That is indeed too bad. It's probably why you and I will never see eye-to-eye in these matters. It's OK, though...I learned to respect you for producing arguments and evidence when asked, although you may never care much for me.
'Salright... 
That last particular rundown really didn’t have much to do with you. You’re at least intellectually honest enough to consider things, after the fact. There are, however, a number of others who have allowed emotional investment to rule. Mueller could say water is wet and it would have to be some sort of deep state conspiracy.
When someone surrounds himself with lowlifes engaged in unethical and illegal behavior, we shouldn’t really be surprised to find the central figure is doing similar things. In the end, I think this will be somewhat like Watergate, in the sense that the president was not directly involved in the initial actions. I doubt Nixon ordered the break in or had advanced knowledge of it.
Similarly, I think we will ultimately discover people around Trump like Bannon, Manafort, Cohen, and personnel with Cambridge Analytica had multiple contacts with Russian or WikiLeaks associated individuals. People will want to continue with the ‘show me the man and I will show you the crime’ mantra. However, in an official investigation, you cannot obstruct justice, commit perjury, or suborn perjury, in an attempt to avoid political embarrassment, without consequence. Nixon aptly demonstrated that.
