March 23, 2019
Evidence! How did Schiff, Swalwell, and so many other talking heads lose sight of it?
By Patricia McCarthy
Even though we do not yet know exactly what the Mueller Report says, we do now know that no other indictments are in the works. No collusion with Russia by the Trump campaign was found. So the self-assured and confident predictions by so many on the Left that they had seen "cold, hard evidence," and that Mueller would find copious evidence of "collusion" with Russia, was just wishful thinking alone.
They all had to know that the infamous "dossier" was faked. The late Senator McCain, driven by his antipathy for Trump, may have believed it for a moment and so shopped it around in hopes it would derail Trump. They all had to know that it had been commissioned by Hillary Clinton's campaign.
They ignored these inconvenient facts. They leaped to a conclusion they hoped could be sold to the American public. That they counted on our mostly pathetic media is understandable, but what explains the same leap by so many so-called legal experts and actual lawyers like Schiff and Swalwell, Jeffrey Toobin, and even at times Judge Napolitano? The degradation by politics of our higher education may explain the lapses of younger lawyers who were merely indoctrinated in law school, but what explains the blinkered, biased convictions of men like Schiff and Swalwell? For over two years, they have fantasized evidence that does not exist and maintained the notion that there is an abundance of proof that Trump colluded with amorphous Russians to rig the 2016 election.
more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/03/evidence_how_did_schiff_swalwell_and_so_many_other_talking_heads_lose_sight_of_it.html
