Author Topic: Chinese Automaker’s Bid for Jeep Raises National Security Concerns  (Read 936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Quote
A Chinese automaker kicking the tires at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and its most profitable asset, Jeep, is raising alarms and could run into strong opposition from the U.S. government.

China’s Great Wall Motor Company on Monday said it was interested in buying Jeep from Fiat Chrysler. It’s not yet clear whether Great Wall has already submitted a bid for Fiat Chrysler’s Jeep or whether one is being prepared. Fiat Chrysler said on Monday that it had “not been approached by Great Wall in connection with the Jeep brand or any other matter relating to its business.”...

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/22/chinese-automakers-bid-for-jeep-raises-national-security-concerns/



Wingnut

  • Guest
Re: Chinese Automaker’s Bid for Jeep Raises National Security Concerns
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2017, 02:57:15 pm »
Chrysler is lying thu their teeth.  That Fat Carpetbagging Italian SOB Sergio Marchionne and FCA is adopting the obligatory Sergeant Schultz defense,..... "we know nothing"
They are talking. Just as sure as FIAT stands for "Fix It Again TAO-CHING".
« Last Edit: August 22, 2017, 02:59:08 pm by Wingnut »

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Re: Chinese Automaker’s Bid for Jeep Raises National Security Concerns
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2017, 01:31:48 am »
There were a hellavu lot of military equipment built by Chrysler.  This would be gone if the Chinese control things.
Among other items





http://www.allpar.com/history/military/
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline montanajoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,324
Re: Chinese Automaker’s Bid for Jeep Raises National Security Concerns
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2017, 06:27:25 am »
I would think this could not possibly go through...but I've been wrong before..