#Wikileaks- (Clinton) Foundation vulnerability points

[ABX]

#PodestaEmails

               From:robbymook2015@gmail.com
               To: cmills@cdmillsgroup.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, huma@hrcoffice.com
               Date: 2015-02-25 00:22
               Subject: Foundation vulnerability points
            

               Below is a list of key vulberability points for consideration.  John, I
added some important process questions at the end per our discussion this
morning.

*Donations and candidate participation*

   - Money from foreign governments
   - Domestic or foreign individual donors with vetting issues (i.e. the
   campaign and foundation should agree on vetting criteria and jointly
   discuss any donors who fall outside the criteria)
   - HRC attending Foundation events
   - HRC's name remaining in the Foundation name

*Operational issues*

   - Travel on corporate or donated planes (these should be vetted against
   SD and Senate work)
   - Especially lavish/high-end hotels for events
   - Overseas events with foreign leaders or government officials
   - If the Foundations issue reports that are critical of its own progress
   or indicate that there may not have been progress on projects
   - Potential conflicts from overseas-owned organizations (UK and Sweeden)

*Process questions *

   - Who presents information to HRC and the family on vulnerabilities and
   press issues?
   - Who needs to be engaged in discussing press matters regarding the
   foundation?
   - Who has the ultimate say on press language?  Who is engaged in the
   sign off process? (note: the Foundation will be the on the record voice on
   Foundation issues)
   - Is the campaign engaged in discussing Foundation donor vetting?
   - Is the campaign engaged in discussing Foundation operations like
   foreign events, domestic events to avoid vulnerabilities?
            

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31013

[Oceander]

The wikileaks stuff is probably not enough to alter the election, but it may be enough to tie a President Clinton down in knots for four years, and - provided the bleep haven't destroyed the GOP's control of Congress - provide a solid basis for impeachment proceedings against her.

It would be the ultimate in cruel ironies if the bleep, in their zeal to elect the unelectable, managed to destroy the one avenue through which she might have been defeated.