Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
Another example of how the military isn't plagued by wokeness, just like Thoroughly Woke Milley said. *****rollingeyes*****
72
30-Year Naval Academy Teacher Details Depth Of DEI Rot In America’s Military Institutions
11 April 2024

By Shawn Fleetwood  |  The Federalist

It’s no secret the Biden administration has “reimagined” the U.S. military into a left-wing social experiment.

From employing enlisted drag queens to boost recruitment to using taxpayer funds to host LGBT “pride” events on military installations, America’s supreme fighting force has prioritized promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) racism over addressing the biggest challenges hampering U.S. military readiness.

A recently released book unveils how this leftist ideology is also infecting the military’s service academies.

In Saving Our Service Academies: My Battle with, and for, the US Naval Academy to Make Thinking Officers, author and professor Bruce Fleming documents the pervasiveness of DEI throughout the U.S. Naval Academy (USNA) and shows how the institution’s cookie-cutter bureaucracy is crippling individuality among the school’s midshipmen.

https://starrs.us/30-year-naval-academy-teacher-details-depth-of-dei-rot-in-americas-military-institutions/
73
[Sarcasm] Other, non-celebrity, serial rapists roam the streets of NYC unpunished, why should Weinstein be singled out for punishment? [/Sarcasm]
74
Military/Defense News / Air Defense: Where the Patriot Missile Batteries Are
« Last post by rangerrebew on April 25, 2024, 04:34:37 pm »
Air Defense: Where the Patriot Missile Batteries Are
 

Ezoic

April 19, 2024: Patriot has been in service since 1984 and experienced its first sustained combat in 1990, when it was used against Iraqi SCUD ballistic missiles fired at Israel and Saudi Arabia. Its success rate, 40 to 70 percent, was mediocre at best. That was largely due to the improvised modifications Iraqis made to their SCUDs to extend their range. As a result, the SCUDs tended to fall apart during the terminal (speeding down towards the target) flight phase which created unintended countermeasures. Some of the larger pieces of these modified SCUDs, like additional fuel tanks, broke away and were seen by Patriot radar as the actual missile warhead section. In some cases, non-warhead portions, like the fuel tanks carrying very toxic fuel, of the SCUD came down on military or civilian personnel on the ground. Subsequent upgrades to Patriot increased accuracy against deliberate or accidental countermeasures.

Patriot has been used against UAVs but firing a missile costing over four million dollars at homemade UAVs, as Israeli forces did a few times, isn’t healthy for the economy so Israel developed cheaper solutions for UAVs.

https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htada/articles/2024041901851.aspx
75
And even more sane people will run for the exits...

Stupid squared...
76
Just as Thoroughly Woke Milley assured everyone, this is proof there is no wokeness in the military. *****rollingeyes*****
77
Military Could Hit Troops With Courts-Martial For Refusing To Use Preferred Pronouns, Experts Say
Fort Cavazos receives the Honorable Christine Wormuth, Secretary of the Army
 

MICAELA BURROW
INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, DEFENSE
April 21, 2024
7:58 PM ET
FONT SIZE:

The military could seek to formally punish service members for refusing to use another service member’s preferred pronouns under existing policy, according to military experts.

A 2020 Equal Opportunity law opened the door for commanders to subject someone who refuses to affirm a transgender servicemember’s so-called gender identity to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for charges related to harassment, Capt. Thomas Wheatley, an assistant professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Such a move would likely infringe on a servicemember’s constitutional rights to uphold their conscience, but it might not prevent leaders from employing more subtle ways of disciplining service members.


Military experts told the DCNF Congress should step in before it’s too late.

The military “is right to want to protect the rights and welfare of its transgender service members. But it owes the same protection to those who share a different perspective on the issue, especially when that perspective is a deep-seated expression of personal conscience,” Wheatley told the DCNF. (RELATED: Pentagon Won’t Respond To New Research Casting Doubt On Studies Supporting Military’s DEI Push)

None of the military’s rules explicitly prohibit so-called “misgendering,” when someone uses pronouns to describe a transgender person which do not correspond to the person’s new gender identity, Wheatley explained. However, existing guidance implies that using pronouns rejected by another person violates Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) regulations against sex-based harassment and discrimination.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/04/21/military-could-hit-troops-with-court-martials-for-refusing-to-use-preferred-pronouns-experts-say/
78
If it isn't the time to scale the program back, you can almost count on today's military to do it. :thud:
79
Now is not the time to scale back on the B-21 bomber program
By Col. Mark Gunzinger (ret.)
 Apr 23, 07:00 AM
 
The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony on Dec. 2, 2022. (U.S. Air Force)
In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin made headlines when he hedged about the ultimate size of the B-21 Raider buy, explaining that new technologies may supplant the aircraft by the late 2030s.

“I think there are other technological advancements that we would see to be able to augment [the B-21] and have a better mix … before we commit to [the B-21] as being the platform [that will serve as the backbone of the future bomber force] beyond that,” he explained.


That is a bet on a hypothetical and distant technological vision. Now is not the time to suggest the Air Force dial back on B-21 acquisition. Credible combat capacity in mass is required, given the scale of our threats in multiple regions, the unique role bombers play and the fragility of our reusable long-range strike enterprise.

Given their global range, ability to carry large payloads and unmatched stealth, B-21s will play a crucial role in missions that span the operational spectrum. In times of peace, they will deter adversaries, reassure allies and favorably shape regions that are critical to our national interests. In times of conflict, they will be able to strike large numbers of targets at sea and on land deep behind enemy lines, and serve as key information nodes as part of the Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control complex. That involves gathering data with onboard sensors, processing battlespace information at the combat edge, collaborating with other mission assets, and creating decisive non-kinetic and kinetic effects. No other weapon system can do this.

https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/2024/04/23/now-is-not-the-time-to-scale-back-on-the-b-21-bomber-program/
80
Something will go wrong.  Nothing the military does seems to finish on time. **nononono*
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10