Well, I did edit out "ugly" and "vengeful" (if you would do the same, please).
But I still maintain that he has a deep disdain of pro-life, pro-morality TBR members, and has a meanness that has been really surprising to me.
The irony is that he attacks us because we aren't nice and fair enough, while accusing us of all sorts of vile things himself.
Perhaps he actually is only here to shut down threads as some have said. Who knows?
People on forums tend to defend their opinions the way Velocoraptors defend their eggs - they somehow get the idea that there is some very profound threat to them in not doing so effectively.
CG Jung once said of people's own perception of their own morality, "It is impossible for one to conceive of any morality superior to their own."
What I think heir Jung must have meant by that is we ascribe to the best morality that makes sense to us. When and if we encounter any moral synthesis which we deem superior, we then adopt it for our own.
One big problem with Forum debates is that people are so quick to defend their POV sometimes, that they don't take time for reflection and pondering - they "listen to respond" instead of "listening to understand".
Personally, I dislike it when people stand too much on technicalities and legalisms and I see a lot of that with Jazzhead's position(s). As if something that is legal is ergo, automatically moral.
Laws should be guidelines for justice. Clearly (at least to me) any law which allows someone to destroy another person's business/livelihood because of their refusal to provide some casual product/service, is immoral (idiotic) and should be eradicated.
Jazzhead's arguments are so ponderous they get bogged down in legalisms, perfunctory deferral to abstruse technicalities and other things tangential to making a sound moral judgment. His posts avoid the larger, more-central issues and concentrate on things that seem to me to be detached from the larger, more-vital elements.
There is an immediate gestalt, a zeitgeist in human activity that gets lost in cerebralism. Too much excursion into philosophical sophistries leads AWAY from health and sanity, not toward them.
We need to stop passing and maintaining laws that do not feel right. Sometimes intuition is a good guide - so in this case, which simply STINQUES of Statist, militant homsexual BS.
