Author Topic: Why The Navy Said Goodbye To The S-3 Viking Submarine Hunter  (Read 178 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Why The Navy Said Goodbye To The S-3 Viking Submarine Hunter
« on: October 26, 2020, 04:30:12 pm »

October 25, 2020

Why The Navy Said Goodbye To The S-3 Viking Submarine Hunter

What else could it do?
by Sebastien Roblin

Here's What You Need To Remember: The Navy is unlikely to return to the Viking, despite its demonstrated flexibility. This is out of a defensible preference for operating fewer different types of aircraft to maximize efficiency in training, maintenance and spare parts. However, the Viking’s retirements reinforces the Navy’s continued reliance on short-range carrier-based aircraft, which is becoming an increasing liability as more capable shore-based missiles threaten carriers at or beyond the maximum combat radius of their onboard aircraft.

Eight years ago the U.S. Navy retired:

A) Its only dedicated carrier-based tanker;

B) its last dedicated carrier-based antisubmarine airplane;

C) a carrier-based plane with more than twice the range of its current jets;

D) all of the above.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/why-navy-said-goodbye-s-3-viking-submarine-hunter-171249