Author Topic: Washington Supreme Court baffles lawyers with split opinion  (Read 294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • News/Opinions Cat MOD
  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,571
Washington Supreme Court baffles lawyers with split opinion
« on: April 19, 2019, 06:14:08 PM »
Q13 Fox April 18, 2019

SEATTLE — An evenly split ruling from the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday had lawyers scratching their heads.

The case arose from a domestic violence call. Three police officers responded to a passerby’s report of a loud argument in an apartment. When they arrived and demanded to be allowed in to check on the people inside, one of the residents, Solomon McLemore, declined.

The officers broke down the door, as allowed under an exception to the general requirement that police need a warrant or permission to enter. They found that neither McLemore nor his girlfriend was injured, but they arrested McLemore for obstruction.

The issue for the Supreme Court was whether McLemore’s refusal to help the officers enter the home constituted obstruction. González, joined by Chief Justice Mary Fairhurst and Justices Charles Johnson and Sheryl Gordon McCloud, said it did not. Stephens, joined by Justices Susan Owens, Mary Yu and Charles Wiggins, said it did.

Without either side garnering a majority, the split means the question remains unresolved.

More: https://q13fox.com/2019/04/18/washington-supreme-court-baffles-lawyers-with-split-opinion/
He who makes an attempt to enslave me, thereby puts himself into a state of war with me.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf