Sad thing is 9/11 truthers have had many in the “conservative” ranks who actually believe that garbage.
Never mind now, when Trump has stoked their paranoia even more.
Say what you will about Towers 1&2--sure looked like planes hit them to me. Other questions have been raised about temperatures melting steel, and the duration of the heat in the pile, that I'd like to see answered. As for the Pentagon, people have seen a lot of Hollywood nonsense about relatively intact crashed planes, not realizing that aircraft's strength is for containing a tube full of people or cargo and keeping it aloft.
They do not 'do' fender benders well, and a serious impact at speed will yield fragments that seldom resemble an aircraft. Landing dear and engine parts tend to survive as recognizable bits, and something the tail surfaces or parts than can be readily fit mentally into an image of an aircraft.
That said, (and I'm not a 'troofer'), Tower 7 sure looked like a controlled implosion.
People commonly dash off to the nearest theory which explains the things they question, and especially when official answers either are not forthcoming or do not flange up. Usually, careful analysis will disclose lies, misconceptions, or errors intertwined with the truth, but that just adds credence to assertions of malice and deceit.
It behooves us all to keep in mind that the first person who sees the attack coming is not "paranoid", just perceptive. There may be some false alarms, but those are better than being caught napping. Eternal vigilance and all that. Besides, you aren't paranoid if there really is someone out to 'get you', and the witch hunt over J6 and the event itself, censorship, and reports of people being sought by the FBI for perfectly legal comments made online, and egregious differences in prosecutorial zeal, are sure indicators that there is malicious intent by plenty of folks out there who may well be more intimately interconnected than just belonging to the same nominal political denomination.
