Author Topic: Cost Overruns Threaten Offshore Development  (Read 856 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Cost Overruns Threaten Offshore Development
« on: July 01, 2019, 04:03:20 pm »
Cost Overruns Threaten Offshore Development
https://www.rigzone.com/news/cost_overruns_threaten_offshore_development-01-jul-2019-159178-article/

...Matthew Fitzsimmons, VP, Cost Analysis at Rystad Energy, notes that “even if oil prices stay above $60 per barrel over the next five years, final investment decisions could take longer to reach” to allow for sufficient time to mature the engineering definition and “ this will lower the uncertainty that their funding estimates will carry.” He warns that “failure to do so will not only have an adverse impact on the operator’s ability to control cost overruns but also the minority share owners of the field.”

Recent well-publicized cost overruns are a wake-up call and signal the vital importance of proper project planning and implementation. For example, the cost estimate for Shell’s huge Prelude FLNG project was $11 billion back in 2011. Nonetheless, due to the unforeseen mega engineering and fabrication challenges posed by this pioneering venture, development costs ballooned to around $15 billion – an increase of more than 36 percent. The scale of this cost overrun caused the major to cancel its order for another three FLNG units worth around $4.6 billion from Samsung Heavy Industries.

Impact on oilfield support companies

Since the oil price debacle of summer 2014, oil producers have become even more cost conscious and have imposed strict controls over their capital expenditures. This has been achieved largely in-house, with many operators opting for fewer, but better drilled wells, alongside more phases per development, whilst employing the latest technology, modularization and standardization of equipment and parts. The drive to reduce costs has inevitably had a knock-on effect on the profitability of major oilfield service companies including Schlumberger, Halliburton, Transocean and Norway’s Aker solutions, which competed for work in the downturn and temporarily reduced their fees. Indeed, the major oil companies have been remarkably successful in driving the average pre-final investment decision break-even point down to US$49 per barrel of oil equivalent compared with a pre-crisis $78 in 2014, according to a Wood Mackenzie report released November 2018.

While break-even costs of deep-water projects have fallen and industry profits and confidence are up, the supply chain and oilfield service companies will once again try to raise fees as demand for their services rises with increased activity. Simultaneously, industry insiders doubt whether the oil majors have fully factored in Rystad Energy’s findings on likely cost inflation in forthcoming projects.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Re: Cost Overruns Threaten Offshore Development
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2019, 05:46:49 pm »
Cost overruns amid price uncertainty is the staple upon which the best in industry operate.

Example I am familiar with is Gorgon, sanctioned in 2009 for $37 billion which ballooned upwards to $54 billion before completion.  https://thewest.com.au/business/oil-gas/do-your-homework-chevrons-outgoing-chief-john-watson-learns-from-gorgon-mistakes-ng-b88643593z

I happen to know when original feasibility estimates were done in the late 1980s, the estimate was less than $5 billion total costs.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,445
Re: Cost Overruns Threaten Offshore Development
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2019, 06:16:59 pm »
Never understood the investment justification for a $5 billion deepwater platform that will yield maybe 100k bbl/d at full production.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cost Overruns Threaten Offshore Development
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2019, 06:48:47 pm »
Never understood the investment justification for a $5 billion deepwater platform that will yield maybe 100k bbl/d at full production.

Very simplified version of payback:

$50/BBL
x 100,000BPD
= $5,000,000/D
x 365D
= $1,825,000,000/yr
x 20yr
= $36,500,000,000 = $36.5B

Yes, it is a lot more complicated with diminishing returns, lots of Operating Cost, etc.

But it obviously is a money maker or they wouldn't be in the business for decades.

Not every platform or every well, but the industry in general has a decent return on investment.


Life is fragile, handle with prayer