Author Topic: Rush Transcripts...Dec. 3rd  (Read 455 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 381,855
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Rush Transcripts...Dec. 3rd
« on: December 03, 2019, 06:45:30 pm »
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/



Trump Makes Stand at NATO Summit

Dec 3, 2019



RUSH: The media today was going wild over Trump’s comments from the NATO summit in London where he called Macron’s comments about NATO being brain-dead insulting. And of course Trump is the guy who has said that NATO is useless, that’s it’s worthless without in the United States. It is Trump who has said that none of these other member nations are paying anywhere near their fair share of the operating expenses and the upkeep.

Now, for those of you who don’t know, there aren’t actually dues. NATO’s not some club where they’ve got a general secretary and an IT director and then somebody in billing and assessment. They don’t send out bills to member nations. The way a member nation pays its responsibilities in NATO is by way of funding its own defense. And that’s what a number of NATO members haven’t been doing. And we never call them on it. And you know why we never call them on it?

It’s the same reason this crazy world order that was set up after World War II got set up. Basically, here’s the premise of the current existing world order. It’s unfair that the United States is so big; it’s unfair the United States is so rich; it’s unfair the United States is so prosperous; it’s unfair the United States is so influential and dominate.

So the United States will pay more than its fair share. The United States will allow member nations of the United Nations to pick its pocket now and then. Americans set this up, by the way. Americans set this up as a way of assuaging their guilt, as a way of, they would say, keeping the peace. But it’s classic. It’s almost people who were embarrassed at the superpower status, both economically, militarily, any number of ways.

And I’m not exaggerating this. I’m not making this up. This is classic the way this current world order exists. And what’s always been ironic about it to me, here we have the United States of America who’s been around hundreds of years less than European countries. And, by the way, this is not a rub on European countries, don’t misunderstand me when I say this. There are many, many reasons for this. But in less than 250 years a nation that never existed was founded and became the dominant economic power, moral power, military power the world had ever seen.

Meanwhile, nations around the world, including in Europe, been around thousands of years, can’t even hold a candle to us. Now, as I say, there are reasons for it. So then we have these world organizations, we got European Union, we got the NATO, then we’ve got the G7, the G20, the G8, whatever it is. And in every one of these organizations, the United States is pointed to, “It’s unfair you’re so big. It’s unfair you’re so powerful.” We’ve always had Americans agree. “You know, it really is.”

And so to balance this out we’ve allowed our pockets to be picked. We have allowed ourselves to be guilted into paying for everything, disaster relief around the world, because we can. But rather than the United States becoming a model for other nations and economies to follow in order to achieve their own degree of such power and success, they have been allowed to go ahead and run themselves as quasi-socialist democracies depending on the United States for trade, for defense, for any number of things.

And there has been very little real appreciation for it. The real appreciation lasted just a few years after World War II. And depending on who the U.S. president is, they can really hate us, as they do now with Donald Trump.

So Trump comes in like a bull in a china shop and says this whole existing world order stuff doesn’t make any sense. We shouldn’t be the ones having to defend the world, we shouldn’t, the ones having to feed the world. If we’re gonna do it, you’re gonna pay us. For crying out loud, none of this is fair. And these people are freaking out, and they have been ever since he was elected.

So he shows up to the NATO meeting during the campaign. I’m convinced that one of the reasons the intelligence community, the deep state, were originally appalled at Trump was due to his statements about NATO during the campaign. You know, NATO is like any other bureaucracy. It is set up to perpetuate itself. It is there for its ostensible purpose, to defend member nations against the evil transgressions of tyrannical regimes like in Russia, and at the time East Germany, Soviet Union, what have you.

Now those tyrannical governments are gone or are much smaller, but NATO hasn’t changed its charter. It’s been allowed to exist, it’s got fat, dumb, and happy, and it’s got its own bureaucracy of people who don’t do much and who don’t want to solve much because then there’s no reason to exist. And NATO, like a number of other bureaucracies in the United States, has become a place where the elites exclusively appoint themselves and their children and use it to fatten their lifestyles.

I’m not exaggerating this. That’s why Trump is viewed as such a threat, because he has no respect for that. That’s not what the purpose of NATO is. For him, NATO is defensive in nature. It is there to protect member states against aggression. It’s not there to make sure your kids have a job in the future. It’s not there to make sure that you have three homes somewhere. It’s not there to perpetuate your constant leadership position whether you’ve earned it or not.

It has a specific purpose. That specific purpose has been watered down and diluted, and Trump wants to build it back up. And he thinks the only way it’s gonna happen is if these member states actually pay for what they are getting, what they are being provided.

For the longest time the Europeans didn’t fund any of their own defense. We were putting missiles in Europe to protect them and us against whatever aggression might come from the Soviet Union or from East Germany or from any of the other Soviet — the Eastern Bloc. And that allowed them to become these fat, dumb, and happy welfare states that allowed them to experiment with open borders because their birthrate replacement levels started plunging. They didn’t have enough of their own native human beings to maintain populations, so like Angela Merkel opening up the borders to let immigrants from all over the world in thinking it’s gonna lead to all kinds of new employees feeding new industries and jobs. And of course it’s done nothing but corrupt her culture.

Trump sees all of this and is hell-bent on taking it back to what it intended to be. And there’s so many people who depend on NATO as it has become. Trump is viewed as somebody who’s gonna turn everything upside down, harm them professionally, harm them economically. This will not — especially some guy who in their view isn’t even qualified to be president or to tell them which way is up when it comes to American foreign policy.

Remember when the Democrats in Congress, the media, were telling us that Trump is gonna destroy NATO? That’s what they were originally afraid of. That’s why they got their backs all arched up and out of whack. Trump has actually made it stronger, just like Trump has improved the U.S. economy, just like Trump has improved American trade deals around the world and our status.

He has made NATO stronger than ever by jawboning these other member states into increasing their own defense spending. Western Europe is much more capable of defending itself than it’s ever been. And they are mad as heck at Trump about it.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  What’s interesting is that Trump is being blasted by the very same people who never wanted him to be elected president because he was blasting NATO, because he was criticizing and ripping NATO for being ineffective.  The United States was paying way too much of a burden, not just financially, but in the actual defense of Europe.  They were getting off easy.  It was time for them to share more of the load, more of the burden, particularly for their own defense.  These people wigged out.

“This guy is dangerous.  This guy is upsetting the order!”

It’s kind of like those civil servants (whining), “He’s going outside the channels!  He’s ignoring the interagency group!” It’s the same thing here.  It’s identical.  In fact, you remember those people that showed up and testified, Colonel Vindman…? I’m sorry. Lieutenant Colonel Vindman — O say can you see — and then Fiona Hill and what’s her name, Yovanovitch. All these, they’re NATO people.  It’s all the same type of bureaucrat/civil servant/diplomat/intelligence official, whoever, and they’re all…

Remember they were wigging out?  So what did Trump do?  Trump today fired back at the French leader, Macron, who ripped into NATO, saying that NATO is “experiencing … brain death.”  Trump called Macron’s comments “very insulting and nasty.” If anybody’s gonna insult NATO, it’s gonna be Donald Trump, but none of these other people are.  When they start insulting NATO, he comes to its defense — and the reason is, it’s doing things right for a change now.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 381,855
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Dec. 3rd
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2019, 06:46:20 pm »

They’re Gonna Miss This Guy When He’s Gone

Dec 3, 2019



RUSH: You know, it’s amazing, and I think it’s just kind of taken for granted now. Donald Trump has spent the whole day talking to the media while he was talking to world leaders. He talks to them with the media there. It went on for an hour with macaroon, Macron, whatever, from France, and then Justin Trudeau from Canada, and these guys are like little puppy dogs sidling up to Trump, wanting his approval.

You know, Macron tried to act like he was growing a pair by ripping Trump on something, and Trump wasn’t having it. And it’s just fun to watch. I’m gonna tell you the Drive-Bys may hate this guy, but when he’s gone, they’re not gonna know what to do, because while Trump is here, they have abandoned the whole concept of covering news. And at some point, they’re gonna have to go back to that. At some point they’re gonna have to get interested in something that isn’t Donald Trump.

And, you know, the longer you get into bad habits, the more common the bad habits are and the harder they are to break. And it’s worse than a bad habit, what the Drive-By Media is doing, but, I mean, they have become so — can you imagine, they hate this guy and they can’t ignore him. The way to do the most damage to Donald Trump — I probably shouldn’t tell ’em how to do it. They couldn’t do it anyway, even if they believed and trusted me.

But it’s fascinating to watch. They hate the guy. They despise the guy. And they can’t stop looking at him. They can’t stop listening to him. They can’t stop making their entire world, their entire existence about Donald Trump. Everybody in the Drive-By Media, the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, I know they think of themselves as the resistance, but, believe me, they are gonna miss this guy when he is gone. He is compelling.

You know, when you see Trump on TV, when they do, they stop, they stop everything and listen. They’re looking for their hatred being fed. They’re looking for energy, whatever it is. They watch in great resentment. They watch and catalog all the lies, and they look at each other, “Can you believe this guy? Can you believe this guy?”

“No, I can’t believe this guy.” Then they turn right back to the TV and get more of it. “Can you believe this guy?” Then they call their Never Trumper buddies. “Did you hear what this guy just — I can’t believe this guy.” And then they turn right back to the TV for another dose. He is without question — this is not a competence assessment here — he simply is the most interesting politician in the country right now. And it’s been many, many, many moons, ladies and gentlemen — a little Elizabeth Warren lingo there — many moons since there has been anybody else this interesting in politics.

You know, politics is showbiz for the ugly. It’s a way to look at it. And Trump is kind of a crossover. He’s done showbiz for the ugly, and he’s done showbiz for the beautiful. And that’s another reason why they resent him. He’s a bigger star than they are. I mean, they look at Trump and they see the burgeoning crowds at rallies, and they realize there’s nothing this guy does that they could do. None of them could run for president and get elected. None of ’em could win a state. None of ’em could win a precinct. None of ’em could win a primary. They hate this guy. But they can’t stop oogling the guy.

I’m gonna tell you, they’re gonna be bored to death when he’s off the stage in, what, another five years. They’re not gonna be able to stop covering him after he leaves the White House. That’s when they’re gonna try to put him in jail. Adam Schiff’s gonna be walking around with a cane carrying a bunch of files from whistleblowers saying, “I got the evidence right here,” calling whoever’s at the Southern District of New York, “Please listen to me, we finally got the goods on Trump.”

It’s so bad. Melania introduces the gorgeous — have you seen ’em? You know, folks, I wish everybody could visit the White House during the holiday season. I’ve been there during George H. W. Bush, back in the early nineties. I was there when George W. Bush was president. And I went to a White House Christmas party last year.

The way the White House is decked out with the Army and Navy orchestras and string ensembles playing Christmas music throughout the mansion, it’s just stunning. It is classic Americana. And it is exactly the way you would think Christmas should be presented at the epitome of the ability to do it. It’s just stunningly gorgeous.

So the Washington Post, somebody, did a story on it, the decorations that Melania introduced, and what did they do? They had to go after her clothes. They had to rip her coat. They praised the decorations, then we get a big piece in the Washington Post about how she’s a loner and the choice of coat that she wore to introduce the decorations was pathetic. This is the same bunch of people who thought that Michelle Obama was a style-setting trend maker.

And then of course we’ve got the story today that the Trumps don’t sleep in the same bed. Do you think the Clintons did, folks? Ahem. Just asking. Do you know how unrare it is for presidents to sleep alone for all kinds of reasons, I don’t want to delve into deeply personal things, but, I mean, they don’t have any boundaries in where they will — they hate Melania. They despise her. She is everything they secretly wish they were, is the bottom line. Which is true of most people who hate. They wish were they what they hate. Hatred in many ways is just resentment.

So Macron sidling up to Trump, spending all this time talking about how much he and Trump agree about things, and Trump’s not letting him get away with it. “Oh, no, we don’t.” You know, Trump doesn’t like Facebook or Google or Amazon, but the French have decided they’re gonna raise taxes on ‘em. Trump said (paraphrasing), “No, you’re not. You are France, you are not America, you are not gonna tax American companies. If anybody’s gonna do that, I am. But you’re not.”

He even stood up for NATO today. You know, he constantly crosses these people up.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 381,855
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Dec. 3rd
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2019, 07:47:32 pm »

Keep Eyes on the Barr-Durham Investigation, Not the IG Report

Dec 3, 2019



RUSH: The other big news of the day, there’s a Washington Post story, and it has another famous, anonymous source. We don’t know who the source is. And the story says the attorney general, William Barr, has told, quote, unquote, associates that he disagrees with Horowitz’s conclusion – it’s the inspector general — report coming week from yesterday, December 9th. That he, Barr, disagrees with Horowitz’s conclusion that the FBI had enough information in July 2016 to justify launching the investigation into the Trump campaign.

So the story is that Barr disagrees. He doesn’t think they had enough information to start the investigation. He thinks it was a spy operation. Now, we don’t know if this is true or not, it’s the Washington Post. They and the New York Times literally made up things. They literally created sources, made ’em anonymous out of thin air in order to have their own opinions reported as news. And make no mistake, that is what has happened. That’s what’s become of mainstream media.

It is no longer — and you know this without me having to say it — it’s no longer about the news. It hasn’t been about the news in I don’t know how long. It’s nothing but left-wing activism or left-wing opinion that is camouflaged and disguised as news and reporting, so we don’t even know if this story is accurate. We don’t know who the source is. And intelligence guided by experience, the source may not exist. It could be totally made up. It’s just one story out there.

Now, it rings true to a lot of people because — look, my friends, I don’t know how long ago it was. It’s been at least weeks that I shared my own personal opinion on this inspector general report, that it was not gonna be anything anybody would be happy about. The inspector general is so limited in what he can do. He can’t really even compel testimony. The people he talks to are given two weeks to look at the report and lobby for changes and edits.

And the inspector general is a deep stater. He’s one of them. He’s a swampist. And I have never thought — especially — we were gonna get this report in May. And it’s been delayed, and it’s been delayed, and we’ve had one excuse after another to tell us why it’s being delayed. There’s no reason for it being delayed. We know what happened. And we know that the investigation into Trump did not start in July of 2016. But that’s their story, and they’re sticking with it.

I saw McCabe, who has been fired from the FBI — he’s now hired by CNN as a commentator — and I’m thinking this is three weeks ago, maybe even longer, I saw McCabe explaining the justification for and the timeline for the beginning of the FBI investigation into the possible Russian collusion with Trump. And then he retold the George Papadopoulos story.

(imitating McCabe) “George Papadopoulos was in London, and he told a number of people that he was a Trump campaign official. He told a bunch of people that he knew the Trump campaign knew the Russians had dirt on Hillary.” Papadopoulos never said emails, by the way. He said dirt. And McCabe insisted that that’s when this began.

Well, we know it began before that. The FBI was running operations on this before the summer of July 2016. The Papadopoulos angle is toward the end of the month. And you know the story is that Papadopoulos was invited to London by one of the FBI informants named Stefan Halper. He’s either a Cambridge or Oxford professor. He’s best friends with the MI5, former MI5, CIA in London, a guy named Breedlove or Goodlove or Epsteinlove or whatever his name is. He and Halper are dead close, dead tight.

Halper’s also worked for some American presidents. He’s got a farm in Virginia. So he’s wired deeply into this whole FBI, CIA intelligence community, both the U.K., the United States. And he calls Papadopoulos. He’s a recent hire in the Trump campaign as a foreign policy adviser. Remember, when Trump gets started in this campaign, he’s never done it before.

And he’s not fully staffed. And one of the things that, quote, unquote, you just have to do, you have to have advisers in your campaign, you have to have foreign policy advisers, you have to have domestic policy advisers, you have to have this adviser and that adviser. Just the way it’s always done. And Trump was slow to staff up.

So Papadopoulos was a guy that had been recently hired to join the Trump foreign policy apparatus. He gets a call from Stefan Halper inviting him to London. Travel is paid for. Hotel accommodations are paid for. I think he was paid $3,000 to give a lecture at some organization. They wanted to get him there. When they got him there is when they told him the Russians had dirt on Hillary. There’s another agent involved here named Joseph Mifsud.

Now, Mifsud is also one of the people suspected of, quote, unquote, telling Papadopoulos the Russians had dirt on Hillary. Mifsud is denying it. The Mueller report portrays Mifsud as a Russian agent in order to tie Papadopoulos and Trump to the Russians. The short version of this, after they tell Papadopoulos this, they then arrange for him to meet the Australian ambassador at a London bar, where Papadopoulos tells Alexander Downer — ’cause right before he goes to the meeting with Downer, Stefan Halper says, “Remember, George, the Russians got some dirt on Hillary. Remember that?”

“Oh, yeah.” Papadopoulos goes, tells this to Downer. Downer’s initial reaction is that Papadopoulos is a kook. “What do you mean, the Russians –” but that was just for show. Because after Papadopoulos mentions this, which he didn’t know until FBI agents or informants told him this, Papadopoulos didn’t know what the Russians had without somebody telling him. It was FBI reps that did. Downer then calls the FBI, former Australian ambassador, big ties to the Clintons, big ties to the Clinton Foundation. And Downer tells the FBI, “Hey, I’ve got this guy from the Trump campaign that just told me that he knows that the Russians have dirt on Hillary.”

That’s what they’re saying is the beginning of this investigation. That’s an absolute crock. They set that up before it happened, and there were other things going on during the Trump campaign that they were trying to undermine. And all during this time I mentioned yesterday Obama, in April of 2016 and maybe even in 2015, is telling everybody, there’s no way the Russians could hack or affect the outcome of a presidential election. It’s silly to think so. It’s too complex, it’s too spread out. The Electoral College would be impossible for anybody to know where to go and what to do. Voting machines are not connected to the internet. It’s not possible.

And all that was being done to make sure that after Hillary won, which everybody knew was gonna happen, that her election would not be seen as tainted. It would be totally pure and totally genuine. Well, then she loses. Trump wins. So now they gotta taint his election. So guess what? He colluded with Russia. The idea that this started in July of 2016 with George Papadopoulos — but that, I think, based on my reading of the Washington Post story, this is what Barr disagrees with, if this story is true. And it’s what the inspector general’s gonna say makes perfect sense.

The FBI had every reason — you better be prepared, this IG report is gonna say they had every reason to investigate. You’re gonna get ticked off like you haven’t been ticked off. Remember, I told you, the IG, this whole segment, they’re not gonna be turn on each other here. They’re gonna have each other’s backs. Even the Struck Strzok Smirk-Pages of the world and McCabes and all these people that fired Comey, people in disgrace, they’re gonna be defended and backed up.

The story could well be true. And Barr would be well within his rights to disagree with it. Barr thinks the Trump campaign was spied on. That’s why he’s got his own investigator and a grand jury doing his own investigation into this. But whether the Post story’s true or not, I don’t know.

Look, I want to repeat a story for you, because I need to give you as much, quote, unquote, evidence, as much reason as I can to believe the degree to which the Obama DOJ and intelligence community conspired against Trump and the idea that this investigation began ’cause the FBI was minding its own business, one day was shocked to learn that a new hire in the Trump foreign policy apparatus was running around talking about the Russians having dirt on Hillary.

Give me a break. But that’s their story, and that’s what they’re sticking to. And that’s what the IG report is apparently gonna say, that that’s perfectly warranted as a reason for the investigation setup.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  Des Moines, Iowa. We are starting here with Bill.  Great to have you on the program, sir.

CALLER:  Thanks for taking my call, Rush.

RUSH:  By the way, Bill, you’re in Iowa.  Did you hear what Biden said about black people finding the blond hair on his legs when he’s in the swimming pool fascinating?

CALLER: (laughing)

RUSH: Did you hear that?

CALLER:  The creepiest thing I’ve ever heard — and then last night, I watched all these Democratic strategists (laughing) stick up and saying we “took it out of context.” We just listened to it! (laughing)

RUSH: (laughing) It just boggles the mind — and then the picture of him sucking on his wife’s finger at the podium.

CALLER:  Oh, we were told, “That’s the Bidens just being playful.” He is creepy.  It is just creepy.  I have a quick question for you —

RUSH: Yeah?

CALLER: — and this is not attacking my fellow conservatives at all.  But as the Russia hoax collapsed in CNBC and CNN’s hands like dust, their ratings took a plummet ’cause they kept saying they had the goods for years.  Well, then all of a sudden, the Mueller report comes out, Mueller gets in front, and he’s a complete dud. He doesn’t know what’s in his own report.  Their ratings dropped.  Watching Hannity last night, it felt like he was kind of walking back a little bit.  Are you concerned at all that a similar thing…? I’ve noticed that a similar thing could happen to this report coming out Monday.  I just wanted to get your thoughts on: Are we setting ourselves up for the same thing that happened to liberals with Mueller?

RUSH:  Now, now, now, now. Let me restate the premise of the question.  What old Bill here — who was admittedly creeped out by Biden talking about how black people love and are fascinated by the blond hair on his legs coming up when they see it in the pool. I don’t know how they… (Eh, I don’t even want to go there.) Bill remembers that after two years of nightly assurances and promises by everybody on MSNBC that Donald Trump was going to jail, that he had cheated, that he was a traitor.

He colluded with the Russians. The election was illegitimate. Hillary really had won; the Mueller report was gonna establish it.  Two years of every night, multiple times a day in the newspapers.  Then the Mueller report hits, and guess what?  No collusion.  And MSNBC promptly lost 1.5 million viewers in prime time.  They just vanished. It made perfect sense.  That audience had been lied to.  Now, that audience is back, which is interesting.  I’ll explain that in a minute.  They’ve almost recovered that audience.

So what Bill wants to know here is, “Oh, my.  Could that happen to Fox?  Because Fox has been telling us that all these deep state people are headed for jail for two years.  We’ve been hearing this and that from all these guests on Fox.”  The only way that — and you said you’re hearing people talk things back.  Look, I don’t watch enough every night to know.  If there have been guests and so forth on Fox promising viewers that the inspector general report is gonna identify criminal behavior and have it referred for prosecution?

(Sigh) Then they’re gonna have a problem.  If they have just predicted that that’s gonna happen at some point but not specifically tied to the IG report, then they’re not as vulnerable.  But if the predictions have been based on specifically what the IG report is gonna have, I guess that possibility exists.  But there’s a difference in the two audiences, and I don’t think any Fox drop-off would even come close to what happened at MSNBC — and I’ll tell you why, except I’ve run out of time to do it right now.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Let me follow up on the previous call from Iowa. It really is true that MSNBC lost — they went from Rachel Maddow’s show is 9 o’clock prime time, after two years of promising that audience that Trump was going to jail, kicked out of the White House, not be impeached, he was gonna be criminally charged, he was an agent of Russia, he was a treasonous agent, he stole the election, worked with Putin. They told their audience that every day, all day and all night.

And they literally created a mad pack of insane lunatics that called themselves the Resistance with a capital R. That’s not an accidental name. It is purposeful. The resistance is the French resisting the Nazis. It traces back in the modern era to World War II, resisting the evil empire, which at the time was Nazi Germany. So that’s the reason it was chosen.

MSNBC and CNN, too, was feeding their audiences. And, by the way, they were all being fed by the New York Times. The New York Times is the, oh, I don’t know leader in all this. You know, they had that piece written by Jim Ruten — Ruten — I’m having a mental block — was it Rutenberg who said when a guy like Trump is elected, you have to throw out every principle of journalism there is and stop him. And so the New York Times gave up everything that it had, I think, falsely achieved.

I don’t think the New York Times ever has been fair and even and only opinionated on opinion pages. I think the New York Times has been a left-wing rag for a long time. But they went all-in. They ripped the camouflage away and said, “This is what we are purposed to now, is getting Donald Trump and taking him out of office.”

So as the Bible, all the other disciples in the news business, from the Washington Post to CNN to MSNBC, to NBC News, ABC, CBS, they followed suit. And so, yeah, their audiences believed them, trusted them, accepted it all as undeniable. And so they believed that the culmination of all of it, the Mueller investigation, was gonna upturn the evidence. They’d already seen it in the New York Times. The New York Times already reported the evidence.

I don’t know if you remember, the New York Times had anonymous quote after anonymous quote day after day after day of what Trump had done, what Trump had said, who Trump had met, what Trump associates were doing. It was outrageous. You know, we’ve forgotten it because it’s been replaced by current day outrages.

You know, the Kavanaugh thing became it’s own life form, and then this Schiff impeachment debacle, it’s become its own life form. And that’s all these last three years have been. Well, when the Mueller report came out and there was no collusion and there was no evidence of collusion and there was no obstruction, the MSNBC audience abandoned them. And in prime time they went from three million down to almost just 800,000.

So the question was, will the same thing happen to Fox? And I don’t know. I doubt it. I don’t know how many people on Fox have been promising their audience the IG report is going to contain lots of criminal referrals and people are going to jail. If anybody’s been saying it, I haven’t heard it, ’cause I’ll tell you, the IG report’s not gonna say that. The IG report is not gonna be satisfactory to many of us at all. The difference is that I didn’t expect that it would be.

And again, it was supposed to be out in May, then it was delayed and delayed and delayed and we kept getting reasons for the delay. Just call me a doubting Thomas, I never thought there was gonna be anything to it. I think that’s why Barr has begun his own investigation. I think the Fox audience is not going to have anything happen to it like the MSNBC audience did, because the Mueller report was final. That was it. There was nothing else going on that that audience could latch on to with continued hope. They just had their reality snatched out from underneath them.

But here there is the Durham, slash, Barr investigation that is ongoing. There’s also another thing. Whatever the people watching Fox have been told is the truth. The people watching MSNBC have been lied to. The people watching MSNBC were lied to. The people watching CNN have been lied to. The people reading the New York Times have been lied to over and over and over again.

If you watch Fox News, we’re talking prime time, if you watch Fox News you have been told the truth about what happened. The problem is, the people that engaged in all of this, what I think is clear illegality, I think it’s always been a long shot that the swamp is going to exact any kind of serious punishment on itself, and that’s all the IG is. He’s a swampist.

So the frustration’s gonna be there, but I don’t think the Fox audience is gonna think at the end of the day they’ve been lied to about it. They might have other reactions, but not over the substance of what they’ve been told. The frustration’s gonna be how unfair it is, how stacked the deck is, the ongoing frustrations. The deep state’s big. The deep state’s the Democrat Party. And they’ve got their defenses up and they’re out to protect themselves.

Now, let me give you a real CliffsNotes version. I started to talk about it a little yesterday. I want you to remember things, and sometimes repetition’s the best way to get there. The degree to which the so-called deep state, the Obama DOJ and intelligence community conspired against Donald Trump. That story that came out before Thanksgiving about Obama and Trump meeting after the 2016 election and Obama saying, “Trump knows nothing,” it was a Politico story, I believe. Doesn’t matter.

It was reported that what Obama meant was that Trump is an absolute idiot. He doesn’t know a thing about how government works. He doesn’t know a thing about this town. He’s so unqualified. That’s how it was interpreted. I don’t think that’s what Obama meant.

I think what Obama was saying when he said Trump knows nothing, what he was saying was Trump yet did not know of the operation to undermine his campaign, did not know of the ongoing operation to undermine his transition and presidency. I think that’s what Obama meant. Because that operation had been underway since the summer of July ’16. By their own admission.

Let’s go back and let’s use the Papadopoulos story for just this purpose. Let’s say that was when it began — it didn’t, but that’s before the election. And that was an FBI setup. And Obama had to be in on all of this because it’s his underlings engaging in it. We know he was because of a meeting that happened on January 5th in the Oval Office. In that meeting, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and Obama, and there may have been some other staffers in there to memorialize it, but those are the principals. And a strategy was hatched.

The strategy was that they had a meeting coming up, a scheduled meeting with Trump at Trump Tower on January 6th the next day. Clapper, Brennan, Obama, and Comey decided – the dossier was out there at this time, but nobody had publicized it, nobody had put it in the news. The Hillary bought and paid for Steele dossier was all over town. McCain had gotten a copy of it, sent an associate of his over to the U.K. to get it. I mean, it was all over the place. The media had it. Just nobody could verify any of it. It was all bogus. But they wanted to use it.

They had no reason to use it. The purpose of the January 6th meeting was to tell Trump about it, which would make it news. Prior to the January 6th meeting, Trump, during the transition period, had said he didn’t need to meet with the intelligence people every day because he’s smart, he’s got a good memory. I don’t need to see ’em every day. Big no-no. Intelligence community wants access to the president every day.

Jimmy Carter, for example, the first meeting every day in the Oval Office was 7:30 with Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was the national security adviser who collated all the intel. President’s daily brief. And Trump here he was saying he was smart, had a good memory, didn’t need to meet with these people.

They thrive on access. They thrive on influencing foreign policy. And with Trump they were even more demanding of this access because they didn’t like him, they hated him, and they wanted to do whatever they could to sabotage whatever he might do they disagreed with. So they wanted that access. And Trump had just said, I don’t need to see these guys.

So Obama and Brennan and Clapper and Comey strategized that they will tell Trump about the dossier, one story in the dossier, in the January 6 meeting at Trump Tower. And they do it under the premise, “Mr. President, look, we know that you don’t think you need to meet with the intelligence people, but you do.” And after a certain period of time went by, Comey asked Clapper and Brennan to leave, and they did. So it’s just Comey and the president.

And after those guys leave, Comey tells Trump about the golden showers story in the dossier under the guise — this has all been testified to, by the way. I’m not making this up. This has all been testified to. It’s been written about, it’s out, it’s everywhere. Comey says to Trump (paraphrasing), “Mr. President, this is why we think you need to have regular meetings with the intelligence community. You need to know what’s out there. You need to know the kind of things our enemies are saying. You need to be prepared for it.” And Comey told him about the golden showers story. In essence, “Mr. President, there’s a credible story that you’ve hired prostitutes to urinate on a bed that President Obama slept in in Moscow.”

Now, Trump’s first reaction to this is to think that he’s being blackmailed. He knows that it didn’t happen. Now, Trump has also made a mistake at this point. Trump has assumed that all of these guys — Comey particularly — are gonna want to ingratiate themselves with him to keep their jobs.

He is unaware of how much they hate him. He is unaware how much they want to undermine him. Trump is also a natural charmer, and even if he were aware of that, he believes he could charm them out of their hatred and opposition. So when Comey tells him the story, Trump’s first reaction is that he’s being set up. This is blackmail. He knows it didn’t happen.

Why is this guy telling me this? He doesn’t know about the dossier. This is the first he’s heard of it, and only one particular story from it. So Trump says something (paraphrasing), “You know this is not true. This is crazy. That never happened.”

“I know, Mr. President, I know, but this is the kind of thing that you need to be aware of.” The president is not happy at this point and begins thinking of firing Comey at this point in time, which he should have done, in retrospect. Anyway, Comey leaves the Trump Tower office and calls Clapper, says, “Mission accomplished.”

“Mission accomplished” was telling Trump about the golden showers story. That makes it legitimate news in the way news is made, the way Washington works. So Clapper then called CNN, which would soon hire him as a commentator, analyst, and Clapper reported the president had just been told about the Steele dossier. Oh, my goodness, this is wonderful news, the dossier’s news, and CNN runs the story. They ended up getting a Pulitzer for reporting this when it was nothing more than an, “Okay. Go ahead” phone call from James Clapper. They got a Pulitzer for this.

Now, that all happened exactly as strategized by Obama, Clapper, Brennan, and Comey the day before. And then it was around that time that Trump says that he believes his wires are tapped at Trump Tower. And he was told by somebody in the intelligence community, and it was true, and they moved their campaign offices out of Trump at that point.

Now, the point I’m telling you this, this is the degree to which people conspired to set Donald Trump up to legitimize the dossier, to put it in the news. All the while Comey is lying to Trump, telling him he’s not a target of the investigation, and Trump gets mad that Comey will not say that in public. Now, after Comey did this, there are people throughout the White House, Trump staff who wanted Comey fired the minute this happened. They understood exactly what had gone on.

And the president was advised, “If you’re gonna fire Comey, do it now, do it before you’re inaugurated, do it now when everybody’s being fired with the change of administration. Don’t wait.” If he had fired Comey before he was inaugurated — well, I don’t know how much would have changed, but there would not have been a special counsel appointed because of it, I’ll damn well guarantee you that.

Trump should have fired Comey the minute he had suspicions, when he realized he couldn’t charm this guy, when he thought, “Oh, my God. They are trying to blackmail me.” But he didn’t. I don’t know why. I don’t know who was advising him not to. The point of the story here, folks, Obama’s is out there saying, “Trump knows nothing.” Yeah, Trump knows nothing of the efforts we’re engaged here to undermine him. I’m convinced that’s what he meant.

And at the same time, these guys are running around, the IG report saying, “No, there’s insufficient reason here to suggest the investigation should not have happened.” Hell’s bells, the IG report is as wrong as it can be, if that’s what it’s gonna end up saying. There was every reason to investigate this, and this last story I just gave you, which is widely known, if you’ve read the books and the columns about it. There’s every reason in the world that does not justify the FBI opening this investigation like the IG report’s supposedly gonna say, yeah, it makes perfect sense they would. They set it all up to happen the way it did.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 381,855
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Rush Transcripts...Dec. 3rd
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2019, 08:07:29 pm »

Kamala Couldn’t Overcome Mayor Pete, Mini Mike, Russian Agent

Dec 3, 2019



RUSH:  No big surprise.  Kamala Harris (Kamala Harris, whatever) has backed out or is dropping out of the 2020 presidential race.  She was never in it.  She was never in it.  The media hyped her a little bit because of all the boxes she checks off. She’s a woman, female.  Supposedly African-American, but really isn’t.  She hates Trump.  No nonsense, smart, had an affair Willie Brown. She checked all the boxes.  It just never worked out.

She just wasn’t able to get in there, can’t overcome Mayor Pete. Where you’ve got people like Joe Biden talking about his blond leg hair and sucking his wife’s fingers, I mean, if you’re Kamala Harris, how in the world do you compete? How do you campaign against that? What do you…? (interruption) What? (interruption) You couldn’t know about the Biden blond leg hair? (interruption) You haven’t heard that? (interruption)

Oh, yeah, he was talking about how young people — African-Americans — go nuts watching his leg hair turn blond in the sun and in the swimming pool.

He says they liked to go down there and hug his legs and so forth, that they’re fascinated by it.  I mean, how’s Kamala Harris supposed to compete with that?  This guy’s the frontrunner!  You know the next one that’s gonna drop outta here — maybe not next, but it’s imminent — is Fauxcahontas.  She’s gone.  After one week, Mini Mike has already bought 6% support in the Democrat primaries.  One week!  Mayor Pete creeping up in there.  Biden’s son’s lawyers left him in the middle of some paternity suit trial.  It’s bad news out there.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34