WaPo DOUBLE STANDARD: Hid Sexual Assault Allegation Against Virginia’s Lt. Governor, But Publicized

[Sighlass]

Full Title: WaPo DOUBLE STANDARD: Hid Sexual Assault Allegation Against Virginia’s Lt. Governor, But Publicized Allegations Against Bret Kavanaugh And Roy Moore During Investigation!

Date: February 5, 2019Author: evansnewsreport.com 0 Comments   

By: Brian Evans

On Superbowl Sunday, Big League Politics reported that Virginia’s Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax had sexual assault allegations posed against him by Vanessa Tyson.

Vanessa Tyson accused him of having sexually assaulted her at the DNC Convention in Boston, Massachusetts in 2004.

By Monday morning, Lt. Gov. Fairfax admitted that he knew about the allegations, threatened to sue Big League Politics for printing the article, and then defended himself, by stating that his name was allegedly cleared by the Washington Post journalists! He said…

    “The person reported to be making this false allegation first approached the Washington Post – one of the nation’s most prominent newspapers – more than a year ago, around the time of the Lieutenant Governor’s historic inauguration. The Post carefully investigated the claim for several months. After being presented with the facts consistent with the Lt. Governor’s denial of the allegation, the absence of any evidence corroborating the allegation, and significant red flags and inconsistencies within the allegation, the Post made the considered decision not to publish the story.”

The full statement is below…

However, does the Washington Post have the authority to decide guilt or innocence in regards to who committed crimes, and who did not? Why did the Washington Post run unsubstantiated 30-year-old sexual assault allegations against Judge Roy Moore in 2017, which changed the outcome of an election, and without proof? Why did the Washington Post drop the investigation of Roy Moore, after the election was over? Did the sexual assault allegations matter less, or was it all political? Why did the Washington Post repeatedly publish unsubstantiated 34-year-old sexual assault allegations against Justice Bret Kavanaugh without evidence? Why did the Washington Post run smear campaign articles against potential witnesses who refuted every assault charge that was widely publicized by the Washington Post?

Ultimately, The Washington Post has become nothing more than a propaganda paper for the radical left! They dig for dirt on anyone who opposes the Marxist or Socialist agenda, while burying and covering up stories on those who they want to protect! Therefore, the Washington Post is no longer a true journalistic publication, but instead a propaganda mouthpiece for the now-radicalized left!

Read rest at link below....

https://evansnewsreport.com/2019/02/05/wapo-double-standard-hid-sexual-assault-allegation-against-virginias-lt-governor-but-publicized-allegations-against-bret-kavanaugh-and-roy-moore-during-investigation/?fbclid=IwAR2mWhClW1DgTsPcnxU7Ua-Dv4A_ySBc226OJCswzbsW1-D9GPM_G6G8gu4

[Sighlass]

Also of interest was the leaked memos (6 of 12 pages, Wapo is not releasing/leaking the other 6 pages for some reason). These leaked memos talk about how the group that interferred in the Alabama elections graded themselves. It is interesting inside tidbits... especially seeing how some here at TBR bit it hook line and sinker (especially the women whom they pointed out were their target audience).



.......



Read all 6 pages leaked at this link (below)

https://medium.com/@jeffgiesea/breaking-heres-the-after-action-report-from-the-alabama-senate-disinformation-campaign-e3edd854f17d

[XenaLee]

Uh....

is this really news..... or new?   (that WaPo has a massive, leftie-like double-standard)

Seriously?

[Sighlass]

Uh....

is this really news..... or new?   (that WaPo has a massive, leftie-like double-standard)
Seriously?

It ties a nice bow tie into other stories we (especially me) have followed. It was not posted in "News", but "Scandal Watch" section because it fits better there. Yes you are right about the left media having double standards.

Also of interest was the correlations drawn between how Moore and Kavanaugh were treated that some here deny being remotely related. I personally don't see how anyone with eyes to see could make that claim and neither did this author.

In that vein, the second post makes sense.... again this is not me saying that women were the most easily swayed, but the liberal disinformation group (mostly men) that was hired by the billionaire progressive in California. They actually gloat about how they were able to sway white conservative women to vote differently then previous elections. Not just gloat, but back it up with polling.

[XenaLee]

It ties a nice bow tie into other stories we (especially me) have followed. It was not posted in "News", but "Scandal Watch" section because it fits better there. Yes you are right about the left media having double standards.

Also of interest was the correlations drawn between how Moore and Kavanaugh were treated that some here deny being remotely related. I personally don't see how anyone with eyes to see could make that claim and neither did this author.

There is no question at all in my mind re: how the left treats anyone on the right side of politics totally differently than those on their same leftist side.  I've been observing this phenomena for decades.  The leftist politics of personal destruction has been honed to a fine art by these slimebags on the left.  And they will continue to "Herman Cain" anyone and everyone on the right.... since, just as we saw with Moore, it usually works so well for them.

[Sighlass]

There is no question at all in my mind re: how the left treats anyone on the right side of politics totally differently than those on their same leftist side.  I've been observing this phenomena for decades.  The leftist politics of personal destruction has been honed to a fine art by these slimebags on the left.  And they will continue to "Herman Cain" anyone and everyone on the right.... since, just as we saw with Moore, it usually works so well for them.