General Category > Trump Legal Investigations

It Looks Like the Anti-Flynn Judge Could Defy Appeals Court and Keep This Clown Show Going

(1/1)

mystery-ak:
It Looks Like the Anti-Flynn Judge Could Defy Appeals Court and Keep This Clown Show Going
Matt Vespa

Posted: Jun 26, 2020 3:00 AM

It’s over. Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is finally out of legal purgatory. As Katie wrote, the DC Appeals Court finally ruled that the case against him should be dismissed. They torched the main argument doled out by retired Judge John Gleeson, who argued against the Department of Justice’s motion to dismiss the case. That’s what’s funny about this whole affair and exposes the explicit hackery on the bench here. There was no case. The DOJ motion outlined clear evidence of misconduct on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The prosecutor resigned. The defense sure as hell wasn’t going to deny the motion. All parties agreed: drop the case. Yet, Judge Emmet Sullivan, who said that Flynn was a traitor, decided to double-down. Not only did he refuse to dismiss the case, he tapped Gleeson to fight the motion and see whether Flynn could be charged with—get this—perjury. Why? Well, Flynn was pressured into a plea deal for “lying to the FBI,” which he only did when the Special Counsel’s Office threatened him with financial ruin.

It was a political witch-hunt; one could argue a political assassination. The anti-Trump elements in DC took him out over phone calls; run-of-the-mill diplomatic phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. And we now know, based on former disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok’s notes we know that even James Comey admitted that the calls were not out of the ordinary or even improper. They were “legit.” Strzok was also the man who reportedly signed off on the FBI’s counterintelligence probe into Russian collusion that set off this circus in 2016.

Sullivan actually allowed amicus briefs to be filed as well. So, every anti-Trump legal mind could take a swipe at Flynn. He outsourced the prosecution. It’s madness. Oh, and Gleeson just happened to work for the firm that is presenting Sally Yates, the DOJ’s resister-in-chief, who refused to enforce Trump’s executive order on immigration. Flynn’s new legal team under Sidney Powell, which was assembled in 2019, said new evidence will show that Flynn was the victim of a plot within the FBI. That proved to be true; Comey and Andrew McCabe, both former disgraced FBI officials, were gunning for Flynn at all costs. When Sullivan tried to keep this act going, Powell filed a writ of mandamus that was granted by the appeals court, who could have rejected it outright.

more
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/06/26/it-looks-like-the-antiflynn-judge-could-defy-appeals-court-and-keep-this-clown-show-going-n2571387?utm_campaign=inarticle

PeteS in CA:
While Sullivan could appeal the decision for an en banc appeals court hearing or one of the judges on that appeals court could petition for such an en banc hearing, I've not seen any indication either is planned.

WarmPotato:
God America's becoming shitty

Smokin Joe:

--- Quote from: WarmPotato on June 29, 2020, 12:15:48 am ---God America's becoming shitty

--- End quote ---
Just parts of it. Some turds float to the top.

Navigation

[0] Message Index