Author Topic: LIVE THREAD: All hell is breaking loose across America Weekend Thread..Last Part  (Read 9817 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,076
  • I hate nothing, not even OUR President
   Welcome to TBR @benldguy
No government in the 6,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 26,038
  • Gender: Female
At this point...I'm of the mid t pul out the Feds and just let the domestic terroristic assholes burn these Liberal sh*tholes burn to the ground.

People voted for the "leadership" that's allowing this to happen...so they should reap the results of their own actions.

While I agree that the voters got the government that they voted for, pulling the feds out would, in my opinion, set a bad precedent because they are FEDERAL officers protecting FEDERAL property.  This has nothing to do with the local voters nor with the local government in spite of the $500/hour fine being leveled by the city against the feds because they put up a fence.

Absolutely agree.  A bad precedent has been set; the anarchists have been allowed to get away with their destruction.  Things should have never been allowed to get out of control.

Welcome by the way to The Briefing Room -- I'm sure you'll will enjoy this forum as much as I have.   :beer:
I Believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution, to obey its laws; to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies.

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,053
Absolutely agree.  A bad precedent has been set; the anarchists have been allowed to get away with their destruction.  Things should have never been allowed to get out of control.

Welcome by the way to The Briefing Room -- I'm sure you'll will enjoy this forum as much as I have.   :beer:
I agree, but they should have been stopped by the Mayors or Governors of the respective states.

The seminal difference between now and the 60s is that in the 60s the governors did call in the National Guard and shut this crap down.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression


There are no "Socialists", no "Progressives", only Communists, with every negative image that totalitarianism might muster, demanding fealty and conformity to their views, with a legacy of 150,000,000 dead and counting.

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 22,795
  • Gender: Male
bele wrote:
"A bad precedent has been set; the anarchists have been allowed to get away with their destruction.  Things should have never been allowed to get out of control."

To which Joe replied:
"I agree, but they should have been stopped by the Mayors or Governors of the respective states."

Joe, don't you see that this approach cannot work when the "mayors or governors" are ON THE SIDE of the communist insurgents?

It not 3 sides:
1. the insurgents
2. the mayors/governors
3. us

It's JUST TWO.

This is why the ONLY way to stop them is to use "the force we have" -- federal agents and the U.S. Army.

Same as in 1861, except that the communists will become a much more tenacious enemy...

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 57,838
  • Gender: Male
  • Impeach Him Again! Harder!!!®
bele wrote:
"A bad precedent has been set; the anarchists have been allowed to get away with their destruction.  Things should have never been allowed to get out of control."

To which Joe replied:
"I agree, but they should have been stopped by the Mayors or Governors of the respective states."

Joe, don't you see that this approach cannot work when the "mayors or governors" are ON THE SIDE of the communist insurgents?

It not 3 sides:
1. the insurgents
2. the mayors/governors
3. us

It's JUST TWO.

This is why the ONLY way to stop them is to use "the force we have" -- federal agents and the U.S. Army.

Same as in 1861, except that the communists will become a much more tenacious enemy...

Yeah, back them the Democrats just wanted to own other people.
We need to re-coin the expression, "Press Bias" to "Media Bigotry."
I will NOT comply.
                          Castillo del Cyber! ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,053
Yeah, back them the Democrats just wanted to own other people.
Back then, my ancestors defended their land from invasion, best they could.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression


There are no "Socialists", no "Progressives", only Communists, with every negative image that totalitarianism might muster, demanding fealty and conformity to their views, with a legacy of 150,000,000 dead and counting.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 57,838
  • Gender: Male
  • Impeach Him Again! Harder!!!®
Back then, my ancestors defended their land from invasion, best they could.

I guess we all got burned....
We need to re-coin the expression, "Press Bias" to "Media Bigotry."
I will NOT comply.
                          Castillo del Cyber! ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,053
bele wrote:
"A bad precedent has been set; the anarchists have been allowed to get away with their destruction.  Things should have never been allowed to get out of control."

To which Joe replied:
"I agree, but they should have been stopped by the Mayors or Governors of the respective states."

Joe, don't you see that this approach cannot work when the "mayors or governors" are ON THE SIDE of the communist insurgents?

It not 3 sides:
1. the insurgents
2. the mayors/governors
3. us

It's JUST TWO.

This is why the ONLY way to stop them is to use "the force we have" -- federal agents and the U.S. Army.

Same as in 1861, except that the communists will become a much more tenacious enemy...
1861 had decades of attempted negotiations to prevent the final Well, I agree with you, in that those who were ostensibly the people charged with upholding the law have engaged in some outrageous acts of nonfeasance which indicate they are tacitly, if not overtly, on the side of the rioters. 

They are in egregious violation of their oaths of office, but their removal, short of a declaration of hostilities with the Federal Government, remains a State of Local issue UNTIL the Federal Government is petitioned for aid in the restoration of order and the rule of Law. What form or particulars such a petition would have to assume is beyond my knowledge, but carefully worded, such could go down as one of the seminal documents of American History.

How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression


There are no "Socialists", no "Progressives", only Communists, with every negative image that totalitarianism might muster, demanding fealty and conformity to their views, with a legacy of 150,000,000 dead and counting.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf