then. Shiner or Pearl or Lonestar?
Shiner...hands down.
-
I went to a Big 10 Uni, 50k plus students. A fraternity brother of mine I would place in the top 25 of guys on campus in terms of looks
We were leaving a house party one night and 4 girls were walking in and one just started going crazy over Scott saying he was the most attractive man she had ever seen in real life. Her next comment was 'You can bend me over this car and **** ** if you like"
When I realized what looks, status and power mean to women and what these men can get away with versus ordinary mortals
@dfwgator
Sounds like it might be U of M. She wasn't from Ypsi by any chance?
-
Shiner...hands down.
I defer to your superior judgement. I've never had Pearl.
-
I defer to your superior judgement. I've never had Pearl.
The Hipsters down on Lower Greenville Av used to love it.
-
My bad! It was still funny though! :silly:
Scott is now about 60 lbs overweight, balding, aged badly in the face. My wife went to the same school at the same time and was in a sorority and remembers him and when I showed her the FB pics of him recently at a alumni get together she could not believe it.
Scott dated the most stunning women -the ones so beautiful you just want to kill yourself because you would never experience such beautiful perfection and his wife is just sorta ho humm nothing great,not ugly but not overly pretty either.
Not what I expected 35 years.
@Wingnut
-
10-4, amigo. I wouldn't touch any of those with your unit....
And especially the IBTC members appearing in it!
-
I defer to your superior judgement. I've never had Pearl.
I don't think they still make that stuff! At least I hope not!
-
I just threw up a little in my mouth just now.
How do you get past the gag-reflex?
You must have a cast-iron stomach… or are kinky beyond your years.
The redhead looks pretty good. A long hot bath, scrub her up, some makeup and decent clothes and she would be hot. Hopefully one of the ones with no STD.
@INVAR
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p320x320/16114908_1261563960605161_6837428325817152532_n.jpg?oh=7c786296df3952cfe3f12c456031c1b8&oe=59157057)
I'm eyeballing one right now.
That probably is like what the strip clubs in hell look like......or Schenectady.
-
That probably is like what the strip clubs in hell look like......or Schenectady.
"Hey, Achmed, here are your 72 Virgins!"
-
I went to a Big 10 Uni, 50k plus students. A fraternity brother of mine I would place in the top 25 of guys on campus in terms of looks
We were leaving a house party one night and 4 girls were walking in and one just started going crazy over Scott saying he was the most attractive man she had ever seen in real life. Her next comment was 'You can bend me over this car and **** ** if you like"
When I realized what looks, status and power mean to women and what these men can get away with versus ordinary mortals
meh....it was a burden that some of us were happy to bear. :bolt:
-
The redhead looks pretty good. A long hot bath, scrub her up, some makeup and decent clothes and she would be hot. Hopefully one of the ones with no STD.
That's not going to dress or clean up what is between her ears, which makes what is between her legs equally unappealing …. at least to me.
-
I don't think they still make that stuff! At least I hope not!
They did go under...Just before I left DFW I thought I read some micro brew bought the recipe and they were going to resurrect it. WHy...I have know idea. It was pure panther piss.
-
They did go under...Just before I left DFW I thought I read some micro brew bought the recipe and they were going to resurrect it. WHy...I have know idea. It was pure panther piss.
Yes, but it didn't taste like much, so if you didn't like beer it was the beer to drink.
-
There's only 1 Shiner, the 'O'riginal classic Premium.
I burned out on The boch and blonde ages ago.
(http://www.ohbeautifulbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/shiner_premium_bottle-450x500.jpg)
-
Yes, but it didn't taste like much, so if you didn't like beer it was the beer to drink.
Oh it tasted like something all right! It tasted like what I imagine that stuff in the wastewater sump at the plant might taste!
-
I went to a Big 10 Uni, 50k plus students. A fraternity brother of mine I would place in the top 25 of guys on campus in terms of looks
We were leaving a house party one night and 4 girls were walking in and one just started going crazy over Scott saying he was the most attractive man she had ever seen in real life. Her next comment was 'You can bend me over this car and **** ** if you like"
When I realized what looks, status and power mean to women and what these men can get away with versus ordinary mortals
@dfwgator
Underground comic book legend Robert Crumb has devoted a number of his comics to the advantage alpha males have over beta males. He couldn't believe that many women would throw themselves at males who were not only physically attractive but also tended to treat women like dirt.
Crumb being a self-described beta male kept his resentments hidden until he became famous. And then despite looking like a skinny dweeb, he became the object of desire of numerous females who wanted him to jump into the sack with them.
For many years Crumb used his fame to do exactly that and get a sort of revenge over the alpha males as he recounted in one of his comics.
The facts are many females love bad boys contradicting the swill femi-nazis hand out about females desiring pajama boy types. Despite their best efforts human nature can't be changed. Femi-nutzies hate it, but that's the reality.
-
Underground comic book legend Robert Crumb has devoted a number of his comics to the advantage alpha males have over beta males. He couldn't believe that many women would throw themselves at males who were not only physically attractive but also tended to treat women like dirt.
Crumb being a self-described beta male kept his resentments hidden until he became famous. And then despite looking like a skinny dweeb, he became the object of desire of numerous females who wanted him to jump into the sack with them.
For many years Crumb used his fame to do exactly that and get a sort of revenge over the alpha males as he recounted in one of his comics.
The facts are many females love bad boys contradicting the swill femi-nazis hand out about females desiring pajama boy types. Despite their best efforts human nature can't be changed. Femi-nutzies hate it, but that's the reality.
And look who all the models are dating.....Rappers, because it's the one safe place to be an alpha-male. White guys aren't allowed to be alpha-males anymore.
-
And look who all the models are dating.....Rappers, because it's the one safe place to be an alpha-male. White guys aren't allowed to be alpha-males anymore.
Speak for yourself.
-
Speak for yourself.
I meant more in the media.
-
I meant more in the media.
I know. Couldn't resist the set up though. :beer:
-
I don't think they still make that stuff! At least I hope not!
The old Pearl Brewery in San Antonio in being redeveloped into some high end shopping and restaurants IIRC.
-
The old Pearl Brewery in San Antonio in being redeveloped into some high end shopping and restaurants IIRC.
Just what the world needs. **nononono*
-
Just what the world needs. **nononono*
Where is it in respect to the RiverWalk and the Alamo Dome?
-
Underground comic book legend Robert Crumb has devoted a number of his comics to the advantage alpha males have over beta males. He couldn't believe that many women would throw themselves at males who were not only physically attractive but also tended to treat women like dirt.
In my dating days when I was Mr Nice Guy I tended to be friend zoned and the ones I treated like crap they stuck to me like glue.
And treating like crap does not mean physical abuse or such.. but not returning phone calls-treating them indifferently.
@goatprairie
-
There's only 1 Shiner, the 'O'riginal classic Premium.
I burned out on The boch and blonde ages ago.
(http://www.ohbeautifulbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/shiner_premium_bottle-450x500.jpg)
Shiner has quite a collection now, and they're all good:
https://www.shiner.com/beer
Believe it or not, but the Ruby Redbird is great on a summer afternoon. I'm a fan of the dark beers.
-
And look who all the models are dating.....Rappers, because it's the one safe place to be an alpha-male. White guys aren't allowed to be alpha-males anymore.
Or ghetto sports stars
@dfwgator
-
Here is the the thread. Ok no one came out and called them skanks or whores. I exaggerated. I will admit went overboard in my speech.
YOU however did say they (the women I was referring to) were not conservative when you do not know them. The general thought from other posters(not all) was that people don't act that way when in fact women when they get in groups are just as vile as men in sexual talk about the opposite sex. Yes, even conservative, Republican women.
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,228659.msg1084538.html#msg1084538
@goodwithagun
Again, I was using your own tactics against you. Stinks, huh.
-
I know. Couldn't resist the set up though. :beer:
Low-hanging fastball. Is there a Cricket equivalent? And, for crying out loud, do you EVER sleep?
-
Low-hanging fastball. Is there a Cricket equivalent?
I must admit, I don't watch cricket. It is somewhat boring.
And, for crying out loud, do you EVER sleep?
No.
-
Low-hanging fastball. Is there a Cricket equivalent?
The full toss. (Don't ask me how I know that.)
-
The full toss. (Don't ask me how I know that.)
That was a wicked googly!
-
I haven't been in Texas for many, many years, so my memory of y'all's brews is hazy, at best. Back east, we stick to this:
(http://sommbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Yuengling-Traditional-Lager-2.jpg)
-
I haven't been in Texas for many, many years, so my memory of y'all's brews is hazy, at best. Back east, we stick to this:
(http://sommbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Yuengling-Traditional-Lager-2.jpg)
Good stuff as well.
-
@INVAR
First, did I say or suggest that we should be governed as a theocracy???
No,but you and almost every other Christian out there seem to ALWAYS add the adjective "Christian" to the word "Conservative" and turn it into a phrase that clearly implies you can't be a conservative unless you are a Christian.
Being a Reagan Conservative means we are governed by biblical faith and creeds that establish the moral underpinnings of a civil society whereby liberty can exist; governed by the Declaration and the Constitution which keeps strict limits on the federal beast and upholds a distinct American culture and its values; and a defense policy that protects us against those in the world that wants a piece of us.
HorseHillary! It may mean that to you,but it damn sure doesn't mean that to everyone.
If course I do. Samuel Adams himself said that as the reformation got rid of popery in religion and enabled men to be self-governed and led by God without interference from the institutions of men, so too did he advocate getting rid of the popery in politics - in terms of ridding the notion of monarchy and sole rulers from the minds of men.
He was right about that because the Catholic Church of the time may have been the model Communism used as a base. In fact,some Catholic sects today are little more than offshoots of the communist party. The whole damn "Liberation Theology" bunch. They are evil and draw a lot of attention,but I doubt they speak or act for the typical Catholic of today,though.
While Protestantism is MUCH less dictatorial in most cases than Catholicism,it's still no friend of free thought. You toe the line or you are bounced,and without Freedom of Expression you have no Constitution to be conservative about.
As a nation and people, we WERE governed by the moral and religious codes of the faith that established the civil society.
You cannot have the kind of liberty intended for us in terms of a limited government with opportunity for all to pursue happiness without it.
Says who? Is this one more way to express the "Freedom through obedience and work!" ethnic of 30's Germany?
Because if that were possible, George Bushs' totally misguided idea to bring Constitutional liberty to Iraq would have succeeded.
Irrelevant. His intention was purely to protect his Saudi masters and keep the gold rolling in.
But it didn't and won't. It doesn't work anywhere else but here. And the reason for that is because of the kind of religious heritage and reverence we as a people once had for that which is now seen as an evil and considered totally unnecessary for freedom to exist.
It works here in SPITE of religion,not because of it. That is why we have separation of Church (religion) and state here.
So what we see in terms of our decline and divisions are a direct result of the distance we have put between ourselves and the foundational principles that forged us. INCLUDING the Christian faith that you hold so much disdain for, that is not entirely unwarranted.
And you were doing soooo good. Right up to the point where you included the Christian (and every other faith,I might add) as a major factor in how and why we live free. Organized religion,EVERY organized religion is about enslaving it's followers and gaining power.
-
Where is it in respect to the RiverWalk and the Alamo Dome?
Away from the dome and the river walk...more towards the airport.
-
@Smokin Joe
In that I only disagree that Trump will be allowed to skate. The liberals will fight any and all measures or policies, and failing that, the man himself, in a distraction to ensure as many of their policies remain in place as possible.
You wait. It won't be long before the alleged "conservatives" here and on other boards join forces with the Clintonites to throw up roadblocks for everything that Trump tries to do,regardless of what it is.
Their biggest fear is their beloved RINO's will be out of power forever. They are NOT conservatives,they are Republicans.
-
At least so far, looks like Trump is delivering, so I'm cautiously optimistic that he'll nail his SCOTUS picks.
@dfwgator @jmyrlefuller
I am outright confident he is going to nominate conservatives. It's his nature to fight back. The more the left,including our alleged pals in the alleged Republican Party rant and rave about how wrong he is,the more he is going to dig his heels in and refuse to compromise. He MAY at some time admit he made a mistake about something,but it damn sure won't be because someone else publicly claimed he did and wanted to rub his nose in it.
This is the one true thing you can say about him that has been true his whole life.
-
I like the fact that at least so far, Trump is dancing with the ones that brought him, and not trying to reach out to the other side.
:beer:
-
I can't believe there has been 421 replies to a thread about a bunch of moronic women protesting Trump. I'm so tired of hearing about pu$$ygate that I could scream. No person in her right mind was offended by what he said. He spoke the damned truth. There are women that will sell themselves, throw themselves at men simply because the man has money and power. This speaks more of worthless women to me than men. Until women value themselves, they will always be the butt end of a joke and deservedly so.
I have an acquaintance, a close friend's wife, that claims that "money and power is what turns her on." Her husband has both, but not enough. Never enough. This type of woman sickens me. She needs to get off her ass and make her on money and power instead of lusting after every man that has it and carping at those close to her that do not.
I've said my piece on this sordid subject. To those that don't like it, too bad. I find it disgusting that women are crying about Trump. Disgusting.
@Unlimited
:beer:
-
She may be cute, but she's had a run-in with a tattoo man.
@Cyber Liberty
Will somebodie PLEASE splain to me why it is still "cool and trendy" for teen girls to get tattoos,when you can't go to the grocery store anymore without seeing some 250 lb white-haired granny with tattoos running up her neck and legs?
Yeah,that's really some "cutting edge show society your finger!" stuff,alright.
-
Interesting, your giving me advice based on your errant imagination and false assumptions. Unfortunately, I don't take advice from willfully ignorant people.
As for my "motivations".......... I am an across the board conservative (including social and moral conservatism), who despises the left, and an honest person who speaks my mind. I value integrity and point it out when it's not there.
I will continue to do so even if people who choose not to read the actual words call it "thumping the tub" and insinuate that I am somehow a leftist because I don't agree with liberalism.
Enough of this pretzel talk. When you have something legitimate to contribute, give me a buzz.....
:seeya:
So, what is this continual harping on Trump's past, based on a FALSE, ROTE criticism made by the Left...what's that supposed to accomplish?
Does it steer legislation? Does it make Trump listen to his more conservative insiders? Does it prevent the cronies, who ARE in there, from getting to the trough?
NO. It's just noise and chaos.
The LEFT wants noise and chaos. They want a crisis, so they can ram through more big-government tyranny.
Do you want to help them?
You don't like Trump. That's fine; I don't like him either.
The choice is to work with him, accept that he's there...or else work with the nihilist crypto-Marxist Left.
Do you think the Dowager Empress would be better? Do you want Timmy Sandinista Kaine as President in four years?
DO YOU THINK THAT WOULD BE BETTER?
-
@Cyber Liberty
Will somebodie PLEASE splain to me why it is still "cool and trendy" for teen girls to get tattoos,when you can't go to the grocery store anymore without seeing some 250 lb white-haired granny with tattoos running up her neck and legs?
Yeah,that's really some "cutting edge show society your finger!" stuff,alright.
Search me, Pete. Before you do, if you're looking for tats you're gonna starve...I don't freakin get it either. And if I like her as a friend, I can't say anything like, "That looks like a freakin cartoon." "I didn't know they did tats of Smurfs!"
-
I haven't been in Texas for many, many years, so my memory of y'all's brews is hazy, at best. Back east, we stick to this:
(http://sommbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Yuengling-Traditional-Lager-2.jpg)
Great pic, neighbor!
-
Wow… we go from beer and levity to the deep core of what makes us different than Statists.
Oh well. We are sharpening iron here after all.
No,but you and almost every other Christian out there seem to ALWAYS add the adjective "Christian" to the word "Conservative" and turn it into a phrase that clearly implies you can't be a conservative unless you are a Christian.
I add it to differentiate our principles and where they originate, and why we do not compromise them for pragmatism. I use the term to separate how we view Conservatism, from those who have no use for morality and consider it an embarrassment to a functioning society and government. I fully recognize a lot of self identifying Conservatives don't care about behaviors or economic policy. I proceed from the belief that without moral principles governing the minds and heart of a people in their own lives, a civil society and limited government are impossible, because human nature will dictate selecting rulers who will give them their desires at the expense of others.
Only a moral people and culture can be governed by the Constitution that was made for us. It cannot govern a wicked, debased and morally depraved people, and such people will abuse government to impose their own debauchery and redefine morality and the civil society.
HorseHillary! It may mean that to you,but it damn sure doesn't mean that to everyone.
Of course not. That is why the GOP was happy to accommodate Obama's agenda and fund it without opposition. They understand more than half the population are die-hard Liberal Leftists and Socialists that want government to be god.
As a nation and people, we WERE governed by the moral and religious codes of the faith that established the civil society.
And why today - liberty and freedom as intended for us is a growing impossibility. As nations become more corrupt and vicious (because they have no need nor use for religion or God) they have more need to be controlled by a police state just to keep a semblance of order.
Says who?
Says many of the Founders.
It works here in SPITE of religion,not because of it. That is why we have separation of Church (religion) and state here.
I still cannot find that anywhere in the Constitution. A private letter from Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists in 1801, yes. Not any Amendment that made that the law of the land.
And you were doing soooo good. Right up to the point where you included the Christian (and every other faith,I might add) as a major factor in how and why we live free. Organized religion,EVERY organized religion is about enslaving it's followers and gaining power.
You are confusing human nature infused into institutions of faith (ie: popery) with the moral principles that undergird the biblical religion. Whether you recognize it or not, we have arrived where we are culturally and politically in this divided nation, due the direct result of a people who, like you - who have little or no use for religion or the bible.
What you see in those pics of the fat, ugly feminists who demand their right to do what they want, whenever they want, on your tax dime - is the direct result of a people who have no use for and hate the very religion, principles and faith that you disdain. They think Trump embodies them - and if there is anything I have learned in life - it is that the natural mind of man, hates the entire concept of God.
-
Away from the dome and the river walk...more towards the airport.
So it won't be a tourist draw whatsoever.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p480x480/16105568_1429233963756571_5066052934246895936_n.jpg?oh=42a623a768ec41559abd3432b9323bd9&oe=5906D50A)
-
Search me, Pete. Before you do, if you're looking for tats you're gonna starve...I don't freakin get it either. And if I like her as a friend, I can't say anything like, "That looks like a freakin cartoon." "I didn't know they did tats of Smurfs!"
@Cyber Liberty
I once asked a young woman at a local stop and rob what the Chinese characters running up her neck stood for. Not really thinking about anything at the time,just bored and distracted. Her answer was "Cheryl,my name.",and smiled. I was so shocked at this astounding public display of ignorance and stupidity,I told her without thinking "Do you REALLY think some bearded biker trash with a 8th grade education working in a tattoo shop even knows how to accurately ink Chinese characters,never mind spell a name that doesn't exist in the Chinese alphabet? How do you know it doesn't mean something like "Stupid,fat,white cow",and here you have it plastered all up and down your neck for the whole damn world to see?"
She got pissed,just like it was my fault she was so stupid she got strange lettering in a language she can't read inked forever on her neck. Somehow it was MY fault.
BTW,in the spirit of full disclosure,I have ONE tattoo. It's on a bicep,and it has US Army jump wings and the word "US Paratrooper"above and below the wings. In my defense,I was 17 and had just graduated from jump school,something not easily accomplished back then before AA,time-outs,and touchy-feely PC nonsense. We started out with a class of 425 students,and graduated 187 3 weeks later.
I did briefly consider shaving my head and having a big red arrow and the words "This End Up!" tattooed at the bottom of the arrow when I was based on Okinawa,but let myself be talked out of it by friends. I was doing a bit of drinking at the time,and getting into a lot of bar fights,so I thought it would be pretty funny.
Had a E-7 in my company that had a dotted line tattooed all around his neck,with the words "cut on the dotted line" tattooed above it. Even I thought that was a little weird.
-
(http://www.demotivationalposters.org/image/demotivational-poster/small/1003/lesbians-lesbian-ugly-demotivational-poster-1267460184.jpg)
-
txradio wrote:
"Well that explains the support for Sharia law at the protest..."
Was there? (support, that is, I ignored the whole thing)
Any so-called "alliance" between feminists and muslims is not going to end well... ;)
-
@Cyber Liberty
I once asked a young woman at a local stop and rob what the Chinese characters running up her neck stood for. Not really thinking about anything at the time,just bored and distracted. Her answer was "Cheryl,my name.",and smiled. I was so shocked at this astounding public display of ignorance and stupidity,I told her without thinking "Do you REALLY think some bearded biker trash with a 8th grade education working in a tattoo shop even knows how to accurately ink Chinese characters,never mind spell a name that doesn't exist in the Chinese alphabet? How do you know it doesn't mean something like "Stupid,fat,white cow",and here you have it plastered all up and down your neck for the whole damn world to see?"
She got pissed,just like it was my fault she was so stupid she got strange lettering in a language she can't read inked forever on her neck. Somehow it was MY fault.
I just don't get it, Pete. I have Chinese (and Taiwanese) friends at work, and I have them translate stuff all the time for me. I showed them pictures of these women and they laughed their asses off when they read them.
-
I just don't get it, Pete. I have Chinese (and Taiwanese) friends at work, and I have them translate stuff all the time for me. I showed them pictures of these women and they laughed their asses off when they read them.
My youngest son is fluent in about ten different Chinese dialects. I once asked him to tell me what a tat like that said. His response was "I have NO idea! Not any Chinese that I know!"
-
My youngest son is fluent in about ten different Chinese dialects. I once asked him to tell me what a tat like that said. His response was "I have NO idea! Not any Chinese that I know!"
That's probably what they found so amusing.
-
That's probably what they found so amusing.
Exactly my point! :beer:
-
I add it to differentiate our principles and where they originate, and why we do not compromise them for pragmatism.
Ok,fair enough. I am not sure most people do it for those reasons,though.
I use the term to separate how we view Conservatism, from those who have no use for morality and consider it an embarrassment to a functioning society and government.
Do you think people have to be Christians to be moral? If not,why did you write that?
I fully recognize a lot of self identifying Conservatives don't care about behaviors or economic policy. I proceed from the belief that without moral principles governing the minds and heart of a people in their own lives, a civil society and limited government are impossible, because human nature will dictate selecting rulers who will give them their desires at the expense of others.
Once again,that is implying that someone has to be a Christian to have moral principles.
Only a moral people and culture can be governed by the Constitution that was made for us. It cannot govern a wicked, debased and morally depraved people, and such people will abuse government to impose their own debauchery and redefine morality and the civil society.
And there your train leaves the tracks once again. Who died and made YOU God,and gave you the right to determine what is "wicked,debased,and morally depraved"?
There has been some truly wicked,debased,and morally depraved religious leaders. People that make Hitler and Stalin seem to be shoplifters by comparison. Or do you deny this?
And why today - liberty and freedom as intended for us is a growing impossibility. As nations become more corrupt and vicious (because they have no need nor use for religion or God) they have more need to be controlled by a police state just to keep a semblance of order.
Horseshit stacked high is still horseshit.
You are confusing human nature infused into institutions of faith (ie: popery) with the moral principles that undergird the biblical religion. Whether you recognize it or not, we have arrived where we are culturally and politically in this divided nation, due the direct result of a people who, like you - who have little or no use for religion or the bible.
Organized religion is the greatest evil that has ever plagued mankind,yet people like you still defend and promote it,based on your fears that your kind and loving God will torture you in a burning lake of fire for all eternity if you piss him off. At the root of all religions are fear and superstition,and here you are demanding it be the base that controls our government.
What you see in those pics of the fat, ugly feminists who demand their right to do what they want, whenever they want, on your tax dime - is the direct result of a people who have no use for and hate the very religion, principles and faith that you disdain.
You flatter yourself. I doubt any of them fear your religion. Or even think of it often enough to fear it.
They think Trump embodies them - and if there is anything I have learned in life - it is that the natural mind of man, hates the entire concept of God.
It's good to see you understand it's only natural for sane people to reject the slavery that is organized religion.
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p480x480/16105568_1429233963756571_5066052934246895936_n.jpg?oh=42a623a768ec41559abd3432b9323bd9&oe=5906D50A)
@DCPatriot
"HELP! I AM BEING HELD AGAINST MY WILL! SOMEBODY LET ME OUT OF HERE!"
Then,if it is a boy,about 12 years later the biggest focus in his life will revolve around getting back into one of those things as far as he can.
Which tells us all a lot about how fair life is.
-
I don't think they still make that stuff! At least I hope not!
Pearl was a proud purveyor of generic beer, through several outlets.
(http://www.billsbeercans.com/~billsbee/canstore/images/IMG_1813.JPG)
Depending on the wholesaler who put together a generic-beer supply in his catalogue, the actual brewer was mentioned on the label...in small print.
It opened my eyes, in Ohio, to find that (http://www.billsbeercans.com/~billsbee/canstore/images/IMG_3035.JPG) was brewed by Pearl.
Pearl also did some batch-orders of Billy Beer...along with Utica Club, in central New York.
-
@DCPatriot
"HELP! I AM BEING HELD AGAINST MY WILL! SOMEBODY LET ME OUT OF HERE!"
Then,if it is a boy,about 12 years later the biggest focus in his life will revolve around getting back into one of those things as far as he can.
Which tells us all a lot about how fair life is.
:laugh:
-
(http://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16115027_10154285604413595_8158149791989777947_n.jpg?oh=4abd0573cd319b27d469b2730370e916&oe=591A96A9)
-
:amen:
-
Do you think people have to be Christians to be moral? If not,why did you write that?
No. But the morality that we accept in this country (and by extension, much of the declining West) comes from the Bible.
Once again,that is implying that someone has to be a Christian to have moral principles.
I'm using 'moral principles' in the exact same manner that the Founders did. I'm sorry you are having a knee jerk reaction that my position implies that only Christians can be moral. They were once the established and accepted standards of behavior and thinking in this country. We were not governed by the behavior and thinking of Muslims, Hindus or Zoroastrians.
And there your train leaves the tracks once again. Who died and made YOU God,and gave you the right to determine what is "wicked,debased,and morally depraved"?
I'm not God, but I can read His Word and know what He defines as wicked, debased and morally depraved.
There has been some truly wicked,debased,and morally depraved religious leaders.
Absolutely. Human nature does not disappear just because one belongs to a church. We sin continually - and cause pain, misery and suffering. We also earn the eternal death penalty for doing so, and that is why we need a Savior to begin with - or - life has no purpose beyond the here and now. And if that be the case, why must we abide a moral code at all? Let the strong rule and oppress the weak. Let the Alphas rule and wipe out the rest. I mean that is how much of the rest of the world operates.
Horseshit stacked high is still horses hit.
I'm not hubris enough to call Benjamin Franklin full of horseshit, because that was his quote that I simply paraphrased.
Organized religion is the greatest evil that has ever plagued mankind,yet people like you still defend and promote it,based on your fears that your kind and loving God will torture you in a burning lake of fire for all eternity if you piss him off.
Correct. Religion in the hands of men that are made into institutions have done great evil in the name of their god. As to the latter, I actually do not subscribe to that particular doctrinal position that some do.
At the root of all religions are fear and superstition,and here you are demanding it be the base that controls our government.
Either the principles of liberty and self governance, that have their root in scripture bind a civil society, or they do not. If they don't, then the tyranny of men and the whims of men will govern. It's how we have arrived at transgendered bathroom rights and that your property should be redistributed to those whom they think are more deserving.
It's good to see you understand it's only natural for sane people to reject the slavery that is organized religion.
As opposed to the slavery of men and human nature when they make themselves god? i.e.: The Soviet Union under Stalin. Mao's China. Pol Pot's Cambodia. North Korea under the Kims?
I'll take being a slave of The Lord over being a slave of men. At least that was the motivation of the Colonists to resist the legal, lawful authority of the Crown.
-
In my dating days when I was Mr Nice Guy I tended to be friend zoned and the ones I treated like crap they stuck to me like glue.
And treating like crap does not mean physical abuse or such.. but not returning phone calls-treating them indifferently.
@goatprairie
Before I met my wife there was a woman at my place of work who was very shrewish and difficult to get along with. So after a few years of trying to get along with her I stopped talking to her even though we worked in close proximity.
After one year was over she demanded to know why I wouldn't talk to her. I told her I don't like talking to people who can't act decently towards other people.
After that she started being a lot nicer to me and started making overtures. She was an attractive female but not my type, and I eventually got going with my future wife disappointing the other woman. It would never have worked out.
She later announced that she realized that many times she needed to be put in her place. Apparently, by not talking to her for a year I had put her in her place, and now she desired me.
In short: I'll never figure out women if I live to be 150. But I am happy with my wife whose positives counter my negatives.
-
Low-hanging fastball. Is there a Cricket equivalent? And, for crying out loud, do you EVER sleep?
Actually, the phrase is "low, hanging curve ball" ......not fastball. Curve balls are supposed to snap sharply as they approach the batter. If they hang that means they don't break sharply. Curve balls are not thrown as hard as fastballs, so a low, hanging curve ball means an easy pitch for a batter to hit. As you've mentioned cricket, I take it you are from a country where the sport is played....am I correct?
-
Just when you thought it couldn't get any sillier...
Transgender activists claim 'p****hats' that women wore at anti-Trump marches alienated the transgender community by suggesting 'a vagina is essential to womanhood'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4150174/Activists-claim-women-s-marches-isolated-trans-community.html#ixzz4WeLoVBMn
-
No. But the morality that we accept in this country (and by extension, much of the declining West) comes from the Bible.
I'm using 'moral principles' in the exact same manner that the Founders did. I'm sorry you are having a knee jerk reaction that my position implies that only Christians can be moral. They were once the established and accepted standards of behavior and thinking in this country. We were not governed by the behavior and thinking of Muslims, Hindus or Zoroastrians.
I'm not God, but I can read His Word and know what He defines as wicked, debased and morally depraved.
Absolutely. Human nature does not disappear just because one belongs to a church. We sin continually - and cause pain, misery and suffering. We also earn the eternal death penalty for doing so, and that is why we need a Savior to begin with - or - life has no purpose beyond the here and now. And if that be the case, why must we abide a moral code at all? Let the strong rule and oppress the weak. Let the Alphas rule and wipe out the rest. I mean that is how much of the rest of the world operates.
@INVAR
I disagree with you in almost every particular,but you do an excellent job of defending and defining your positions.
-
Just when you thought it couldn't get any sillier...
Transgender activists claim 'p****hats' that women wore at anti-Trump marches alienated the transgender community by suggesting 'a vagina is essential to womanhood'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4150174/Activists-claim-women-s-marches-isolated-trans-community.html#ixzz4WeLoVBMn
@dfwgator
UHHHHHH.....
-
Folks can call these women all kind of names but as someone who lived in the 60's I would not discount the effect. It remains to be seen if this is a flash in the pan or a continuous resistance but history clearly shows determined organized opposition will bring down any presidency... :shrug:
-
@INVAR
I disagree with you in almost every particular,but you do an excellent job of defending and defining your positions.
I appreciate you saying that.
As a former Atheist myself - I tend to have an idea of where some of your hostility comes from.
-
This is true. (To attempt to justify it on these grounds would be a good example of the tu quoque fallacy.)
But I think that some people are noting--reasonably enough, I believe--that there is a double standard at work here.
And that double standard is (both morally and intellectually) indefensible...
If it wasn't for double standards, Liberals wouldn't have any standards at all.
-
You wait. It won't be long before the alleged "conservatives" here and on other boards join forces with the Clintonites to throw up roadblocks for everything that Trump tries to do,regardless of what it is.
Their biggest fear is their beloved RINO's will be out of power forever. They are NOT conservatives,they are Republicans.
Already done. "Alleged conservatives" jumping around claiming to be conservative are already in tighter with the Clintonites than they seem to know--they elected one of her donors!
-
(http://www.demotivationalposters.org/image/demotivational-poster/small/1003/lesbians-lesbian-ugly-demotivational-poster-1267460184.jpg)
Look at the hands. Ring fingers are longer than index fingers. They may like women, but at lease one of those are guys.
-
Actually, the phrase is "low, hanging curve ball" ......not fastball. Curve balls are supposed to snap sharply as they approach the batter. If they hang that means they don't break sharply. Curve balls are not thrown as hard as fastballs, so a low, hanging curve ball means an easy pitch for a batter to hit. As you've mentioned cricket, I take it you are from a country where the sport is played....am I correct?
No, but the fellow I posted that to is...
-
Interesting article (just a snippet):
... In her speech Saturday, Gloria Steinem cited "violence against females in the world" as to why there are "fewer females than males" alive today. As the crowd roared, I thought to myself, “She had to have meant abortion, right? Does she hear what she’s saying? Do these protesters?” I’m certain that I was alone in my thinking.
I am just as offended by Trump’s derogatory “p ----” comment as anyone else. But an average bystander watching the Women’s March participants — reading their signs and t-shirts, seeing their costumes, and hearing their chants — would reasonably conclude that feminists aren't offended by the profane; they're utterly obsessed with it.
This weekend, I stepped into the alternative universe that is the Left’s reality. There, everyone agrees with everyone, and even when they lose, they win. Lack of self-reflection and critical thought is pervasive. It’s how I imagine an insane asylum feels. ...
Read "I was trapped on a train with smug 'Women's March' feminists. This is what I overheard," by Carly Hoilman at Conservative Review (https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/i-was-trapped-on-a-train-with-smug-womens-march-feminists-this-is-what-i-overheard).
-
January 24, 2017
Anti-Trump protesters torch limo belonging to Muslim immigrant
By Rick Moran
A limousine owned by a Muslim immigrant was totally destroyed by fire during the anti-Trump protests over the weekend.
Muhammad Ashraf, the owner of the company, Nationwide Chauffeured Services is now out $70,000 and there is no guarantee that his insurance will cover it.
Red Alert Politics:
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/01/antitrump_protesters_torch_limo_belonging_to_muslim_immigrant.html#ixzz4WgjDMSCI
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
-
Mixed Reaction as Big Clean up Underway Following DC Women’s March
January 23, 2017 | RT.com | RT.com | 2,175 views
litter women's march
They may have attracted the headlines, but the anti-Trump protesters who attended the massive Women’s March in Washington DC, are now drawing criticism for abandoning their placards at landmarks and on the capital’s streets.
Organizers say that more that 2.5 million people took part in demonstrations around the world on Saturday, as protesters voiced opposition to President Donald Trump while also calling for the protection of civil liberties.
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/mixed-reaction-as-big-clean-up-underway-following-dc-womens-march_012017
-
What a bunch of pigs!! I'll bet half this group of hogs were big environment whackos, too. 888oops888
-
I appreciate you saying that.
As a former Atheist myself - I tend to have an idea of where some of your hostility comes from.
@INVAR
I haven't considered myself to be an atheist in over 50 years. I am an agnostic. I don't care if "God" exists or not,but if he does and Christianity,Islam,Judaism,or any other religion I am aware of accurately reflect his character and throughts,the MF needs to be fired,not worshipped.
-
Already done. "Alleged conservatives" jumping around claiming to be conservative are already in tighter with the Clintonites than they seem to know--they elected one of her donors!
@Smokin Joe
And here I was thinking you are an adult. 20 years ago a businessman contributed money to people that he knew would grease some skids for him if he did,and here you are today,having a hissy-fit about it.
Where were you when Poppy Bush was working with the Clintons to sell military technology,computers,and American manufacturing to the Chinese? Or when Boy Jorge pimped out the US military to his Saud masters? Did you complain about that like you are no whining about a businessman doing what all businessmen have to do to survive?
-
Loving Feminists Who “Care About Women” Tell Pro-Life Marcher They Hope She Is Raped
January 23, 2017| by V. Saxena
To the average batty liberal feminist, for whom honesty, consistency and personal responsibility mean about as much as a degree from Hamburger University, nothing quite says “I care about women” like telling another woman, “I hope you are raped.”
Cue PJ Media:
Among the reported 500,000 women marching on Washington, D.C., to protest Trump on Saturday, there was a remnant, a minority who stood for life in a sea of anger. Not everyone was protesting the new president; many were showing up to fight a more direct threat to women’s very existence — abortion.
http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/feminists-who-care-about-women
-
Interesting article (just a snippet):Read "I was trapped on a train with smug 'Women's March' feminists. This is what I overheard," by Carly Hoilman at Conservative Review (https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/i-was-trapped-on-a-train-with-smug-womens-march-feminists-this-is-what-i-overheard).
This weekend, I stepped into the alternative universe that is the Left’s reality. There, everyone agrees with everyone, and even when they lose, they win. Lack of self-reflection and critical thought is pervasive. It’s how I imagine an insane asylum feels. ...
It's all about being a part of the borg,a herd member,and feeling all warm and fuzzy from belonging. Reality must NEVER be allowed to intrude and mess wid de buzz.
-
@INVAR
I haven't considered myself to be an atheist in over 50 years. I am an agnostic. I don't care if "God" exists or not,but if he does and Christianity,Islam,Judaism,or any other religion I am aware of accurately reflect his character and throughts,the MF needs to be fired,not worshipped.
That is a very fair observation.
I discovered that the God of the scriptures and His Salvation are nothing like much of the traditions and the institutions of men have made them into.
-
Gentlemen.
Please cease this reasonable, respectful and well stated examination of differences in personal belief at once. You are giving the internet a bad name.
:tongue2:
Seriously though, kudos to both of you. :beer:
-
Gentlemen.
Please cease this reasonable, respectful and well stated examination of differences in personal belief at once. You are giving the internet a bad name.
:tongue2:
Seriously though, kudos to both of you. :beer:
We all may resume our regular beating of one another about the head. :silly:
-
@Smokin Joe
And here I was thinking you are an adult. 20 years ago a businessman contributed money to people that he knew would grease some skids for him if he did,and here you are today,having a hissy-fit about it.
Where were you when Poppy Bush was working with the Clintons to sell military technology,computers,and American manufacturing to the Chinese? Or when Boy Jorge pimped out the US military to his Saud masters? Did you complain about that like you are no whining about a businessman doing what all businessmen have to do to survive?
You were thinking correctly. I am an adult.
Thanks for making my point.
-
We all may resume our regular beating of one another about the head. :silly:
On it!
-
We all may resume our regular beating of one another about the head. :silly:
Neegan approves!
(http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2016/04/05/05-negan-twd.w529.h529.jpg)
-
Neegan approves!
(http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2016/04/05/05-negan-twd.w529.h529.jpg)
Ray Nagin?
(http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/new-orleans-mayor-ray-nagin-costumed-and-riding-horseback-in-the-2009-picture-id85074346?k=6&m=85074346&s=594x594&w=0&h=ro6JSmi-WxoUPmuksIQi_PDrcDHMHYM9nf127Tx6aos=)
-
@Smokin Joe
And here I was thinking you are an adult. 20 years ago a businessman contributed money to people that he knew would grease some skids for him if he did,and here you are today,having a hissy-fit about it.
Where were you when Poppy Bush was working with the Clintons to sell military technology,computers,and American manufacturing to the Chinese? Or when Boy Jorge pimped out the US military to his Saud masters? Did you complain about that like you are no whining about a businessman doing what all businessmen have to do to survive?
Actually, it was a lot more recent than 20 years ago.
-
That is a very fair observation.
@INVAR
Thank you. I make no great claims to humanity and loving my fellow man,but IF there IS a God,I DEMAND he be more moral than me,or get off the damn stage!
-
Actually, it was a lot more recent than 20 years ago.
@Sanguine
No doubt you are right. I was just ballparking it and remarking on the hypocrisy of the "Bush-Bot conservatives".
-
@Sanguine
No doubt you are right. I was just ballparking it and remarking on the hypocrisy of the "Bush-Bot conservatives".
I can't speak for "Bush-bot" conservatives. I didn't vote for W in the primaries, either.
-
[Conservative women] were officially excluded, but they showed up anyway. That's why I have said the entire march should not be dismissed out of hand.
It will be interesting to see if most of the MSM (with the exception, perhaps, of Fox News) will cover this weekend's March for Life, in Washington, as thoroughly as it covered last week's march...
-
It will be interesting to see if most of the MSM (with the exception, perhaps, of Fox News) will cover this weekend's March for Life, in Washington, as thoroughly as it covered last week's march...
They won't cover it at all.
They NEVER cover the March for Life.
Just because a half a million people, men and women, young and old (mostly young) march to end the abortion holocaust, the war against women and fight for life, why should they cover it? :shrug:
Truth be told, they don't want the rest of the country to know how many people are willing to brave the cold and the elements to stand up for REAL women's rights.
-
They won't cover it at all.
They NEVER cover the March for Life.
Just because a half a million people, men and women, young and old (mostly young) march to end the abortion holocaust, the war against women and fight for life, why should they cover it? :shrug:
Truth be told, they don't want the rest of the country to know how many people are willing to brave the cold and the elements to stand up for REAL women's rights.
EXACTLY right! 888high58888
-
EXACTLY right! 888high58888
I was going to add, thank the LORD for EWTN! We watch the whole march, hear the speeches, listen to interviews and hear commentary every year.
At least the truth is getting out there!
-
They were officially excluded, but they showed up anyway. That's why I have said the entire march should not be dismissed out of hand. It wasn't only leftists who showed up.
@musiclady
I'm curious. Were they attacked by the leftist women there,or where they "allowed" to have their own opinions?
-
I was going to add, thank the LORD for EWTN!
What television network is EWTN?
I am just not familiar with those call letters.
-
What television network is EWTN?
I am just not familiar with those call letters.
Trinity Network eg Catholic Channel
-
Trinity Network eg Catholic Channel
@montanajoe
Thanks. I thought that was the old 700 Club network? If it was,how did it become Catholic?
-
@montanajoe
Thanks. I thought that was the old 700 Club network? If it was,how did it become Catholic?
No, it's always been Catholic. The 700 Club is on another network, the one founded by Pat Robertson. EWTN was started by a nun named Mother Angelica. A friend of mine worked there as a set designer in the 1980s and she said Angelica was a hoot.
-
What television network is EWTN?
I am just not familiar with those call letters.
Eternal Word Television Network.
It's the Roman Catholics' station.
-
What television network is EWTN?
I am just not familiar with those call letters.
@pjohns
I see others have answered it for you. I'm not Catholic, but they are such stalwarts for Life that I watch much of what they broadcast.
My husband and I have intended to go to the March for Life several years and were snowed out, so I watched their broadcast all day.
Even though we had no plans to go this year, we still watched their broadcast.
VERY encouraging.
-
Neegan approves!
(http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2016/04/05/05-negan-twd.w529.h529.jpg)
I prefer the Bear Jew:
(http://www.tasteofcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/The-Bear-Jew.jpg)
-
Reposting from Facebook a comment from the head of Students for Life, one of the pro-life groups that tried to participate in the march:
I've read some disturbing comments from those who identify as pro-life feminists saying they were more welcome at the pro-abortion, so-called Women's March than at the March for Life.
I was there with our team (mostly all women) at both events. Here's what I know: When I was in the crowd of the Women's March, as long as those gathered couldn't see my pro-life sign that read “abortion betrays women”, I was welcome. As soon as I put it up, I was not.
Our team was spit at, cursed at, multiple signs were ripped from our hands, and if it weren't for the Planned Parenthood-trained marshals protecting us from their own crowd, we would have been physically attacked.
At the March for Life, our team headed to the Supreme Court early to make sure the few pro-abortion protestors who showed up didn't hog all of the media attention (trust me, this happens). No pro-lifer screamed, cursed or spit at them. In fact, the cursing and the yelling always always came from them. The differences were stark.