he wants to sell the land back to the states and make education local control.
Since states haven't wanted the land when it was offered to them, has he said how that will be addressed? I applaud putting the burden of land maintenance onto the states that surround it, but how does that work out legally if they don't want it?
Plus, what about the ranchers? The feds give a HUGE subsidy to ranchers by offering them grazing land at something like 1/23 the market rate. I'd hate that the price of beef would skyrocket, but it would be worth it if we cut the federal budget/taxes by a corresponding amount...the rancher subsidy is wrong.