None of that is correct. Civil marriage is a form of contract, between two parties. Full faith and credit has always included one state permitting enforcement of a contract entered into in another state. A party married in New Jersey can move to Arkansas and be able to enforce the marriage contract, just like any other.
Now, Arkansas doesn't have to recognize the same rights and privileges to a civil marriage as New Jersey does. If Arkansas doesn't let a married couple deduct the cost of home renovations on a state income tax return, then that's the rule in Arkansas even if the deduction is available in New Jersey. Of course, the that local law must, as per the Constitution, afford equal protection. The deduction must be provided (or denied) to the parties to a marriage whether gay or straight.
States (and localities) have traditionally be sovereign with respect to public security and safety issues. If New Jersey won't allow concealed carry, then just try to understand that there is simply no tradition of full faith and credit extended to other states to allow their citizens to travel to New Jersey with concealed weapons.
You might try to argue that reciprocity is indicated by the natural and Constitutionally-protected right to travel. After all, that natural right lies behind why full faith and credit is extended to the enforcement of contracts, including marriage contracts. But again, public security and safety are traditionally local concerns, up to local rules and local law enforcement. You come to New Jersey, you play by its rules. You observe its speed limits, and you also obey its laws when carrying, or not carrying, a gun.
Capiche?
Caipche? WTF do you think you are some wannabe Soprano?
I gotta contract for you, the ultimate contract. It begins We, The People.....
What about that contract?
Nevermind the strawmen of legitimately local issues. If the Government can impose upon all States the requirement to allow perversion, Then the card I carry which says I have been background checked and found to be of good enough character to carry a lethal weapon should indicate that in all jurisdictions, and be a valid permit. If my Driver's License is accepted in states which have subtly different rules concerning things like "right turn on red", then my CCW permit should also be accepted.
That's an excellent policy. By all means, stay away. You'd make a poor neighbor with that kind of childish and selfish attitude. And, as far as the Constitutional and federalism goes, it is you that is fundamentally wrong.
Selfish attitude? YES! Absolutely!
I am a selfish lout who wishes to secure the blessings of Liberty for himself, his family, his neighbors and his prosperity from those who would twist natural rights into wrongs and warp the even the most basic human relationships, those who call good evil and evil good. Bad neighbor? For the likes of you, certainly.
I gladly will refuse to spend any money in those jurisdictions which would deny me or mine our Constitutionally enumerated and God-Given Rights, especially while creating Rights for perversions out of thin air. I must note those jurisdictions aren't exactly flush with prosperity, but don't come here, don't flee in this direction, instead wallow in the cesspit you have created.
And if, by accident I must tread there I will shake the dust from my feet when I leave.
I would not enter a war zone without the means to defend myself, much less a town that has more murders on a Saturday morning than the entire State I live in has in a year. (There's a reason for that, but Reason has left the jurisdictions we speak of.)
Either my license to carry a firearm has full faith and credit, or your perverted pals' little piece of paper means nothing legally.
