Kamala Harris’ Method of Questioning Witnesses Reveals Her Low Character
Undermining your own credibility on questioning is something a good examiner would never do, because it makes you less persuasive. Yet Joe Biden’s running mate does it all the time.
By Jay Whig
October 18, 2020
Vice presidential candidate Senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) has always been an odd choice for the No. 2 spot on the Democrat ticket.
During last year’s July primary debate, Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) deconstructed Kamala’s record of prosecutorial abuse, with devastating results. Harris sunk to single digits, where she lingered until finally dropping out in December, narrowing the race to Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass), Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Joe Biden.
When the dust settled and the time came for Biden to choose a running mate rather than pick a popular figure he went for an identity politics exacta—a woman of color. A trifecta, of course, would have been a woman of color with popular appeal.
Harris—given Biden’s advanced age—is de facto the top of the ticket. If he had let himself see this, Biden might have altered his calculus, because Harris could not win the presidency—not even close—were she de jure the top of the ticket. It’s a good thing Harris cannot win the presidency. As Gabbard’s takedown showed, Harris is not a good person.
A look at Harris’ style of examination tells us even more.
more
https://amgreatness.com/2020/10/18/kamala-harris-method-of-questioning-witnesses-reveals-her-low-character/