There is that, but I fault him on the facts. What abuse of power? Name one. He can't. He tries but facts prove him wrong. Even the Democrats can't seem to name any instances of abuse of power or crimes. Yet they state the charge as tho that in itself is enough to convict. I need facts.
I agree.
But then let's remember, that no one has clearly defined "abuse" in this instance.
If calling for the investigation of corruption of Democrats and their kin from previous administrations is "abuse" (a word democrats seem to abuse regularly), then it may be that they see the duties of his office, actually being performed as abusive.
If we look at some of the things they see as 'abusive', we can start with the use of factual information to enforce the law, which seems to be the combination of number one and two on their list, especially if they aren't the ones doing it.
