Author Topic: China plans a solar power play in space that NASA abandoned decades ago  (Read 902 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,392
CNBC by Eric Rosenbaum and Donovan Russo 3/17/2019

Key Points

    Science-fiction writer Isaac Asimov is credited with bringing the idea of space-based solar power projects to prominence in 1941.

    Space stations and satellites already use solar panel arrays for their power needs, but NASA abandoned the concept of stand-alone space solar after some study decades ago.

    The idea of building renewable-energy projects in space to beam the sun’s energy back to Earth is controversial but could fundamentally reshape the way every person and business on the planet receive electricity.

John Mankins has spent his professional life working on novel ideas that could transform the way humans use technology in space, solar power among them. But Mankins’ interplanetary musings went beyond the way solar is already used to power satellites and the International Space Station. During a 25-year career at NASA and CalTech’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, he devised multiple concepts to extend the use of solar in space, among them a solar-powered interplanetary transport vehicle and a space-based power system.

It’s that second idea, in particular, that had Mankins’ attention while holding top research positions at NASA during the 1990s and 2000s, including overseeing the $800 million Exploration Systems Research and Technology group. Mankins — who now runs his own private aerospace firm, Artemis Innovation Management Solutions — had the task of figuring out whether there was a way to deliver electricity to the planet by beaming it from space. It’s an idea that could fundamentally reshape the idea of the utility business — and give control over it, on a global scale, to whichever world power gets there first.

“If you can dramatically lower the cost of space solar, you can take over most of the energy market of the world, ” said Mark Hopkins, a member of the National Space Society board of directors and former Rand Corp. executive.

Mankins got close to seeing the idea make it into reality, with support from the Bush White House and Congress in the 2000s, and positive reviews from the National Academy of Sciences and a national security unit within the Department of Defense. But the program never took flight, for a variety of reasons. So when the news recently broke that the idea — abandoned decades ago by NASA — was coming back to life with a big push from government, it was cause for excitement. But it isn’t NASA finally backing the idea. It’s the Chinese government.
The space race heats up

China’s ambitions in space rival that of the United States. Its two main objectives were originally human spaceflight (accomplished in 2003) and a permanent Chinese space station, which is coming closer to reality — it announced in early March that a manned space station similar to ISS is now on schedule for 2022, earlier than expected.

As the two geopolitical foes increasingly turn their attention to a technological and military race beyond the earth’s atmosphere, space-based solar power projects are an overlooked, often criticized idea. But with China recently announcing that within the next decade it expects to finish the high voltage power transmission and wireless energy tests that would be needed for a space-based solar power system, the concept is likely to get renewed attention.

All of the plans in the space race have potential implications for a new military build-out in space of increasing relevance to the world’s powers. The Trump administration formalized plans in February for a branch of U.S. military known as the Space Force. The solar power station plans being contemplated by China include the launch of small- to medium-sized solar power projects in the stratosphere to generate electricity between 2021 and 2025, followed by a space-based solar power station that can generate at least a megawatt of electricity in 2030, and a commercial-scale solar power plant in space by 2050.

More: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/china-plans-a-solar-power-play-in-space-that-nasa-abandoned-long-ago.html

Online Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,605
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
How is pumping megawatts of energy through the atmosphere from space by laser or microwave not going to warm the planet?

That's the sunlight that would have missed.

 9999hair out0000
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline kidd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 894
Solar power is prohibitively expensive as a baseline power source.

In space, the amount of time that the cells would be exposed to sunlight might almost double.
But I really doubt that the improved efficiency would offset the enormous cost of placing heavy solar cells and a large laser into geosynchronous orbit, where it would be out of reach for any needed maintenance.

Offline Joe Wooten

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,455
  • Gender: Male
Solar power is prohibitively expensive as a baseline power source.

In space, the amount of time that the cells would be exposed to sunlight might almost double.
But I really doubt that the improved efficiency would offset the enormous cost of placing heavy solar cells and a large laser into geosynchronous orbit, where it would be out of reach for any needed maintenance.

Yep. I remember reading an engineering study back in the 80's that flatly stated that launch costs alone make in too expensive. Not to mention that efficiency losses due to PV cell degradation are accelerated in space. You also would not be putting those "cheap" Chinese PV panels up there. Due to the radiation environment, these will be hardened and thus much, much more expensive. There was a damn good reason NASA abandoned the project. it was doable with 1980's technology, but not practical. That is still true 30 years later.

Look for more "China Scare" articles like this to be coming out.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2019, 01:54:49 pm by Joe Wooten »