Ann Coulter: We Put ‘Lunatic,’ ‘Lazy’ Trump in the White House for One Reason — The Wall

[edpc]

I don't trust the Heritage Foundation either - DeMint left with all haste. That makes me bloody well suspicious.

Point is, let's not pretend Trump knows anything about any of these people. He just nominates whoever people tell him would be a good choice or might fit the 'central casting' mold. Look at his recent AG nominee. He's been friends with Mueller for decades.

[roamer_1]

Point is, let's not pretend Trump knows anything about any of these people. He just nominates whoever people tell him would be a good choice or might fit the 'central casting' mold. Look at his recent AG nominee. He's been friends with Mueller for decades.

That's all right...

But if Heritage is throwin Kennedys, there is something vitally wrong with Heritage...

[Emjay]

@Emjay why don't you quit telling people how they should think?  The GOP had the majority the past 4 years and the DEMS still maintained their power over them. Pelosi just handed Trump his behind and she even delayed his SOTU.  I don't ever remember the DEM Speaker of the House delaying a SOTU address.  That's just one example.  The past several elections my choice as my senator was between Rubio (RINO) and a DEM.  We need to get rid of RINO's and not keep voting them in just to oppose the DEM. I don't like Rubio.  I don't like his recent stance against Trump, so why should I continue to vote for him?  I'm all done having to vote for RINO's.  IF and when a conservative runs, I'll cast my vote.  Otherwise I'm just keeping the swamp creatures alive.

Secondly, you threatened awhile ago to put me on 'ignore'.  I've done you the favor.  Peace.

@libertybele   It's one thing to whine because everything doesn't go your way, but it's just silly to say you'll never vote Republican again.  Right now, and in the forseeable future, there are only two choices.

[jpsb]

I don't trust the Heritage Foundation either - DeMint left with all haste. That makes me bloody well suspicious.

Yes I noticed that too, good point.

[jpsb]

That's all right...

But if Heritage is throwin Kennedys, there is something vitally wrong with Heritage...

I believe Trump takes advise on judges from the Federalist Society.

[jafo2010]

When Bill Maher first appeared on the scene, he was funny.  The last 3-4 times I watched his program, he did not make me laugh once.  His single focus anti-anyone conservative has grown old and boring.  I haven't watched him in years, and did so this past year.  How does he stay on cable?  He is a major yawn!

And I applaud Coulter's rhetoric, for she is speaking the thoughts of many Trump supporters.  If there is anything he MUST have a result on it is the wall.  No progress on the wall in four years will definitively cost him votes.  He cannot afford to lose anyone.

[corbe]

   @Emjay I love ya Honey, but your relentless pursuit of @libertybele and @Chosen Daughter makes me further understand just how screwed up I am in always loving the one that has a tendency to twist my mind in understanding why.

[edpc]

I believe Trump takes advise on judges from the Federalist Society.

In early March 2016, following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, Heritage’s John Malcolm published a list of potential Supreme Court justices in a Daily Signal article, “The Next Supreme Court Justice.” The non-exclusive list contained eight names, including Kavanaugh’s.

After releasing an initial list of 11 names in May 2016, Trump later added to his list to include Kavanaugh. Trump gave credit to The Federalist Society and The Heritage Foundation for helping to inform his thinking in compiling his own list.

https://www.heritage.org/impact/supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-was-included-the-list-the-heritage-foundation-helped


Apparently, both organizations contributed to the list.

[QueenCatofAragon]

Sixty may be the new fifty but it is still too old for tossing hair and crossing legs.

And I resent her using Trump to get attention.  She used him when she supported him and now she's using him with negative remarks.

@Emjay

Wait—50 is too old to cross your legs?  That sounds like Haircutter at TOS who said women ought to cut their hair short when they turn 40.

My mother-in-law is over 70 and crosses her legs sometimes— looks perfectly graceful.

[jpsb]

@Emjay

Wait—50 is too old to cross your legs?  That sounds like Haircutter at TOS who said women ought to cut their hair short when they turn 40.

My mother-in-law is over 70 and crosses her legs sometimes— looks perfectly graceful.

@QueenCatofAragon

Welcome back, missed you ;)

[Emjay]

   @Emjay I love ya Honey, but your relentless pursuit of @libertybele and @Chosen Daughter makes me further understand just how screwed up I am in always loving the one that has a tendency to twist my mind in understanding why.

I'm sorry @corbe but those women are unbearable.  I only chastise them when I am absolutely driven to it by their mindless whining.  So, it's not relentless, it is occasional.

It is also a waste of time, baby, and I need to stop.  Twisting your mind even further would be cruel and unusual. 

[Emjay]

To clarify, a woman can cross her legs at any age, but crossing and re-crossing constantly during a single interview is not a good look.

[QueenCatofAragon]

@QueenCatofAragon

Welcome back, missed you ;)

@jpsb

Thank you!  Doesn’t matter how often we disagree, I never take it personally.

[jpsb]

@jpsb

Thank you!  Doesn’t matter how often we disagree, I never take it personally.

 

[Emjay]

@jpsb Let's hear it for the Nice Guys.