Author Topic: 2020 Democrat candidates are now supporting reparations for slavery  (Read 782 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
February 22, 2019
2020 Democrat candidates are now supporting reparations for slavery
By Peter Barry Chowka

On February 21, a New York Times feature story about proposals for the government to pay American blacks reparations for slavery has moved the issue closer to the front burner in the lead up to next year’s presidential elections. The article’s title summarized the story: “2020 Democrats Embrace Race-Conscious Policies, Including Reparations.” Largely overshadowed on an incredibly busy news day was the disclosure that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (MA), one of the early front runners for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, is now enthusiastically on the reparations bandwagon:

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/02/2020_democrat_candidates_are_now_supporting_reparations_for_slavery.html#ixzz5gGWo9jQg
 

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: 2020 Democrat candidates are now supporting reparations for slavery
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2019, 09:31:23 pm »
No one ever confronts these people with the facts!

An abbreviated history ...


Black slave owners have not been studied as a part of American history, rather as a datum to American history, and yet slavery as a perpetual institution is legalized based on a case brought before the House of Burgess by an African, who had been indentured in Jamestown, Virginia 1621 and was known as Antonio the Negro according to the earliest records.


Anthony Johnson was a Black man, one of the original 20 brought to Jamestown in 1619. By 1623, he had achieved his freedom and by 1651 was prosperous enough to import five "servants" of his own, for which he was granted 250 acres as "headrights".

Johnson was captured in his native Angola by an enemy tribe and sold to Arab slave traders. He was eventually sold as an indentured servant to a merchant working for the Virginia Company.

He arrived in Virginia in 1621 aboard the James.

Johnson was sold to a white planter named Bennet as an indentured servant to work on his Virginia tobacco farm.

He was the first black indentured servant, the first free black, and the first to establish the first black community, first black landowner, first black slave owner, and the first person based on his court case to establish slavery legally in North America.
One could argue that he was the founder of slavery in Virginia.

In 1651 Anthony Johnson was given 250 acres as "head rights" for purchasing five incoming white redemptioners.

By July 1651 Johnson had five indentured servants of his own.
(four white and one black)

In 1654, he brought a case before Virginia courts in which he contested a suit launched by one of his indentured servants, a Negro who adopted the name of John Casor.

Johnson won the suit and retained Casor as his servant for life, who thus became the first official and true slave in America.

This officially made Johnson the first legal slave owner in the British colonies that would eventually become the United States.

Virginia made this practice legal for everyone in 1661, by making it state law for any free white, black, or Indian, to be able to own slaves, along with indentured servants.

While Johnson is generally considered by most historians to be the first legal slave owner in the British colonies that would become the United States, there was one person who preceded him in 1640 who owned a slave in all but name. 

The virtual slave was John Punch, ordered to be an indentured servant for life, though by law was still considered an indentured servant with all the rights that went with that. 

In Punch’s case, he was made a lifelong indentured servant owing to the fact that he tried to leave before his contract was up.  When he was captured and brought back, the judge in the matter decided a suitable punishment was to have Punch’s contract continue for the rest of his life.


In 1652 John Johnson, Anthony Johnson's eldest son, purchased eleven incoming white males and females, and received 550 acres adjacent to his father.

There were a number of additional Virginia land patents representing grants to free blacks of from fifty to 550 acres for purchasing white redemptioners.


Like many wealthy landowners of the pre-Civil War South, Sherrod Bryant owned slaves. They probably worked much of Bryant's 700 acres in Middle Tennessee, an area larger than that of Andrew Jackson's Hermitage plantation.

The slaves under Bryant helped raise hogs for their owner, who had a large family and was always looking to buy more property. Unlike many slave owners, however, Sherrod Bryant was black.

Most indentured servants in the British colonies in America were actually Irish, English, German, and Scottish, rather than African.

I don't have any links for the above.

This is from some of my saved college notes from years ago when I studied African American history.

Too: According to economic historian Stanley Engerman, “In Charleston, South Carolina about 42 percent of free blacks owned slaves in 1850, and about 64 percent of these slaveholders were women.”
"Hell is empty, all the devil's are here!"
~ Self

Offline Dexter

  • User banned for personal attacks. --CL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,624
  • Gender: Male
Re: 2020 Democrat candidates are now supporting reparations for slavery
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2019, 09:35:54 pm »
Yeah man, black 18 year olds need to be paid money for how much they personally suffered from the slave trade. If not for the evil white man their family tree would have stayed in Africa, where people are much better off.
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: 2020 Democrat candidates are now supporting reparations for slavery
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2019, 07:34:29 pm »
A tweet by Thomas Sowell suggested this study/book:

Quote
When Europeans Were Slaves: Research Suggests White Slavery Was Much More Common Than Previously Believed

COLUMBUS, Ohio – A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been estimated before.
Robert Davis

In a new book, Robert Davis, professor of history at Ohio State University, developed a unique methodology to calculate the number of white Christians who were enslaved along Africa’s Barbary Coast, arriving at much higher slave population estimates than any previous studies had found.

Most other accounts of slavery along the Barbary coast didn’t try to estimate the number of slaves, or only looked at the number of slaves in particular cities, Davis said. Most previously estimated slave counts have thus tended to be in the thousands, or at most in the tens of thousands. Davis, by contrast, has calculated that between 1 million and 1.25 million European Christians were captured and forced to work in North Africa from the 16th to 18th centuries....

https://news.osu.edu/when-europeans-were-slaves--research-suggests-white-slavery-was-much-more-common-than-previously-believed/

As one tweeter noted, at least they had their white privilege.

Offline dfwgator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,475
Re: 2020 Democrat candidates are now supporting reparations for slavery
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2019, 07:47:12 pm »
Yeah man, black 18 year olds need to be paid money for how much they personally suffered from the slave trade. If not for the evil white man their family tree would have stayed in Africa, where people are much better off.

"Thank God my granddaddy got on that boat!" - Muhammad Ali