Author Topic: Warren formally launches 2020 campaign, makes no mention of Native American controversy  (Read 237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 34,942
Warren formally launches 2020 campaign, makes no mention of Native American controversy
Fox News, Feb 9, 2019

LAWRENCE, Massachusetts – Vowing to “fight my heart out,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Saturday formally declared her candidacy for president.

The populist Democratic senator, who was re-elected in November to a second term representing Massachusetts, pushed her progressive platform as she told her life story of growing up “on the ragged edge of the middle class” and spotlighted her efforts on behalf of working class Americans.

“This is the fight our lives. The fight to build an America were dreams are possible, an America that works for everyone. I am in that fight all the way. And that is why I stand here today to declare that I am a candidate for president of the United States,” Warren said in this working class city that sits along the Merrimack River in northern Massachusetts.

Warren promised to fight so “that every kid in America can have the same opportunity I had - a fighting chance to build something real.”

Warren spotlighted her upbringing in Oklahoma, saying “when my daddy had a heart attack, my family nearly tumbled over the financial cliff.”

But as expected, she didn’t say a word about her claims of Native American ancestry, which first surfaced during her 2012 victory over then-Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts.


More  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-formally-launches-2020-presidential-bid?fbclid=IwA
"January 20th 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."  --  President Donald J. Trump

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 34,942
Words fail me.   ***suicide***
"January 20th 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."  --  President Donald J. Trump

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,220
I put her chances at about 1,024:1.
I have decided to officially and formally not apologize. I'm not sorry at all, even slightly.

    Indeed, I especially want to convey my absence of remorse to anyone who was offended by what I said. If you are the sort of person who gets twisted into knots when someone articulates a point of view that differs from your own, then you are exactly the sort of person who should never receive an apology for a differing point of view — if I were offering one, which, again, I'm not.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 29,472
Yawn. 

She isn't a serious contender, she won't be a VP contender and I'm pretty sure she won't be in anyone's cabinet.  The best she can hope for is big speaking fees.
Cui bono?

Walk in Wisdom
See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil.

But the noble make noble plans, and by noble deeds they stand.

Offline Dexter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,134
I put her chances at about 1,024:1.

People said similar things about Obama in the early days. Elizabeth Warren is up there with Ocasio when it comes to left wing rock star status.

"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

Offline Dexter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,134
She isn't a serious contender

Who do you think the most serious contenders are when it comes to the left wing?
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 29,472
Who do you think the most serious contenders are when it comes to the left wing?

I think Sanders has some lefty gravitas still, Harris has some appeal, Beto has some appeal (both of them until more is exposed about them), and Biden. 

Now, remember, I don't find any of them appealing, appropriate or fit for the job; just answering your question.
Cui bono?

Walk in Wisdom
See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil.

But the noble make noble plans, and by noble deeds they stand.

Offline Dexter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,134
I think Sanders has some lefty gravitas still, Harris has some appeal, Beto has some appeal (both of them until more is exposed about them), and Biden. 

Now, remember, I don't find any of them appealing, appropriate or fit for the job; just answering your question.

Elizabeth was a lot more known than Sanders before he ran for president. She has a lot of name recognition and is almost exactly the same as Sanders politically. The main difference is she's more of a fighter than Bernie. She's got a very aggressive in-your-face style that the left absolutely adores. The people here don't like Warren for obvious reasons, but don't let your bias lead you to underestimate her. She is absolutely a serious contender in 2020. Unless another big name announces a run really soon you can expect her to be Trump's opponent.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2019, 04:42:03 PM by Dexter »
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

Offline The Ghost

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,158
Was it announced via Smoke Signals or tomtoms?
#StandWithCovington
"You don’t hand matches to an arsonist, and you don’t give power to an angry left-wing mob. Democrats have become too EXTREME and TOO DANGEROUS to govern. Republicans believe in the rule of law - not the rule of the mob. VOTE REPUBLICAN!"

Online jmyrlefuller

  • TBR's resident Grim Reaper
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 15,339
  • J. Myrle Fuller
    • Fullervision
I think Sanders has some lefty gravitas still, Harris has some appeal, Beto has some appeal (both of them until more is exposed about them), and Biden. 

Now, remember, I don't find any of them appealing, appropriate or fit for the job; just answering your question.
Don't rule out Sherrod Brown as a dark horse. Midwestern setting, consistently won elections in a purple state, and sufficiently left-wing enough that the Democrats won't revolt if he's forced upon the party.

Online jmyrlefuller

  • TBR's resident Grim Reaper
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 15,339
  • J. Myrle Fuller
    • Fullervision
Elizabeth was a lot more known than Sanders before he ran for president. She has a lot of name recognition and is almost exactly the same as Sanders politically. The main difference is she's more of a fighter than Bernie. She's got a very aggressive in-your-face style that the left absolutely adores. The people here don't like Warren for obvious reasons, but don't let your bias lead you to underestimate her. She is absolutely a serious contender in 2020. Unless another big name announces a run really soon you can expect her to be Trump's opponent.
I think Warren has ruined her credibility with this whole Native American fiasco. Even on the left, if you read left-wing media, when they talk about Warren, it's always "we don't need her. She's a liability." If they want a deranged lefty firebrand, Kamala Harris can do all that, is getting plenty of free publicity from the media, and she's a genuine POC.

I'll also note that Warren stated a few months ago that she wasn't running and wasn't going to run. She has issues with being a pathological liar... something the Dems are going to have to avoid if they're seriously looking to take any high ground in a fight against Trump.

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,337
  • MAKE LAWS, DON'T BREAK LAWS!
I think Sanders has some lefty gravitas still, Harris has some appeal, Beto has some appeal (both of them until more is exposed about them), and Biden. 

Now, remember, I don't find any of them appealing, appropriate or fit for the job; just answering your question.

Sanders still has a huge following in Washington State, by people who want to bankrupt the country.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2019, 04:54:36 PM by Chosen Daughter »
Some people have an ability to negotiate. It's an art you're basically born with. You either have it or you don't.

It would take an hour-and-a-half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles. I think I know most of it anyway. You're talking about just getting updated on a situation

Donald Trump

U.S. Constitution
Article 4 Section 4

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened)

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,220
People said similar things about Obama in the early days. Elizabeth Warren is up there with Ocasio when it comes to left wing rock star status.
It was a joke about her American Indian DNA.
I have decided to officially and formally not apologize. I'm not sorry at all, even slightly.

    Indeed, I especially want to convey my absence of remorse to anyone who was offended by what I said. If you are the sort of person who gets twisted into knots when someone articulates a point of view that differs from your own, then you are exactly the sort of person who should never receive an apology for a differing point of view — if I were offering one, which, again, I'm not.

Offline Snarknado

  • Anti
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
Bernie has a pretty strong grip on the non-Wall-Street fund raising industry. Warren and the rest will have a hard time prying much away from him. Hollywood money could make the difference, and 0bama's endorsement, presumably Harris or Booker rather than Warren, will be a big influence there.

The Wall St. money is also an interesting factor - with Clinton they knew her phony rhetoric was just pandering to get votes. I don't think they can be that confident about this cycle's pretend-moderate candidates. And then what do they do when one of the rabid socialists gets the nomination? They won't support Trump directly but how about a Schultz?
---
There is no O in 0bama

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 16,419
Actually, I'd love to see Warren and Bernie debate each other.  Pure comical entertainment.   :pop41:
"I believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey it laws; to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies." -William Page


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf