BINGO! 
For example,according to the FBI crime statistics from a couple of years ago black males between 18 and 45 committed slightly more than 90 percent of the murders in this country. WHY is it considered racist to say most black males are thugs,when in FACT,they ARE thugs. "Thug" is a much-admired career field in many black households.
This is certainly not news to the black people that live in the Dim "game reserves". THEY are the primary prey of the thugs. You won't hear them complain about it much because they are afraid of being physically attacked if they do,and are afraid with damn good reason.
Hell,even Jesse Jackson screwed up and admitted the truth that when he is walking alone down the street in NYC and hears footsteps behind him,he is relieved when he turns around and sees it is a white man following him.
It ain't no secret,folks!
One point I must make. Just because most homicidal thugs are black males, does not mean that most black males are homicidal thugs. Location and surroundings have much to do with that, despite the efforts of the media to export the thug lifestyle to the most rural corners.
Even within the statistical groups oversimplification and generalization can be the enemy of identifying which groups have the most problems.
I must note the unfortunate progression of programs, University dreck, and media efforts to undermine the efforts of those in the fifties and sixties who wanted their children to get a classical education and build solid lives and families. Totalitarian efforts need an aggrieved underclass to use to tear down the status quo, and they have done all in their power to create and even subsidize one within the black community, but the effort has not been universally successful in areas where the success of the old models of family and responsibility and solid education have put the lie to the identity politics message. Those areas, and indeed, that subset of the demographic is free to make moral lives for themselves without suffering the depredations common in some urban environments.
An unfortunate effect, however, of identity politics has been that a significant fraction who are not thugs will cover for others who are in the thug neighborhoods, either out of fear or because they aren't going to betray the identity group.
We see the same with a large number of Muslims and terrorists as well. While most terrorists are Muslim, one cannot say honestly that most Muslims are terrorists, despite the fundamental beliefs which will often cause at least tacit support for such efforts by silence from the 'faithful'.
For what it is worth, however, the cultural rot emplaced in the sixties and carefully assisted in its metastization throughout all demographics not vigilant against it, nurtured through pop culture and media which have made it the 'norm' in the minds of far too many, becomes the very grievance through which those who fall prey to it 'identify', and thus embracing such misery, those who rail against it often are the very purveyors of their own ills.
The human wreckage wrought by those who claim to be do-gooders is unrivaled in history.
In the end, I have met three kinds of people: good folks, assh*les, and folks I don't know well enough to tell, and they come in all sizes, shapes, and colors. With some, their behaviour is constant, with others, it changes depending on who else is around--and that, too is not limited to any one group. It is the reason I avoid crowds and crowded venues (a crowd is just a mob waiting for a loudmouth and a spark), and perhaps why, despite having many acquaintances, I call few 'friend'.
