Without a Wall, Border Security Cannot Be Achieved

[rangerrebew]

Without a Wall, Border Security Cannot Be Achieved

March 26, 2019


Brian Lonergan

After President Trump and Democrats in Congress fought over a border wall in the longest government shutdown in history, the result was a deal that gave little satisfaction to the supporters of either side. In the view of Trump’s base, the $1.375 billion allotted for wall construction is woefully inadequate. The anti-borders movement views Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the border, so he can build the wall himself, as nothing short of yet another allegedly impeachable offense.

Amid the furor, both sides claim to be in favor of border security. But that doesn’t stop the anti-borders movement from insisting that “walls don’t work” and that a wall is nothing more than a “vanity project” for Trump. So who is right? Is it possible to be for border security and against a border wall?

In a word, no.

 https://www.irli.org/single-post/2019/03/26/Without-a-Wall-Border-Security-Cannot-Be-Achieved?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI1YCx9sab1gIVnbXACh3njA17EAMYAyAAEgK7vvD_BwE

[Fishrrman]

I've been saying this online for 25 years now, Brian.

Why you be just comin' around to the idea?