Author Topic: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?  (Read 1114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« on: November 01, 2016, 05:00:50 pm »
I assume this is about Hillary as it is from Podesta to Hillary's assistant.

Quote

            
            
Any sense of whether and when she wants to talk?

            

               From:john.podesta@gmail.com
               To: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com
               Date: 2015-09-26 18:39
               Subject: Any sense of whether and when she wants to talk?
               
            


         

            

               How bad is her head?
            



         
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/40281



Offline GAJohnnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,866
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2016, 05:04:47 pm »


Who is more dangerous to the future of the Republic?

A crude lewd bombastic President facing a hostile press and a suspicious Congress/Judiciary or a corrupt, lawless bribe- able President with a slavishly adoring press and a lap dog Congress/Judiciary?

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,751
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2016, 06:03:17 pm »

Who is more dangerous to the future of the Republic?

A crude lewd bombastic President facing a hostile press and a suspicious Congress/Judiciary or a corrupt, lawless bribe- able President with a slavishly adoring press and a lap dog Congress/Judiciary?
Umm, that's a tough one, because in the first set of descriptors you left out psychotic and childish.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2016, 06:05:09 pm »

Who is more dangerous to the future of the Republic?

A crude lewd bombastic President facing a hostile press and a suspicious Congress/Judiciary or a corrupt, lawless bribe- able President with a slavishly adoring press and a lap dog Congress/Judiciary?

It seems you have two interchangeable descriptions there that could apply to either candidate.

I would put a response like this.

If someone approached you and said they were going to shoot one of your arms, then tried to convince you choosing the left arm was the best option for you because you are right dominant, you wouldn't start negotiating on the size of bullet- you would reject their proposal and fight against that person.

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,751
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2016, 06:09:09 pm »
How bad is her head?

It's so bad________________________________ ****drummer

You know of course, that it's setups like this that get a certain group of guy's in trouble here, right?
@AbaraXas

Offline bolobaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,373
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2016, 02:12:06 am »
It seems you have two interchangeable descriptions there that could apply to either candidate.

I would put a response like this.

If someone approached you and said they were going to shoot one of your arms, then tried to convince you choosing the left arm was the best option for you because you are right dominant, you wouldn't start negotiating on the size of bullet- you would reject their proposal and fight against that person.

@AbaraXas

Good one.

Unfortunately, it will be lost on the if-you-don't-support-Trump-you-support-Hillary crowd. Have you EVER seen them listen to logic or a reasonable argument?

That's why the end of your analogy is soooo spot-on. Eventually, we are going to have to fight these fools to regain the true meaning of conservatism.
How to lose credibility while posting:
1. Trump is never wrong.
2. Default to the most puerile emoticon you can find. This is especially useful when you can't win an argument on merits.
3. Be falsely ingratiating, completely but politely dismissive without talking to the points, and bring up Hillary whenever the conversation is really about conservatism.
4. When all else fails, remember rule #1 and #2. Emoticons are like the poor man's tweet!

Offline bolobaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,373
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2016, 02:13:12 am »
How bad is her head?

It's so bad_that Bill had to get it from an intern instead!_ ****drummer

You know of course, that it's setups like this that get a certain group of guy's in trouble here, right?
@AbaraXas

@GtHawk
« Last Edit: November 02, 2016, 02:13:36 am by bolobaby »
How to lose credibility while posting:
1. Trump is never wrong.
2. Default to the most puerile emoticon you can find. This is especially useful when you can't win an argument on merits.
3. Be falsely ingratiating, completely but politely dismissive without talking to the points, and bring up Hillary whenever the conversation is really about conservatism.
4. When all else fails, remember rule #1 and #2. Emoticons are like the poor man's tweet!

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Wikileaks - How bad is her head?
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2016, 02:14:25 am »

Who is more dangerous to the future of the Republic?

A crude lewd bombastic President facing a hostile press and a suspicious Congress/Judiciary or a corrupt, lawless bribe- able President with a slavishly adoring press and a lap dog Congress/Judiciary?


There is no difference twixt the two; your description is woefully inapt, by half.