Author Topic: CNN's Cillizza Makes Case for Collusion; Admits We Haven't Seen Proof  (Read 312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

CNN's Cillizza Makes Case for Collusion; Admits We Haven't Seen Proof
By P.J. Gladnick | February 23, 2019 4:28 PM EST

If CNN's Chris Cillizza were the District Attorney on a Perry Mason episode, the famed lawyer could just sit back and relax because the prosecutor would make the case for him that the defendant was not guilty.

This is basically the absurdity that silly Cillizza performed in his Friday column. After going through a lot of effort pointing out how the Donald Trump 2016 campaign could have colluded with the Russians, Cillizza concludes that there is no proof that such collusion took place. Case closed. So why did he even bother to try to make it in the first place? Perhaps someone out there could channel the network jester to explain his bizarre thought patterns to us.
 

Source URL: https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/pj-gladnick/2019/02/22/cnns-cillizza-makes-case-collusion-concludes-no-proof