This claptrap argument again? 
The Constitution (via Roe and via Heller)
Speaking of clap traps. The Constitution speaks for itself. To find out what the Constitution says, all you have to do is to read the Constitution. Here it is again:
Amendment X:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
And if you bothered to actually read Roe or Heller, you would find ZERO reference to the Tenth Amendment and the powers delegated therein. So your decision to reference Roe and Heller as authorities on the Constitution were extremely poor choices. But then you knew that already. Besides, the Constitution itself is the last thing you would ever use in subjecting your version of tyranny on the good people of Georgia.
secures both a woman's right to choose when to reproduce
No one is denying a woman's right to reproduce. But then you knew that already.
and your right to own a gun for self-protection.
It is the Constitution - not Heller - that secures my right to own a gun, for any reason I so choose. It was included in the Bill of Rights as a protection against the tyranny of government, the exact type of tyranny that you advocate.
Each of these INDIVIDUAL rights is secured against the would-be tyrants in your state's legislature that would take it away.
My legislature is not composed of tyrants. They legislate per the will of the people they represent. And any time they go against the will of the people, they can be voted out of office and replaced with new legislators to do the people's bidding. It's how a representative government works. Yet your idea of government is a tyrannical federal judiciary that usurps our right to representative legislation with absolutely no Constitutional basis to do so.
You advocate the tyranny of the majority when it's not an individual right important to you being denied.
As a member of this society, the valuation of life is extremely important to me. Because without it, our society falls apart. The most heinous acts of anti-social violence become more common as society is forced (at the point of the federal gun) to tolerate the massacre of those most innocent and helpless. The devaluation of human life spills over into every aspect of society. And because of tyrants such as yourself, I am powerless as a member of said society to do a thing about it.
If you want to do things differently in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by exercising your common right under the Constitution, then you will never find me standing in the way. I only ask that you extend the same courtesy to me and allow my fellow Georgia citizens to exercise our Constitutional right to self-government.
But I guarantee you won't be arguing for the right of the legislature in your state to require you register and insure your gun.
Good. As a rule, you should have zero voice as to what our Legislature does. We can handle it ourselves. Yet that is not at all what you advocate.
You spout the hypocritical position of "rights for me but not for thee".
Let's review again, shall we? In the absence of federal law, I wholeheartedly advocate the right of the people to mold and shape their societies through their state legislatures unader Amendment X of the Constitution of the United States of America. That goes for you in your State, a Texan in Texas, a New Jersean in New Jersey, and a Ohioan in Ohio. There is zero hypocrisy in that. None. Zip. Nada.
