Evidence doesn't "die". But the will to prosecute sure as hell suffers from fatal wounds. And the only reason he was impeached is because he lied under oath about the affair with Monica, as I recall. Had NOTHING to do with the original investigation. All beside the point... since you're attempting to equate Clinton, who anyone with half a remaining working brain cell knows was guilty as hell (and still is).... with Trump, who has been "under investigation" for over two years now... with NO clear evidence discovered and/or presented of his wrong-doing. The comparison is... with all due respect...
asinine. 
If evidence does not ‘die,’ then explain the constant theories, often seen here, concerning Arkanicide. It’s been generally accepted, being in the New York construction business for decades, meant Trump had to play the game – whether that was in corrupt politics or union/mob deals. So, let’s not try to push some pristine babe in the woods BS. You don’t hire someone like Roy Cohn to be your attorney, unless you’re dirty.
The comparison to Clinton is hardly asinine. Both are sleazy tail chasers, who are overly impressed with themselves, and manage to charm the simple minded. Both sent their surrogates to bitch and whine about an out of control investigation and persecution. Rudy Giuliani has become his Lanny Davis. A sex scandal emerged, in the course of both investigations. It’s likely the dive into the business finances, related to his version of the bimbo eruption, will be his undoing. After all, he is listed as ‘Individual-1’ in a federal conviction.
