Cortez Communist Party

[rangerrebew]

Cortez Communist Party
Last updated: February 23, 2019

Introduction The Democratic Party has become increasingly radicalized over the past few decades, to the point where it can no longer be classified as a liberal party. Traditional liberalism was defined by its commitment to four principal values: individual rights (as opposed to group rights); the rule of law (as opposed to governance stemming from …
Introduction

The Democratic Party has become increasingly radicalized over the past few decades, to the point where it can no longer be classified as a liberal party. Traditional liberalism was defined by its commitment to four principal values: individual rights (as opposed to group rights); the rule of law (as opposed to governance stemming from the whims of powerful men in positions of power; limited government; and free enterprise (the only economic system compatible with individual liberty).

But the Democratic Party today is a hard-left – indeed, communist – party that flatly rejects the aforementioned liberal principles which it once embraced. Specifically, it is a stalwart champion of:

https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/organizations/cortez-communist-party/

[Fishrrman]

1959:
The democratic party.

2019:
The democrat-communist party.

Why don't the other members of this forum call them out for who they really are?

[Cyber Liberty]

1959:
The democratic party.

2019:
The democrat-communist party.

Why don't the other members of this forum call them out for who they really are?

Who here does not?

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Who here does not?

@Cyber Liberty

  I'd say anyone who does not consistently refer to democrats as "rats" like I do, and President Trump wishes he had the balls and anonymity to emulate is a commie-symp.

You know what is really scary?  Few people get worked up about the label "communist" and less so "socialist."  There was a time that the label "liberal" was effective (under Reagan and Bush41)  There was a time when people questioned the ideological implications of a widespread social safety net as communist, socialist, or liberal.  IMO Today both parties chase the same causes. 

President Trump can declare America will never be a socialist country, but I think we already are.  S.S., unemployment, health care, welfare, education, and more.  Trump just want American welfare for Americans and he's picked a great foreign villain to unite us against, and to distract us from our loss of freedom and focus our rage on the ineffective symbol of a wall.

Today farm subsidies to cushion the blow of tariffs, friendly negotiations with a communist countries like NK and Russia, government land grabs, and legislation by executive decree are considered conservative.  George Orwell was off by 30 years.

[Wingnut]

@Cyber Liberty

  I'd say anyone who does not consistently refer to democrats as "rats" like I do,

Why would a "Rat" like you call himself a rat?

[Cyber Liberty]

@Cyber Liberty

  I'd say anyone who does not consistently refer to democrats as "rats" like I do, and President Trump wishes he had the balls and anonymity to emulate is a commie-symp.

You know what is really scary?  Few people get worked up about the label "communist" and less so "socialist."  There was a time that the label "liberal" was effective (under Reagan and Bush41)  There was a time when people questioned the ideological implications of a widespread social safety net as communist, socialist, or liberal.  IMO Today both parties chase the same causes. 

President Trump can declare America will never be a socialist country, but I think we already are.  S.S., unemployment, health care, welfare, education, and more.  Trump just want American welfare for Americans and he's picked a great foreign villain to unite us against, and to distract us from our loss of freedom and focus our rage on the ineffective symbol of a wall.

Today farm subsidies to cushion the blow of tariffs, friendly negotiations with a communist countries like NK and Russia, government land grabs, and legislation by executive decree are considered conservative.  George Orwell was off by 30 years.

I can't see much (if anything) wrong there.  Especially about the Orwell part.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

I can't see much (if anything) wrong there.  Especially about the Orwell part.

Thanx for the reply.

[Cyber Liberty]

Thanx for the reply.