Yeah, well only if you think Saddam Hussein and Gadaffi with nukes were stabilizing forces. I don't. Unlike Cruz, I think we're better off without them.
His statement wasn't about if "we" were better off without those two, although I disagree with your opinion, anyhow. It's about how the Middle East is these days, and it's clearly much worse. Were millions of "refugees" leaving the Middle East prior to Iraq 2003?
Personally, Iran having nukes and Libya/Syria/Yemen/NE Iraq being a terrorist playground right now is a bigger risk than Saddam ever was, although I think had we kept bases in Iraq, and had Clinton/Kerry/Dems all not been Sunshine Patriots, things would be safer for us now.
I don't blame Bush at all. He had 85% of public opinion to take out Saddam, who was clearly a threat to the US and also his citizens. I blame the Sunshine Patriots in the Dem party who found votes in a turning public sentiment, and who pissed on the graves and the wounds of those soldiers they voted to send into Iraq.