Grown people having sex for money imposes nothing on you. The imposition is yours.
That is not true. It degrades culture and degrades women. I have grandchildren here.
You really think your example is equivalent? Also “Deal with what the majority wants or get bent.†doesn’t sound very libertarian to me, especially when the thing doesn’t involve you. Views like that delegitimize the conservative message because they’re hypocritical.
Bullshit sommore. Libertarianism is directly couched in federalism. Civil-libertarianism (Goldwater conservative) is not against law. It is *FOR* law and order. It prefers local law to all others. within the strict confines of an originalist reading of the Constitution, and the constitutions of the various states respectively, with sovereignty housed as close to the people as possible.
What you propose stinks of liberal anarchism, not to be confused with libertarian principles in the least.
Your first mistake is in the abject failure to recognize what prostitution does to a community - To the degradation of women's honor. What it does to promote adultery and divorce, and how it tears families to pieces. To sanction prostitution is to lend it credence - to favor it over the welfare of families and a decent environment to raise children. It endorses broken homes.
Your second mistake is to lend even more power to an overweening federal government, wishing for a federal decree to enforce your ludicrous proposal - No libertarian of any stripe would endorse that.
If you want to try it, then go where it is already legal, or change it where you are. You have zero right to impose it upon me and mine by federal fiat.
And don't try to wrap yourself in libertarianism anymore. It makes your ass look big.
Poll
