Author Topic: Report: Schiff lied about statute protecting whistlblower's anonymity  (Read 475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

Report: Schiff lied about statute protecting whistlblower's anonymity

    by: Free Press International News Service 2019-11-20 Source: FreePressers



House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff openly lied on two occasions during the Nov. 19 public impeachment hearings, reports say.

One falsehood by the California Democrat running the hearings came when he claimed that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had earlier testified that he thought President Donald Trump might have broken the law, Breitbart News noted.

In his opening statement on Tuesday, Schiff claimed that Vindman had reported his concerns about Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to a National Security Council lawyer because he thought the president might have done something illegal.

https://freepressers.com/articles/reports-schiff-caught-in-falsehoods-twice-during-tuesday-hearing?utm_source=&utm_medium=deployer&utm_campaign=Newsletter&utm_term=&utm_content=20191121182229

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,274
Re: Report: Schiff lied about statute protecting whistlblower's anonymity
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2019, 06:36:00 pm »
Schiff lied about a lot of things.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,142
Re: Report: Schiff lied about statute protecting whistlblower's anonymity
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2019, 06:59:08 pm »
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/20/democrat-jackie-speier-proves-no-law-protects-whistleblower-identity/

Quote
Speier read aloud from a Washington Post article published earlier in the day that fact-checked Schiff’s claim that the whistleblower — whom Democrats previously wanted to testify — has a “statutory right” to anonymity.

She read the following into the record (emphasis added):

Quote
Federal law expressly restricts the inspector general’s office from disclosing whistleblowers’ identities. It says that “the Inspector General shall not disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee, unless the Inspector General determines that such disclosure is unavoidable during the course of the investigation or the disclosure is made to an official of the Department of Justice responsible for determining whether a prosecution should be undertaken.”

That appears to be the lone statutory restriction on disclosing a whistleblower’s identity, applicable only to the inspector general’s office. We found no court rulings on whether whistleblowers have a right to anonymity under the ICWPA or related statutes.

Jackie Speier is a Dem and her district borders Nancy Pelosi's. Breitbart says she "accidentally" disproved Schiffty's claim about anonymity, but I think it's more of a, "The WashPost exposed the lie, it's time to admit it and move on," kind of thing.
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.