HR 127 real guncontrol will TEETH

[Elderberry]

Joe Biden’s Plan to Repeal the Second Amendment

The Libertarian Institute by Matt Agorist | Feb 6, 2021

https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/joe-bidens-plan-to-repeal-the-second-amendment/

HR127, known as the Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act introduced by Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18], is, without a doubt, the most tyrannical gun control bill ever proposed. Like all gun control measures, this bill would hit the poor and minority communities the hardest. Its massive scope would also turn tens of millions of legal, law abiding gun owners into felons overnight.

As TFTP reported in December, before Joe Biden took office, his administration has major plans for eviscerating the Second Amendment. Biden has been an outspoken gun grabber and on his campaign website, he’s stated that he will use executive action to enforce gun control.

On the site, Biden states that he will use executive action to “get weapons of war off our streets.” Calling an AR-style weapon a “weapon of war” is laughable given the fact that Biden, under president Obama, aided in the wholesale slaughter of countless innocent civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, and Somalia—using actual “weapons of war” like drone strikes, hellfire missiles, and sanctions.

Nevertheless, the new boss—who is the same as the old boss, contrary to what many believe—is presiding over a Congress that will consider the most tyrannical gun control measures in the history of America, HR127.

[txradioguy]

No way in hell this bill makes it out of committee.

[mystery-ak]

Dem Rep. Jackson-Lee Pushes Gun Registry And Psych Evaluations for Owners

by Jonathan Davis

It’s almost comical to watch liberals online deny claims made by conservatives that Democrats are coming for the Second Amendment and America’s tens of millions of gun owners.

Almost.

It would be laughable if it weren’t true, as Democrats continually prove every single time they have power.

The latest to put the lie to leftists who say Dems support unfettered Second Amendment rights is long-serving Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas, no less.

***Help Us Take Down The Liberal Media With Our FREE News App!***

She is introducing legislation that would create a national gun registry (that will later be used to confiscate guns — otherwise, what business does the federal government have knowing how many guns Americans own and of what type?), and force every gun owner to undergo a psychological evaluation (which will be used to then deny gun rights on trumped-up charges of political ‘wrongthink’ — we’re already seeing that).

more
https://trendingpolitics.com/dem-rep-jackson-lee-pushes-gun-registry-and-psych-evaluations-for-owners/

[Elderberry]

H.R. 127 – A Bill Designed to Express Hostility Toward Law-Abiding Gun Owners

NRA-ILA 2/11/2021

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20210211/hr-127-a-bill-designed-to-express-hostility-toward-law-abiding-gun-owners

All gun control bills share the same basic goal: a world in which fewer people own firearms. Some bills simply ban certain types of firearms or ammunition outright. Others place obstacles in the path of owning firearms or ammunition to make them more difficult and expensive to obtain, thereby shrinking the market for them. The fundamental flaw of these approaches is that they treat all law-abiding firearm owners as would-be criminals, when the reality is that most firearm-related assaults and homicides are committed by people who completely disregard the law, including laws against taking human life. 

H.R. 127 combines both failed approaches. It bans common types of ammunition and original equipment magazines for most self-defense firearms. And, it makes all firearms more difficult to obtain and possess through a punitive licensing and registration scheme. In its details, however, H.R. 127 is so outrageous, persecutory, and unworkable that its main function is simply to display the hostility of its author and supporters toward firearms, those who own them, and those who want to own them.

•   H.R. 127 would ban common types of ammunition, including every shotgun shell larger than .410.

o   The bill states: “It shall be unlawful for any person to possess ammunition that is 0.50 caliber or greater.”

o   Violations of this ban would result in the imposition of a fine of at least $50,000 and imprisonment of at least 10 years, mandatory penalties not seen in many violent or infamous federal crimes, including torturing someone to death outside the U.S. or committing treason during wartime.

o  Hunting whitetail deer would be legally impossible in at least 10 U.S. states if these restrictions went into effect.

o   The bill would also make it impossible for Americans to follow President Biden’s advice to keep a double-barreled, 12 gauge shotgun for self-defense, rather than an AR-15.

o  Innumerable numbers of shotgun shells currently possessed by law-abiding people for lawful purposes would suddenly become contraband.

•   H.R. 127 would force Americans to relinquish hundreds of millions firearm magazines with no compensation.

o   The bill states: “It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device”, and defines such devices to include those “that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition,” excluding certain integral .22 rimfire magazines.

o    Industry production figures show that there are hundreds of millions of 11+ round magazines.

o   As with its ban on shotgun shells, H.R.127’s magazine ban would apply retroactively, affecting items already owned by millions of Americans for lawful purposes, with no compensation for owners forced to relinquish property that was lawful when obtained.

•   H.R. 127 would require the federal government to register some 400 million guns in the span of only 3 months.

o   The bill states that registration information would have to be provided to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive, “in the case of a firearm acquired before the effective date of this section, within 3 months after the effective date of this section.”

o   But BATFE would also have to create the registration system during those 3 months.

More at link.

[andy58-in-nh]

Politicians Prefer Disarmed Peasants.

[skeeter]

Politicians Prefer Disarmed Peasants.

After filling DC with the Guard and throwing up a fence around congress as one of the first things the new congress did what did anyone expect?

[GrouchoTex]

Can't we just ban SheJack and her Oysterpersons?
Let her go plant a flag on Mars.

[Freedom2020]

Germany, in the period immediately before the Nazis came on, restricted citizens from the possession of weapons  and only the government had combat guns. 

The key to understanding what is happening in America today is to realize  that socialist leaders are, for the most part, groups of psychopathic individuals  acting cooperatively.

There is a difference in the brain functioning of socialist leaders (psychopaths) compared to the brains of ordinary people. So while normal people work and raise their families, the pack of sociopaths hunt down individuals and now, the whole society.  As they did in Cuba, China, Venezuela...

I made a text explaining this difference in historical and scientific terms, based on the work of the Polish physician Andrew Lobaczweski. His findings are revealing and explain exactly what we are facing now.

It is not necessary for people to suffer in order to wake up, if they can be made aware of what they are fighting against. Please read the text and share it. We need everyone to understand the evil that lurks in front of us.  The more people understand this, the easier it will be for people to act locally to save America.


Link -->  http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,424671.0.html  <-- "Analysis - Psychopaths Seeking Power. The World today - 2021"

[sneakypete]

They just don't get the Constitution period!

@Bigun

Oh,they understand it alright,they just don't like the thought of "all those people out there running around free to make their own decisions."

[sneakypete]

Politicians Prefer Disarmed Peasants.

@andy58-in-nh

BINGO!

[Smokin Joe]

This is the one we all have been terrified of.  Many will not comply.

None should. Clear violation of the 2nd Amendment.  Void.

[mountaineer]

Democratic bill would create public registry of gun owners, their guns, and where they keep them
Critics are calling it 'dangerous'
Phil Shiver
February 17, 2021

A Democratic bill introduced in the House of Representatives this year aims to create a mandatory and publicly accessible registry listing the names of gun owners, how many guns they have, and even where they keep their firearms.

Additionally, the bill, H.R. 127, would ban several types of commonly used ammunition .50 caliber or greater, require gun owners to purchase firearm insurance costing $800 per year, and force those seeking to buy a gun to complete a psychological evaluation and a government training course prior to the purchase.

Should gun owners fail to adhere to the new restrictions, they could face an harsh penalty of 10 years in prison and fines of $50,000 to $150,000. ...

The Blaze

[sneakypete]

Democratic bill would create public registry of gun owners, their guns, and where they keep them
Critics are calling it 'dangerous'
Phil Shiver
February 17, 2021The Blaze

@mountaineer

Maybe it is just me,but I sense a disturbance in the Force,Obi-wan. Things will be shifting. "Tribes" will be gathering. Bad words will be spoken.

[Smokin Joe]

Democratic bill would create public registry of gun owners, their guns, and where they keep them
Critics are calling it 'dangerous'
Phil Shiver
February 17, 2021The Blaze

VOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOID (Get the idea?)

Massive noncompliance.

[sneakypete]

VOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOID (Get the idea?)

Massive noncompliance.

@Smokin Joe

Not only do the gun grabbers not care,most hope there will be non-compliance so they can claim this just proves gun owners are criminals that want to overthrow the government. With Biden as the acting President and the media behind them,they will be able to spin it in the news and gain a lot of support from the massive amount of city dwellers in this country who don't own,have never owned,and mostly don't even know anybody who DOES own a gun.

Don't forget. This really has nothing to do with gun control. It's about population control,and it is a fight we MUST NOT let them win.

[thackney]

VOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOIDVOID (Get the idea?)

Massive noncompliance.

I suspect that may be the real goal of liberals. 

Massive non-compliance -> massive felonies of mostly conservatives -> massive reduction of republican voters

[libertybele]

After filling DC with the Guard and throwing up a fence around congress as one of the first things the new congress did what did anyone expect?

Exactly.  The DEMS stole the election, planned the insurrection and then used it as an excuse to build a barrier around the WH armed with guards.

Soros, Gates, and other global marxists want to disarm us to control us (obviously). They also still have the whole COVID virus as an excuse to start rounding up people (conservatives) quietly at random to quarantine them and 'house' them.

I'm hoping that the bills fails ... but the House has acquired some complete whaccko's like AOC and Ohmar and I'm afraid that it's going to pass.  If it passes the House, there is no wall of GOP Senators to stop it.  Expect the RINO's to vote along with the DEMS. We have GOP Senators like Rick Scott who sold FL down the river on the 2A while he was governor; so I think we'll so more GOP Senators voting for it, rather than against it.

God help us.

[Smokin Joe]

I suspect that may be the real goal of liberals. 

Massive non-compliance -> massive felonies of mostly conservatives -> massive reduction of republican voters

Multiple States are considering laws which prohibit the enforcement of executive orders or even laws which conflict with the State Constitutions. The last time the Federal Government occupied States (with troops and forced them to change their Constitutions) was after the War of Northern Aggression.

[sneakypete]

Multiple States are considering laws which prohibit the enforcement of executive orders or even laws which conflict with the State Constitutions. The last time the Federal Government occupied States (with troops and forced them to change their Constitutions) was after the War of Northern Aggression.

@Smokin Joe
tht
You are speaking,of course,of the FIRST "War of Northern Aggression". Part 2 is going to be something special.

[Smokin Joe]

@Smokin Joe
tht
You are speaking,of course,of the FIRST "War of Northern Aggression". Part 2 is going to be something special.

Yep, and I fully believe we are in the opening phases now.

[sneakypete]

Yep, and I fully believe we are in the opening phases now.

@Smokin Joe

As do I.

My fondest hope is that in addition to all the regular citizens that end up killed or crippled for life because of this that more than a few of the "privileged people" get THEIR clocks wound,too.

[Smokin Joe]

@Smokin Joe

As do I.

My fondest hope is that in addition to all the regular citizens that end up killed or crippled for life because of this that more than a few of the "privileged people" get THEIR clocks wound,too.

May Almighty God reward them as they so richly deserve...