Are people who Liberals/CNN/MSNBC designated as a "White Hispanic" counted as White or as Hispanic? They are not Hispanic or 'mixed race' according to the Liberal definition. They are White people as White as any White American. They just happen to be White people born and raised in Hispanic countries. So how does one count that?
This is the problem with reparations as well. What is the specific definition of a so called Black person? What percentage of African DNA is required to qualify as being Black? Technically, Obama is not a Black man. He is mulatto, as are most Black Americans. When you see a real Black person from Africa, those guys are jet black. They are black like tar. Most American Black people are more of a mocha color. Not only that, but today there are thousands of 'woke' White hipsters who 'identify' as being Black. Will they get reparations? Reparations may sound like a viable idea until you start breaking down the details. Then the whole concept becomes a spaghetti plate of confusion and contradictions. Which, of course, is normal for Liberal ideas and programs.
How would they decide who 'owes' reparations and who does not, considering that most White people came to America on Ellis Island a hundred years or more after slavery was abolished? And what about the significant number of Black slave owners that were in America antebellum? What about all the Black soldiers who fought with the Confederacy against the Union soldiers? Will they get reparations?
What about all the current ongoing present day slavery happening in countries all over the world right now, today? How will they deal with all of these issues is still unknown. Even the supporters of reparations have no idea how it will actually work.
Hitler had this problem before the Democrats. When he decided that some races would have privileges and others would not, then he was forced to come up with a definition of what an Aryan is, and what constitutes being Jewish. Even Hitler and his staff never got it quite right even upto the end of the war. Technically Hitler himself and many of his staff did not qualify under the Nazi definition of Aryan characteristics.
The point I am making is that anyone attempting to subdivided a population into minute definitions of subset groups of various races, will inevitably be confounded. It simply doesn't work that way. Over the course of thousands, or tens of thousands of years, populations have interbred to the point now that almost everyone living today has DNA markers from several races in them. So, the only logical solution would be for everyone to take a mandatory DNA classification test (which is coming very soon, btw) and come up with a percentages scale of who qualifies for which benefits based on their DNA. Hitler would have loved DNA tests if it existed during his lifetime, and would be very much in favor of the race divisions and subdivisions the Liberals/Democrats are creating today.
Democrats are saying as loudly as they possibly can, the vaunted 'melting pot' is OVER. They are openly saying they want to ditch the melting-pot concept, and to revert back to segregation on scale the world has never seen before. What they are espousing is taken directly from Brave New World by Huxley. Populations would be divided into Alphas, Betas, Gammas, Deltas, and Epsilons. This would be sort of caste system and would determine what jobs and benefits you can hold and your status in society. Except unlike Huxley's definition, your designation would have nothing to do with IQ or ability, it would be based solely on genetics and nothing else. People in government and billionaires would find a way to exempt themselves, as they always do.
