Author Topic: JUST IN: FEDERAL JUDGE DENIES DEM Effort To Block Citizenship Question From 2020 Census  (Read 291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 106,732
  • �It�s easier to fool people than to convince them

JUST IN: FEDERAL JUDGE DENIES DEM Effort To Block Citizenship Question From 2020 Census
Feb 10, 2019

 

President Trump’s judicial appointees are already paying off. Judge Dabney L. Friedrich was nominated by Trump June 2017, confirmed by the Senate Nov 2017 and took the district court seat Dec 2017. The 2017 Trump appointee just declined to block the citizenship question on the 2020 census:

US DISTRICT JUDGE DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH ruled against an effort by Democrats to keep the question of citizenship off of the upcoming census:

Finally, the plaintiff argues that its members will be irreparably harmed if and when their own citizenship data is collected. But this harm, too, is neither imminent nor certain.

https://100percentfedup.com/just-in-federal-judge-denies-dem-effort-to-block-citizenship-question-from-2020-census/
“A society does not ever die ‘from natural causes’, but always dies from suicide or murder – and nearly always from the former….”
    ― Arnold Joseph Toynbee’s A Study of History.

Offline rustynail

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,990
There is more than one Federal Judge.

Offline RetBobbyMI

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,360
Someone in one of the sanctuary states will file in their own state, most likely in California. Then they will get a different ruling, dragging it out and forcing it to go to SCOTUS, where Roberts will again be the tie breaker if they can get the RBG corpse to vote again.
"Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid."  -- John Wayne
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.� ? Euripides, The Bacchae
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.� ? Laurence J. Peter, The Peter Principle
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.� ? Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,180
Someone in one of the sanctuary states will file in their own state, most likely in California. Then they will get a different ruling, dragging it out and forcing it to go to SCOTUS, where Roberts will again be the tie breaker if they can get the RBG corpse to vote again.

I guess they'll have to be more specific about how illegals are 'harmed' in the next filing. That might open a whole 'nuther can of worms leading to unintended consequences.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,251
  • Pray for peace but train for war.
I guess they'll have to be more specific about how illegals are 'harmed' in the next filing. That might open a whole 'nuther can of worms leading to unintended consequences.

I think I can answer that.   The answer is.... the illegals would supposedly be harmed.... by the public knowing exactly how many illegals there already are here in the states.  The number would stun and shock, IOW... and would probably cause them to ....

demand border control and (gasp).....

a wall.

Can't have that (reality bites).

Time for unity in America! (better late than never)



Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf