@INVAR
"The courts" are government aren't they? If the government is corrupt beyond redemption, why involve them.
Because bureaucrats are worse and unless you got buckets of money from big lobbying firms, our "Representatives" are not interested in 'the little people' unless it grows the state or their wallets.
Look, this is a pissin' in the wind thing - hardly a hill to die on.
I hear that about every single issue from abortion to guns to deficit spending involving the talons of the insatiable Statist beast in D.C.
I'm convinced there is no hill much of anyone in this country is willing to die on for liberty, except a few of us 'extremists' and nutjobs.
This merely enforces previously unenforced existing food safety regs of identity standards.
This has NOTHING to do with 'safety'. This has everything to do with punishing those not from the Dairy lobby who are hurting their profit margins as people are turning to alternatives instead of dairy.
It just says you can't call it "milk".
And you cannot call a transgendered by what's between their legs, you cannot call homosexual perverts or their behavior a sin, but you can be forced to bake them a wedding cake. It never ends with the government telling us what we are allowed to think, say and do. I'm freaking sick and tired of their fingers getting into all our pies.
It can still be sold and the choices will still be available.
Under what 'market' will it be allowed to be sold? Will Big Dairy get government to ban selling soy milk in the dairy case? I'm sure that's the next step.
Get government out of it. Let the manufacturers hammer it out in court.
I don't see that as a bad thing particularly in light of this:
I see anything government touches as a bad light.
Is that beef? I think not and I'd appreciate knowing that it's not quite the real thing before i get it home.
Is "meat" genetically grown from fecal matter a public health risk? Soy, coconut and almond milk is arguably not. So an entirely different situation.
