0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I like it. I'm just trying to keep my sense of humor.
The Zodiac note or Cruz's bill?
I like the Cruz bill.
" keep immigrant families together after they cross the border", in a bus heading south.
Reading the details, that sounds like the plan for those who don't manage to convince an immigration judge they have a legitimate asylum claim.
That's how I read it. And, entering illegally is one of the things that makes it not legitimate.
The problem lies in the fact the activist judges that populate these immigration courts have allowed what is defined as "legitimate" reasons for asylum to become so broad that there really is no such thing as an illegitimate reason for asylum any more in their estimation.Then there's the fact we have groups meeting these hoardes of people heading towards our border to coach them on exactly what to say to convince a judge they need to stay in this country.
Claiming asylum at the border is not illegal. The claim may or may not be found to be legitimate, but a family's arrival starts a process to determine the legitimacy of the claim. What is outrageous to most Americans is separating parents and children pending the asylum determination. Yes, folks who are incarcerated must be separated from their children. But is it appropriate to treat an arrival at our border seeking asylum as a common criminal?
CLOSE THE BORDER!HALT ALL IMMIGRATION.UNTIL THOSE ALREADY HERE CAN BE VETTED, PROCESSED AND ASSIMILATED INTO AN AMERICAN CULTURE.NO MORE REFUGEES OR ASYLUM SEEKERS UNLESS THEY ARE CHRISTIANS UNDER PERSECUTION THAT CAN BE VERIFIED.
Using all large caps doesn't make your rantings any less insane.
Claiming asylum at the border is not illegal.... But is it appropriate to treat an arrival at our border seeking asylum as a common criminal?
@Jazzhead No but CROSSING that border IS illegal and thus it is entirely appropriate to treat an arrival as a common criminal because that is what they are. There are legitimate ports of entry for asylum seekers that don’t involve breaking our laws. And now you’ll babble on about some other libtard belief that you hold.
Trust me, you would rather have THOSE large caps than other large caps being used.
Is that another threat of violence?
Yes, he is going to throw virtual capital letters at you. Large angry ones. Come on, Jazzy, give it up!
Dr.Darrell ScottVerified account @PastorDScottOnce the mid terms are over, liberals won’t talk about detained or separated illegal immigrant children until 2020. #itsallpolitics_________________________Nick Searcy, INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR Verified account @yesnicksearcy14m14 minutes agoNick Searcy, INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR Retweeted Chad PergramNarrator: Schumer thinks having the political issue is far more important than any of those silly children he's pretending to care about.
