Flynn Hearing Reveals Existence of Bombshell DOJ Memo Exonerating Michael Flynn By Sara Carter

[mystery-ak]

Flynn Hearing Reveals Existence of Bombshell DOJ Memo Exonerating Michael Flynn
By
Sara Carter -
September 10, 2019

A bombshell revelation was barely noticed at National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s hearing Tuesday, when his counsel revealed in court the existence of a Justice Department memo from Jan. 30, 2017 exonerating Flynn of any collusion with Russia. The memo, which has still not been made available to Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell, is part of a litany of Brady material she is demanding from prosecutors. The memo is currently under protective order and Powell is working with prosecutors to get it disclosed, SaraACarter.com has learned.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan presided over the hearing Tuesday  and set a tentative Dec. 18 sentencing date. He told the prosecution and defense that the sentencing date could be moved depending on the outcome of requests for Brady material requested by Powell and how the case will unfold in the upcoming months. Sullivan also noted during the hearing that the Brady order takes precedence over the plea agreement.

Powell will likely seek to have case dismissed for ‘egregious’ prosecutorial misconduct and withholding of exculpatory material.

“Judge Sullivan is obviously taking the Brady issues very seriously and clearly told the prosecutors that his Brady order stands regardless of the plea agreement or the plea,” Powell told SaraACarter.com. “If the prosecutors here were seeking justice instead of a conviction, General Flynn would not have been prosecuted. They have been hiding evidence that he was exonerated in early 2017.”

more
https://saraacarter.com/flynn-hearing-reveals-existence-of-bombshell-doj-memo-exonerating-michael-flynn/

[PeteS in CA]

IMO, Judge Sullivan should give Flynn's prosecutors a choice: all the requested information, unredacted, is in Sidney Powell's hands by September 30th or the case will be dismissed with prejudice plus career-damaging sanctions against the prosecutors. And if the former happens, rejection/retraction of Flynn's guilty plea will be the first order of business and possibly happen if the information demonstrates that the guilty plea was obtained through prosecutorial misconduct and financial coercion.

[Bigun]

IMO, Judge Sullivan should give Flynn's prosecutors a choice: all the requested information, unredacted, is in Sidney Powell's hands by September 30th or the case will be dismissed with prejudice plus career-damaging sanctions against the prosecutors. And if the former happens, rejection/retraction of Flynn's guilty plea will be the first order of business and possibly happen if the information demonstrates that the guilty plea was obtained through prosecutorial misconduct and financial coercion.

Why the 30th?   A week should be more than sufficient.

[PeteS in CA]

Why the 30th?   A week should be more than sufficient.

Given the speed of bureaucracy, a three week deadline might be challenging.

More seriously, it undermines any appeal based on an unreasonable deadline.