Author Topic: Is Putin Really the New King of the Middle East?  (Read 152 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,656
Is Putin Really the New King of the Middle East?
« on: October 20, 2019, 07:31:46 pm »
Is Putin Really the New King of the Middle East?
American Conservative, Oct 18, 2019, Patrick J. Buchanan

<snip>

Yet, consider what Putin has inherited and what his capabilities are for playing power broker of the Middle East.  He has a single naval base on the Med, Tartus, in Syria, which dates to the 1970s, and a new air base, Khmeimim, also in Syria.

The U.S. has seven NATO allies on the Med — Spain, France, Italy, Croatia, Albania, Greece and Turkey, and two on the Black Sea, Romania and Bulgaria. We have U.S. forces and bases in Afghanistan, Iraq, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman and Djibouti. Russia has no such panoply of bases in the Middle East or Persian Gulf.

We have the world’s largest economy. Russia’s economy is smaller than Italy’s, and not a tenth the size of ours.

And now that we are out of Syria’s civil war and the Kurds have cut their deal with Damascus, consider what we have just dumped into Vladimir Putin’s lap. He is now the man in the middle between Turkey and Syria.

The Syria of which Putin is now supposedly king contains Hezbollah, al-Qaida, ISIS, Iranians, Kurds, Turks on its northern border and Israelis on its Golan Heights. Five hundred thousand Syrians are dead from the civil war. Half the pre-war population has been uprooted, and millions are in exile in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and Europe.

If Putin wants to be king of this, and it is OK with Assad, how does that imperil the United States of America, 6,000 miles away?


More:  https://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/is-putin-really-the-new-king-of-the-middle-east/



« Last Edit: October 20, 2019, 07:36:22 pm by Right_in_Virginia »

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,656
Re: Is Putin Really the New King of the Middle East?
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2019, 07:36:54 pm »
FTA

Quote
If Congress believes we have interests in Syria so vital we should be willing to go to war for them — against Syria, Turkey, Russia or Iran — why does Congress not declare those interests and authorize war to secure them?

Our foreign policy elites have used Trump’s decision to bash him and parade their Churchillian credentials. But those same elites appear to lack the confidence to rally the nation to vote for a war to defend what they contend are vital American interests and defining American values.


Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,656
Re: Is Putin Really the New King of the Middle East?
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2019, 07:54:55 pm »
Quote
Five hundred thousand Syrians are dead from the civil war. Half the pre-war population has been uprooted, and millions are in exile in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and Europe.

I don't understand why any political or military "leader" would demand we embrace the status quo and object to our efforts to end this horror.

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,073
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Is Putin Really the New King of the Middle East?
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2019, 08:55:30 pm »
To the title of the thread...we should be so lucky Putin would think Syria is Afghanistan, only easier to defeat.  The Levant has "Quagmire" written all over it.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed: