Author Topic: Can You Be a 'Scientist' but Reject the Scientific Method?  (Read 396 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 105,277
  • �It�s easier to fool people than to convince them
Can You Be a 'Scientist' but Reject the Scientific Method?
« on: January 30, 2019, 07:57:43 AM »
January 30, 2019
Can You Be a 'Scientist' but Reject the Scientific Method?
By Jonathon Moseley

As reported in Politico on January 27, climate activists at the American Meteorological Society’s annual meeting in January in Phoenix, Arizona admitted they are failing to persuade the American people of the threat of global warming.

    Leading climate scientists and meteorologists are banking on a new strategy for talking about climate change: Take the politics out of it.

    That means avoiding the phrase “climate change,” so loaded with partisan connotations as it is. Stop talking about who or what is most responsible. And focus instead on what is happening and how unusual it is -- and what it is costing communities.

Read more:
“A society does not ever die ‘from natural causes’, but always dies from suicide or murder – and nearly always from the former….”
    ― Arnold Joseph Toynbee’s A Study of History.

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 24,330
Re: Can You Be a 'Scientist' but Reject the Scientific Method?
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2019, 08:31:13 AM »
Excellent article, well worth reading in its entirety!

@rangerrebew Thanks for posting this!
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

There are no "Socialists", no "Progressives", only Communists, with every negative image that totalitarianism might muster, demanding fealty and conformity to their views, with a legacy of 150,000,000 dead and counting.

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo