What part of 'no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law' and 'the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized' are so hard to understand?
Hard to believe I actually see some justifying this on a Conservative forum... but then again between extreme authoritarianism and trolls, the Constitution has been all but discarded.