VIDEO: Is the Whistleblower's Name the New Yahweh (YHWH)?

[pjcomix]

Since liberals treat the name of the Whistleblower as something so sacred that it can never be said aloud, has it become the new Yahweh? At least the ancient Hebrews were allowed to read the consonants, YHWH, but liberals nowadays would probably not even allow the consonants of the Whistleblower's name to be published. As we saw, President Trump is now being criticized for retweeting a post that links to a story in which that name of the liberal holiest of hollies is mentioned.

Note to YouTube: Nowhere in this video is the sacred name of the Whistleblower (nor even his consonants) mentioned, so help me Gaia.

Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

 @mystery-ak   @Cyber Liberty

[PeteS in CA]

IMO, the LeakBlower is more like "He who must not be named", Voldemort.

There is no law the mandate he be kept anonymous, but the Dems have lied about there be one so as to peddle their ludicrous narrative that President Trump is dangerous.

[Cyber Liberty]

IMO, the LeakBlower is more like "He who must not be named", Voldemort.

There is no law the mandate he be kept anonymous, but the Dems have lied about there be one so as to peddle their ludicrous narrative that President Trump is dangerous.

The Rats will have to keep that narrative going if there are going to be witnesses called.  Leakblower will be at the top of the list.

[corbe]

The real reason Eric Ciaramella is being protected so fervently

Published 1 hour ago on December 29, 2019   

By JD Rucker ï‚™   

Several mainstream media outlets are in full attack-mode against President Trump for Tweets he made over the weekend that name CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella as the whistleblower in the Ukraine scandal. There are stories galore about the flurry of Tweets the President made, noting how many of the accounts he Tweeted were “questionable.” Twitter even suspended several of them shortly after the President retweeted them.

When the media universally condemns something like this, they usually received a mass memo from Democratic handlers. There’s a lot to unpack, here. Let’s start with “outing” Eric Ciaramella. Is it wrong for news outlets to name him as fitting all of the known facts about the whistleblower, many of which were initially reported by the NY Times? No. His name has been widely publicized as being the whistleblower based on a ton of circumstantial evidence, including a document naming him as relevant to the impeachment hearing released by Adam Schiff’s own office. The next obvious question is whether or not it’s legal for the President or anyone else in DC to name him. Again, the answer is no for everyone other than the inspector general or IG office staff. Even left-leaning FactCheck.org had to resort to obscure “expert” blog posts to cast any doubt on the issue before finally admitting it is not against the law unless there’s retribution.

<..snip..>

https://noqreport.com/2019/12/29/real-reason-eric-ciaramella-protected-fervently/

[Chosen Daughter]

Trump is out of control and this is once again offensive.  Defending Trump once again leads to comparisons to Jesus.

[PeteS in CA]

Trump is out of control and this is once again offensive.  Defending Trump once again leads to comparisons to Jesus.

If you're saying that pj compared Trump to Jesus, you misread his post.

As for Trump being "out of control" doesn't Ciaramella's continued residence in the land of the living - weeks after his name became publicly known - pretty much disprove the Dems' claim that Trump is a danger to Ciaramella?

[EdinVA]

We need to pass whatever legislation is required to make it easier for government employees to be fired by ANY superior.
These folks are running around spewing whatever sails thru their empty heads in pursuit of their 15 minutes of fame and big check from the liberals supporting them.