Author Topic: Mohammed, the Dirty Democrat in Charge of 'Cleaning Up' San Francisco - Front Page Mag  (Read 239 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Excerpt:

Quote
Mohammed, the Dirty Democrat in Charge of 'Cleaning Up' San Francisco
 How Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, Mohammed Nuru and other Democrats made San Fran so filthy.
June 6, 2019   Daniel Greenfield

..

 But Mr. Clean was a protégé of Mayor Brown and complaints quickly rose from DPW employees about corruption, discrimination and intimidation. DPW employees complained that he filled DPW positions with his own political allies from SLUG, diverted street cleaning funds to SLUG, and used public employees to improve areas near his home. DPW people who complained about Mohammed were demoted or transferred. If you crossed Mr. Clean, the word was that he would ‘clean you out’.

"Everybody was scared of Willie Brown," a former DPW maintenance manager who was forced out for resisting Mohammed Nuru's alleged abuses said. "Nobody wanted to do anything about it."

Nuru had been a Brown campaign volunteer before he even became a citizen. And had allegedly forced SLUG employees to campaign for the corrupt San Fran boss, telling them that their jobs depended on it.

More at: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273918/mohammed-dirty-democrat-charge-cleaning-san-daniel-greenfield#.XPqRXldmk5s.twitter

Could their problems, at least a good part of it have to do with this guy? Interesting write up.



It's like Star Parker says, you don't have to go to Venezuela, Cuba to see socialism and its failures. It's here in the US.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,355
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
I don't particularly care about the deteriorating conditions in San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Seattle any more.

Don't care at all.

The only logical conclusion that can be drawn is that the majority of voters in those districts are satisfied with such conditions. If they were not, why do they keep voting for a party (and political ideology) that not only does nothing to alleviate the problems, but actively promotes policies that exacerbate them?

They are getting "what they voted for".

And I believe that more of them then you might think are "happy with it all."