Author Topic: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020  (Read 584 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« on: February 20, 2020, 06:29:37 pm »
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/


My Cancer Conundrum

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: Now, I checked the email during the break, and a number of you have asked why I haven’t provided an update on treatment. Folks, this is a tricky answer because there’s two sides to this. One of the things that I have learned in the short period of time since I’ve been diagnosed is, if you’re not careful, this disease can take over your life. It can take over everybody in your family’s life and it becomes all consuming, which I don’t think is good. I’m trying to avoid that happening.

I don’t want every day to become scans, blood draws, notes, records, phone calls to doctors, and this kind of thing. I’m doing what’s been prescribed. So far, it’s working. I really, I really believe… I’m running a risk saying this, but I really, really… (chuckles) I really believe all of your prayers are having an impact. I cannot tell you how good I feel. The other side of this is that other people think that it could be inspirational for those also suffering from the diagnosis or from cancer in their own ways, and that’s true too.

So I’m caught in the middle. I don’t want to live it. I don’t want to. I don’t want it to overtake my life. It’s a big enough part of it as it is now, as it must be. But I don’t want to spend so much time on it. I don’t want to keep everybody updated every day. It’s just… (sigh) I’m just not comfortable talking about myself. I’m happier thanking everybody for all their ongoing support; then the other side of it is, I know full well how inspiring it can be.

Alex Trebek is inspiring a lot of people, according to a story in the New York Post today. So, to me, it’s about finding a happy, a proper balance here. ‘Cause I guarantee you, you could get sick and tired of me talking about it if I did, and if I answered as many questions about it as people are getting. So bear with me through all this, and I guarantee you: You will not end up being uninformed.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2020, 07:09:17 pm »

None of These Democrats Can Compete with Trump

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: Now, let’s get to the debate last night. We got audio sound bites from the debate and a lot of reaction from the Drive-By Media. The Drive-By reaction to this debate last night is predictable. By the way, I don’t mean to sound cynical, and I don’t mean to sound bored by it. I’m never bored by any of this, so don’t misunderstand any tone in my voice.

It’s just it’s so easy now to predict how the media is going to cover or not cover an event or a story. It’s so easy to predict how they’re going to be disappointed and when. I don’t know what their expectations were. Well, I do know. Their expectations for this debate last night that somebody, somebody was gonna rise up from this cream of the crop and demonstrate they have the ability to take out Donald Trump. And what happened is that it became obvious to anybody that none of them have the ability to take out Donald Trump. Trump can take himself out, and that’s a long shot, but these people can’t.

Now, you have to imagine yourself… This is what I try to do: Imagine… Do you know what I did last night? I’ll tell you what I did. I haven’t done this in years. We’re on the plane coming home when the debate started. The debate started, and that meant what? (chuckles) That meant watching PMSNBC, and I haven’t had PMSNBC on a TV that I’ve had control of in years. But I committed to it. I committed to watching, ’cause if you watch a debate, you gotta watch PMSNBC, and then you gotta watch the aftermath of the debate.

It is a different world. I know it’s a different world. But to see it? It’s an alternative universe. Folks, these people have nothing in common with you and me. Nothing whatsoever. I’ll give an example here in just the most recent news story out of Cambridge, Massachusetts, in just a second. So I watched this last night, and I watched it trying to watch it as a Democrat. Do you know how hard that is? Do you know how hard it is to imagine yourself a Democrat watching these people?

I did it because I really wanted to see if I could immerse myself in this enough to try to imagine how your average leftist watching this would react to it. I don’t know that I was able to do that because my reaction to this debate was that there literally is nobody on that stage or anywhere in the Democrat Party right now that can even occupy a stage with Donald Trump and survive it. There isn’t anybody on that stage last night that has the street smarts, the political smarts, the skills, the unstated talents and abilities to stay even with Donald Trump.

No matter what the subject matter. No matter what the debate topic. Even Trump tweeted he watched the debate last night, and he said — and he knew it was gonna happen. He says it was the worst debate he had ever seen (chuckling) which is classic. It’s the worst debate he’s ever seen, and Bloomberg was the worst debater he’s ever seen. “Mini Mike Bloomberg’s debate performance tonight was perhaps the worst in the history of debates, and there have been some really bad ones. He was stumbling, bumbling and grossly incompetent.

“If this doesn’t knock him out of the race, nothing will,” and then here is the tag line: “Not so easy to do what I did!” And there it is, in a nutshell. Donald J. Trump: “Not so easy to do what I did!” You know, the great make what they do look easy. They make anybody think they can do it. Even athletes. They’re so natural at it that you think you can do it. You want to go try — until you do, and then you find out: If you’re not naturally talented in whatever you’re trying to do, you have no prayer.

These people think that because Trump got elected anybody can. Because he’s outside of politics, that means anybody outside of politics can? This is classic. Bloomberg looks at Trump ever since Trump got elected, and he is seething with jealousy — and this is what is really propelling and motivating Bloomberg, ’cause Bloomberg thinks he’s the smartest guy in New York City, obviously.

He thinks Trump’s one of the stupidest and dumbest, and if Trump can do it, he can do it. Last night, Bloomberg demonstrated that he doesn’t have the foggiest idea what he is doing. Let me give you an example. So Fauxcahontas hits him on the NDAs. Were you watching? By the way, I need to ask: Were you watching the issue I’m talking about? (interrupting) Okay.

If you weren’t, let me check the audio sound bite roster real quick here and see if we’ve got Fauxcahontas beating up on Bloomberg on the NDAs. Hang on. (muttering) The pages are sticking together. (sigh) Yeah, grab sound bite number 12 and number 13. This… This would have been so easy! This would have been so easy to nuke! Even I, not a professional politician, could have done it. So here we go: Sound bite number 12.

This is Fauxcahontas going Megyn Kelly on Bloomberg.

WARREN: I’d like to talk about who we’re running against: A billionaire who calls women “fat broads” and “horse-faced lesbians,” and no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.

CROWD: (Wooooo!)

WARREN: Democrats are not going to win if we have a nominee who has a history of hiding his tax returns, of harassing women, and of supporting racist policies like red lining and stop and frisk. Look, I’ll support whoever the Democratic nominee is, but understand this: Democrats take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another.

RUSH: Well, here’s the thing about this. Bloomberg is staring like deer-in-the-headlight eyes. I watched Bloomberg, and I said, “Everybody thinks this guy’s brilliant,” and you know I’m on record as telling you I don’t think he is. I’m not one of these people that’s dazzled by wealth, because I myself am. I’m not in Bloomberg’s league, don’t misunderstand. But I’m not dazzled by it. I know so many people who think people who have a lot of money are brilliant, and people suck up to them.

I don’t know why. Maybe they think they’re gonna give them some of their wealth. It never makes sense to me. But, yeah, maybe Bloomberg had to become expert at something to succeed at what he did. But when you get down to common sense and just plain old IQ, it isn’t there, and last night… How do you not show up prepared for this? Well, I’ll tell you how you show up not prepared for it.

You think nobody can touch you! Because you’re arrogant and you’re condescending and you’re conceded, and you think nobody can touch you. You think nobody’s gonna be able to damage you on this, because you can buy your way out of it. You can buy your way out of it the media. You can buy your way out of it in campaign ads. And he didn’t have an answer for it. There’s one more bite here from Fauxcahontas, ’cause this is where Bloomberg responded to her.

WARREN: So, Mr. Mayor, are you willing to release all of those women from those nondisclosure agreements so we can hear their side of the story?

CROWD: (cheers and applause)

BLOOMBERG: We have a very few nondisclosure agreements.

WARREN: Uh, how many is that?

BLOOMBERG: Let me finish.

WARREN: How many is that?

BLOOMBERG: None of them accuse me of doing anything other than maybe they didn’t like a joke I told, and let me just point —

CROWD: (boos and jeers)

BLOOMBERG: — and let me point —

CROWD: (boos and jeers)

BLOOMBERG: There’s agreements between two parties that wanted to keep it quiet and that’s up to them. They signed those agreements and we’ll live with it.

(crosstalk)

BIDEN: Come on.

RUSH: Yeah, they… Well, they were forced to sign the agreement. Look, my take on this is different than what you’re thinking. They had to know this was coming. People can survive this. In American politics in 2020, people can survive this if they know how to do it. This is my point. Trump doesn’t have any competition. Trump’s line on this was, “Yeah, I was just talking about Rosie O’Donnell, nobody else,” and the place erupts with laughter, and he dulls the knife that Megyn Kelly threw at him.

But Bloomberg? “Well… (muttering),” staring with deer-in-the-headlight eyes, “I had very few nondisclosure agreements.” “Well, how many?” “Well, I…” All he would have had to say… You know what it is? All he would have to say is something like, “I’ll release all these women as soon as every member of Congress releases all of their NDA women.” Do you know how many members of Congress have NDAs because of sexual abuse? It probably dwarfs… Bloomberg probably can’t even dream of that number, and he could have blunted the criticism.

But there wasn’t any preparation for this.

There wasn’t any! It’s like he thought he would be untouchable, and you could probably think of other retorts to this that Bloomberg could have had. Look, I don’t think — I have never thought — that Bloomberg is gonna be the Democrat nominee, and so I didn’t go into this expecting him to dazzle anybody. But the Drive-Bys did. The Drive-Bys expected him to dazzle and wow because they’re just the looking for anybody that can wipe out Trump and they’re looking for anybody who can bury Crazy Bernie — and Crazy Bernie emerged as the big winner last night.

Oh, yeah. Not even close, folks. Don’t doubt me.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, the debate last night. It was comical. It was funny. It was predictable. And in terms of Bloomberg, he let an Indian squaw beat the tar out of him, as you just heard. And I’m telling you, she’s taller than he is, and it’s a factor, and don’t doubt me. How many ways, how many ways… (interruption) What? What do you think? What are you looking at me that way for?

An Indian squaw beat the tar out of Bloomberg. Absolutely. Fauxcahontas. She said it, not me. For crying out loud, I just listen to what these people say about themselves and I go with it. She says she’s one-2,000th Indian, okay. She’s a mom, she’s a squaw.

At any rate, how many ways could he have punched back at her? But he hasn’t the slightest idea how to. Why doesn’t he have the slightest idea how to? Because he doesn’t have to, and he fires anybody and everybody who gets in his way, who disagrees with him. That’s the way he does business. Fine and dandy. But that’s not how this works.

He could have thrown so much at her on policy. He could have thrown the Indian stuff at her. This guy did the impossible last night. He made Biden look good. And do you know how it’s over for Biden? ‘Cause none of ’em cared a whit last night about Biden. Buttigieg going after Klobuchar. Klobuchar going after Buttigieg. Biden trying desperately to get noticed. Crazy Bernie trying to defend himself against whatever’s going on with the Culinary Union in Las Vegas.

I’ve seen somewhere on the internet today that some say Bloomberg should have hired somebody to coach him. He did. He had coaches. He did rehearse. He has been asked about these NDAs on television and radio interviews before. But I’ll tell you what happens. The people he hires to coach him, if they hit him too hard, he gets rid of them too. It’s his modus operandi.

He knows everything, folks. He’s one of these people, he knows it all, he’s not gonna hire some lesser person to teach him how to do anything. There isn’t anybody that can teach him how to do anything. That’s his problem. He doesn’t think there’s a political consultant out there or a debate stage manager that can teach him anything.

But he lacks more than stature. It was obvious, his mind is not quick. He didn’t even look to be in the moment. He had no humor whatsoever. The only thing he said last night that resonated was Crazy Bernie and his conversation about socialism, communism versus capitalism is probably the best conversation in the world to get Donald Trump reelected. He was right about that.

But he can’t laugh at himself. There’s nothing self-deprecating about the guy. And whether you know it or not, Trump makes jokes about himself all the time. Trump is self-deprecating. You may have to know how to spot it, but he is. But when I looked at Bloomberg – understand I’ve never met him. I’ve been two holes behind him on the golf course I can’t tell you how many times, and you need a telescope to see him.

Never met him. He just doesn’t seem to have, at least in that setting last night, any discernible personality. If you’re in this business, whatever you are has to jump out of people’s TV screens at them. If you don’t have that — and that’s an “it” factor — if you don’t have that in any area of media, be it television, movies, Drive-By Media news, if you don’t, just by your very existence, capture people’s attention simply when their eyeballs are on you, then you’re missing something very important.

And Bloomberg to me comes off as a little crabby, looked like he really thought it was beneath him to even have to be there last night. But aside from that, where a lot of people looked at it last night and thought it was funny or thought it was great because the gloves came off and finally it was a real debate, there’s a part of it, folks, and I would not be honest with you if I didn’t share this. There’s a lot of this thing last night that scared the hell out of me because these people believe this crap that they were saying. They believe every word of it.

We look at it, even today — I’ve been laughing at these people for 30 years, thinking nobody’s ever gonna believe whatever it is they’re saying. And now look. There’s 30 to 35% of this country that’s signed on to full-fledged socialism, communism. One lie after another. They have bought it. Some of the most inane, crazy, insane things people now believe, you and I laughed at them for all of these years.

And people were laughing at ’em last night. And, to me, there was a lot of it that is really scary, if these people ever get presidential power — and someday, you know, the law of averages, you can’t allow how silly and funny and comical they appear to make you relax.

And even though it looks like there’s not a one of them that could come close to beating Trump, you can’t let that cause you to develop a sense of passivity and say, “I don’t need to vote. The turnout’s gonna be so high. These Democrats don’t have a chance.”

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Adam in Orange, Connecticut. You’re first, and it’s great to have you. I’m glad you waited. Hello, sir.

CALLER: Hello, Rush. Thank you very much. To get to the point — I’m sorry — I just wanted to edify the last segment that what I saw on stage last night was just complete hatred and disdain. Bernie’s face, Warren’s face, and, you know, I edify this because the left-wing liberals, the liberal side, all they have to thrive on is people needing them. And what Trump has inevitably created here in the environment for the past four years is people don’t need them, and they have nothing to run on but negativity and hatred. And that rallies the soldiers on their side. And that’s why I think, ultimately, they’re gonna lose; they’re gonna lose big.

RUSH: I think that’s exactly right. You know, folks, what Adam said here is so well stated, and it’s so basic. There isn’t anything uplifting on positive coming out of any of these people. Theirs is a politics of grievance. Everybody in America is a victim of something. Life in America is torturous, unfair, disadvantaged. Fauxcahontas saying, “When I’m in the White House, I’ll fight for your family.” It’s not your job to fight for people’s families. It’s the head of the family’s job to fight for the family. It’s not your job to fight for the family.

But they want everybody to be dependent. They want everybody to feel victimized. They want everybody to feel aggrieved. And, as such, there isn’t anything positive. Contrast that to Trump. Trump is a can-do — Make America Great Again — and he has done it. So well, in fact, that Obama had to come out and endorse the Trump economy by claiming credit for it. So that really is a good observation. There isn’t anything uplifting. That’s not how you build a winning movement.

You can build a significantly sized revolution of grievance and anger and upset. You know, I’ve said this I don’t know how many times. You go back to 1960, we’re in the post-World War II boom, and Eisenhower’s terms have expired. So it’s Nixon-Kennedy, 1960, and what did JFK campaign on? He said, “Hey, you know what? Things are good, and we can do even better,” and then he started talking about how it’s time to let the young people take over and make it even better than it is.

These Democrats today can’t even bring themselves to acknowledge when things are good for people, and they then can’t even bring themselves to try to make things better, because in their worldview, things cannot be better, especially when a Republican’s in the White House. So there really isn’t anything infectious about them on the positive side. Quickly before the break I got an email, “What do you mean, Trump is self-deprecating? I have never heard Trump make fun of himself!” Okay, let me give you an example.

He does this as numerous rallies. He talks about bringing back the old-fashioned lightbulb. Remember we had to get rid of the old-fashioned incandescent lightbulbs and get whatever these newfangled things are — and I was always opposed to getting rid of the incandescents ’cause they were great. They are. Trump says these new lightbulbs that have been mandated, they’re too expensive and they make you look orange.

And then he laughs and says, “I don’t like that.” Now, that’s self-deprecating because one of the criticisms of Trump is that his makeup makes him look orange — and he does his own makeup, by the way. So don’t think that Trump doesn’t laugh at himself. He does. Does Bernie Sanders? No way. Fauxcahontas? No way. (Snort!) Bloomberg? There’s no way. And that just means, folks, that there’s a segment of humanity that’s not readily present and seeable in these people.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2020, 07:09:53 pm »

Drive-By Media Glued to Stone Sentencing

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: If you want to know how bad the debate was last night, and it was very bad, but I gotta tell you, I disagree with a lot of the conventional wisdom about that debate. We’ll get to that in a minute. If you want to know how bad it was, all you need to know is that right now the Drive-By Media is glued to the courthouse where Roger Stone’s going to be sentenced.

Can you think of anything that matters less to anything in the future of this country than the sentence Roger Stone’s going to get? Because whatever it is, is gonna be commuted or pardoned at some point. Everybody knows it. These people are so obsessed. They still can’t figure it out. They’re so obsessed with getting Trump that they’re focused on this sentence that the judge is gonna hand down, Roger Stone. Since impeachment bombed out, since Mueller bombed out, they’re hoping somehow that Stone getting a long sentence will convince people what a creep Trump is.

It’s getting funny. It’s been funny for a while, scary at the same time, but it’s getting funny and ridiculous, the media’s obsession with fake news, irrelevant news. They’re just looking for anything to keep themselves engaged with hope that they can do something that’s gonna topple Trump, and after last night’s debate, they know, like I told you the day after State of the Union address.

And someday, folks, someday when I get permission, I’m gonna tell you the whole story of that day because it will explain how the Democrats don’t have anybody that can touch Donald Trump. In terms of achievement, in terms of accomplishment, in terms standing side by side on a debate stage, in terms of defeating him. They just don’t have anybody with half the heart, number one, but they don’t have anybody that’s even close to him in terms of personality and the ways he has to get what he wants, despite all odds against him.

And they’re so obsessed that everything they’ve tried, which has always worked whenever they targeted a Republican, none of it’s working against Trump, and they can’t learn from it. They’re continuing to try variations of their old weapons and ammo, and now they’re camped out at the courthouse waiting for the sentence for Roger Stone.

And this nonstory about Bill Barr and all these fake leftists acting like they’re bipartisan DOJ officials demanding that Barr resign. Barr’s not gonna resign. Barr does not have a problem with Trump. None of this is real. It’s just a continuation of the fake news that got started with Trump-Russia collusion, meddling, and all of that.

Great to have with you, folks. Rush Limbaugh here, as always, behind the Golden EIB Microphone. The telephone number is 800-282-2882. Email address, ElRushbo@eibnet.us.

A story I just saw. I guess it’s been known since yesterday, but it I just found it. It’s on PJ Media. You know how the Democrats during impeachment were making this major effort for witnesses because they wanted John Bolton to come up there. They wanted Bolton to unload on Trump. They knew after all of these years, after all of these things, Bolton was the guy that was gonna take out Trump for ’em. And Chuck Schumer is still bummed that he couldn’t persuade the rest of the Senate to vote for witnesses. Nothing is going their way.

Now Trump is in California and he’s embarrassing the Democrats out there. He’s doing exactly what I hoped he would do when I suggested last summer that he go out there. Well, here’s the news about Bolton. And it is from yesterday.

“President Trump’s former national security advisor, John Bolton, made a public appearance alongside Obama’s former national security advisor, Susan Rice, at Vanderbilt University.”
For those of you in Rio Linda, it’s in Tennessee somewhere. And you know what Bolton did? (interruption) What, you think it’s funny that I have to point out to Rio Linda that Vanderbilt’s in Tennessee? Well, it’s the kind of thing they might not know. There are a lot of people that might not know where Vanderbilt is. Think of a train track, for example.

Bolton, standing side by side with Susan Rice, you know what he said? “He blasted the Democrats’ ‘grossly partisan’ impeachment against Trump, and downplayed the impact of the testimony he would have had,” if he had been called. “According to Bolton, the House ‘committed impeachment malpractice.’”

Wait ’til they — I’m sure they’ve heard this by now. This is gonna infuriate them even further. They don’t know how lucky they are that they didn’t get Bolton called up there, because he would have embarrassed the heck out of them, even more than they already have been. I saw this, and folks, I just had a Cheshire cat smile. ‘Cause I know all of this.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: It’s comical. It is literally comical. The Drive-By Media is glued to that courthouse waiting for the Roger Stone sentence. Can you imagine anything more irrelevant today, tomorrow, than the Roger Stone sentence? I mean, it’s not irrelevant to him, don’t misunderstand. And why? They’re hoping the judge throws the book at Stone because that might convince people that Trump colluded with Russia. They still can’t forget it, move past it.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: The Drive-Bys are trying to act like the Stone sentence is a major, major problem for Trump. Okay. So what did those ludicrous, Trump-hating prosecutors recommend for Stone? Seven to nine years. Seven to nine years. And then when Trump and Barr moved in and said, “Wait a minute, this is outrageous,” they huff and they puff and they resign, and the media starts claiming, “What a bunch of honorable lying prosecutors these guys are!”

They’re nothing but a bunch of Mueller holdovers. So the judge hands down 40 months. For those of you in Rio Linda, that is three years and four months. Three years! It’s not even to the bottom of the threshold recommended by the Trump-hating line attorneys: Seven to nine years. So here is a headline from CNBC. “Roger Stone Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison as Judge Slams Him for ‘Covering up for’ Trump.”

And the Drive-Bys are talking about how the judge made it perfectly clear that this Mueller investigation was valid and that the Trump-Russia collusion was a valid investigation and that Stone’s paying the price. Stone’s gotta about it through some drug counseling or drug testing. It’s a $20,000 fine. But this is nowhere near the minimum that the Trump-hating DOJ lawyers who resigned suggested. So the Drive-Bys are picking up the pieces, trying to make it look like the judge is affirming everything. (chuckles)

The Mueller investigation, the impeachment, WikiLeaks, all of this. It’s pathetic. It is literally pathetic. I mean, in the real world, they just got creamed. They’re hoping seven to nine years. They want Stone to die in jail, and he gets three years and a few months — and now they’re out trying to make it look like this is devastating to Donald Trump. This could be the end of the Trump administration, is what they want people to believe.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline EdinVA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,584
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2020, 07:13:31 pm »
Quote
Can you think of anything that matters less to anything in the future of this country than the sentence Roger Stone’s going to get?
Disagree.  It goes to the very core of the USA.... Fair and unbiased judiciary, Rule of law, Justice for all....

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2020, 07:13:55 pm »

Cambridge Allows Illegals to Drive Without Licenses

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: Just a random news story that I happened to see before today’s excursion into broadcast excellence began. And it’s from Cambridge, Massachusetts. You know what’s in Cambridge, among many other things? Harvard. MIT. Skip Gates. Okay?

Headline: “New Cambridge, Mass. Law Bars Police from Arresting Undocumented Immigrants for Driving Without a License.” Now, we become sort of desensitized to this because this is the kind of thing that’s been going on in California for a long time.

But let’s break this down. What is this, really? Undocumented immigrants, illegal immigrants, people in the country illegally in Cambridge, Massachusetts, now will not be arrested for driving without a license. You will be. If you are a resident and you’re driving without a license in Cambridge, you’re gonna be arrested. But an illegal immigrant will not be.

This is a new Cambridge, Massachusetts, law “aimed at protecting those illegally residing in the country from the grasp” of ICE. “The new law, passed unanimously by the city legislature, directs police in Cambridge to issue a court summons to an undocumented individual driving without a license instead of arresting them, although the driver may be arrested for other legal complications, such as active or outstanding warrants.” But even that is iffy.

Now, folks, this is the kind of thing back 20 years ago when it was proposed that we laughed at. This will never happen. Why, you crazy? But we should have seen it coming ’cause this is the route to voter registration for the Democrats.

In what universe does it make any sense to give illegal aliens, noncitizens more rights and more protections under the law than law-abiding citizens? In what universe does that make sense? In what universe is that even right? This is why there’s such a partisan divide, and note who it is. This is the left. They love Big Government. They love the biggest government they could get, and now they are crafting laws in local communities to penalize their beloved federal government.

Here’s a pull quote from a city councilor, Quinton Zondervan: “We need to protect our community members from a federal government that’s out of control. There are no other reasons for the police to arrest someone, give them a court summons instead which keeps them out of the clutches of the Trump administration.”

So you see, it’s all about opposition to Trump. But it’s more than that. Anyway, this is the kind of stuff that while you watch these Democrats on stage and you properly have a great time laughing at it, you have to remember they believe that cockamamie stuff that you’re laughing at last night.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,537
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2020, 07:43:12 pm »
Disagree.  It goes to the very core of the USA.... Fair and unbiased judiciary, Rule of law, Justice for all....

 :yowsa:  :amen: @EdinVA it has nothing whatever to do with anything else but that!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2020, 07:59:10 pm »

Polling Data You’re Not Hearing About Because It’s Great for Trump

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: There’s some fascinating polling data out there, and it’s interesting. It goes well with the scope of yesterday’s debate. Let me look at calls that we have. You know there’s not a whole lot of reaction that debate last night? You’re not getting much, are you? I think I may be one of the only people in this audience… Well, I’m not part of audience. I’m the host.

But how many of you watched MSNBC last night, the debate and then the aftermath? I even watched the aftermath. I watched the PMSNBC post-debate analysis. Folks, it was like watching the Star Wars bar scene in English. It was better than the debate, listening to how seriously all these analysts were examining everything that had been said, and there was a clear consensus that developed, and that is that Bloomberg blew it, and they were hoping for such great things.

Most everybody was interested because it was so “rough-and-tumble,” they said. The gloves came off. “The kicks to the crotch were happening all night,” somebody said. I don’t know about that. But at any rate, we don’t have a whole lot of people reacting to it, but I had to. In the event some of you people wanted to know what happened, I have to be the one with the answer for you, and so I endeavored to watch all that, and I haven’t had MSNBC on… It has been years. But juxtapose all that with this.

A Washington Examiner story by Paul Bedard: “Trump Takes 2020 Lead, 52%-48%, All Democrats ‘Probably Lose.'” This is an Economist/YouGov poll. By the way, Sharyl Attkisson is out with a piece — you know, the former CBS News reporter. She’s got a piece essentially saying not a one of these people can beat Trump. That, as things stand now, there’s not a soul in the Democrat Party could beat Trump, and it’s not even gonna be close. But this is a story by Paul Bedard.

“A politically resilient President Trump has pushed into the lead of the 2020 White House race, riding the public’s good feelings about the economy and the view by voters that all leading Democratic candidates will ‘probably lose,’ according to the latest election survey. By a 52% to 48% margin, Trump is leading the generic ‘Democrat’ in the race…” Now, you have to be careful about these generic ballot polls, because everything changes when you put a name in there.

This is one of the tricks the Drive-Bys always use in election years to show Democrats creaming Republicans. They do the no-name polls. They’ll pick a name on the Democrat side and then offer just “Republican” alternative, and the Democrat cleanups. When you add a Republican name, it changes it significantly — and this probably would be the case here too. But I think if you add a name to this Democrat poll, the Democrats do even worse, which is why I think The Economist and YouGov did this poll with generic Democrat rather than a name.

‘Cause this poll shows 52-48. I think it would be even worse if it was, say, Trump versus Crazy Bernie, Trump versus Klobuchar, Trump versus Mayor Pete, Trump versus Bloomberg. “By a 52% to 48% margin, Trump is leading the generic ‘Democrat’ in the race, a significant margin for a president who just beat back impeachment to stay in office.” See, there’s another example where conventional wisdom is dead wrong. They think Trump ought to just be barely squeaking by because he was just acquitted in an impeachment trial.

What they don’t get is that most people think all of that was bogus and uncalled for and purely political and frustration on the part of the Democrats because they haven’t been able to defeat Trump any other way. That impeachment victory of Trump’s was such a slam dunk, there’s no wonder it’s redounding to him positively. “The latest Economist/YouGov survey also found that most voters believe that Trump will probably beat all of his Democratic challengers by at least 19 percentage points,” 19 percentage points!

“While White House officials are buoyed by the results and other polls showing a post-impeachment surge, some told” Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner, Secrets “that they believe the race is extremely tight and unclear due to the emergence of” Bloomberg. Dream on. Bloomberg is not clouding the race. He’s clearing the picture.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2020, 08:41:41 pm »

Polling Data You’re Not Hearing About Because It’s Great for Trump

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: There’s some fascinating polling data out there, and it’s interesting. It goes well with the scope of yesterday’s debate. Let me look at calls that we have. You know there’s not a whole lot of reaction that debate last night? You’re not getting much, are you? I think I may be one of the only people in this audience… Well, I’m not part of audience. I’m the host.

But how many of you watched MSNBC last night, the debate and then the aftermath? I even watched the aftermath. I watched the PMSNBC post-debate analysis. Folks, it was like watching the Star Wars bar scene in English. It was better than the debate, listening to how seriously all these analysts were examining everything that had been said, and there was a clear consensus that developed, and that is that Bloomberg blew it, and they were hoping for such great things.

Most everybody was interested because it was so “rough-and-tumble,” they said. The gloves came off. “The kicks to the crotch were happening all night,” somebody said. I don’t know about that. But at any rate, we don’t have a whole lot of people reacting to it, but I had to. In the event some of you people wanted to know what happened, I have to be the one with the answer for you, and so I endeavored to watch all that, and I haven’t had MSNBC on… It has been years. But juxtapose all that with this.

A Washington Examiner story by Paul Bedard: “Trump Takes 2020 Lead, 52%-48%, All Democrats ‘Probably Lose.'” This is an Economist/YouGov poll. By the way, Sharyl Attkisson is out with a piece — you know, the former CBS News reporter. She’s got a piece essentially saying not a one of these people can beat Trump. That, as things stand now, there’s not a soul in the Democrat Party could beat Trump, and it’s not even gonna be close. But this is a story by Paul Bedard.

“A politically resilient President Trump has pushed into the lead of the 2020 White House race, riding the public’s good feelings about the economy and the view by voters that all leading Democratic candidates will ‘probably lose,’ according to the latest election survey. By a 52% to 48% margin, Trump is leading the generic ‘Democrat’ in the race…” Now, you have to be careful about these generic ballot polls, because everything changes when you put a name in there.

This is one of the tricks the Drive-Bys always use in election years to show Democrats creaming Republicans. They do the no-name polls. They’ll pick a name on the Democrat side and then offer just “Republican” alternative, and the Democrat cleanups. When you add a Republican name, it changes it significantly — and this probably would be the case here too. But I think if you add a name to this Democrat poll, the Democrats do even worse, which is why I think The Economist and YouGov did this poll with generic Democrat rather than a name.

‘Cause this poll shows 52-48. I think it would be even worse if it was, say, Trump versus Crazy Bernie, Trump versus Klobuchar, Trump versus Mayor Pete, Trump versus Bloomberg. “By a 52% to 48% margin, Trump is leading the generic ‘Democrat’ in the race, a significant margin for a president who just beat back impeachment to stay in office.” See, there’s another example where conventional wisdom is dead wrong. They think Trump ought to just be barely squeaking by because he was just acquitted in an impeachment trial.

What they don’t get is that most people think all of that was bogus and uncalled for and purely political and frustration on the part of the Democrats because they haven’t been able to defeat Trump any other way. That impeachment victory of Trump’s was such a slam dunk, there’s no wonder it’s redounding to him positively. “The latest Economist/YouGov survey also found that most voters believe that Trump will probably beat all of his Democratic challengers by at least 19 percentage points,” 19 percentage points!

“While White House officials are buoyed by the results and other polls showing a post-impeachment surge, some told” Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner, Secrets “that they believe the race is extremely tight and unclear due to the emergence of” Bloomberg. Dream on. Bloomberg is not clouding the race. He’s clearing the picture.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Look at this, folks. This is a CNBC story. This is a survey of small business owners. And you know what small business is. Small business is the number one employer in America. Most jobs are at small businesses, not corporations. Some people are surprised by that, but it’s true, stop and think about it.

Ninety-three percent of Republicans approve of the job Trump is doing in this quarter. The same in the fourth quarter of 2019, 93%. Eat your heart out, Mitt Romney. Sixty-four percent, 64% of small business owners approve of the way Trump is handling his job. This is the highest approval rating for Trump among entrepreneurs since CNBC and SurveyMonkey began conducting this survey in 2017, 64% small business owners. This was responses from more than 2,100 small business owners, 64%.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2020, 08:42:18 pm »

The Rare Heart and Character of the Donald Trump I Know

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: I’ve had people send me emails, “Would you expand what you mean by the Democrats don’t have anybody that can go toe-to-toe with Trump?” Folks, to accurately define what I mean by this and explain it, I would have to offer you some things I can’t right now, some details on the entire day that led to Kathryn and I going to Congress, the House chamber for the State of the Union address. Let me see if I can try, though.

And I’m talking strictly about personality. I’m talking about depth of character and heart, confidence. An aura and an attitude that anything can be done, that anything can happen and that there’s no openness for anybody being negative about anything. It’s a personality trait. It’s a character trait.

And what is ironic about it is that people who only have formed an opinion of Trump based on criticism he gets in the media, when you tell them he has depth of character and heart, you lose ’em. They think the last thing Trump has is character. They think he’s totally devoid. They think he’s brusque and he’s an ogre. This is the public image of him that the media has trumpeted since he first got in the race in 2015.

But when you get to know him personally, and I mean really get to know him, and you encounter the can-do, will-do, there’s no way we can be stopped personality, then you realize how rare it is. If there’s any self-doubt in Donald Trump, he will never portray it, unless he’s joking about something. And even when he’s joking, he’s serious. He is somebody that doesn’t take “no” for an answer, but never manipulates you and never commands and never demands.

You end up doing what he wants even when you think you can’t. But not because you have been intimidated or made afraid. It’s hard to describe. All I can tell you is that the Democrats don’t have anybody — and the Republicans don’t, either, right now — there isn’t anybody that can match up or compete with these human characters and personality traits that Donald Trump has.

But I’m still not — I haven’t zeroed in on it, and it would be easy if I could give you some details that I don’t have permission to share yet about that day. But if I were able, you would not have any questions about what I’m talking about. So do your best to believe what I’m telling you here. It’s a rare, rare personality and character that Donald Trump has, and there aren’t very many people who could compete with it anyway.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Look, folks — I mean, what a great way to sum it up — Trump is just can-do. He’s positive. He exudes confidence and leadership, has no self-doubt, does not let you have any self-doubt, will not tolerate you thinking you can’t do something if he wants you to do it. I’ll just give you one example, and this is sort of out of context, and it’s not gonna be fully explanatory. But on that day, we had no business being able to make it to Washington on the day of the State of the Union. We didn’t have any clothes.

My transportation was not available. Doctors… I had a crucial surgical procedure at 5 p.m. that day. There was no way. There no way under the sun I had any business being in Washington that night. I tried to tell the president this, and he agreed with me. “Oh, yeah, your health comes first. There’s no question. Look, I’ve cleared you into Reagan National. My guys are gonna meet you. They’re gonna bring you right here to the White House.

“If you need a tailor to fix the jacket, we got somebody here. Don’t worry about it! I understand your health has to come first.” What do you say to that? “I’ve cleared you into Reagan National. My guys are gonna bring you here to the White House. If you need somebody to fix the jacket, no problem. I understand your health comes first. Can’t you just tell the doctors to do part of it, like, right now, and then let you go later this afternoon?”

“Well, it’s not quite that easy.”

“Well, what’s his name?”

“Um…” (chuckling) And I knew nothing about the medal at this time. I knew nothing about it, and it’s one of the reasons he was so insistent. But the point is, in his world, there was no way it wasn’t happening. No matter what was standing in the way, it was going to happen. No matter what the objection was. No matter how sensible the objection was. No matter how sincere it was. No matter what. But it ends up happening because you want to do it. (laughing) It’s not because you’ve been demanded. It’s not because you have been ordered.

It’s not because you’ve been intimidated or manipulated to show up. It’s hard to describe. All I can tell you is, there are so few people. I understand he’s got the power of the presidency, but even without that he’s this kind of guy, and it’s rare. I can assure you the Democrats — Republicans, either — have nobody. Bloomberg thinks he can do it, and he’s making fool of himself.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,038
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Feb. 20, 2020
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2020, 08:43:06 pm »

Bernie’s in the Driver’s Seat, But Don’t Be So Sure Bloomberg Blew It

Feb 20, 2020



RUSH: Can I give you the lay of the land on the Democrat side right now? I don’t know if the Drive-Bys are reporting this. I don’t know how honest they’re being.

Right now, Bernie Sanders is unbeatable. Bernie Sanders is gonna have a delegate lead after Super Tuesday that Bloomberg cannot buy or beat. If everything holds true, the way it’s lining up now be with Bernie Sanders is gonna — and then the thing to watch is gonna be, “What does the DNC do with superdelegates?” That’s how they kept him from getting the nomination in 2016. It’s not Biden. Right now, Bernie Sanders is sitting in the driver’s seat.

Even though Buttigieg is leading in delegates right now because of the Hawkeye Cauci and New Hampshire, Bernie Sanders — the way things are lining up right now — is going to soon (after Super Tuesday) have an insurmountable delegate lead. And if Bloomberg doesn’t do something about that — and last night did not get him off to a good start… There’s no way. This is still about who and delegates.

Unless the Democrats change the rules and throw out delegates and say, “We’re gonna give the nomination to the richest guy,” in which case Crazy Bernie would come in second. (laughing) He’s got three homes. Bloomberg has 11. Bernie doesn’t have a jet. Bloomberg has three. Bernie has a Podunk little fishing vessel. Bloomberg has six yachts. Well, five. One may be a dinghy to get back and forth from one yacht to the next. But Crazy Bernie would be number two in terms of number of homes. Of course, we don’t know how many Pocahontas really has, ’cause a tepee you can put one of those up anywhere.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: The ratings are in for this debate last night, and they’re big. They are big, and the reason for that is all the hype about Bloomberg and the rich guy.

I’ll tell you something, folks. You really have to learn to ignore the conventional wisdom. The conventional wisdom is that the Democrats destroyed themselves last night. The conventional wisdom is that Crazy Bernie… He is leading the pack and he is leading the delegates. By the way, one of the moderators last night asked every participant in the debate, “Do you think the Democrat with the largest number of delegates, even if it’s not the minimum requirement…?

“Should the Democrat with the largest number of delegates get the nomination?” Crazy Bernie was the only guy who put his hand up and said yes, ’cause he’s gonna have most of the delegates. Superdelegates, that’s when the DNC starts playing games to try to get rid of him. My point about the ratings is with a lot of people tuning in, the conventional wisdom is that these people looked like fools last night. To you and me, yeah.

But I’ll guarantee you that there are enough disaffected, angry, aggrieved people who think they’re victims who are gonna tune in and watch this thing last night, and if somebody impressed them? You just don’t count your chickens. You know the old hackneyed saying. But whereas the conventional wisdom even throughout much of the mainstream media is how… In fact, let me give you a sound bite of this. We put together a montage. (singing) Babadabba.

Yeah, here.

Grab number 5. This is a montage of the Drive-Bys reviewing Bloomberg and his performance. But the conventional wisdom is that this was a disaster for the Democrats last night — and some people say if the ratings were big, it’s an even bigger disaster. But I don’t think… What I have learned after 30 years of thinking, “Nobody’s gonna believe this leftist claptrap” — and I’ve watched the number of people who do grow and grow and grow — is I don’t discount anything. So this is not long. It’s about 37 seconds of Drive-By Media experts shocked by how disastrous Bloomberg was.

GLORIA BORGER: Bloomberg was awful. I’m sorry.

BAKARI SELLERS: The performance was godawful. It was one of the worst performances.

BRET BAIER: Bloomberg had a rough, rough go.

WILLIE GEIST: They tore the skin off him.

HOWIE KURTZ: You have to call Mike Bloomberg the loser.

SARAH SANDERS: He was definitely the big loser.

JASON JOHNSON: This probably was the most expensive night in Vegas I’ve ever seen. (chuckles) He lost everything. It was a very bad night.

MARC THIESSEN: An absolute flameout! What a disaster.

KRYSTAL BALL: It was an utter and complete disaster. He should have just stayed home.

VAN JONES: This was a disaster for Bloomberg. Bloomberg went in as the Titanic, billion-dollar machine Titanic. Titanic, meet iceberg.

RUSH: That’s Van Jones. Do you think they’re right? (interruption) You think they are right. You think in this case conventional wisdom has got it right? See… (interruption) I know. I know to us the guy looked like a doofus, deer in the headlights, didn’t know how to do things. But he still got all that money. And people are still fascinated by that. Especially Democrats. You know, don’t believe this garbage that Democrats don’t care about money. (Snort!)

They care about money more than you do, and they use it to gauge their stats and so forth. Why do you think most billionaires in America are Democrats? At any rate, here is Andrew Yang. Now, this is the guy, he’s out of the race. He’s a big climate change guy. He was telling everybody in the early debates we need to move people to higher ground because of climate change. He was on the CNN post-debate analysis, and somebody said to him, “Andrew, you know this field the best. You know what it’s like on that stage. What’s your take on what happened?”

Number 6. Three, two, one…

YANG: I don’t think he was coached hard enough. You coach him and you have him give you 60-, 75-second answers (claps his hands) over and over again until he can do it in his sleep. And the fact that he did not have those answers at his fingertips lets me know, categorically, he was not properly prepared for this debate.

BORGER: Well, they say they coached him on all of those issues, so —

BASH: And that he had extensive debate prep with —

BORGER: Exactly!

BASH: — with real mock debates with his aides playing all the roles of all the people.

RUSH: Okay. So how do you explain it? If they did coach him — and I told you, they did. If they coached him, and if he thus was supposedly prepared, then what happened? I’ll tell you what happened. He doesn’t believe the people who coached him. There isn’t anybody that can tell him any more than he already knows. He is one of these personality types, partly because he has all this money.

He thinks he’s smarter than anybody else and there’s nobody that can tell him anything. Nobody in politics can tell him anything. He’s been mayor of New York and he commanded, “You can’t have a soft drink more than 12 ounces!” He’s the expert. He’s the expert in how much sodium you should be eating, and nobody can tell him different. So, yeah, he went through the coaching, but it obviously didn’t take. Here’s more Andrew Yang as he adds to the analysis.

YANG: Donors who are on the sidelines right now, frankly, are getting phone calls from Mike Bloomberg saying, “Hey sit this one out; I got this,” and if you’re a donor, not donating is actually a pretty appealing pitch.

PANELISTS: (laughter)

BASH: Mike Bloomberg is calling donors saying, “Don’t give to my opponents”?

YANG: Mike Bloomberg is calling donors, saying, “Hey, just sit this one out. I’ve got this. I’ll bankroll the whole thing. Uh, just don’t donate to anybody.” I heard this from a major donor, a person who donates to a number of candidates, ordinarily.

BASH: Yeah.

RUSH: Ah, don’t you love that? He’s calling other donors, “Don’t donate to these people, I got it, I got it handled.” And then he watched the debate last night, “I don’t think you got it, Mini Mike, I don’t think you got it handled.” We’ll see.

Folks, talking about Democrats watching a debate, when the conventional wisdom says that Bloomberg stunk up the joint, it’s entirely possible that many Democrats watching loved it. Don’t doubt me. I’m not predicting it, but I’m just telling you I wouldn’t be surprised. When’s the last time you believed the media on anything, huh? (interruption) Who? (interruption) Mr. Snerdley’s asking me if I think the Democrat base appreciated Bloomberg talking about how he made his own money with hard work.

No. They think the game’s rigged. That doesn’t impress them. If Bloomberg was giving it all away, like the Kennedys pretended to do, he might have a little bit more — that doesn’t impress them. (interruption) Well, no, his best moment was when he told Crazy Bernie that “your conversation about communism is the best damn thing to get Donald Trump elected happening on this stage tonight.” That was his best moment.

We got one more Doug Schoen. Doug Schoen has come out of retirement. He’s been a Fox News political analyst ever since he got dumped by the Clintons. I mean, he left the Clintons. I’m sorry. Now he’s back with Doomberg. Doomberg has hired Doug Schoen. So Doug Schoen was on Fox News last night, and it was Mike Emanuel filling in for whoever. He said, “Hey, Doug, give me a winner and loser after this debate last night, please.”

SCHOEN: The winner tonight was Donald Trump. I mean, the Democrats forgot that the opponent is the president, not one another.

RUSH: No, they didn’t.

SCHOEN: The personal attacks may have sounded good to some viewers or some ideologues, but the loser are the Democrats. If we nominate a socialist like Bernie Sanders, who doesn’t accept capitalism or people who believe in massive tax increases, we’re gonna lose. It will be like George McGovern. It will be a blowout. Or like Mike Dukakis. Frankly, I was very discouraged with what I saw as a Democrat and as somebody who wants the party to win in November.

RUSH: Now, this is what I don’t get. These candidates all hit Trump last night. They also hit each other. What the hell are they supposed to do? Trump’s not the opponent right now. If you’re Mayor Pete, Klobuchar and everybody else is the opponent. Well, Bloomberg’s the opponent, Crazy Bernie. What are they supposed to do? They have to hit each other last night.

And here’s another thing. Doug, you have to forgive me. The idea that McGovern’s an outlier or that Dukakis is — how come your party keeps nominating socialist outliers? Your party keeps nominating socialists. Obama was. Obama had everybody cowed. You can’t have a bigger Trojan horse than Barack Obama. Obama gets elected, 40% of the white vote because they want to end racism. They’re tired of being called racists. And they think the best way to eliminate all this talk about America being a racist nation is to vote for the first black guy running for president.

So they did. And then what does Obama do? Here comes massive Obamacare, here comes all this big-time left-wing socialism. They didn’t call it that, but that’s what it was. There isn’t a Democrat on that stage who’s not a socialist. Bernie is a communist. But how in the world, Govern and Dukakis? Yeah, these are the standard-bearers. The Kennedys were the same way.

The idea that these guys are outliers is what’s wrong. The Democrat Party is a Socialist Party. You cannot conclude anything other than that when the leading frontrunner is a communist. Crazy Bernie. How in the world do you say he’s an outlier? Sorry, Doug. But the Democrat Party, when it had guys in it like — oh, who was that old guy from Texas? John Connally and then — (interruption) Who? (interruption) Well, Lloyd Bentsen, yes, but he’s not the guy I’m thinking of. There was a Democrat Party standard-bearer. Can’t think of his name. It will come to me.

But those days of the Democrat Party are gone. Mondale was a socialist communist. Look what he was talking about in 1984 when he was running against Reagan. The idea that this party is somehow some centrist bunch of mild, peaceful, harmless Democrats is a biggest myth in American politics.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Andrew Yang says that Bloomberg is calling other donors and telling them to sit it out. Right? Does that constitute rigging the election? If one candidate is telling other donors to sit it out, that he can handle it, and you’re another Democrat candidate, would you think that that is an attempt to rig the primary?
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34