I'm on my way to the ABC Islands of the Caribbean for eight days aboard the Celebrity Beyond starting Saturday April 27. The first place I hit will be the Ocean View Café BUFFET bar where not only a plethora of delicious food is awaiting me for lunch tomorrow but also I can start drinking again. In fact, I think I might start drinking a few beers today so all those drinks won't be a complete shock to my system. Oh, and our Steve Kane Radio Show group also has a serious mission project aboard ship. Namely to try out ALL the Martinis on the Martini Bar menu. Perhaps we shall determine which is the best Martini aboard.

https://rumble.com/embed/v4p7scz/?pub=7wvc3

The United States Constitution is antithesis of Europe's "Divine Right of Kings" and "Absolute Right of Kings".

Which Article, Section, Clause, or Amendment of the US Constitution enumerates that the President is absolutely immune from prosecution for all potential crimes committed while holding Office?

We are allegedly a nation of laws.  Laws are written.  Show us the piece of paper, the page, the paragraph, the sentence, and the written words that grant the Office of President, or the Holder of the Office of President, absolute immunity?

The Office of the President only has the powers provided to it by the US Constitution, or delegated to the Executive by Laws of Congress.  If it ain't in writting, it's bull$h!t.

In the context of the article, you would be on the side of "No immunity, whatsoever."  I can't wait for the Obama and Biden trials.

Immunity for Me but Not for Thee
By William Woodruff
April 26, 2024


Whether Presidential Immunity is a Good Thing or a Bad Thing Shouldn’t Depend Upon Party Affiliation

“Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office?” That is the question the Supreme Court will answer when it hears oral argument in Trump v. U.S.  on April 25, 2024.

Legacy media and the ladies of “The View” nearly lost their collective minds when the Court agreed to hear Trump’s appeal of the D.C. Circuit’s decision denying him immunity for his actions surrounding the events of Jan. 6, 2021. However, even Jack Smith, the Special Counsel prosecuting the case, argued that it was of “imperative public importance” that the Court resolve the immunity question before trial.


But forget about Trump for the moment. The issue is bigger than Trump and his legal woes. As the partisan divide between the left and the right grows larger, there is a real risk that the criminalization of policy differences could raise our current state of “lawfare” to a new level.

Several retired four-star generals and admirals, as well as former cabinet officials, have filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court arguing that granting immunity to former presidents for actions within the outer perimeter of their official duties would raise questions about the ability of the United States to peacefully transfer power from one administration to another, and thereby pose a grave risk to national security.

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2024/04/26/immunity_for_me_but_not_for_thee_1027716.html

Trump and his henchmen are alrighty attempting to gaslight us for his potential election loss in the Fall.

US Army to shift aviation force structure back to tailored brigades
By Jen Judson
 Apr 25, 08:49 AM
 
DENVER, Colo. — The U.S. Army’s aviation force structure will move away from modular Combat Aviation Brigade designs needed during heel-to-toe rotations in Iraq and Afghanistan and return to a model that tailors those units for specific divisions, according to the service’s branch chief.

“Today we have modular CABs, so every CAB looks the same on paper,” Maj. Gen. Mac McCurry, the Army’s Aviation Center of Excellence commander, told reporters April 24 during the Army Aviation Association of America’s annual summit in Denver. During heel-to-rotations “it was imperative that we’d be able to replace a [heavy] capability with a light capability and those changes to modular CABs happened in the early 2000s,” he said.


The Army is returning to what it did prior to years of operations in the Middle East and will design division-based formations that do not look the same.

For example, McCurry said, “a light infantry division is more reliant on mobility than a heavy division is from the air, those soldiers have to move, rapidly reposition. We’re putting more [UH-60] Black Hawk [utility helicopters] into the light divisions and taking some of those Black Hawks out of the heavy divisions and heavy divisions remain focused on lethality.”

https://www.defensenews.com/land/2024/04/25/us-army-to-shift-aviation-force-structure-back-to-tailored-brigades/