The Democrat Leninist Revolution Is Here

[rangerrebew]

March 29, 2019
The Democrat Leninist Revolution Is Here
By Rich Logis

The Democratic Party's Leninist fundamental transformation is near complete.

It was November 6 and 7, 1917 when Lenin and his Russian Bolsheviks led a coup d'état against the Duma's provisional government.

The parallels between the Bolshevik takeover, which begat the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the über-leftward turn of the Democratic Party are impossible to ignore.  Lenin and the Bolsheviks did not significantly differ ideologically from the Romanov monarchical dynasty they ended with their takeover, or from the Mensheviks, from whom the Bolsheviks spilt in 1903, just as the new Democrats don't differ much from the old Democrats.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/the_democrat_leninist_revolution_is_here.html#ixzz5jYd06pxC
 

[Absalom]

March 29, 2019
The Democrat Leninist Revolution Is Here
By Rich Logis

The Democratic Party's Leninist fundamental transformation is near complete.

It was November 6 and 7, 1917 when Lenin and his Russian Bolsheviks led a coup d'état against the Duma's provisional government.

The parallels between the Bolshevik takeover, which begat the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the über-leftward turn of the Democratic Party are impossible to ignore.  Lenin and the Bolsheviks did not significantly differ ideologically from the Romanov monarchical dynasty they ended with their takeover, or from the Mensheviks, from whom the Bolsheviks spilt in 1903, just as the new Democrats don't differ much from the old Democrats.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/the_democrat_leninist_revolution_is_here.html#ixzz5jYd06pxC

-------------------------
The Social Democrats under Alexander Kerensky overthrew the Romanov Dynasty
in Feb, 1917 but his Provisional Government would not withdraw Russia from the
Great War, opening the door for Lenin and his Bolsheviks in Oct, 1917; a fateful decision.

[goatprairie]

-------------------------
The Social Democrats under Alexander Kerensky overthrew the Romanov Dynasty
in Feb, 1917 but his Provisional Government would not withdraw Russia from the
Great War, opening the door for Lenin and his Bolsheviks in Oct, 1917; a fateful decision.

During the time of the Provisional government Lenin admitted that Russia was the freest country in the world.
The Bolsheviks took over, and that "problem" was soon fixed.

[Fishrrman]

An excellent piece.

An excerpt:
The 2020 presidential election will be a civil war between the old and new guards of the Democratic Party.  Their imbroglio has much to do with the Millennial and Generation Z voting blocs.  Millennials are the largest generation in America's electorate, and any day now, they will surpass the Baby-Boomer generation as the largest potential voting bloc.  Add Generation Zers into the Millennial mix, and the soon to be largest voting bloc in U.S. history will be young adults and 30-somethings who have undergone decades of Ludovico-esque Democrat social engineering that has mass-produced tens of millions of Leninists who don't know who Lenin was — exactly as he would have wanted it.  Though unverified, Lenin is believed to have coined the term "useful idiot."  He'd blush at the useful idiocy of most Democrat voters, who have deified stupidity.  "Give me just one generation of youth," Lenin said, three months before his revolt, "and I'll transform the whole world."

[mountaineer]

One tweeter wonders where the leftist protesters have gone. Lying low? Waiting for some grand occasion to wreak havoc?
 I'll condense his tweets:

Stu Cvrk @STUinSD

Thread: Leftwing Street Activists Are AWOL, But for How Much Longer?

1. The Democrat rank-and-file appear to be shocked into silence by the release of the Mueller report and subsequent exoneration of @POTUS for “collusion” and obstruction of justice allegations.
10:00 AM - 30 Mar 2019

2. Are they merely suffering through Kübler-Ross’s five stages of grief and still stuck on stage one (denial), or are they contemplating direct action through their various activist organizations?

3. With the Smollett farce and the national crisis on the border, false flags and other activities are a distinct possibility in the near future. What would it take to spark a street protest of some kind? School will be out in a couple of months, and summertime is protest time.

4. Except for the woefully under-reported yellow vest riots ongoing in Paris, I haven’t seen much in the way of street activity here in the US lately except for a few riots in Portland last year. Given the penchant for the Left to take to the streets on demand, they’re overdue!

5. I’m inclined to believe that the Deep State cabal will foment riots in order to deflect from their impending indictments and prosecutions for sedition. It will be one of the last cards they can play before being arrested and perp-walked.

6. Which reminds me of my own direct exposure to street protested during the anti-nuke demonstrations way back in the mid-1980s when another Republican president was under siege from the Left. Here is some personal anecdotal insight into leftwing activism.

7. While there are a lot of pro-nuclear freeze items available on the web that attempt to explain the movement and their objectives (from a leftwing perspective), here is a slightly more objective item explaining some of the pertinent issues involved: https://www.nps.gov/articles/antinuclearactivism.htm …

8. The nuclear freeze movement was heavily infiltrated by CPUSA, Socialist Workers Party, and other pro-Soviet organizations (pretty much like BLM and Antifa are these days!).

9. Widespread protests were well-coordinated in the US and Europe, and the protesters’ leadership was drawn from seasoned anti-Vietnam protester ranks.

10. The Soviets viewed the nuclear freeze movement as an important continuation of psychological warfare against the US and funded and used indigenous US fellow-travelers and orgs to facilitate that campaign.

11. You may wish to read this document from the files of the CIA in order to better understand the ideological background of the freeze movement:
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP87M00539R001001360023-3.pdf …

12. In the mid-80s, I learned an important lesson about nuke freeze protesters and activists in general that translates into understanding the leftist activists of today. Here is my story.

13. I attended a defense industry business conference in MD. Its purpose was sharing of knowledge of advanced anti-submarine warfare-related technologies among various reps from the Navy and industry. The Soviet submarine threat was real back before the Berlin Wall fell.

14. During breaks on the first day of the conference, we noticed a gaggle of protesters with signs, skeleton masks, etc., picketing outside the conference center. Some were shouting, but most were marching back and forth and occasionally flipping conf attendees the bird.

15. During one of the afternoon breaks, I decided to go out and confront them directly (probably stupidly in retrospect, but I was young and foolish back then). About 30 or so surrounded me and started peppering me with questions and accusations.

16. “Baby killer, war-monger, the US is evil, the Soviets are our friends, the Vietnam War killed ‘millions.” You get the idea. I proceeded to give them factual historical information about Vietnam and countered every accusation with calmly presented facts.

17. My purpose was to actually try to convince them that they were in fact misguided and ignorant about history and in particular the nature of US-Soviet relations over the years, including nuclear weapons strategy and use.

18. After a while, they became fairly subdued and ran out of slogans to the point where, despite having absurd painted faces and masks and smelling bad from alcohol and/or bad personal hygiene, they almost became respectful. I went back into the conf & thought nothing more of it.

19. The next day, we noticed a precipitate drop in the number of protesters outside the conference center. I went out during another break to find out the reason for the drawdown. Here is what I learned.

20. All of the protesters had been bused to the conference center in old yellow school buses. I spoke with one of the bus drivers at length. I asked him why so few people showed up on this the second day of the conf.

21. He explained that (paraphrasing) “some guy came out yesterday and debated a bunch of these people to the point that they were demoralized and decided not to show up today.”

22. He also further explained that a lot of these folks were street people and/or students recruited by protest organizers and bribed/paid to participate, so most were not as ideologically committed to the cause as were the organizers and funders of the protests.

23. The important lesson I learned is that sometimes direct confrontation in a non-threatening way can actually make a dent in these people, but probably only the more peaceful variety of them. I don’t think I’d try that with the Antifa thugs carrying baseball bats, for example.

24. To fast forward to today, it’s important to note that the protesters (violent or otherwise) that we see on the tube from time to time are part of a continuum of paid activists and funders who have been using street protests for political purposes since the Vietnam era.

25. Those activists became leaders, fund-raisers, and organizers of future left-wing protests. Think of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn as perfect examples; they are working behind the scenes these days, as opposed to “manning the barricades” like they were in the ‘60s.  ...

He goes on to talk about Obama and his ties to ACORN.  https://twitter.com/STUinSD