House Democrats Again Block Request to Vote on Bill to Stop Infanticide

[TomSea]

House Democrats Again Block Request to Vote on Bill to Stop Infanticide
 National   Steven Ertelt   Feb 7, 2019   |   4:49PM    Washington, DC

This is the second time Congressional Democrats thwarted an attempt by Republicans to vote on a bill that would provide medical care and treatment for babies who provide survived failed abortions — twice in the House and once in the Senate.

As LifeNews reported, pro-abortion Senator Patty Murray blocked a vote on Monday on a bill from pro-life Republican Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska that would stop infanticide nationwide. Then, yesterday, Democrats blocked Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s unanimous consent request to vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Read more at: https://www.lifenews.com/2019/02/07/house-democrats-again-block-request-to-vote-on-bill-to-stop-infanticide/

Today, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise asked Democrats to allow a vote on what should be a noncontroversial bill. They refused.

[txradioguy]

There needs to be ads run during the next election cycle touting the fact that Progressives are completely unwilling to defend the life a a child...period. Shove their claim about being the caring party down their throats.

[Jazzhead]

There needs to be ads run during the next election cycle touting the fact that Progressives are completely unwilling to defend the life a a child...period. Shove their claim about being the caring party down their throats.

Exactly right.   Make 'em pay the price for their extremism.

[austingirl]

There needs to be ads run during the next election cycle touting the fact that Progressives are completely unwilling to defend the life a a child...period. Shove their claim about being the caring party down their throats.

The demcoms apparently don't see the hypocrisy of their cries of "children in cages" and "children separated from "parents"/human traffickers, when they fail to protect newborns. Maybe they should stipulate an age when a child matters.

[txradioguy]

The demcoms apparently don't see the hypocrisy of their cries of "children in cages" and "children separated from "parents"/human traffickers, when they fail to protect newborns. Maybe they should stipulate an age when a child matters.

@austingirl the age of the child matters to Libs in direct correlation to how important that child's age is to their political agenda.

Remember when it comes to DACA "children" run all the way up to the age of 25.

[austingirl]

@austingirl the age of the child matters to Libs in direct correlation to how important that child's age is to their political agenda.

Remember when it comes to DACA "children" run all the way up to the age of 25.

@txradioguy
Very good point on the DACA babes in arms

[IsailedawayfromFR]

Paul Ryan had the power to do this and failed.

He could have authorized a video in the House chamber on the grisley details of a partial birth abortion down to the sucking out of the brains and the cessation of a beating heart.

That would have ended any ridiculous voting against protecting the life of a newborn, as well as late term abortions.

Ryan was an epic failure.

[Smokin Joe]

There needs to be ads run during the next election cycle touting the fact that Progressives are completely unwilling to defend the life a a child...period. Shove their claim about being the caring party down their throats.

Start calling them what they are:

The Party of Death